:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民意識的社會參與效應:志願結社及日常接觸
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:傅仰止 引用關係
作者(外文):Fu, Yang-chih
出版日期:2014
卷期:55
頁次:頁179-226
主題關鍵詞:社會參與志願結社日常接觸公民社會Social participationVoluntary associationsDaily contactCivil society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:73
  • 點閱點閱:71
臺灣民眾在解嚴後是否積極參與社會活動?社會參與的形式有何演變?都是瞭解公民意識的重要議題。最新研究顯示志願結社的趨勢下降,尤其是「工具性」社團參與式微,透露出公民意識似乎益趨薄弱,公民社會的發展面臨危機。本文透過臺灣社會變遷基本調查近年資料,擴大檢視兩種可能孕育公民意識的社會參與形式。「志願結社」直接測量正式的社會參與,「日常接觸」則涵蓋不拘內容的社會活動,兩者都和民眾的政治效能強度、公共議題討論頻率、公民責任義務的評估息息相關。近年來參加社團的趨勢下降,日常生活中的人際接觸則未減少,日常接觸也逐漸包含不認識的對象,初步顯露出即時短暫的社會互動跡象。從這些趨勢顯示,臺灣民眾參與社會的形式趨向多元化,社會連結的原則可能也隨著科技進展而有所調整。「志願結社」如同其他眾多概念,延續社會科學既有的研究傳承;「日常接觸」則依據古典社會學論述及近一世紀來的社會發展,在概念化和測量工具上另求創新,並以臺灣社會的調查研究成果為主要依據,補足從「志願結社」來理解公民意識發展的思維。正如本文研究結果所顯示,公民意識發展的社會參與效應如何,應透過不同研究取徑來加以探索,以多方掌握社會變遷的重要面向。
Recent studies indicate a steady decline in voluntary association membership in Taiwan, which may hinder civil societal development. However, these studies have paid little attention to the role of informal social interactions. Using data from the Taiwan Social Change Survey, I examine voluntary association membership trends vis-à-vis the degree of daily contacts, which I argue is a more encompassing type of social participation. Similar to joining voluntary associations, daily contacts are positively associated with the survey respondents' political efficacy, discussion of public issues, and normative perceptions of citizens' duties and obligations. The extent of daily contacts has remained high since the late twentieth century, although with some changing patterns. In particular, contacts with unknown others increased between 1997 and 2010, indicating more fleeting social interactions. The findings suggest a diversifying pattern of social participation that probably reflects macro-level trends in new technology, social media, and globalization.
期刊論文
1.Mutz, Diana C.(2002)。Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice。American Political Science Review,96(1),111-126。  new window
2.Burt, Ronald S.(1984)。Network Items and the General Social Survey。Social Networks,6(4),293-339。  new window
3.Fu, Yang-chih、Ho, Hwai-Chung、Chen, Hsiu Man(2013)。Weak Ties and Contact Initiation in Everyday Life: Exploring Contextual Variations from Contact Diaries。Social Networks,35(3),279-287。  new window
4.Letki, Natalia(2004)。Socialization for Participation? Trust, Membership, and Democratization in East-Central Europe。Political Research Quarterly,57,665-679。  new window
5.Marsden, Peter V.(1990)。Network Data and Measurement。Annual Review of Sociology,16,435-463。  new window
6.McPherson, J. Miller、Smith-Lovin, Lynn(1987)。Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups。American Sociological Review,52(3),370-379。  new window
7.Pescosolido, Bernice A.、Rubin, Beth A.(2000)。The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology。American Sociological Review,65(1),52-76。  new window
8.Siegel, David A.(2009)。Social Networks and Collective Action。American Journal of Political Science,53(1),122-138。  new window
9.Lowndes, Vivian(2004)。Getting On or Getting By? Women, Social Capital and Political Participation。The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,6(1),45-64。  new window
10.Carothers, Thomas(2002)。The End of the Transition Paradigm。Journal of Democracy,13(1),5-21。  new window
11.Newton, Kenneth(1997)。Social Capital and Democracy。American Behavioral Scientist,40(5),575-586。  new window
12.Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.、Treiman, Donald J.(1996)。Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations。Social Science Research,25(3),201-239。  new window
13.林南、陳志柔、傅仰止(20101200)。社會關係的類型和效應:臺灣、美國、中國大陸的三地比較。臺灣社會學刊,45,117-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Huddy, Leonie、Khatib, Nadia(2007)。American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement。American Journal of Political Science,51(1),63-77。  new window
15.傅仰止(2004)。Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary。Social Networks,27(3),169-186。  new window
16.Granovetter, Mark S.(1983)。The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited。Sociological Theory,1,201-233。  new window
17.侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華(20080400)。臺灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究:「臺灣社會變遷基本調查」第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析。調查研究:方法與應用,23,7-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.林宗弘(20121200)。非關上網?臺灣的數位落差與網路使用的社會後果。臺灣社會學,24,55-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Lin, Nan、Dumin, Mary(1986)。Access to Occupations through Social Ties。Social Networks,8(4),365-385。  new window
