:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣中小學教師職業婚姻配對表之分析
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:游宗輝黃毅志 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Tsung-huiHwang, Yih-jyh
出版日期:2016
卷期:46
頁次:頁73-101
主題關鍵詞:中小學教師婚姻配對階級意識Secondary school and elementary school teacherMarriage matchingClass consciousness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:496
  • 點閱點閱:190
臺灣中小學教師有很高的職業社經地位且工作條件良好,過去研究中也指出中小學教師在職業流動,特別是代內流動上具有高度的封閉性,而此職業特性是否也表現在其婚姻配對上而形成職業婚配封閉性?本研究運用中研院社會所建置之「社會資本的建構與效應」資料庫,採百分比交叉婚配表及對數線性與對數相乘等方法進行婚配表分析,藉以探究中小學教師的婚姻配對結構,並與其他職業進行比較。研究顯示:各項職業本人與配偶職業相同之相對機會中,以農、林、漁、牧人員的封閉性最高,而中小學教師居於第二;此外,職業間的社經地位差距愈大,則婚姻配對的機會就愈小。
Secondary school and elementary school teachers in Taiwan have a high occupational socioeconomic status and satisfactory working conditions. Previous studies have revealed that the intragenerational occupational mobility of secondary school and elementary school teachers is particularly low. The occupational outflow and inflow of secondary school and elementary school teachers are highly limited. Whether this occupational characteristic is also reflected by teachers primarily marrying other teachers, leading to closed occupation-based marriage matching that is conducive to the development of class consciousness, must be resolved. In this study, data were retrieved from the Construct and Effect of Social Capital Database instituted by the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica. Subsequently, percentage cross tabulation, log-linear analysis, and log multiplication were applied to establish and analyze a marriage matching table to explore the marriage matching structure within secondary school and elementary school teachers and to compare the marriage matching structure with those of people in other occupations. Regarding the probabilities of intraoccupational marriage, people in the fields of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and animal husbandry exhibited the highest level of intraoccupational marriage, followed by secondary school and elementary school teachers. In addition, people in occupations involving a greater distribution of socioeconomic status were associated with a lower probability of marrying one another.
期刊論文
1.黃毅志(20141200)。臺灣中小學教師職業流動表分析。教育研究集刊,60(4),33-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉爽(2000)。臺灣人口婚姻:現狀、特點與問題--兼與大陸地區人口婚姻狀況的比較。人口研究,24(4),61-66。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hout, M.(1983)。Mobility Tables。Sage University Papers,31。  new window
4.林俊瑩(20010600)。中小學教師婚姻配對模式的特性之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究,1(1),181-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林瑞華(20120600)。階級不同不相為謀:大陸臺灣人社會融入狀況之研究。東吳政治學報,30(2),127-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.施建彬(20030600)。由中國文化脈絡談臺灣外籍新娘現象與跨文化通婚適應問題。研究與動態,8,141-151。  延伸查詢new window
7.柳杰欣、吳麗娟、林世華(20090600)。適婚男女知覺父母婚姻關係、依附關係與其婚姻態度之相關研究。教育心理學報,40(4),641-662。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張榮富(20111200)。結婚最佳時機的性別差異:一個以臺灣人口資料的模擬配對研究。思與言,49(4),215-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張榮富(20130900)。北高兩市與全臺男女各年齡層擇偶機會的差異--兼論男性外婚與女性不婚。城市學學刊,4(2),27-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張榮富、陳玫瑜(20120300)。年齡被接受度的性別差異--以年齡偏好的雙向配對擇偶模式評估。經濟論文叢刊,40(1),119-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃毅志(20001000)。文化資本、社會網絡與階層認同、階級界限。國立政治大學社會學報,30,1-42。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃毅志、章英華(20051200)。臺灣地區族群交友界限之變遷:1970年與1997年的比較。臺灣社會學刊,35,127-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Duncan, O. D.(1979)。How destination depends on origin in the occupational mobility table。American Journal of Sociology,84(4),793-803。  new window
14.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1998)。Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, and Trends。Annual Review of Sociology,24,395-421。  new window
15.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。  new window
16.Marsden, P. V.(1988)。Homogeneity in confiding relations。Social Networks,10,57-76。  new window
17.蘇船利、黃毅志(20121200)。教師之抗爭意識以及專業自主意識與其參加組織意願的關連:以臺東為範圍。教育實踐與研究,25(2),195-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.林益慶(20000700)。中小學教師的社會流動與職業取得。教育研究資訊,8(4),114-140+a8。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃毅志(19980400)。臺灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估。調查研究:方法與應用,5,5-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政(20061200)。臺灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷。人口學刊,33,1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.林俊賢、黃毅志(20080900)。臺灣地區中小學教師客觀階級位置、文化資本與主觀階級認同:與其他職業做比較。教育研究集刊,54(3),99-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.張思嘉、周玉慧(20040600)。緣與婚前關係的發展。本土心理學研究,21,85-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.蔡淑鈴(19940600)。臺灣之婚姻配對模式。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),335-371。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Goldthorpe, J. H.、Llewellyn, C.、Payne, C.(1980)。Social mobility and class structure in modern britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Blau, Peter M.、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American occupation structure。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
3.Goodman, Leo A.(1984)。The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Giddens, Anthony(1973)。The class structure of the advanced societies。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
5.黃毅志(2002)。社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識:台灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續。台北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃毅志(2011)。臺灣的教育分流、勞力市場階層結構與地位取得。臺北市:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.Weber, M.(1966)。Class, status and party。Class and power: Social stratification in comparative perspective。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
2.孫清山、黃毅志(1997)。台灣階級結構:流動表與網絡表的分析。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE