The amendment to the Labor Standards Act was passed on December 21, 2016. The new policy of "one fixed day off and one flexible rest day" triggered a great debate among management and employees, and governments at all levels were very busy with it. The fact that many problems arose, but failed to be solved by laws, clearly shows a lack of integrated policy planning; the new policy also had an impact on many industries. Prices went up, and many industries faced with increasing labor costs resorted to closing their businesses on weekends as a response. Additionally, the town hall of all counties, cities, villages, and towns forced their staff, including temporary personnel and cleaners, to work extra hours, due to tight financial budgets and shortages of human resources. Basically, it is not enough to observe the issue of "one fixed day off and one flexible rest day" from the angle of the complexity of politics, and what should be thoroughly discussed is the justification of the existing problem. On the one hand, we should observe its background and learn different countries' developmental trends for labor and management issues in the globalization context, as well as the developmental focus and features of global policies at a macroscopic level. On the other hand, we should view the legislative spirit and criterion of the Taiwan Labor Standards Act, and whether the amendment follows the trends of globalization at a microscopic level. Only when we follow this direction can we address the root cause of the issue of "one fixed day off and one flexible rest day", and understand the governance relationship among the government (the public sector), management (the private sector), and employees (the third sector). The focus of the debate of the issue of "one fixed day off and one flexible rest day" is on the local level, which belongs to the topic of "local governance", but is also closely related to national governance. This paper will explore the central and local relations from the perspective of global governance, as well as the relation among the three roles of the government, management, and employees, as based on the interactive relationship between the two levels of national governance and local governance. The complexity of the relations shows the "network effect" and the influence of "competition and cooperation effect". It is complicated, and the solution may affect other aspects of the issue, therefore, the concept of global governance must be involved.