:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:樂齡學習者對於活躍老化規範性需求課程重要性及參與的評估
書刊名:中正教育研究
作者:魏惠娟 引用關係陳冠良陳嘉彌 引用關係
作者(外文):Wei, Hui-chuanChen, Guan-liangChen, Jia-mi
出版日期:2017
卷期:16:1
頁次:頁35-76
主題關鍵詞:活躍老化課程活躍老化規範性課程高齡教育規範性需求課程Active aging curriculumActive aging and normative coursesElder educationNormative needs curriculum
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:297
  • 點閱點閱:231
世界衛生組織(World Health Organization, WHO)因應高齡化社會,於2002年提出活躍老化(active aging)的政策架構,成為老化國家的共同願景。我國教育部於2014年起應用活躍老化的概念,提供一套樂齡學習的核心課程,以回應學習者的規範性需求(normative needs)。本研究目的有四:首先分析參與規範性需求課程者之背景;其次,探討參與者對於活躍老化規範性需求課程目標重要性的評估;第三,分析參與者對於規範性需求課程各層面、各學習主題重要性的評估與實際參與情形;最後,從參與不同的規範性需求課程者之意見,探討他們對於學習目標重要性的評估。本研究以問卷調查法進行資料蒐集,針對樂齡學習中心、樂齡大學以及長青學苑的參與者為對象,共回收3,179份有效問卷。研究結果發現,女性認為活躍老化學習主題的重要性高於男性;本研究對象同意老年時期的學習目標為學習新知、行動實踐以及持續學習,其中又以學習新知與行動實踐,最能預測學習者持續學習的情形。參與學習者對於活躍老化課程重要性評估結果,大多數都在「重要」程度以上。不過,雖然研究對象對於活躍老化課程重要性的評估,絕大多數都認為重要,但是被認為重要的課程並不一定是參與率較高的課程。本研究建議高齡教育機構或課程規劃者,加強活躍老化規範性課程的開設;課程與教學設計要能滿足學習者想要學習新知、產生行動的目標,特別是對於被學習者評估為較不重要的課程,也就是被忽略的課程,以及被學習者評估為重要,但是實際卻較少參與的課程,更要積極提供。
The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed the Active Aging Policy Framework in 2002 as a shared vision for aging countries. In turn, the Ministry of Education in Taiwan developed a core curriculum framework using the Active Aging concept in response towards learners’ normative needs. There were four aims of the study. First, the study analyzed learners’ backgrounds. Second, learners’ thoughts about the importance of learning goals were assessed. Third, the study surveyed the importance of a normative need-based curriculum in terms of its dimensions and learning topics from the learners’ perspectives, along with the extent of learner participation. Finally, the study explored participants’ opinions concerning learning goals. The study used a questionnaire surveying 3,179 learners from Lo-Ling Centers, Chang-Chin Shue Yuen and Lo-Ling Da-Shue. Results of the study reveal that in comparison with male participants, female participants deemed the courses more important. Overall, most participants agreed that continual learning is crucial and should be an integral part of life. The degrees of learning and applying new knowledge can be key indicators of participants’ learning. Even though most of the participants believe active aging courses to be important, they might not necessarily participate in those courses. The study suggests that senior learning organizations and program planners provide more normative need-based courses. The study also recommends course designers or instructors to consider the following as primary learning goals: learning new information, applying knowledge, and continual learning. Courses viewed by learners as less important, or even ignored, should in fact be provided more often. Finally, courses viewed as important, but had fewer participants engaging should also be provided.
期刊論文
1.朱芬郁(20071200)。高齡者活躍老化初探。北縣終教,30,16-24。  延伸查詢new window
2.林麗惠(20070100)。從高齡教育機構開設的課程類別評析高齡學習內容之發展趨勢。課程與教學,10(1),83-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳嘉彌、魏惠娟(20150700)。樂齡大學學員基本知能學習需求與生活品質之探索性研究。實踐博雅學報,22,65-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Monette, M. L.(1977)。The concept of educational need: An analysis of selected literature。Adult Education,27(2),116-127。  new window
5.Riley, M. W.、Riley, J. W. Jr.(2000)。Age integration: Historical and conceptual background。The Gerontologist,40,266-272。  new window
6.林麗惠(20061200)。臺灣高齡學習者成功老化之研究。人口學刊,33,133-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李雅慧、魏惠娟、胡夢鯨(20140900)。新加坡退休者的學習歷程之探索。當代教育研究季刊,22(3),91-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.魏惠娟、施宇澤(20091200)。高齡教育工作者課程規劃能力評估之研究:以樂齡學習資源中心為例。成人及終身教育學刊,13,1-40。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐慧娟(20030900)。成功老化:老年健康的正向觀點。社區發展季刊,103,252-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.徐慧娟、張明正(20041200)。臺灣老人成功老化與活躍老化現況:多層次分析。臺灣社會福利學刊,3(2),1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.魏惠娟、陳冠良、李雅慧(20140600)。活躍老化高齡教育課程架構與評析:規範性需求的觀點。中正教育研究,13(1),45-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Chou, Kee-Lee、Chi, Iris(2002)。Successful aging among the young-old, old-old, and oldest-old Chinese。International Journal of Aging and Human Development,54(1),1-14。  new window
13.Rowe, John Wallis、Kahn, Robert L.(1997)。Successful Aging。The Gerontologist,37(4),433-440。  new window
會議論文
1.魏惠娟(2010)。論高齡教育方案目標:應該是什麼?為什麼?如何?。新北市亞洲2010年高齡教育學術研討暨專案研究成果發表會。新北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏惠娟、蔡旻璇(20080509)。高齡教育需求評估之次級資料分析。新竹。65-82。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.魏惠娟、胡夢鯨、蔡秀美、李雅慧、高文彬(2010)。老人交通安全教育教材研編及推廣計畫成果報告 (計畫編號:P09901-995000)。臺北市:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Huang, C. Y.(2003)。Taiwanese elders: Successful aging and physical activity(博士論文)。University of the Incarnate Word,San Antonio, Texas。  new window
2.陳淑珍(2008)。高齡教育學術研究趨向之探討:1990-2007國內碩博士論文分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃雪雅(2015)。高齡教學專業人才培訓之研究:Kirkpatrick的學習層面之評估(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡昭玉(2016)。低識字高齡者的學習動機、持續動力與學習改變(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張良鏗(2007)。美國老人寄宿所學習機制在我國實施可行性之研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rowe, J. W.、Kahn, R. L.(1998)。Successful aging。New York:Dell。  new window
2.陳肇男、徐慧娟、葉玲玲、朱僑麗、謝嫣娉(2012)。活躍老化:法規、政策與實務變革之臺灣經驗。台北市:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2015)。教育部補助各直轄市及縣(市)政府申辦104年度樂齡學習中心計畫撰寫原則。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2016)。教育部補助各直轄市及縣(市)政府申辦105年度樂齡學習中心計畫撰寫原則。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2015)。一百零五年度推展社會福利補助經費申請補助項目及基準。臺北市:衛生福利部社會及家庭署。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃富順、梁世武(2006)。臺灣地區民眾對於我國已邁入高齡化社會之看法民意調查報告。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.魏惠娟、胡夢鯨、蔡秀美、陳冠良(2009)。教育部樂齡教育輔導團第一年訪視成果資料。嘉義縣:國立中正大學高齡教育研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
8.Knowles, M. S.(1980)。The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy。Chicago, IL:Association Press/Follett。  new window
9.McClusky, H. Y.(1971)。Education: Background issues White House conference on aging。Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
10.魏惠娟(2015)。樂齡生涯學習。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.Peterson, David A.(1983)。Facilitating education for older learners。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
12.黃富順(20040000)。高齡學習。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.World Health Organization(2002)。Active ageing: A policy framework,http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf,(WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8)。  new window
圖書論文
1.莊雅婷、黃錦山、魏惠娟(2008)。臺灣高齡教育現況分析之研究。高齡教育政策與實踐。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baltes, Paul B.、Baltes, Margret M.(1990)。Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation。Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Havighurst, R. J.(1963)。Successful aging。Processes of aging。New York, NY:Atherton Press。  new window
4.Kingson, E. R.、Williamson, J. B.(2001)。Economic security policies。Handbook of aging and the social sciences。San Diego, CA:Academic Press。  new window
5.Riley, M. W.、Riley, J. W. Jr.(1994)。Structural lag: Past and future。Age and structural lag: Society's failure to provide meaningful opportunities in work, family and leisure。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE