:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:陰惡之害:清朝前中期西南地區的「漢奸」問題
書刊名:政大史粹
作者:鹿智鈞
作者(外文):Lu, Chih-chun
出版日期:2014
卷期:27
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:清帝國漢奸邊疆中國西南Qing EmpireHanjianMiaoFrontierThe Southwest of China
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:261
滿洲政權入主中原後,如何妥善處理帝國內的多民族事務,始終是皇帝的統治重點。「因俗而治」是清廷治邊政策的主要方針,不過基於現實局勢的考量,清世宗在西南地區大規模實施「改土歸流」,以強化中央在苗疆地區的直接統治。此舉看似有利於皇帝掌控西南邊疆,但當地大小不一的亂事仍時有所聞。在清朝君臣心中,西南地區的混亂多是「漢奸」所致,他們隨意出入苗界,勾結甚至擾害苗人,造成天性「愚昧」又「單純」的苗人抗官或是攻擊漢民。官方深信唯有嚴格查拿這些罪魁禍首,才能有效維持西南邊疆的安定,這類見解使得地方大員非常重視「漢奸」案件,皇帝也常指示臣工妥善處理相關問題。然而清朝前中期官方論述中的「漢奸」,與當代「漢奸」的意義不盡相同。當代人們習稱的「漢奸」,多指與外人勾結的叛國者,但在清朝前中期官書與檔案中的「漢奸」用語,實具有更複雜的內涵。本文針對清朝前中期西南地區「漢奸」問題的梳理,不僅有助於釐清該詞彙意義的歷史變遷,亦能反思皇帝的邊疆統治策略,以及清帝國中的多民族關係。
After the Manchu conquered Ming Dynasty, it had been important for the emperor to deal with problems derived from multi-ethnic groups. "Administration according to minorities' cultures" had always been the main direction when governing frontier region. However, with consideration of feasibility in current situation, Yongzheng emperor had extensively implemented the policy, "gaituguiliu", in order to reinforce the governance of the Miao frontier; though, the policy was not as promising as it might have seemed. Rebellions and resistance kept taking place without ease. From the perspective of the emperors and administrators, the chaos of the Miao frontier should be attributed to the "Hanjian". The Hanjian came and left the region of Miao without being controlled and even colluded with or harmed Miao people. Consequently, Miao people who were regarded as "simple and naïve" rebelled against the government and attacked the Hans. The government believed that only if they eliminate the Hanjian could they bring ease to the Miao frontier. Those perspectives made local administrators paid great attention to cases related to the Hanjian, which were also concerned by the emperors. Interestingly, the meaning and definition of Hanjian in early and middle Qing Dynasty, which was mention above are different in modern times. The Hanjian are regarded as betrayers who collude with foreigners in modern times. However, the meanings of the Hanjian mentioned in official documents from early and middle Qing Dynasty were more complex and diverse, which will be discussed and organized in this paper. With this effort, we could gain a better understanding about the changing definition and meaning of the Hanjian through time, the strategy of ruling frontier, and reflection of the relationship among different ethnic groups in Qing Empire.
期刊論文
1.葉高樹(20061200)。「參漢酌金」:清朝統治中國成功原因的再思考。臺灣師大歷史學報,36,153-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張世瑛(20011200)。從幾個戰後審奸的案例來看漢奸的身分認定問題(1945-1949)。國史館學術集刊,1,161-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳密(201001)。清代官書檔案所見漢奸一詞指稱及其變化。歷史檔案,2010(1),57-67。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳密(2010)。「漢奸」考辨。清史研究,2010(4),107-116。  延伸查詢new window
5.金峰(201112)。鴉片戰爭時期清政府處理漢奸問題措施研究。廣州大學學報(社會科學版),10(12),82-88。  延伸查詢new window
6.張中奎(201003)。清帝國時期的苗疆敘事考察。西南民族大學學報(人文社會科學版),2010(3),12-17。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉毓晴(20130600)。「漢奸」:國族認同的形塑與演變。東亞觀念史集刊,4,345-388。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王柯(20040600)。「漢奸」:想像中的單一民族國家話語。二十一世紀,83,63-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.邱澎生(200812)。十八世紀清政府修訂《教唆詞訟》律例下的查拿訟師事件。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,97(4),652-669。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張寧(20120600)。十八世紀的「漢奸」認定與「隱形」的法律文獻。法制史研究,21,163-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.羅久蓉(19950600)。歷史情境與抗戰時期「漢奸」的形成--以一九四一年鄭州維持會為主要案例的探討。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,24(下),815-841。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.梁志源(2003)。清代中期苗漢關係之研究--以川楚雲貴地區為例(1723-1850)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張銓津(1996)。鴉片戰爭時期的“漢奸”問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.清代宮中檔奏摺及軍機處檔摺件。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1998)。明史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.覺羅勒德洪(1985)。清世祖章皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1985)。清世宗憲皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐家幹、吳一文。苗疆見聞錄。貴陽:貴州人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.羅家倫(1968)。中華民國史料叢編A28•黃帝魂。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1986)。清宣宗成皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.曹振鏞(1986)。清仁宗睿皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1986)。清高宗純皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬齊(1985)。大清聖祖仁皇帝實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.薛允升、黃靜嘉(1970)。讀例存疑。臺北:成文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.中國第一歷史檔案館(1989)。雍正朝漢文硃批奏摺彙編。上海:江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.明清內閣大庫檔案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Sutton, Donald S.(2006)。Ethnicity and the Miao Frontier in the Eighteenth Century。Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
2.王鐘翰(2004)。雍正西南改土歸流始末。王鍾翰清史論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.張捷夫(1980)。論改土歸流的進步作用。清史論叢。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.張捷夫(1982)。清代土司制度。清史論叢。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.張捷夫(1984)。關於雍正西南改土歸流的幾個問題。清史論叢。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳盛韶(199711)。水溺。問俗錄。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE