:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:什麼是「蜜迪亞」?重新思考媒體/媒介研究
書刊名:傳播研究與實踐
作者:翁秀琪 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Shieu-chi
出版日期:2011
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁55-74
主題關鍵詞:典範媒介生態學中介再中介延伸的心靈ParadigmMedia ecologyMediationRemediationExtended mind
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:237
傳播新科技正以十倍百倍的速度演化中,攸關新媒體的重大議題正不斷地浮現(emergent),任何一個新的理論概念被推出,很快就會失效,或重新被定義、調整。但是,這絕對不表示我們就得不斷丟掉前面的理論概念,而是或許應該以一種「概念系譜學」的方式,深究各類與 media 相關的概念在何時、為何會轉變,或許才能掌握「什麼是蜜迪亞?」這個大哉問。 「什麼是『蜜迪亞』?」是一個根本而困難的問題。本文從典範、媒介生態學、中介,再中介,直接性,和超直接性,以及延伸的心靈等理論概念切入,試圖為「什麼是蜜迪亞?」這個提問打造初步的問題意識。
New communication technologies innovate rapidly, and issues relevant to new media emerge correspondently. Any “new” theoretical concepts which try to tackle these issues will be swiftly substituted, but this does not mean that we should discard those obsolete concepts like throwing away our old shoes, but rather take a geneological approach, and try to find out when certain concepts become obsolete and why. “What is media?” is a fundamental but difficult problem. This article tries to tackle this problem by building up a scaffold with theoretical concepts such as paradigm, media ecology, mediation, remediation, immediacy, hypermediacy, and extended mind. And this proposal should only be considered as an initial attempt.
期刊論文
1.葉啟政(20031200)。傳播媒體科技庇蔭下人的天命?。中華傳播學刊,4,3-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kauffman, S. A.(1991)。Antichaos and adaptation。Scientific American,265(2),64-84。  new window
3.Clark, A.、Chalmers, D.(1998)。The extended mind: Active externalism。Analysis,58(1),7-19。  new window
4.黃厚銘(20091000)。邁向速度存有論--即時性電子媒介時代的風險。新聞學研究,101,139-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.van Loon, J.(2008)。Media technology: Critical perspectives。Berkshire:Open University Press。  new window
2.Clark, Andy(2008)。Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.周芳典、陳國明(2005)。媒介素養概論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.吉見俊哉、蘇碩斌(20090900)。媒介文化論--給媒介學習者的15講。臺北:群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lum, Casey Man Kong、何道寬、林文剛(2010)。媒介環境學:思想沿革與多維視野。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
6.Philipsen, H.(2007)。Moving media studie--Remediation revisited。Frederiksberg, Denmar:Samfundslitterature Press。  new window
7.McLuhan, M.(1967)。The medium is the message。New York:Random House。  new window
8.葉啟政(2005)。現代人的天命:科技、消費與文化的搓揉摩盪。台北:群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kauffman, Stuart A.(1995)。At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Bolter, Jay David、Grusin, Richard(2000)。Remediation: Understanding New Media。MIT Press。  new window
11.Manovich, Lev(2001)。The Language of New Media。MIT Press。  new window
12.Ong, Walter J.(1982)。Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the word。Routledge。  new window
13.McLuhan, Marshall(1964)。Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill Book。  new window
14.Kauffman, Stuart A.(1993)。Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Luhmann, Niklas(1990)。Essays on Self-Reference。New York:Columbia University。  new window
圖書論文
1.蘇碩斌(2009)。台灣譯者說明因緣:譯作的偶然與感觸。媒介文化論:給媒介學習者的15講。臺北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Renckstorf, K.、McQuail, D.(1996)。Social action perspectives in mass communication research: An introduction。Media use as social action: A European approach to audience studies。London:John Libbey。  new window
3.Ito, M.(2005)。Mobile phones, Japanese youth, and the re-placement of social contact。Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of social sphere。London:Springer。  new window
4.Heidegger, M.(1993)。The Question Concerning Technology。Basic Writings: Martin Heidegge。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE