:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:他者的歷史殤慟--兩岸中學社會科教科書中猶太大屠殺議題之敘寫與啟思
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:李涵鈺王立心陳麗華 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Han-yuWang, Li-hsinChen, Li-hua
出版日期:2016
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁71-107
主題關鍵詞:教科書猶太大屠殺歷史社會科中國大陸TextbooksHolocaustHistorySocial studiesMainland China
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究主要探討臺灣及中國大陸國中及高中歷史及社會科教科書中如何敘寫猶太大屠殺,採內容分析法對教科書內容進行分析並提出反思與編撰建議。研究發現兩岸教材的內容編排與文本設計:可增加重要事件與符號、多提供一手資料增加具體認知、敘事角度與立場、圖照片的使用可更多元平衡、增加對戰後可能的影響與相關因應措施等思考;此外,建議臺灣的教科書對於歷史脈絡及原因應更具體、掌握定義與重要概念、猶太大屠殺議題除了放在補充資料,也應在主文敘及、增加探究活動與討論問題,引發歷史意識及深度思考。最後從課程組織、敘事角度、論述觀點、活動設計分別提出省思,希望從猶太大屠殺議題反省教科書設計問題,並思考更深層學習歷史的意義,批判反省種族滅絕的根源,及和平與人權價值探討的重要,裨益國際公民素養的培育。
This paper explores how secondary school history and social studies textbooks in both Taiwan and Mainland China narrate the Holocaust. It employs content analysis to review the textbooks and brings up reflections and suggestions. Suggestions for both textbooks include increasing significant events and signifiers, adding more primary data for better understanding, embedding diverse perspectives, putting more consideration into the use of pictures and images, and discussing post-war impact and relevant measures that the government took. Taiwan’s textbooks should provide more concrete historical contexts and causes of events that focus more on definitions and important concepts. The Holocaust and related issues should be included in the main text, not only in supplementary statements. Inquiry and discussion of the issues should also be added to increase historical consciousness and encourage depth of thought. Ultimately, this paper shows our reflections on curriculum organization, narrative views, discourse types, and instructional activity designs. With the Holocaust and relevant issues, we attempt to rethink the problems of textbook design, to seek deeper meaning of history learning, and to criticize the origins of genocide and the importance of investigating peace and human rights, so as to promote the cultivation of international citizenship.
期刊論文
1.吳維寧(2014)。以色列的大屠殺教育。人本教育札記,301,78-83。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳鴻逸(2013)。《平凡的邪惡》之正義記寫。人本教育札記,292,106-107。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉聯娟(2004)。臺灣高中歷史教科書納粹政權及其屠殺猶太人之內容。臺德學刊,6,61-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葉聯娟(20121200)。連結生命道德教育的外語教學--「納粹種族迫害文學」(Holocaustliteratur)的教學。人文暨社會科學期刊,8(2),59-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bromley, P.、Russell, S. G.(2010)。The Holocaust as history and human rights: A cross-national analysis of Holocaust education in social science textbooks, 1970-2008。Prospects,40,153-173。  new window
6.Davis, B. L.、Rubinstein-Avila, E.(2013)。Holocaust education: Global forces shaping curricula integration and implementation。Intercultural Education,24(1/2),149-166。  new window
7.Dubiel, H.(2003)。The remembrance of the Holocaust as a catalyst for a transnational ethic?。New German Critique,90,59-70。  new window
8.Foster, S.、Burgess, A.(2013)。Problematic portrayals and contentious content: Representations of the Holocaust in English history textbooks。Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society,5(2),20-38。  new window
9.Hirsch, S.、McAndrew, M.(2014)。The Holocaust in the textbooks and in the history and citizenship education program of Quebec。Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society,6(1),24-41。  new window
10.Kinloch, N.(2001)。Parallel catastrophes? Uniqueness, redemption and the Shoah。Teaching History,104,8-14。  new window
11.Lindquist, D.(2009)。The coverage of the holocaust in high school history textbooks。Social Education,73(6),298-304。  new window
12.Maier, C. S.(2000)。Consigning the twentieth century to history: Alternative narratives for the modern era。The American Historical Review,105(3),807-831。  new window
13.Short, G.(2003)。Lessons of Holocaust: A response to the crisis。Educational Review,55(3),277-287。  new window
圖書
1.Bauman, Zygmunt(2000)。Modernity and the holocaust。Cornell University Press。  new window
2.歐用生(1996)。國民小學社會科教學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪雯柔(20000000)。貝瑞岱比較教育研究方法之探析。臺北市:揚智文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Krippendorff, Klaus(2004)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology。Sage Publications。  new window
5.中華人民共和國教育部(2003)。歷史課程標準。北京市:人民教育。  延伸查詢new window
6.培生教育出版(2013)。朗文當代高級英漢雙解詞典。臺北市:朗文。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳明華(2012)。朗文英文字彙通:字首.字尾.字根全集。新北市:培生。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bereday, G. Z. F.(1964)。The study of Bereday's comparative method in education。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
9.Bergan, D. L.(2009)。War and genocide: A concise history of the Holocaust。Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
10.Knothe, F.(2014)。Surviving evil: The pictorial language of Sara Atzmon。Hong Kong:University Museum and Art Gallery, the University of Hong Kong。  new window
11.Niewyk, D. L.、Nicosia, F. R.(2000)。The Columbia guide to the Holocaust。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
12.Pettigrew, A.、Foster, S.、Howson, J.、Salmons, P.、Lenga, R.、Andrews, K.(2009)。Teaching about the Holocaust in English secondary schools: An empirical study of national trends, perspectives and practice。London, UK:Institute of Education。  new window
13.Short, G.、Reed, C. A.(2004)。Issues in Holocaust education。Ashgate。  new window
14.Totten, S.(2002)。Holocaust education: Issues and approaches。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
15.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2013)。Why teach about the Holocaust?。Paris:United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization。  new window
其他
1.花亦芬(20140512)。公民社會如何讓教科書政策走向「去國家化」? ,http://kam-a-tiam.typepad.com/blog/2014/05/公民社會如何讓教科書政策走向去國家化.html, 。  延伸查詢new window
2.王宗銘(2011)。暑期戰鬥營學員穿納粹軍服未遭勸阻,國防部道歉,http://www.nownews.com/n/2011/07/07/509122。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪蘭(2013)。人間百年筆陣--自掃門前雪,當心成偷走正義的共犯自掃門前雪,http://www.merit-times.com.tw/NewsPage.aspx?Unid=319389。  延伸查詢new window
4.范捷茵(2014)。上一代教育重本土,印尼推崇希特勒,http://anntw.com/articles/20140626-b5xT。  延伸查詢new window
5.Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research(2014)。The Georg Eckert Institute presents preliminary findings from its study examining the way in which the Holocaust is handled in schools worldwide,http://www.gei.de/en/press/press-releases/press-releas-details/article/zum-schulischen-umgang-mit-dem-holocaust-weltweit-eine-studie-des-georg-eckert-instituts-praesen.html。  new window
6.International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance(2014)。Teaching guide,https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/educate/teaching-guidelines。  new window
7.Merriam-Webster(2014)。Genocide,http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genocide。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gregory, I.(2000)。Teaching about the Holocaust: Perplexities, issues and suggestions。Teaching the Holocaust: Educational dimensions, principles and practice。London, UK:Continuum。  new window
3.Pingel, F.(2014)。The Holocaust in textbooks: From a European to a global event。Holocaust education in a global context。Paris, France:Editor。  new window
4.Soysal, Y. N.(2000)。Identity and transnationalization in German school textbooks。Censoring history。New York, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE