:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政府推動認養代替購買寵物之政策行銷分析
書刊名:中華行政學報
作者:魏淑惠石振國 引用關係
作者(外文):Wei, Shu-huiShih, Chen-kuo
出版日期:2017
卷期:20
頁次:頁151-168
主題關鍵詞:政策行銷行銷要素組合認養代替購買寵物動物福利流浪犬Policy marketingMarketing factorsAdoption instead of buying petAnimal welfareStray dog
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:278
  • 點閱點閱:2
「認養代替購買寵物」是政府近年為了解決流浪動物問題所採行的主要政策,核心目標 是「為流浪動物找一個新家」,以降低收容所中流浪動物的數量,此政策的實施成效與行銷息息相關,本文主要應用Snavely的政策行銷理論,透過深度訪談及文獻分析等研究方法,瞭解農委會與臺中市政府推動「認養代替購買寵物」政策的實施現況,並進一步分析此政策的行銷策略與管道,以及所面臨的困境與可能解決之道,期能應用研究發現,提供政府未來 研擬相關政策之參考。 本研究的主要發現包括:1.政策行銷成功的主要原因除政策規劃機關、政策執行機關與夥伴團體的合作無間外,長官的支持和內部人員對政策的瞭解也是不可或缺的因素。2.行銷管道中,成本最低、效果最好的是網路行銷,但最能引起民眾共鳴的是辦理現場認養活動;促銷活動除了有實質活動外,名人偶像代言也有聚集人潮效果。3.認養政策在行銷過程遇到 的困境是經費與人力的不足、民眾對於名犬和體型小犬隻的偏愛、民眾認養後二度棄養問題及政策延續的不確定性等。針對前述問題,本研究並提供一些相關政策建議,並衷心期盼未 來在政府積極推廣「認養代替購買寵物」的政策下,能夠提高認養率與建立飼主責任感,讓所有動物都不再流浪。
"Adoption instead of buying pet" is major policy of Government on solving stray animals in recent years. "Finding a new home for stray animals" is a core target to decline amount of stray animals in shelter. The efficiency of the policy implementation is relative to marketing. Therefore, this study is to apply in Snavely's policy marketing model, in-depth interviews and literature analysis to understand implementation status of Council of Agriculture and Taichung City Government. Furthermore, it analyzes marketing strategy, way of this policy, facing difficulties and possible solution. The findings of this study provide the reference of policy for Government in the future. The findings of this study are as the following: 1. The major reasons of successful marketing policy are not only excellent elaboration between planning organization, execution organization and Animal Protection Association, but also supports from chiefs and internal personnel understanding. 2. The lowest cost and the best effective marketing way is E-marketing. But the most popular one is adoption events. Promotion is an actual activity and celebrity endorsement is helpful for attracting crowd. 3. The difficulties of this study are short fund and staff, preference of famous and small dogs for people, second abandonment after adoption and uncertain continue policy. This study subject to the aforesaid problems provides some relevant policy suggestions. Deeply hope it will enhance ratio of adoption and build responsibility of pet owners under Government positive "adoption instead of buying pet" spread, the stray animals will not be there anymore.
期刊論文
1.Burton, Suzan(1999)。Marketing for Public Organizations: New Ways, New Methods。Public Management,1(3),373-385。  new window
2.許桂森、陳美玲(20030300)。我國動物保護工作概況。農政與農情,129=366,59-66。  延伸查詢new window
3.李茂生(20030300)。動物權的概念與我國動物保護法的文化意義。月旦法學,94,155-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Snavely, Keith(1991)。Marketing in the Government Sector: A Public Policy Model。American Review of Public Administration,21(4),311-326。  new window
5.許桂森(20050800)。因應動物保護國際化的變革與作法。農政與農情,158=395,54-59。  延伸查詢new window
6.Broom, D. M.(1993)。A Usable Definition of Animal Welfare。Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,6,15-25。  new window
7.Kellert, S. R.(1985)。Attitudes toward Animals: Age-related Development among Children。Journal of Environmental Education,16,29-39。  new window
學位論文
1.周佩蓉(2008)。國小低年級學童動物保護教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭小綾(2014)。我國動物保護法規範之探討--以抑制流浪動物為中心(碩士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄧惠文(2007)。蘭嶼觀光旅遊業發展策略之研究--政策行銷理論之應用(碩士論文)。國立東華大學,壽豐。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張世賢(2005)。公共政策分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.魯炳炎(20070000)。公共政策行銷理論之研究:應然面與實然面的對話。臺北:韋伯文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳定(2003)。公共政策。新北市:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.翁興利(2004)。政策規劃與行銷。臺北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.丘昌泰(20130000)。公共政策. 基礎篇。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE