本文是一個接續性質的研究，以1994年到2013年間臺灣出版的學術期刊論文為對象，進行有關「行政倫理」領域研究的內容檢視，目的在發現近20年來「行政倫理」研究主題的落點與其間的變化，「行政倫理」研究方法的選擇與其間的變化，「行政倫理」研究的引述偏好與關鍵論文。初步研究結果有：1.期刊論文中有接近50%的比例屬於「行政倫理的應用」此類研究主題，而臺灣行政倫理的早期研究大都處理理論發現系絡的基礎問題，從第2個10年開始「驗證系絡」類型的研究快速成長。2.臺灣行政倫理的研究者雖然已朝「行政倫理的應用」方向前進，但仍習慣從理論推導演說的方法來印證，經驗調查的資料分析方法相對較少；從2009年開始，出現較多以「倫理政策議題」為分析單元的研究。3.從行政倫理研究引述偏好來看，臺灣行政倫理研究的知識結構存在所謂的「集中現象」，資料引述圍繞在幾種關鍵性的論文，各關鍵性論文影響不同主題類型的研究。

This is a longitudinal study aimed to find out the change of intellectual structure of administrative ethics studies in Taiwan from 1994 to 2003. This literature review focused on research topics, research methods, and citation preferences. And the research scope narrowed down to the articles published in Taiwan. Major findings were: 1.There were over 50% of the articles categorized to ＂application of administrative ethics＂, that is to say, the research community worked on the context of discovery in the first decade, and turned to the context of verification in the last ten years. 2. The research community used to take the theoretical argumentation as an analysis tool, but little worked on empirical study, from 2009 there were much more research took ＂currently ethical issues＂ as the unit of analysis. 3. We can easily find out the phenomenon of centrality in administrative ethics studies from the research community citation preferences.