:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩漢封禪轉變及其意義
書刊名:先秦兩漢學術
作者:胡正之 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Cheng-chih
出版日期:2013
卷期:20
頁次:頁47-76
主題關鍵詞:封禪漢儒方士受命太平登仙災祥革命漢承秦制Feng-shanHan Confucian scholarFang shiMaster of esotericaAccepting god's willPacificAscending celestial beingAuspicious omenRevolutionHan Dynasty succeeding Chin's system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:54
「封禪」自魏晉以降,多為後人所詬,率以為非聖王之制,乃方士誣神與陋儒導諛所虛造。唯籀諸載籍,漢人未嘗如此視之,反而鄭重其事,引合經藝以讚成其事。且兩漢之論封禪者又非小儒鲰生,即淹博之賈誼、儒者宗之董生,亦無不嚴肅以待。苟漢儒非盡庸妄愚固,則此中當有可說者,作〈封禪為漢儒共信〉第一。爬疏資料可知:兩漢言封禪者眾,大要可分為二:有方士之封禪、有儒生之封禪,作〈兩種封禪〉第二。儒生方士言封禪也同,然其精神指趣則異若白黑,作〈儒生與方士〉第三。漢武光武俱行封禪,然因所采之論異,故二君之封禪大異其趣,作〈二武帝封禪〉第四。光武封禪之所以不行元封舊儀,折節洙泗矩範者,在於孝武惑於方士,蠹財病時以成此一封,鑒此前車,故漢人敷暢先儒之精義,匡正俗謬,導之於正,為〈封禪於兩漢之轉化衍變〉第五。
Since Six Dynasties, the ritual of feng-shen (The Worshipping Ritual of Heaven and Earth) had been criticized for losing its decency since the ceremony was no longer conducted by a legitimated king but shaman and fang-shi (masters of esoterica) who hardly known the descent way to conduct the ritual. Though recorded in books, people in Han Dynasty did not dwell upon the negative comments on the ceremony but took it seriously, combining classical knowledge and art crafts to perform the ceremony. During the two Han dynasties, those who researched on the feng shan ritual were not just some mediocre scholars but the great masters such as Jia Yi and Dong Shen who treated the ritual seriously. Thus Han Confucian scholars were not all mediocre and stubborn scholars, still there were some worth discussion, especially those involved in promoting "Feng-Shan as the common believe for Han scholars". First of all, the related documentation revealed that many had claimed that there were two major Feng-Shan ceremonies during two Han dynasties. One was the fang-shi's feng-shan (The worshipping ritual of Heaven and Earth for masters of esoterica), another was the scholar's feng-shan. Therefore, known as two feng-shan ceremonies. Secondly, though both scholars and master of esoterican both claimed feng-shan 儒 ceremonies, they differ in polar opposites in their spirits and faiths, thus known as "scholars and masters of esoterica." Thirdly, though Emperor Wu of Han and Emperor Guangwu of Han both practiced Feng-Shan, yet they adopted different discourses and their practices were very different, thus known as "the Feng-Shan of two Emperor 'Wu'". Fourthly, the reason Emperor Guangwu of Han would not practice the original rituals and would rather change the rituals that were previous set by Confucian scholars was because the Emperor Wu of Han was bewildered by masters of esoterica and consumed his wealth and health to practice the ceremony. Finally, learning this lesson from his predecessor, Fu Chang of Han corrected the false and the wrong with Confucian predecessor scholars' discourses, thus known as "the transaction and transformation of Feng-Shan between two Han dyanasties".
期刊論文
1.王樹明(19980300)。東岳泰山新詮。故宮學術季刊,15(3),99-114+左5-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.胡正之(20120300)。漢儒災異說商榷。先秦兩漢學術,17,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉宗迪(20050900)。泰山封禪考:從觀象授時到祭天告成。先秦兩漢學術,4,61-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.阮芝生(19961100)。三司馬與漢武帝封禪。臺大歷史學報,20,307-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.胡正之(1991)。漢儒革命思想研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黎翔鳳(2011)。管子校注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭玄、孔穎達(198101)。禮記正義。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊家駱(1987)。新校本史記三家注。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊家駱(1981)。隋唐子書十種。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.馮時(2006)。中國古代的天文典人文。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.秦蕙田(1970)。五禮通考。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊家駱(198102)。新校本漢書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊家駱(197811)。新校本三國志。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.馬端臨(1991)。文獻通考。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.范祖禹、呂祖謙(1977)。唐鑑。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.王先謙(197907)。荀子集解。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.賈證、閻振益、鍾夏(2007)。新書校注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.范曄、楊家駱(1987)。新校本後漢書并附編十三種。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.王充、黃暉(1983)。論衡。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.班固、陳立、吳則虞(1987)。白虎通疏證。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.李偉泰(1985)。漢初學術及王充論衡述論稿。臺北:長安出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.錢穆(1978)。兩漢經學今古文平議。東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.董仲舒、蘇輿(1996)。春秋繁露義證。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.應劭、王利器(1983)。風俗通義校注。漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.蘇轍、陳宏天、高秀芳(1990)。蘇轍集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.班固、王先謙、上海師範大學古籍整理研究所(2008)。漢書補注。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.王應麟、翁元圻(1956)。困學紀聞。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE