:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐代斷屠政策的發展與社會變遷
書刊名:史原
作者:吳景傑 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Jing-Jie
出版日期:2013
卷期:復刊4=25
頁次:頁197-233
主題關鍵詞:斷屠飲食習慣農業生產力Prohibition of livestock slaughterDietary habitsAgricultural productivity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:11
唐朝自立國以來便持續推行斷屠政策,目前的研究多將此一政策解讀為宗教性的行為,但政策的制定必然有其複雜的考量,以因應龐大帝國的運作,並且適應各時各地的現實需求。每一道斷屠政策隨著時空的不同,其背後是否有不同的動機?為解答此問題,本文收集唐朝政府頒布的五十餘道斷屠政策,依照頒布的時間排列,觀察斷屠政策的整體演變。透過本文的討論可以發現,宗教因素與皇帝誕辰忌日固然為政策制定的原因之一,但斷屠政策同時也反映唐代不同時期牲畜供需失衡的問題:國初是為了重建,保護具有勞動力的牲畜;盛世則是飲食習慣的改變與對外戰爭的消耗,導致需求大過於供給;安史之亂後,中央政府失去西北畜牧區,對內控制力亦削弱,為了維持耕牛數量再度採取國初保護生產力的政策。
At the beginning of its establishment, the Tang government continued the prohibitions on livestock slaughter. Current research often attribute a religious basis to these prohibitions. If the whole country was pious at the time, why were the policies frequently promulgated and why did they include such a large number of situations? Were there other, non-religious motivations driving these prohibitions? I arrange all the policies in chronological order and observe the relation between the prohibitions and social transformation. It certainly is the case that the prohibitions of livestock slaughter were based on religion and the commemoration of emperors' dates of birth, but they also reflected the need in Tang society to maintain the livestock population. In the beginning, the government protected livestock in order to rebuild. Later, in the golden age of the Tang, we see another shift in the motivations behind these policies, particularly through the changes in dietary habits and the demands of war. In the aftermath of the An-Lushan rebellion, they lost their livestock area in the northwest. In addition, the government was losing control over many regions of its empire. Thus we can see that religion is not the only factor driving these policies. Over the course of the Tang Dynasty, regardless of the challenges they were facing, maintaining the livestock population was also a primary consideration.
期刊論文
1.劉淑芬(20020100)。「年三月十」--中古後期的斷屠與齋戒。大陸雜誌,104(1),15-33。  延伸查詢new window
2.乜小紅(2006)。試論畜牧業在唐五代社會經濟中的地位和作用。西北師大學報(社會科學版),43(4),84-88。  延伸查詢new window
3.王賽時(1997)。唐代飲食中的魚鱠。文史知識,8,58-61。  延伸查詢new window
4.拜根興(1998)。唐代道教徒養生飲食述論。陜西師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),4,106-112。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬萬明(1993)。唐代畜牧業興盛的原因。中國農史,12(3),20-26。  延伸查詢new window
6.張萍(2002)。唐代的「斷屠釣」。中國典籍與文化,2002(4),79-84。  延伸查詢new window
7.張萍(2000)。唐代飲食文化中的道教色彩。蘭州大學學報(社會科學版),28(2),110-115。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃正建(1999)。唐代的「胡食」。文史知識,6,86-89。  延伸查詢new window
9.趙克生(2001)。屠釣之禁形成的原因及影響。中國農史,3,3-7。  延伸查詢new window
10.趙克生(2000)。屠釣之禁的歷史考察。安徽史學,4,12-15。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉樸兵(2008)。略論唐宋飲食文化的差異。殷都學刊,3,50-54。  延伸查詢new window
12.黎虎(1999)。唐代的飲食原料市場。中國經濟史研究,1,65-75。  延伸查詢new window
13.王韻(2002)。論唐代禁止屠宰漁獵的好生文化。中華文化論壇,3,66-69。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉淑芬(20020200)。「年三月十」--中古後期的斷屠與齋戒。大陸雜誌,104(2),16-30。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳偉明(1990)。唐宋時期飲食業發展初探。暨南學報(哲學社會科學版),1990(3),56-64。  延伸查詢new window
16.閻莉(2005)。從飲食文化看大唐世風流變。淮南師範學院學報,2005(4),67-69。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.凃宗呈(2005)。中國中古的素食觀(碩士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖佩英(2007)。唐代斷屠政策之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.嚴茹蕙(2010)。唐日令中所見節假生活初探(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.元稹、周相錄(2011)。元稹集校注。上海:上海古藉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李希泌、毛華軒(2003)。唐大詔令集補編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王壽南(1996)。隋唐史。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐陽修。新唐書。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.王欽若、楊億(1983)。冊府元龜。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬端臨(1983)。文獻通考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.房玄齡、劉俊文、長孫無忌(1996)。唐律疏議箋解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.王賽時(2003)。唐代飲食。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
9.司馬光、胡三省、標點資治通鑑小組(1956)。資治通鑑。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.王溥、方詩銘(2006)。唐會要。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉昫。舊唐書。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.宋敏求(2008)。唐大詔令集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE