:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論史學史研究中的常識與想像:以《通鑑》編纂史料兩條解讀為例
書刊名:思與言
作者:宋家復 引用關係
作者(外文):Sung, Chia-fu
出版日期:2015
卷期:53:3
頁次:頁165-211
主題關鍵詞:事件常識歷史編纂操作歷史書寫操作EventCommon senseHistoriographical operation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:169
嚴耕望先生( 1916-1996)曾經說過:「一般研究學問的人過分強調新史料的重要性,忽視了舊的史料,尤其忽視普通的舊史料……要能從人人能看得到、人人以閱讀過的舊的普通史料中研究出新的成果……。」1但是如何能達成這個高明的目標?卻不容易有定論。本文將以中國史學史上《資治通鑑》研究(所謂「通鑑學」)中,最普通不過的兩條史料的解讀為例,試圖說明史料解讀並不必然與理論和想像站在對立面;相反的,理論和想像的適時介入,有可能開發出對《資治通鑑》(以下簡稱《通鑑》)乃至史學史研究領域不同於「常識」的新視野與新觀點。本文的重點是藉著「解讀史料」, 2追求史學史研究中的新視野與新觀點,並且嘗試將這種解讀升高到盡可能自我意識的層次,以便進一步展開研究反省。沒有史學工作者會極端到拒絕蒐集多方史料納入考慮,但是,優秀的史學論述讀者自然不必提醒,史料的多寡也不必然決定透過解讀所建立詮釋的有效性。也就是說,新視野與新觀點的否證,往往不是指出這裡或那裡多一條相關史料,就可以達成。再多的補充史料,如果解讀上不能出現悖反性異義,那麼這種對宋代史學史料的「熟悉」也只能是述說上的同語重複,在論證上不具否證效力。本文僅僅只選擇「兩條」《通鑑》編纂史料作為解讀焦點,原因正在於此。最後,雖然這篇論文的時空落實在宋代,但與其狹隘地歸類為斷代宋史論文,不如說是《通鑑》以及史學史研究方法上的通盤探討。
This paper focuses on how difficult it is to transcend scholarly common sense and allow imagination to play a role in the decoding of already well-known primary sources while conducting historiographical research. The case in point is from the compiling history of the classic Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government. I will demonstrate that, if we can put aside the conventional view and take up the hermeneutic risk, two commonly cited textual sources, from Li Tao’s Xu zizhi tongjian changbian and Sima Guang’s Sima wenzhenggong chuanjia ji respectively, could and should be re-interpreted in accordance with the language in the 11th century China. By doing that, certain hitherto unexpected possibilities of the connection between the Comprehensive Mirror and the earlier historical encyclopedia Cefu yuangui can be opened up. Imagination, as a new way of reading and connecting textual sources, does not occur ex nihilo but grows out of the juxtaposition of an outside theoretical inspiration. This is the point where Michel de Certeau’s heuristic notion of historiographical operation as a configuration of place, procedures, and products of writing history enters near the end of the paper. Including de Certeau is not only a gesture of foregrounding my personal aspiration, but also meant as an invitation for all those interested in the history of history to go beyond the dichotomy of objectivism and subjectivism and take the practice serious in future studies.
期刊論文
1.De Weerdt, Hilde(2006)。Byways in the Imperial Chinese Information Order: the Dissemination and Commercial Publication of State Documents。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,66(1),145-188。  new window
2.瞿林東(2005)。一代明君的君主論--唐太宗和《帝範》。陝西師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),34(6),14-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.稻葉一郎(1991)。「歷年圖」と「通志」--「資治通鑑」の成立過程に關する一考察。史林,74(4),461-483。  延伸查詢new window
4.尾崎康(1968)。通史の成立まで。斯道文庫論集,7,291-322。  延伸查詢new window
5.Spiegel, Gabrielle M.(2007)。Revising the Past/Revisiting the Present: How Changes Happens in Historiography。History and Theory, Theme Issue,46(4),1-19。  new window
6.Kirkland, Russell(1993)。A World in Balance: Holistic Synthesis in the T'aip'ing kuang-chi。Journal of Sung-Yuan Studies,23,43-70。  new window
7.Hartman, Charles(2003)。The Reluctant Historian: Sun Ti, Chu Hsi, and the Fall of Northern Sung。T'oung Pao, Second Series,89(1-3),100-148。  new window
8.Egan, Ronald(2001)。Reflections on Uses of the Electronic Siku quanshu。Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews,23,103-113。  new window
9.羅炳良(2011)。李攸《宋朝事實》的編撰及其史料價值。江西社會科學,2011(12),105-111。  延伸查詢new window
10.曹家琪(1978)。《資治通鑑》編修考。文史,1978(5),63-89。  延伸查詢new window
11.李文澤(19990800)。司馬光文集版本考述。大陸雜誌,99(2),23-31。  延伸查詢new window
12.宋家復(20141200)。從《冊府元龜》論北宋初期類書式歷史書寫操作的典範意義。新史學,25(4),43-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王德毅(19710100)。司馬光和資治通鑑。圖書季刊,1(3),18-29。  延伸查詢new window
14.王德保(2003)。資治通鑑與冊府元龜。南昌大學學報,31(3),65-71。  延伸查詢new window
15.胡寶華(2008)。從君臣之義到君臣道合--論唐宋時期君臣觀念的發展。南開學報(哲學社會科學版),2008(3),26-34。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.高明士(19890600)。隋唐的帝王學。中央研究院第二屆國際漢學會議。台北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Sung, Chia-Fu(2010)。Between Tortoise and Mirror: Historians and Historiography in Eleventh-Century China(博士論文)。University of Harvard,Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書
1.司馬光、王亦令(1987)。稽古錄點校本。北京:中國友誼出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.周文玖(2006)。史學史導論。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙梅春(2007)。二十世紀中國通史編纂研究。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.莊芳榮(1983)。中國類書總目初稿。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.宋立民(1999)。宋代史官制度研究。長春:吉林人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.周生杰(2008)。太平御覽研究。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王瑞來(2001)。宋代の皇帝權力と士大夫政治。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
8.Certeau, Michel de(1988)。The Writing of History, translated by Tom Conley。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
9.Twitchett, Denis(1992)。The Writing of Official History Under The T'ang。London:Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Chartier, Roger、Cochrane, Lydia G.(1997)。On the Edge of the Cliff: History, Language, and Practices。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
11.嚴耕望(1982)。治史經驗談。臺北:臺灣商務。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉乃和(1983)。冊府元龜新探。鄭州:中州書社。  延伸查詢new window
13.唐雯(2012)。晏殊《類要》研究。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪金富(2004)。遼宋夏金五朝日曆。臺北:中研院史語所。  延伸查詢new window
15.周文玖(2002)。中國史學史學科的誕生與發展。北京:北京師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.釋文瑩(1983)。玉壺野史。臺北:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
17.歐陽修、林青(2004)。歸田錄。西安:三秦。  延伸查詢new window
18.高似孫、周天游(1987)。史略校箋。北京:書目文獻。  延伸查詢new window
19.瞿林東(2006)。中國史學史研究。武漢:湖北教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.韓維志(2006)。上古文學中君臣事象的研究。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡崇榜(1991)。宋代修史制度研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.喬治忠、姜勝利(1996)。中國史學史研究述要。天津:天津教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.郭伯恭(1971)。宋四大書考。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
24.張須(1984)。通鑑學。臺北:聚珍書屋。  延伸查詢new window
25.范祖禹(1983)。帝學。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
26.胡道靜(1986)。中國古代的類書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
27.王盛恩(2008)。宋代官方史學研究。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
28.張耒、查清華、潘超群(2006)。明道雜誌。鄭州:大象出版社。  延伸查詢new window
29.鄧嗣禹(1970)。中國類書目錄初稿。臺北:古亭書屋。  延伸查詢new window
30.王應麟(1983)。玉海。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
31.李燾(2004)。續資治通鑑長編。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
32.歐陽修、李逸安(2001)。歐陽修全集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
33.項潔(20110000)。數位人文在歷史學研究的應用。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梅原郁(1993)。宋初的寄祿官及其周圍。日本學者研究中國史論著選譯。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lee, Thomas H. C.(2004)。History, Erudition and Good Government: Cheng Ch'iao and Encyclopedic Historical Thinking。The New and the Multiple: Sung Senses of the Past。Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press。  new window
3.加地伸行(1996)。類書の總合的研究。平成6.7年度科學研究費補助金研究成果報告書總合研究。豊中。  延伸查詢new window
4.Iggers, Georg G.(2002)。The Professionalization of Historical Studies and the Guiding Assumptions of Modern Historical Thought。A Companion to Western Historical Thought。Malden, Mass.:Blackwell Publishing。  new window
5.Hartman, Charles(2006)。A Textual History of Cai Jing's Biography in the Songshi。Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: the Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics。Cambridge, Mass.:London:Harvard University Asia Center:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Pulleyblank, E. G.(1961)。Chinese Historical Criticism: Liu Chih-chi and Ssu-Ma Kuang。Historians of China and Japan。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Bol, Peter K.(1993)。Government, Society, and State: On the Political Visions of Ssu-ma Kuang and Wang An-shih。Ordering the World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China。University of California Press。  new window
8.瞿林東(1989)。說通歷。唐代史學論稿。北京:北京師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.瞿林東(1989)。唐代史學與唐代政治。唐代史學論稿。北京:北京師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.瞿林東(1989)。唐代史家的通史撰述。唐代史學論稿。北京:北京師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳光崇(1999)。通鑑引用書目探究。通鑑新論。瀋陽:遼寧教育。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳光崇(1999)。通鑑引用書目的再檢核。通鑑新論。瀋陽:遼寧教育。  延伸查詢new window
13.張芝聯(1995)。《資治通鑑》纂修始末。從通鑑到人權研究。北京:三聯。  延伸查詢new window
14.倪士毅(1984)。北宋館閣制度述略。宋史研究論文集。鄭州:河南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.李華瑞(2001)。宋代建元與政治。宋史論集。保定:河北大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.朱鴻(1982)。君儲聖王以導正格--歷代的君主教育。立國的宏規。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
17.徐松(1997)。職官。宋會要輯稿。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.司馬光(1965)。進通志表。司馬文正公傳家集。臺北:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
19.脫脫(1977)。太祖本紀。宋史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.司馬光(1965)。劉道原十國紀年序。司馬文正公傳家集。臺北:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
21.楊聯陞(1961)。The Organization of Chinese Official Historiography: Principles and Methods of the Standard Histories from the T'ang through the Ming Dynasty。Historians of China and Japan。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE