:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:如履薄冰?科技女性陷阱論述之研究
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:王雅玄 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ya-hsuan
出版日期:2016
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁167-193
主題關鍵詞:科技女性科技性別化陷阱論述陽剛女性Women scientists and technologistsGendered technologyThe discourse of trapMasculine woman
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:121
  • 點閱點閱:20
本文關懷女性在科技領域中的困境,蒐集12位女科技教授性別經驗與科技生涯的敘說資料,從個人、家庭、學校與社會等不同脈絡瞭解其性別歷程,歸納其科研生活中如履薄冰的幾個綜合因素。結果發現,科技女性在科研領域中受限於四種陷阱論述。第一,反女性自我論述:科技女性的自我侷限於傳統對女性的否定,受限於生理弱勢無法符應科技需求,陽剛女性產生自我排擠效應,身為女性產生失能恐慌與成功恐懼,自我壓抑性別意識。第二,扛女性職責論述:無論已婚或未婚者都受限於「全母職原罪、無母職污名、好女人羈絆」,女性職責乃事業成功的先備條件。第三,去女性文化論述:理工科系校園文化不利女性,男性建築無女性空間、陽剛文化黃色笑話的威脅、反陰柔特質的父權壓迫。第四,非女性社群論述:科技為男性專有,非女性專業,缺乏女性社群與交流管道。這些論述會造成女性自我設限,降低參與科技領域之動力。本研究呼應先前研究指出女性專業發展的組織阻隔已如建築般天羅地網從玻璃天花板、玻璃牆、陷阱門到泥濘地板,我們在鼓勵女性突破自我走進科技之餘,更該雙管齊下,從社會結構面減少女性在科技領域中的性別制度化藩籬,以免阻隔了女性與男性平等經營科技世界的可能性。
Concerning the female dilemma in Taiwan's context of gendered technology, this study collected narrative data from 12 women scientists and technologists about gendered experiences in their technology career. Situating them back to different contexts among individuality, family, schooling and society, this paper explores how they articulated gender-traps during inferior treatment. In conclusion, women scientists and technologists were trapped by four discourses. First, the discourse of anti-feminine selfhood -- Feminine selfhood was constrained due to traditional denial of women's rights, the self-exclusion effect of masculine women, and the achievement phobia and incapacitating panic in women. Second, the discourse of shouldering women responsibilities -- Both married and unmarried women were trapped in terms of "motherhood as original sin", "non-motherhood as stigma" and "good woman fetters". Woman responsibilities had to be in place prior to career pursuing. Third, the discourse of removing cultural feminization -- Male-dominant campus without women-only space was full of sexual harassment and patriarchal oppression against femininity. Fourth, the discourse of non-female community -- Science and technology is not woman's profession but a man's land that lacks women community. These above discourses caused women self-handicapping behaviors away from a science career. This research corresponded to Guy's (1994) organizational architecture theory that professional women in organizations overwhelmingly faced gendered segregation in research connections such as glass ceiling, glass walls, trap doors and sticky floors. This study gives insight to gender minority in professional development that we shall rethink the institutionalized segregation of gender in the higher education sector in order not to cut off the possibility for women entering into technology management.
期刊論文
1.王雅玄(20120600)。主宰性別主宰科技?科技性別化現象分析。科學教育學刊,20(3),241-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳淑敏(20090300)。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,34(1),75-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.劉仲矩、許雅筑(20130300)。數位影音網站價值衡量指標重要性與性別差異之研究。東吳經濟商學學報,80,53-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王振寰(20030200)。知識經濟時代的社會資本。科學發展月刊,362,52-56。  延伸查詢new window
5.王雅玄(20141200)。如魚得水?科技女性成功論述之研究。教育科學研究期刊,59(4),137-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.彭莉惠、熊瑞梅、紀金山(20111200)。臺灣高等教育擴張對職業成就的影響:世代、性別、性別化科系與初職社經地位的取得。臺灣教育社會學研究,11(2),47-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳建志(20001200)。臺灣地區科系、職業性別隔離與收入性別差異之變遷。教育與心理研究,23(下),285-312。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王建宇(2011)。女性科技人才成長的社會性別因素分析。山西高等學校社會科學學報,2011(8),43-46。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱依娜、何光喜(2014)。高校教師工作與科研時間的性別差異及其仲介效應分析--基於全國科技工作者狀況調查資料。科學與社會,2014(3),86-100。  延伸查詢new window
10.姜蘭虹(19870300)。專業婦女的兩難:對成功與失敗歸因的性別差異與影響。婦女研究通訊,6,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳玉玲、王明傑(20130500)。兒童的文化性別界限與學業成就領域之相關研究。南台人文社會學報,9,125-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.黃玉幸(20141000)。科技大學女學生性別經驗之分析--以雙軌班學生為例。正修學報,27,211-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.游美惠、易言嬡(2002)。男性/陽剛特質(masculinity)& 女性/陰柔特質(femininity)。兩性平等教育季刊,18,101-106。  延伸查詢new window
14.游淑華(20111000)。科大女生的性別論述策略--藝術領域女生與工科領域女生的比對。藝術與文化論衡,2,29-39。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉仲矩、廖子寧(20150900)。Ubike APP數位資本內涵與性別差異重要性之研究。管理資訊計算,4(2),94-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.韓采燕(20100600)。性別化的科技教育:高等教育中的實驗室初探。性別平等教育季刊,50,111-116。  延伸查詢new window
17.嚴祥鸞(20110400)。性別主流化:臺灣女性數學家。全球政治評論,34,97-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Francis, B.(2000)。The gendered subject: Students' subject preferences and discussions of gender and subject ability。Oxford Review of Education,26(1),35-48。  new window
19.Guy, M. E.(1994)。Organizational architecture, gender and women's careers。Review of Public Personnel Administration,14(2),77-90。  new window
20.Hult, K. M.(1995)。Feminist organization theories and government organizations: The promise of diverse structural forms。Public Productivity & Management Review,19(2),128-142。  new window
21.Koch, S. C.、Müller, S. M.、Sieverding, M.(2008)。Women and computers: Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure。Computers & Education,51(4),1795-1803。  new window
22.吳嘉麗(2003)。對謝宇教授「科學中的女性」演講之回應。婦研縱橫,67,94-97。  延伸查詢new window
23.岳修平、劉伊霖、胡秋帆(20040700)。數位學習中的性別差異。婦研縱橫,71,35-43。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉正、陳建州(20071200)。臺灣高等教育學習領域之性別區隔與變遷:1972-2003。教育與心理研究,30(4),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.蔡麗玲(20080800)。「男女大不同」是科學抑或信仰?。性別平等教育季刊,42,33-47。  延伸查詢new window
26.嚴祥鸞(19980400)。性別關係建構的科技職場。婦女與兩性學刊,9,187-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Brickhouse, N.(1994)。Bringing in the outsiders: reshaping the sciences of the future。Journal of Curriculum Studies,26(4),401-416。  new window
28.Rosser, Sue V.(2005)。Through the lenses of feminist theory: Focus on women and information technology。Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies,26(1),1-23。  new window
29.陳婉琪、許雅琳(20111200)。重探高等教育科系性別隔離的影響因素:技職與學術取向教育之對比。臺灣社會學刊,48,151-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Steele, C. M.(1997)。A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance。American Psychologist,52(6),613-629。  new window
研究報告
1.蔡麗玲(2005)。「男理工、女人文」的性別認同型塑--以小學「自然與生活科技」課堂為例 (計畫編號:NSC94-2511-S-017-006)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳惠玉(2005)。大學生人格特質與職業興趣關係之研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.楊巧玲(2007)。學校中的性別政權:學生校園生活與教師工作文化之性別分析。臺北:高等教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Glazer, M.、Slater, M.(1987)。Unequal colleagues: The entrance of women into the professions, 1890-1940。New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press。  new window
3.Wajcman, J.(1991)。Feminism Confronts Technology。Cambridge:Polity。  new window
4.Vaerting, M.、Paul, E.、Paul, C.(1923)。The dominant sex: A study in the sociology of sex differentiation。New York, NY:George H. Doran Company。  new window
5.Xie, Y.、Shauman, K. A.(2005)。Women in science: Career processes and outcomes。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Massey, Doreen B.(1994)。Space, Place, and Gender。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
7.李美枝(1987)。性別角色面面觀:男人與女人的權利暗盤。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Maccoby, E. E.、Jacklin, C. N.(1974)。The Psychology of Sex Differences。Stanford University Press。  new window
9.Harding, Sandra G.(1986)。The Science Question in Feminism。Cornell University Press。  new window
其他
1.史倩玲(20081023)。刻板性別意識扼殺女科學家,http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-9793, 2016/02/27。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳嘉麗(2009)。女性行走科學路坎坷又漫長,http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-9187, 2016/05/11。  延伸查詢new window
3.林唯芳(2008)。女性科技人的社會責任與義務,http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~tfst/005FST/forum/social%20consceince.pdf, 2008/12/09。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部統計處(2015)。大學校院專任教師及助教人數--按職級別、性別及研究類別分,https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/gender/306-3.xls, 2015/01/12。  延伸查詢new window
5.European Commission(2009)。She figures 2009 statistics and indicators on gender equality in science,http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she_figures_2009_en.pdf, 2015/04/22。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wagner, R.(2011)。Embracing liberatory practice: Promoting men's development as a feminist act。Masculinities in higher education: Theoretical and practical considerations。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
2.Davies, B.(1997)。Gender theories in education。International encyclopedia of the sociology of education。Oxford:Pergamon。  new window
3.Witz, A.、Savage, M.(1992)。The gender of organization。Gender and bureaucracy。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
4.方念萱(2002)。聽女孩談她們的電腦故事。電腦美眉誕生術:新科技時代♀教學法。臺北市:女書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Guy, M.、Killingsworth, J. A.(2007)。Framing gender, framing work: The disparate impact of traditional HRM practices。Strategic public personnel administration: Building & managing human capital for the 21st century。Westport, CT:Prager。  new window
6.Weiler, K. A.(1997)。Women and the professionalization of teaching。International encyclopedia of the sociology of education。Oxford:Pergamon。  new window
7.Bleier, R.(1991)。Sex difference research: Science or belief?。Feminist approaches to science。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
8.Grossi, G.(2008)。Science or belief? Bias in sex difference research。Under-representation of women in science and technology。Padova, IT:Cleup。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE