臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：傅柯Heterotopia翻譯考
書刊名：地理研究
作者：王志弘 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Chih-hung
出版日期：2016
卷期：65
頁次：頁75-105
主題關鍵詞：翻譯政治；跨界；差異地點；異質空間；異托邦；Translation politics；Border-crossing；Heterotopia
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:410
  • 點閱點閱:67
傅柯以heterotopia 指稱介於真實空間（real space）和烏托邦（utopia，虛構空間）之間，既真實又虛幻的所在，具有凝縮異質元素於一處而迸發的擾動潛能。這個概念通過英譯及中譯，影響臺灣的空間研究學界，並擴及文學與傳播研究，體現了轉譯與運用舶來概念的本地知識狀況。本文檢視引用heterotopia 的本地研究，比較其譯名、概念內涵、適用案例及論證。作者發現，這些運用多為簡化概念後予以套用，少見置入傅柯思想和具體脈絡的辨析，也未檢討heterotopias概念的缺失。究其原因，除了理論翻譯必然的開放性，也涉及早期引用的示範與仿效；臺灣批判性知識生產急需具備正當性的理論工具；以及，舶來概念及其轉譯的陌生難解，具有誘人的美學魅力。作者主張，要推展heterotopia 的本地轉化，可以通過經驗研究來累積問題意識和分析語彙。再者，翻譯作為跨界而滋生差異的行動，正涉及了heterotopia 的營造。
The term heterotopia is used by Foucault to indicate the space located between real space and utopia. Heterotopia is real yet unreal, and is where heterogeneous elements agglomerate to generate potential of disturbance. Via translation reproduced in English and Chinese, the notion of heterotopia has influenced the field of space studies in Taiwan, and has even impacted studies of literature and communication. This phenomenon shows how the local knowledge system has often appropriated translation and borrowed ideas. This article examines local studies drawing upon the idea of heterotopia, making comparisons of the translations and connotations of the term, and the cases where it has been adopted and the argumentations claimed within. It is found that most of the studies only apply heterotopia in a most reductionist manner. They rarely fit the articles within Foucauldian context and argumentation, and hardly reflect on its deficiency. While the openness of theory translation might have contributed to this outcome, three other factors should also be discussed: 1) the demonstration effect of heterotopia-related writings during the early period; 2) the urgent need in Taiwan to produce critical knowledge to obtain legitimacy through theoretical tools at the time; 3) the ambiguity arising due to the appealing aesthetics and charm of borrowed ideas. This study argues that the indigenization of the term heterotopia could be based on the enhancement of the problematizing ability and analytical vocabulary, both of which should be obtained via empirical studies. Since translation itself is a border-crossing action which generates difference, heterotopia has actually fit itself into this process as part of its product.
期刊論文
1.楊凱麟(20100600)。硬蕊書寫與國語異托邦：臺灣小文學的舞鶴難題。文化研究，10，7-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊凱麟、龔卓軍(20050900)。考古學空間與空間考古學--傅柯的「異質拓樸學」。中國文哲研究通訊，15(3)=59，75-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王志弘(20110600)。我們有多元文化城市嗎？臺北都會區東南亞族裔領域化的機制、類型與作用。臺灣社會研究季刊，82，31-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王志弘、沈孟穎、林純秀(20090400)。族裔公共空間的劃界政治：臺北都會區外圍東南亞消費地景分析。臺灣東南亞學刊，6(1)，3-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Johnson, Peter(2006)。Unravelling Foucault's 'Different Spaces'。History of the Human Sciences，19(4)，75-90。  new window
6.Saldanha, Arun(2008)。Heterotopia and Structuralism。Environment and Planning A，40(9)，2080-2096。  new window
7.羅敏(2013)。不同空間的正文與上下文翻譯出版考察。外國語文（四川外語學院學報），4，114-117。  延伸查詢new window
8.Andriotis, K.(2010)。Heterotopic erotic oases: The public nude beach experience。Annals of Tourism Research，37(4)，1076-1096。  new window
9.Davies, A.(2008)。Guillermo del Toro's Cronos: the vampire as embodied heterotopia。Quarterly Review of Film and Video，25(5)，395-403。  new window
10.Foucault, M.(1984)。Des espaces autres. Une conference inedite de Michel Foucault。Architecture, Mouvement, Continuity，5，46-49。  new window
11.Gallan, B.(2015)。Night lives: Heterotopia, youth transitions and cultural infrastructure in the urban night。Urban Studies，52(3)，555-570。  new window
12.Hook, D.、Vrdoljak, M.(2002)。Gated Communities, heterotopia and a 'rights' of privilege: a heterotopology of the South African security-park。Geoforum，33(2)，195-219。  new window
13.Johnson, P.(2008)。Foucault's spatial combat。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space，28(4)，611-626。  new window
14.Johnson, P.(2013)。The geographies of heterotopia。Geography Compass，7(11)，790-803。  new window
15.Karaosmanoglu, D.(2010)。Nostalgia spaces of consumption and heterotopia: Ramadan festivities in Istanbul。Culture Unbound，2，283-302。  new window
16.Kong, T. S. K.(2012)。A fading Tongzhi heterotopia: Hong Kong older gay men's use of spaces。Sexualities，15(8)，896-916。  new window
17.Laborde, S.(2015)。Environmental research from here and there: numerical modelling labs as heterotopias。Environment and Planning D: Society and Space，33(2)，265-280。  new window
18.Mendel, M.(2011)。Heterotopias of homelessness: Citizenship on the margins。Studies in Philosophy & Education，30(2)，155-168。  new window
19.North, P.(1999)。Explorations in heterotopia: Local exchange trading schemes (LETS) and the micropolitics of money and livelihood。Environment and Planning DSociety and Space，17，69-86。  new window
20.Owens, B. McCoy(2002)。Monumentality, identity, and the state: Local practice, world heritage, and heterotopia at Swayambhu, Nepal。Anthropological Quarterly，75(2)，269-316。  new window
21.Rymarczuk, R.、Derksen, M.(2014)。Different spaces: Exploring facebook as heterotopia。First Monday，19(6)。  new window
22.Salter, M. B.(2007)。Governmentalities of an airport: Heterotopia and confession。International Political Sociology，1，49-66。  new window
23.Tamboukou, M.(2000)。Of other spaces: Women's colleges at the turn of the century in the UK。Gender, Place and Culture，7(3)，247-263。  new window
24.Foucault, Michel、Miskowiec, Jay(1986)。Of Other Spaces。Diacritics，16(1)，22-27。  new window
25.夏鑄九、陳志梧(19881200)。臺灣的經濟發展、蘭嶼的社會構造與國家公園的空間角色。臺灣社會研究，1(4)，233-246。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.石計生(20120900)。大稻埕異托邦：百年城市史裡的「福科問題」與文化閒逛。臺灣社會研究季刊，88，41-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.王志弘(19960400)。臺北新公園的情慾地理學：空間再現與男同性戀認同。臺灣社會研究季刊，22，195-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Foucault, Michel、Miskowiec, Jay(1986)。Text/Context of Other Spaces。Diacritics，16(1)，22-27。  new window
學位論文
1.王志弘(2005)。學術翻譯的症候與病理：台灣社會學翻譯研究，1950s-2000s(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱柏寧(2012)。異托邦的萌生：海筆子帳篷劇團(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hetherington, Kevin(1997)。The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering。London。  new window
2.Foucault, Michel(1975)。Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison。Paris：Gallimard。  new window
3.吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟(2004)。科技渴望性別。臺北市：群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.McHale, Brian(1992)。Constructing Postmodernism。Routledge。  new window
5.Harvey, David(2009)。Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
6.張君玫(2012)。後殖民的陰性情境：語文、翻譯和慾望。群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Miller, J. Hillis、單德興(1995)。跨越邊界：翻譯、文學、批評。台北：書林。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟(2004)。科技渴望社會--STS讀本。臺北：群學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Harvey, David(2000)。Spaces of Hope。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
10.夏鑄九、王志弘(1988)。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。台北：明文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Dehaene, Michiel、De Cauter, Lieven(2008)。Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society。London：Routledge。  new window
12.Vattimo, Gianni、Webb, David(1992)。The Transparent Society。London：Cambridge, England：Polity Press。  new window
13.姜蘭虹、張伯宇、楊秉煌、黃耀雯(2014)。地理思想讀本。臺北市：唐山。  延伸查詢new window
14.Bailie, C.、Kabo, J.、Reader, J.(2013)。Heterotopia: Alternative Pathways to Social Justice。Alresford, Hants：Zero Books。  new window
15.Foucault, M.(1970)。The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences。New York：Vintage。  new window
16.Knaller-Vlay, B.、Ritter, R.(1998)。Dokumente zur architektur 10: Other spaces: The affair of the heterotopia。Graz, Austria：Haus der Architektur Graz。  new window
17.Palladino, M.、Miller, J.(2015)。The Globalization o f Space: Foucault and Heterotopia。London：Pickering and Chatto。  new window
18.Shane, D. G.(2005)。Recombinant Urbanism: Conceptual Modeling in Architecture, Urban Design, and City Theory。Wiley-Academy。  new window
19.夏鑄九、王志弘(19930000)。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。臺北：明文書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.顧燕翎、鄭至慧(19990000)。女性主義經典：十八世紀歐洲啟蒙，二十世紀本土反思。臺北：女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Foucault, Michel(1966)。Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines。Paris：Gallimard。  new window
22.Lefebvre, Henri、Nicholson-Smith, Donald(1991)。The Production of Space。Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
23.Soja, Edward W.(1996)。Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places。Blackwell。  new window
其他
1.Johnson, P.(2015)。Brief history of the concept of heterotopia，http://www.heterotopiastudies.com.。  new window
2.Johnson, P.(2016)。Interpretations of heterotopia，http://www.heterotopiastudies.com.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Genocchio, B.(1995)。Discourse, discontinuity, difference: the question of "other spaces。Postmodern Cities and Spaces。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
2.Foucault, Michel(1998)。Different Spaces。Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 2. Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology。London：Penguin Books。  new window
3.Foucault, Michel、Lotus(1997)。Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias。Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory。New York。  new window
4.Foucault, Michel、Dehaene, Michiel、De Cauter, Lieven(2008)。Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias。Heterotopia and the city: public space in a postcivil society。Routledge。  new window
5.Foucault, Michel、陳志梧(1993)。不同空間的正文與上下文(脈絡)。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。臺北：明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Teyssot, Georges、Stewart, D.(1998)。Heterotopias and the History of Spaces。Architecture Theory since 1968。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
7.季鐵男(1990)。夢幻的真實與理想的虛假。雅砌。  延伸查詢new window
8.林志明(2003)。異端地帶與電影空間。dA夯。  延伸查詢new window
9.De Cauter, L.、Dehaene, M.(2008)。The space of play: Towards a general theory of heterotopia。Heterotopia and the City。London：Routledge。  new window
10.Foucault, M.(2001)。Des espaces autres。Dits et ecrits II, 1976-1988。Paris：Quarto Gallimard。  new window
11.Low, S.(2008)。The gated community as heterotopia。Heterotopia and the City。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：518（臺灣：449，外國：69） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1166620 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66974065
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上