:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生臉書使用與政治參與:以太陽花學運為例
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:陳雅玫
作者(外文):Chen, Ya-mei
出版日期:2016
卷期:22:4
頁次:頁61-91
主題關鍵詞:臉書政治參與太陽花學運FacebookPolitical participationSunflower Movement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:196
  • 點閱點閱:90
「臉書」(Facebook)是臺灣普及率最高的社群媒體,太陽花學運是近年來臺灣民主政治發展重要的學生政治運動。本研究以2014 年太陽花學運為例,探討學生臉書使用與其實際走上街頭參與太陽花學運的關聯。臉書使用以使用動機與使用程度為主要項目,將臉書使用動機分為社交性的與非社交性的使用動機二種,並依臉書暴露程度與注意程度而將臉書使用程度分為高低二種,加以分項檢視。透過深度訪談得知,社交性的臉書使用動機學生,相較於非社交性的臉書使用動機學生,實際走上街頭參與太陽花學運的可能性較高。臉書使用程度較高的學生,相較於臉書使用程度較低的學生,實際走上街頭參與太陽花學運的可能性也較高。進一步比較臉書使用動機與使用程度,則臉書使用程度與學生實際走上街頭參與太陽花學運的關聯性更為明顯。太陽花學運標舉反服貿協議,但是政策未經過細膩的規劃與溝通就實施,更引發學生不滿。經由本次太陽花學運,本研究期待執政者正視學生對臉書等網路新媒體的依賴,及其與學生政治參與的關聯,強化類似於國家發展委員會「公共政策網路參與平台」的功能,讓政府的政策資訊更加公開透明化,在政府政策與計畫的形成、執行及評估等階段,民眾可以透過網路實現對公共政策之參與,進而規劃出較為貼近民心且易於被接受的政策。
Since Facebook is the most popular social media in Taiwan, and Sunflower Movement was an important political movement of students during the democratic development of Taiwan, this study takes Sunflower Movement as an example to find out the relationship between students' Facebook use and their political participation. About students' Facebook use, motivation of use and degree of use are two major items. In addition, this study divides the motivation of Facebook use into social motivation and non-social motivation, and the degree of Facebook use into higher and lower two species, according to the degree of media exposure and media attention. Through the results of in-depth interviews, students, using Facebook via social motivation more than non-social motivation, participated in Sunflower Movement with higher possibility. Besides, students, using Facebook with higher degree more than lower degree, participated in Sunflower Movement also with higher possibility. Furthermore, the degree of students' Facebook use truly played a key role toward the participation of Sunflower Movement. The main demands of Sunflower Movement were to against Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services and it also used to mobilize students' participation. This policy, Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services, implemented without detailed planning and comprehensive communication, aroused students' and the public's dissatisfaction. Via Sunflower Movement, this study expects the government should pay more attention to students' high reliance on Facebook and other social media, and the relationship between students' political participation and social media use. In addition, this study would make a suggestion to the government to strengthen the functions such as the platform for the public's participation in public policy, National Development Council, ensure policy information disclosure, guarantee the public's right to know, reinforce the interaction with the public, and welcome the public's participation in policy planning, implementation, evaluation, etc. through the internet. To sum up, this study hope the government may provide the policy closer to the public's need and easier to be accepted in the coming future.
期刊論文
1.Ancu, Monica、Cozma, Raluca(2009)。My Space Politics: Uses and Gratifications of Befriending Candidates。Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,53(4),567-583。  new window
2.Kushin, Matthew James、Yamamoto, Masahiro(2010)。Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election。Mass Communication and Society,13(5),608-630。  new window
3.Pinkleton, Bruce E.、Austin, Erica Weintraub(2001)。Individual Motivations, Perceived Media Importance, and Political Disaffection。Political Communication,18(3),321-334。  new window
4.翟本瑞(20111000)。從社區、虛擬社區到社會網絡網站:社會理論的變遷。資訊社會研究,21,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.彭芸(20040400)。我國大學生的媒介使用、社會資本與政治信任對象之關連性研究。新聞學研究,79,91-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Huber, C.(2010)。Professional Learning 2.0。Educational Leadership,67(8),41-46。  new window
7.Kim, Joohan、Wyatt, R. O.、Katz, E.(1999)。News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy。Political Communication,16(4),361-385。  new window
8.Hardy, Bruce W.、Scheufele, Dietram A.(2005)。Examining Differential Gains from Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk & Online Interactions。Journal of Communication,55(1),71-84。  new window
9.洪雅慧(20090600)。北、高網路選民大不同?--媒介使用、媒介重要性評估與政治犬儒主義、投票行為之關連性研究。東吳政治學報,27(2),1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林如森(20061200)。社會運動過程中的認同、共識動員與傳播策略。臺灣社會研究,64,151-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Boyle, M. P.、Schmierbach, M.(2009)。Media Use and Protest: The Role of Mainstream and Alternative Media Use in Predicting Traditional and Protest Participation。Communication Quarterly,57(1),1-17。  new window
12.汪子錫(20140600)。E化民主的政策行銷挑戰分析:以反服貿學生運動新媒體運用為例。中國行政評論,20(2),73-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Norris, P.、Jones, D.(1998)。Editorial: Virtual democracy。Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,3(2),1-4。  new window
14.郭秋永(19921100)。政治參與的意義:方法論上的分析。人文及社會科學集刊,5(1),173-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger(2003)。Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective。British Journal of Political Science,33(2),233-259。  new window
16.Shah, D. V.、McLeod, J. M.、Yoon, S.(2001)。Communication, context and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences。Communication Research,28(4),464-506。  new window
17.羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬(20030100)。媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響--五種媒介的比較。新聞學研究,74,19-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張卿卿(20021100)。大學生的政治媒介認知、政治媒介行為與其政治效能與政治參與之間的關係。選舉研究,9(2),37-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Shah, D. V.、Kwak, N.、Holbert, R. L.(2001)。"Connecting" and "Disconnecting" with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital。Political Communication,18(2),141-162。  new window
20.Noam, Eli M.(2005)。Why the Internet Is Bad for Democracy。Communication of the ACM,48(10),57-58。  new window
21.蔡佳泓、陳陸輝(20151200)。「中國因素」或是「公民不服從」?從定群追蹤樣本探討太陽花學運之民意。人文及社會科學集刊,27(4),573-603。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.劉嘉薇(20131200)。聲望與領導:媒體與民眾眼中的總統。傳播管理學刊,14(2),26-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.劉嘉薇、黃紀(20101200)。持續與變遷--政治資訊對大學生政治信任感影響之定群追蹤研究。政治學報,50,111-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Bimber, B.(1998)。The Internet and Information Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism。Polity,31(1),133-160。  new window
25.Boulianne, Shelley(2011)。Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects between News Media and Political Interest。Political Communication,28(2),147-162。  new window
26.Scheufele, Dietram A.、Nisbet, Matthew C.(2002)。Being a Citizen Online: New Opportunities and Dead Ends。Harvard International Journal of Press Politics,3(2),1-4。  new window
27.Lee, Kwan M.(2006)。Effects of Internet Use on College Students' Political Efficacy。CyberPsychology and Behavior,9(4),415-422。  new window
28.Kwak, Nojin、Skoric, Marko M.、Williams, Ann E.、Poor, Nathaniel D.(2004)。To Broadband or Not to Broadband: The Relationship between High-Speed Internet and Knowledge and Participation。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,48(3),421-445。  new window
29.Klandermans, Bert(1984)。Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory。American Sociological Review,49(5),583-600。  new window
30.王嵩音(20061200)。網路使用與選舉參與之研究--以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Delli Carpini, Michael X.(2000)。Gen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment。Political Communication,17(4),341-349。  new window
32.彭芸(20000500)。2000年總統大選的媒介使用、選舉參與及投票對象。選舉研究,7(1),21-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.劉嘉薇(20060100)。大眾傳播媒介與大學生政治信任感關聯性之研究。東亞研究,37(1),161-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.陳憶寧、羅文輝(20060700)。媒介使用與政治資本。新聞學研究,88,83-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.張卿卿(20060100)。網路的功與過:網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討。新聞學研究,86,45-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Boyd, Danah M.、Ellison, Nicole B.(2007)。Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,13(1),210-230。  new window
37.王嵩音(20070100)。網路使用之態度、動機與影響。資訊社會研究,12,57-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.劉嘉薇(20141200)。民眾政黨認同、媒介選擇與紅衫軍政治運動參與。政治學報,58,101-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.王泰俐(20130300)。「臉書選舉」?2012年臺灣總統大選社群媒體對政治參與行為的影響。東吳政治學報,31(1),1-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉嘉薇(2009)。媒介抑鬱論或良性循環論?--媒介影響民眾政治支持的定群追蹤分析。臺灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS2008L)2008年國際學術研討會,(會議日期: 1月17-18日)。臺北:臺灣選舉與民主化調查規劃與推動委員會:國立臺灣大學政治學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hagemann, Carlo、Gras, Annelies(2006)。Political Support and Media Use。International Communication Association, 2006 Annual Meeting,(會議日期: June 19-23)。Dresden。  new window
學位論文
1.劉嘉薇(2008)。大眾傳播媒介對大學生政治支持的影響:一項定群追蹤的研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳蔚承(2013)。實名制、網路社會運動與網路人際關係之初探:以Facebook個人網頁討論士林王家「文林苑」都更案為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Verba, S.、Nie, N.、Kim, J. O.(1980)。Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparsion。N. Y.。  new window
2.Conway, M. Margaret(1985)。Political participation in the United States。Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press。  new window
3.Norris, Pippa(2001)。Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet in Democratic Societies。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Cappella, J. N.、Jamieson, K. H.(1997)。Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Verba, Sideny、Nie, Norman(1972)。Participation in American。NY:Harper and Row。  new window
6.Huntington, Samuel P.、Nelson, Joan M.(1976)。No Easy Choice: Political Participation in Developing Countries。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2014)。2014 年「台灣寬頻網路使用調查」結果公布,http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20140820a.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.創市際市場研究顧問(2014)。ARO/MMX公佈2014年6月Media Metrix網路流量報告,http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_08_05_14.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nieleson, J.(2006)。The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities,http://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/。  new window
4.Howard, Philip N.(2011)。The Arab Spring's Cascading Effects,http://www.psmag.com/navigation/politics-and-law/the-cascading-effects-of-the-arab-spring-28575/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Luskin, Robert C.(2002)。Political Psychology, Political Behavior, and Politics: Questions of Aggregation, Causal Distance, and Taste。Thinking about Political Psychology。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.趙鼎新(2007)。新聞、大眾輿論和運動。運動和革命:理論更新與中國經驗。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Moy, P.、Hussain, M. M.(2011)。Media Influences on Political Trust and Engagement。The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Nie, N. H.、Verba, S.(1975)。Political Participate。Handbook of Political Science。Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley。  new window
5.McQuail, D.、Blumler, J. G.、Brown, J. R.(1972)。The television audience: A revised perspective。Sociology of Mass Communications。Penguin。  new window
6.Kaye, Barbara K.、Johnson, Thomas J.(2006)。The Age of Reasons: Motives for Using Different Components of the Internet for Political Information。The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web in Campaign 2004。Lanham:Rowman and Littlefield。  new window
7.范麗娟(2004)。深度訪談。質性研究。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
8.王甫昌(1997)。結構限制、運動參與、與異議性意識:台灣民眾政黨支持的社會結構基礎初探。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE