臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：藝術定義與藝術終結及其在大學藝術創作教學之意涵
書刊名：藝術研究期刊
作者：何文玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ho, Wen-ling
出版日期：2015
卷期：11
頁次：頁71-105
主題關鍵詞：藝術之定義；藝術終結；藝術創作；藝術創作理論；大學藝術創作教學；The definition of art；The end of art；Art production；Theory of art production；Teaching art production in university
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:6
藝術之定義一直是美學之重要議題，因藝術現象不斷進展與改變，故哲學家與美學家發展出關於此議題之許多不同觀點。Danto 於1984 年提出「藝術終結」看法後，更引發廣大之爭論，此相關思潮不僅影響台灣的藝術創作者，同時亦衝擊大學藝術教育。大學學生在創作學習時，對藝術定義及與其密切相關之藝術終結問題常感不解，當今之藝術創作者應對這些議題加以探究，才不至因迷惑而產生誤解，甚至讓其誤導自己的創作方向，關於這些問題之探討與一些迷思之釐清，將有利於大學之藝術創作教學。因此本文旨在探討藝術定義之發展、藝術終結議題之緣起、藝術終結之意義，同時據以闡釋這些觀點在大學藝術創作教學之意涵。在藝術定義方面，本文分析早期本質論之定義與二十世紀中葉後反本質之定義。在藝術終結意義方面，本文歸納七項主張且加以討論。最後本文提出三方面之觀點，以引導大學學生之藝術創作學習。
The definition of art has been an important issue in aesthetics. Because the phenomena of art is constantly evolving and changing, philosophers and aestheticians develop many different points of view concerning the issue. After Danto proposed the conception of ＂the end of art＂ in1984, it causes many debates. The related thoughts not only influence on Taiwanese artists, but also impact on university art education. University students in learning art production usually feel confused at the definition of art and its closely related problem of the end of art. Art creators nowadays should inquire into these issues so as not to be confused and hence misunderstanding, or even misdirect self's art production. It will be beneficial for art-production instruction in university if these problems are dealt with and some misconceptions clarified. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to deal with the development of art definition, the arising of the issue of the end of art, and the meaning of the end of art. Based on these points, the implications for teaching art production in university are interpreted. In the aspect of the definition of art, this study analyses the earlier essentialist definition, and the anti-essentialist definition after the mid-20^(th) century. As far as the meaning of the end of art is concerned, seven arguments are induced to discuss. Finally, this study proposes three aspects of viewpoints for guiding students' learning art production in university.
期刊論文
1.蕭振邦(200610)。解讀《藝術終結之後》--評論Danto的〝美學〞論述。美術學報. 國立臺北藝術大學美術學院，1，111-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Weitz, Morris(1956)。The role of theory in aesthetics。Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，15(1)，27-35。  new window
3.代迅(2009)。藝術終結之後：黑格爾與現代美學轉向。江西社會科學，2009(1)，104-113。  延伸查詢new window
4.何建良(2008)。藝術終結研究：現狀與問題。中南大學學報，14(1)，38-34。  延伸查詢new window
5.李建盛(2009)。藝術終結問題及理論思考。北京行政學院學報，2009(6)，93-98。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳子林(2008)。藝術終結論：問題與方法。北方論叢，213(1)，4-49。  延伸查詢new window
7.徐陶(2009)。論喬治．迪基的藝術制度理論-兼論藝術定義與藝術實踐之關係。中南大學學報，15(3)，310-314。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭昭第(2011)。從本質主義到反本質主義：藝術本質論的終結及其反思。當代文壇，2，34-38。  延伸查詢new window
9.張冰(2014)。黑格爾的藝術終結觀研究。中國人民大學學報，2014(2)，142-148。  延伸查詢new window
10.韓書堂(2010)。試論我們時代的藝術現實與藝術本質。中國石油大學學報，26(1)，86-89。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉悅笛(2007)。藝術終結與現代性的終結。藝術百家，4，23-26。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉旭光(2005)。終結，還是復活--對黑格爾與海德格藝術終結的比較研究。學術月刊，5，80-103。  延伸查詢new window
13.Carney, J. D.(1991)。Style theory of art。Pacific Philosophical Quarterly，72，272-289。  new window
14.Carney, J. D.(1991)。Style and formal features。Southern Journal of Philosophy，29，434-444。  new window
15.Carney, J. D.(1994)。Defining art externally。British Journal of Aesthetics，34，114-123。  new window
16.Carrier, D.(1998)。Danto and his critics: After the end of art and art history。History and Theory，37(4)，1-16。  new window
17.Carroll, N.(1988)。Arts, practice, and narrative。Monist，71，140-156。  new window
18.Carroll, N.(1993)。Historical narrative and the philosophy of art。Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，51，313-326。  new window
19.Carroll, N.(1998)。The end of art?。History and Theory，37(4)，17-29。  new window
20.Danto, A. C.(1985)。The philosophical disenfranchisement of art。Grand Street，4(3)，171-189。  new window
21.Dickie, G.(1956)。Definition of art。Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，15，27-35。  new window
22.Dickie, Georges(1969)。Defining art。American Philosophical Quarterly，6(3)，253-256。  new window
23.Kelly, M.(1998)。Essentialism and historicism in Danto's philosophy of art。History and Theory，37(4)，30-43。  new window
24.Leon, M. J. A.(2007)。Art's historical nature。Enrahonar，38/39，159-169。  new window
25.Levinson, J.(1979)。Defining art histoyically。British Journal of aesthetics，19，230-250。  new window
26.Levinson, J.(1993)。Extending art historically。Journal of Aesthetics and Criticism，51，411-423。  new window
27.Sinnerbrink, R.(2004)。Heidegger and the "end of art"。Literature and Aesthetics，14(1)，89-109。  new window
28.Danto, Arthur C.(199812)。The End of Art: A Philosophical Defense。History and Theory，37(4)，127-143。  new window
29.Levinson, J.(1989)。Refining art historically。Journal of Aesthetics and Criticism，47，21-33。  new window
30.Danto, Arthur C.(1964)。The Artworld。The Journal of Philosophy，61(19)，571-584。  new window
學位論文
1.Miller, J. M.(2011)。Subjectivity in Hegel's aesthetics(博士論文)。Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame。  new window
圖書
1.科耶夫、姜志輝(2005)。黑格爾導讀。上海：譯林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Maker, William A.(1994)。Philosophy Without Foundations: Rethinking Hegel。Albany, NY：State University of New York。  new window
3.Levinson, J.(2005)。The Oxford handbook of aesthetics。Oxford, UK：University Press。  new window
4.Adorno, Theodor(2000)。The Adorno Reader。Malden, Mass：Oxford, UK：Blackwell。  new window
5.蔣孔陽(1997)。德國古典美學。北京：商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hegel, G. W. F.、朱光潛(1982)。美學。北京：商務印書。  延伸查詢new window
7.降紅燕(2006)。20世紀西方文學批評理論與中國當代文學管窺。四川：四川大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘必新(2008)。藝術學概論。北京：中國人民大学。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bell, C.(1914)。Art。London：Chatto and Windus。  new window
10.Bell, C.(1949)。Art。New York, NY：Capricom Books。  new window
11.Croce, B.、Ainslie, D.(1920)。Aesthetics。London：Macmillan。  new window
12.Danto, A. C.(1992)。Beyond the Brillo Box: The Visual Arts in Post-Historical Perspective。New York：Harper Collins。  new window
13.Danto, A. C.(1997)。Encounters and reflections: Art in the historical present。CA：University of California。  new window
14.Davies, S.(1991)。The definition of art。New York, NY：Cornell University。  new window
15.Dickie, G.(1974)。Introduction to aesthetics。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University。  new window
16.Hegel, G. W. F.、Sibree, J.(1861)。Lectures on the philosophy of history。London：H. G. Bonn。  new window
17.Dickie, G.(1984)。The art circle: Theory of art。New York, NY：Haven。  new window
18.Hegel, G. W. F.(1817)。The encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences。Oxford：Oxford University。  new window
19.Hegel, G. W. F.、Knox, T. M.(1975)。Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Arts。Oxford：The Oxford University。  new window
20.Hegel, G. W. F.、Knox, T. M.(1979)。Hegel's aesthetics。Oxford：The Oxford University。  new window
21.Hegel, G. W. F.、Knox, T. M.(1998)。Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art。Oxford：Oxford University。  new window
22.Heidegger, M.、Hofstadter, A.(1971)。The origin of the work of art。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
23.Heidegger, David、Krell, Farrell(1991)。Nietzsche, Vol I: The will to power as art。San Francisco：Harper and Row。  new window
24.Plato、Lee, H. D. P.(1955)。Republic。London, UK：Penguin。  new window
25.Maker, M.(2000)。Introduction: Hegel and aesthetics。New York, NY：State University。  new window
26.Stecker, R.(1997)。Art works: Definition, meaning, value。University Park, PA：Pennsylvania State University。  new window
27.Tatarkiewicz, T. W.(1980)。History of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics。London：Polish Scientific。  new window
28.Tolstoy, L.、Maude, A.(1995)。What is art?。Oxford University Press。  new window
29.Torres, L.、Kamhi, M. M.(2000)。What Art Is: The Esthetic Theory of Ayn Rand。Chicago, IL：Open Court。  new window
30.何文玲(2008)。學院藝術批評教學理論之研究--形式主義、脈絡主義、及其整合之應用。臺北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.Kuspit, D. B.(2004)。The End of Art。Cambridge：Cambridge University。  new window
32.Vattimo, Gianni、Snyder, Jon R.(1988)。The End of Modernity : Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
33.Young, Julian(2001)。Heidegger's philosophy of art。Cambridge University。  new window
34.Kojève, Alexandre、Nichols, James H. Jr.、Bloom, Allan(1969)。Introduction to the Reading of Hegel。New York：Basic Books。  new window
35.Wittgenstein, L.、Anscombe, G. E. M.(1953)。Philosophical Investigations。Oxford, England：New York：Blackwell Publishers：Macmillan。  new window
36.Danto, Arthur C.、Goehr, Lydia(1997)。After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
37.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、洪漢鼎(2004)。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。上海譯文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.高建平(2012)。進步與終結：向死而生的藝術及其在今天的命運，http://www.hprc.org.cn/leidaxinxi/whjykj/201208/t20120816_196520.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.張冰(2014)。生活論與生態美學--關於藝術的終結命題，http://www.krilta.sdu.edu.cn/getNewsDetail.site?newsId=ad01b08a-63c4-4a 92-bl42-39924calb481。  延伸查詢new window
3.Harries, K.(2009)。Hegel's introduction to aesthetics，http://karstenharries.commons.yale.edu/files/Hegels-Introduction-to-Aesthetics2.pdf。  new window
4.Quigley, T.(2012)。Summary of the argument of Arthur Danto's "After the end of art"，http://timothyquigley.net/ea/danto-ea.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Carroll, Noel(1993)。Essence, Expression, and History。Danto and His Critics。Cambridge：Blackwell。  new window
2.Danto, A. C.(1987)。The Art World。Philosophy Looks at the Arts。New York：Temple University Press。  new window
3.Kennick, William E.(1968)。Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake?。Contemporary Studies in Aesthetics。New York：McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
4.Danto, A. C.(1986)。The end of art。The philosophical disenfranchisement of art。New York, NY：Columbia University。  new window
5.Davies, S.(2001)。Definitions of art。The Routledge companion to aesthetics。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
6.Dickie, G.(2000)。The institutional theory of art。Theories of art today。Madison, Wisconsin：University of Wisconsin。  new window
7.Levinson, J.(1996)。Extending art historically。The pleasures of aesthetics。Ithaca：Cornell University。  new window
8.Weitz, M.(1970)。The role of theory in aesthetics。Problems in Aesthetics。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：525（臺灣：472，外國：53） ／ 本年度總使用人次：950410 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66745609
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上