:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:談殯葬自主權與遺體處分權
書刊名:軍法專刊
作者:張美眉
作者(外文):Chang, Mei-mei
出版日期:2015
卷期:61:4
頁次:頁169-193
主題關鍵詞:殯葬自主權遺體處分權遺體屍體遺願The right of people's funeral self-determinationThe right to control disposition of remainsHuman remainsDead bodiesPosthumous wishes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:124
本文所探討之主題為「殯葬自主權與遺體處分權」,目前我國實務與學說通說,多將「遺體」與「遺產」、「繼承」綁定掛勾,認為遺體之所有權因繼承而歸屬於繼承人所公同共有,如此將使死者對於遺體無處分空間,即使死者使用遺囑或「自用型生前殯葬服務契約」預先安排殯葬事務,在死者遺願與繼承人(生者)之意願發生衝突時,由於繼承人享有遺體之所有權(處分權),故繼承人意願恆為優先,相較美國與日本兩國,我國現行法制對死者遺願之保障相當薄弱。本文認為,「殯葬自主權」涉及人格權與內在信仰自由保護,應受到高度之保障,死者對於殯葬事務之安排,若不違背公序良俗或其他強制或禁止規定,且於現實上亦具可行性時,即不應僅係道德上之誡命,對於生者應具有法律上的拘束力。因此,在比較分析了美國與日本立法例之後,本文建議,首先須使遺體之歸屬、處理與遺產繼承脫鉤,建立「遺體處分權」之概念,釐清現行法上遺體處分權人為何;其次應賦與死者本人最優先的遺體處分權,據此死者得指定特定人選享有遺體處分權(意定遺體處分權人),並使死者對殯葬事務之指示有明確的法律依據;若死者不行使此權利時,法律便應明確規範後順位的遺體處分權人之範圍及順序。
The topic of this article is 'the right of people's funeral self-determination and the right to control disposition of human remains'. Our law practice and theory consider human remains as inheritance and associate them with succession, so the human remains are owned common by their heirs. By this thread, decedents have no right to decide their posthumous bodies. Even the decedent has prearranged their funeral affair by will or self-use preneed contract, whose wish is in conflict with his heir's, the latter will win the priority right to dispose the decedent's body according to the laws. In sum, our current legal system provides less protection to the decedent's final wishes than those of United States and Japan. This article considered 'the right of people's funeral self-determination' should be highly protected, because it involves the people's personal rights and their freedom of religious belief. Therefore, if the decedent's prearrangement of funeral affairs is neither against public policies, nor imperative or prohibitive provisions of the acts, it should be legally bound. After the comparative law study of United States and Japan, the following are the suggestions of this article: Firstly, we should differentiate the disposition right of the decedent's body from the succession to the inheritance, and establish the concept of 'the right to control disposition of bodily remains', and clarify who own the right to deal with the decedent's wish under our current legal system. Secondly, we should grant the decedent an overriding right to control disposition of his own posthumous body; accordingly, the decedent can designate an agent to handle his funeral and follow the directions made by the decedent which shall be legally bound. If the decedent gives up enforcing such right, his bodily remains should be disposed by the rightful heirs regulated in the enacted laws.
期刊論文
1.尉遲淦(20011200)。往生者的殯葬自主權。社區發展季刊,96,128-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃三榮(19951000)。一定要進「墳墓」嗎?--談「殯葬自由」與「自然葬」。萬國法律,83,31-36。  延伸查詢new window
3.林忠義(20080700)。身體、屍體與器官之法律定位。法學叢刊,53(3)=211,129-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.末川博(193106)。遺骸に對する所有權とその抛棄。破毁判例民法研究,1,76。  延伸查詢new window
5.星野茂(199205)。遺体•遺骨をめぐる法的諸問題。法律論叢,64(5),192。  延伸查詢new window
6.中島玉吉(1922)。遺骨の性質。法学論叢,7(1),139-147。  延伸查詢new window
7.宮井川夫(199207)。遺骸に関する所有権。別冊ジュリスト,37,163。  延伸查詢new window
8.市村光惠(1910)。生体及ビ死体ニ対スル私権。京都法学会雑誌,5(80),57。  延伸查詢new window
9.丸山英二(197906)。臓器移植をめぐる法的対応—アメリ力法の対応。神戸法学雑誌,29(1),24-31。  延伸查詢new window
10.石堂典秀(201209)。死後事務委任契約についての一考察:アメリカ法からの考察。社会科学研究(中京大学社会科学研究所),33(1),21-38。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃詩淳(20140815)。死後事務委任契約之效力?/板橋地院100家訴10判決。臺灣法學雜誌,254,207-209。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃詩淳(20150628)。喪葬事務與拋棄繼承。臺灣法學雜誌,274,107-111。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊秀儀(20060200)。論屍體取精之法律爭議及應有的管制架構--以尊重自主為中心思想。萬國法律,145,23-29。  延伸查詢new window
14.李悌愷(20040300)。論屍體(骨)之法律性質。臺灣本土法學雜誌,56,9-22。  延伸查詢new window
15.曾淑瑜(20060200)。從人體精子、卵子之法律地位論死後取精之刑法可罰性。萬國法律,145,15-22。  延伸查詢new window
16.邱玟惠(20091200)。屍體之法律性質 : 物權與人類尊嚴之二元結構初探。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,38(4),335-383。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林忠義(2003)。從多元觀點省思器官捐贈制度的應有走向--以屍體器官捐贈為中心(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱玟惠(2009)。論人體、人體組織及其衍生物於民法上之權利結構(博士論文)。東吳大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.施啟揚(2000)。民法總則。施啟揚。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴炎輝、戴東雄、戴瑀如(2010)。繼承法。台北:戴炎輝。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳猷龍(2003)。民法總則。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.李宜琛(1980)。民法總則。國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
5.王澤鑑(199809)。民法實例研習。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
6.王澤鑑(2005)。民法總則。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
7.林秀雄(2014)。繼承法講義。林秀雄。  延伸查詢new window
8.史尚寬(1955)。繼承法論。榮泰印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.四宮和夫、能見善久(2010)。民法総則。弘文堂。  延伸查詢new window
10.橋本真、伊藤進(200404)。ホーンブック民法I民法総則。北樹。  延伸查詢new window
11.山田修司、林良平(199409)。注解判例民法民法総則。青林書院。  延伸查詢new window
12.須永醇(200512)。新訂民法総則要論。勁草書房。  延伸查詢new window
13.松原正明(200601)。全訂判例先例相続法。日本加除。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭玉波、黃宗樂(2003)。民法總則。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃有志(200202)。殯葬改革概論。黃有志。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃立(1999)。民法總則。臺北:黃立。  延伸查詢new window
17.謝在全(2009)。民法物權論。謝在全。  延伸查詢new window
18.邱聰智(2005)。民法總則。三民。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃茂榮(1982)。民法總則。黃茂榮。  延伸查詢new window
20.施啟揚(2007)。民法總則。施啟揚。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部公告:超越死亡禁忌,勇敢主張淨化殯葬意願,https://mort.moi.gov.tw/frontsite/cms/serviceAction.do?method=viewContentDetail&iscancel=true&contentId=MjM3NQ==, 2015/06/05。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部全國殯葬資訊入口網:淨化殯葬意願書,https://mort.moi.gov.tw/download.do?fileName=/d_upload_dca/cms/file/A0/B0/C0/D0/E0/F217/27043a0b-676b-4f2a-9031-e0b54c114b4a.pdf, 2015/06/05。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳棋炎、黃宗樂、郭振恭(2006)。遺產之繼承:繼承之效力。民法繼承新論。三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE