Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPC, announced the reform of the judicial system at the third Plenary Session of the eighteenth CPC Central Committee. This article is to discuss the judicial system reform's impact on the operation of judicial independence in China. The researcher took secondary data analysis on the judicial system of China, known as Gongjianfa, and did a contextual analysis on related legislation and official documents. It is found that there are some unfair judgments because not only do the prosecutors and the judges not have the power to investigate most of the criminal cases, but also they cannot hold power independently. Moreover, the Chinese communist authorities still insist that the development of the legal system must be under the leadership of the CPC and the budgets and personnel of the regional judiciaries are controlled by the local party committees at the corresponding level, so they have no autonomy at all. However, after abolishing the re-education through labor system, known as the Laojiao system, in November 2013, the criminal suspects have more opportunities to go to trial so political interference would be further suppressed in the local judicial system if the delocalization of the judiciary is truly implemented. However, judicial independence will not be accomplished if the CPC insists on the party-state system because the cadres of the CPC can still lead or direct in politics and therefore interfere with justice. As a result, this judiciary system reform still cannot fundamentally solve the structural problem of the judiciary system in China.