20.Paxton, Pamela(2002)。Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship。American Sociological Review,67(2),254-277。  new window
21.Burt, Ronald S.(2004)。Structural Holes and Good Ideas。American Journal of Sociology,110(2),349-399。  new window
22.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
23.熊瑞梅、張峰彬、林亞鋒(20100600)。解嚴後民眾社團參與的變遷:時期與世代的效應與意涵。臺灣社會學刊,44,55-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Fu, Yang-chih(2005)。Daily Contacts as a Proxy Measure of Personal Networks: Data from 46 Surveys in Nine Societies。2005 Annual Meeting of International Social Survey Programme,(會議日期: 2005/04/03-04/06)。Mexico City, Mexico。  new window
研究報告
1.章英華、傅抑止(2006)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫:第五期第一次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 94-2420-H-001-008-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fischer, Claude S.(1984)。The Urban Experience。San Diego:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。  new window
2.Lofland, John(1976)。Do Social Life: Qualitative Study of Human Interaction in Natural Settings。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Stouffer, Samuel A.(1955)。Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties。New York:Doubleday。  new window
4.Kadushin, Charles(2012)。Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Goffman, Erving(1967)。Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior。Chicago:Aldine Pub. Co.。  new window
6.Laumann, Edward O.(1973)。Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
7.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Durkheim, Émile、Simpson, George(1964)。The Division of Labor in Society。Free Press。  new window
9.Freeman, Linton C.(2004)。The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science。Empirical Press。  new window
10.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Putnam, Robert D.(2000)。Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community。Simon & Schuster。  new window
12.Fischer, Claude S.(1982)。To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.張茂桂、羅文輝、徐火炎(2013)。導讀。臺灣的社會變遷1985-2005:傳播與政治行為,臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之4。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fu, Yang-chih(2009)。The Immediate Returns on Time Investment in Daily Contacts: Exploring the Network-Overlapping Effects from Contact Diaries。Contexts of Social Capital: Social Networks in Markets, Communities, and Families。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Lin, Nan、Fu, Yang-chih、Chen, Chih-jou Jay(2014)。Social Capital in a Comparative Perspective。Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency: A Study of the United States, China and Taiwan。London:Routledge Press。  new window
4.Morales, Laura、Geurts, Peter(2007)。Associational Involvement。Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis。London:Routledge Press。  new window
5.Simmel, Georg(1971)。Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality。Georg Simmel On Individuality and Social Forms。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Simmel, Georg(1955)。The Web of Group-Affiliations. Translated by Reinhard Bendix。Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations。New York:Free press。  new window
7.Simmel, Georg(1922)。The Web of Group-Affiliations. Translated by Reinhard Bendix。Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations。New York:Free Press。  new window
8.Simmel, Georg(1908)。Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality。On Individuality and Social Forms。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.章英華、傅仰止、張苙雲、瞿海源(2012)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫的演變(1985-2011)。臺灣的社會變遷(1985-2005):家庭與婚姻。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lin, Nan(2001)。Building a Network Theory of Social Capital。Social Capital: Theory and Research。New York, NY:Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
11.林南、傅仰止、熊瑞梅(2001)。The Position Generator: Measurement Techniques for Investigations of Social Capital。Social Capital: Theory and Research。New York:Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
12.熊瑞梅、張峰彬、林亞鋒(2013)。解嚴後民眾社團參與的變遷:時期與世代的效應與意涵。臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005:傳播與政治行為,臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之4。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE