:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:全球高齡友善城市推動模式比較研究初探
書刊名:建築學報
作者:趙子元 引用關係黃彙雯
作者(外文):Chao, Tzu-yuanHuang, Hui-wen
出版日期:2014
卷期:90
頁次:頁129-152
主題關鍵詞:高齡友善城市發展脈絡推動模式Age-friendly citiesDevelopment contextPromote strategies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:675
隨著醫療及社會經濟的進步,人民壽命延長與出生率降低,使得高齡人口數量及其佔總人口的比率顯著增加,聯合國指出廿一世紀人類兩大挑戰即為人口都市化及高齡化。世界衛生組織(WHO)提出高齡友善城市的推動也在國際間引起相當共鳴與迴響,本研究以WHO於2010年起推動全球高齡友善城市網絡計畫之目的與架構為藍本,透過背景描述、推動層級與尺度、推動面向、推動策略和部門角色等分析英國、加拿大、澳洲與台灣等國推動高齡友善城市之模式與歷程並進行個案比較研究,探討在不同在地條件特性下,各國所演繹的高齡友善城市推動架構之差異,及各項差異所將面臨的可能潛在問題分析;進而歸納出:建構高層級的合作機制、適合高齡者主動回饋的系統、主要推動組織整合力等三大關鍵成功要素,做為未來建立完善推動架構之建議參考。
Population ageing has become one of the emerging issues in the world due to the success of advanced science, public health, medical knowledge, and technology in the past Century. Accordingly, in response to the vision of Age-friendly cities program proposed by the WHO, this research took the "Global Age-Friendly Cities-A Guide" (WHO, 2007) published by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a blueprint to explore the practical framework of different country and city. One city in four counties each including the United States of America, UK, Australia, Canada and Taiwan are selected as research targets. By conducting comparative studies from five perspectives, this study further concludes three key elements for a better framework to deliver age-friendly cities program. These three key elements include establishing higher-level collaboration platform at central/federal government level, creating sustainable participation system for elderly and enhancing the organizational integration force of the major promoters.
期刊論文
1.Lui, Chi-Wai、Everingham, Jo-Anne、Warburton, Jeni、Cuthill, Michael、Bartlett, Helen(2009)。What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature。Australasian Journal on Ageing,28(3),116-121。  new window
2.Plouffe, L.、Kalache, A.(2010)。Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging。Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,87(5),733-739。  new window
3.李百麟(20130900)。中高齡者宗教信仰與心理健康之關係。危機管理學刊,10(2),61-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.范光中、許永河(20100800)。臺灣人口高齡化的社經衝擊。臺灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,5(3),149-168。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡淑瑩、陳世倚(20101200)。應用GPS探討城鄉高齡者的生活軌跡。建築學報,74,107-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉見祥、吳秀玲(200906)。高齡化對全民健康保險制度之影響。社區發展季刊,125,112-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.DeLeon, Peter、DeLeon, Linda(2002)。What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,12(4),467-492。  new window
8.彭渰雯(20080900)。基層員警取締性交易的執行研究:批判性詮釋途徑之應用。公共行政學報,28,115-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林秀鈴(2012)。縣級地方政府機關推動健康城市國際認證關鍵成功因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.江清馦、侯穎蕙、林慧芬(2003)。臺灣老人福利需求與政策方向。台北市:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.國民健康署(2011)。高齡友善城市指標建立與導入計畫-100 年擴充。台北市:國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hill, Michael、Hupe, Peter(2002)。Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice。London:Sage。  new window
4.World Health Organization(2007)。Global Age: Friendly Cities: A Guide。World Health Organization。  new window
其他
1.國家教育研究院(2014)。比較研究,http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/, 2014/08/27。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡淑瑩(2011)。台灣地區城鄉高齡者對社區公共設施之需求比較分析,http://tag.org.tw/admin/uploads/20120906115825_2422.pdf, 2014/08/27。  延伸查詢new window
3.Age-friendly World(2014)。WHO Global Network,http://www.agefriendlyworld.org/afcc-network, 2014/03/10。  new window
4.AGE Platform Europe(2014)。About Age,http://www.age-platform.eu/about-age, 2014/03/18。  new window
5.AARP(2014)。AARP's Network of Age-Friendly Communities Booklet,http://www.aarpinternational.org/events/agefriendly2012, 2014/03/25。  new window
6.City of Melville(2013)。Western Australia: An Age-Friendly Community,http://www.acswaconferenceperth.com.au/docs/Friday/03-Concurrent-Session-Living-Together/Christine%20Young_WA%20An%20Aged%20Friendly%20Community.pdf, 2014/03/10。  new window
7.City of Melville(2013)。Review of The Age Friendly Melville Strategy Directions from Seniors, 2010-2012,http://www.melvillecity.com.au/newproxy/service/api/node/workspace/SpacesStore/a2c91a0c-da61-4992-8859-435e083211ae/DFS%202013-2017%20Strategy.pdf/content/Review%20of%20Age%20Friendly%20Melville%20Strategy%202010-2012?alf_ticket=TICKET_1fe584e64ff67f4add93130b2446d38f847a91f8, 2014/03/11。  new window
8.District of Saanich(2008)。Municipality of Saanich Age Friendly Cities Report,http://www.saanich.ca/parkrec/community/pdf/SaanichWHOAgeFriendlyCitiesReport.pdf, 2010/07/20。  new window
9.Manchester City Council(2009)。Manchester: A Great Place to Grow Older 2010-2020,http://www.manchester.gov.uk/downloads/file/11899/manchester_a_great_place_to_grow_older_2010-2020, 2014/03/10。  new window
10.Public Health Agency of Canada(2014)。Age-Friendly Communities,http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/afc-caa-eng.php, 2014/03/18。  new window
11.The City of New York,The New York Academy of Medicine(2014)。Age-friendly NYC: A Progress Report,http://www.nyam.org/agefriendlynyc/Age-Friendly-NYC-Report-Final-High-Res2_new.pdf, 2014/03/24。  new window
12.The Edmonton Seniors Coordinating Council(2014)。Vision for an Age-friendly Edmonton: Action Plan,http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/Final-Final_Seniors_council_plan_May26.pdf, 2014/03/19。  new window
13.The City of Edmonton(2014)。Age Friendly Edmonton: One Sheet,http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/AgeFriendly_onesheet.pdf, 2014/03/19。  new window
14.WHO(2007)。World Health Organization (WHO) Age-Friendly Cities Project City of Melville Summary,http://www.melvillecity.com.au/index.php/component/alfrescocontent/?path=/Community_x0020__x0026__x0020_Facilities/Seniors/Age-Friendly_x0020_Melville_x0020_Strategy_x0020_Directions_x0020_from_x0020_Seniors, 2014/03/18。  new window
15.World Health Organization(2002)。Active ageing: A policy framework,World Health Organization。,http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf,(WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8)。 。  new window
圖書論文
1.Matland, R.(1995)。Synthesizing the implementation literature: The mbiguity-conflict model of policy implementation。Public Administration。MA:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE