:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:陽明後學《大學》核心概念的轉移:以黃久庵、李見羅為中心的探討
書刊名:臺大中文學報
作者:侯潔之
作者(外文):Hou, Chieh-chih
出版日期:2018
卷期:60
頁次:頁95-145
主題關鍵詞:黃綰李材知止致知大學Huang WanLi CaiTo know where to stopTo explore knowledge to the utmostThe Great Learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:94
  • 點閱點閱:6
在晚明王學轉詮「知止」的風潮中,黃久庵、李見羅以「知止」為義理統緒所建構出的詮釋系統,在一定程度上表徵了對陽明學傳衍及其流弊的另一股反思、修正、重構的新潮流。就本體詮釋而言,他們不約而同地於其上安立本體,使「知止」反轉成工夫的依據與起點,並以此範定格致等條目的實踐路向。特別是見羅在性體心用的思維上以「止」作為復性的標誌,與晚明宗性的思潮匯流,象徵了晚明由心轉性之本體立場置換的學風轉折。就心理結構而言,久庵在「心即理」的基礎上著眼「理氣不分」的本質內容;見羅則主張心必須服從性理的矩矱,與意知物家國天下等並列為天理落實的管道。不論何者,皆是從工夫論的思考出發,意在制衡心的作用無限擴張的弊病。就工夫重心而言,他們都通過「止」所代表的本體層規定工夫以內外合一為路徑,並從本體內容保證付諸經世的實踐動向。因此,顯現「歸顯於密」之理論面向的同時,也體現出經世的實踐性格,二者的張力乃建立在收煞良知虛用的實學取向上,並經由「理」結合為一而往致用之路層層開展,對於王學虛蕩之流弊實發揮了一定程度的救正效果
In the trend of the Wang school's interpretation of "knowing where to stop" in the late Ming dynasty, Huang Jiu-An and Li Jian-Luo developed an interpretation system as a successive argument. This system was a new trend of review, correction, and reconstitution toward the development and shortages of the Wang school. Huang and Li coincidentally set the noumenon on this system, reversed the "knowing where to stop" concept into the basis and the start of practice, and used it to rule practices such as exploring knowledge to the utmost. In particular, Li’s belief of "the nature as essence and the mind as function" regarded "stop" as the mark of returning to one's nature. This along with the convergence of the ideological trends about the nature in the late Ming dynasty symbolized a change of research style where the nature displaced the mind and became the noumenon. In terms of mental structure, Huang focused on the substantial content of "no discrimination between rational principle and vital energy" on the basis of "the mind is the rational principle." Li deemed that the mind had to follow the nature and the rational principle to serve, with intention, knowledge, being, home, country, and the world, as a channel for implementing heavenly principles. Each one of these started from the thought of the practice theory, with an intention to balance the defects of the infinite expanding function of the mind. In terms of the core of practice, they all supported the syncretization of both the inner and the outer as the path of practice through the noumenon layer represented by "stop." They also guaranteed the tendencies of statecraft implementation with the content of noumenon
期刊論文
1.趙剛、鄭婷、邱忠善(2002)。試析明儒李材的《大學》改本--兼與朱子《大學章句》比較。復旦學報 (社會科學版),2002(2),38-44。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳堅(2012)。黃綰的「艮止」心學--兼談黃綰心學的天台佛學性格。周易研究,116,77-88。  延伸查詢new window
3.張韶宇(2011)。《易》之微言莫要于「艮止」--黃綰「艮止」易學研究。周易研究,105,36-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.侯潔之(20160600)。黃久庵論「意」及其於陽明後學的意義。文與哲,28,153-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.侯潔之(20161200)。從「致知」到「知止」:從黃久庵的艮止思想論《大學》的轉詮意義。成大中文學報,55,201-203+205-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張克偉(1994)。李見羅其人及止修之學。鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1994(4),12-16。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉姿君(20080100)。李見羅「止修說」析論。當代儒學研究,3,107-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張勇(2012)。黃綰艮止之學新探(碩士論文)。湖南師範大學,湖南。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙元煜(2011)。黃綰艮止學說述評(碩士論文)。蘇州大學,蘇州。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.謝兆申(1997)。謝耳伯先生初集。臺南:莊嚴文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.聶豹(2007)。聶豹集。南京:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃綰、張宏敏(2014)。黃綰集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王陽明(1997)。王陽明全集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃綰(1983)。明道編。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王畿、吳震(2007)。王畿集。鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.李材。見羅先生書。  延伸查詢new window
8.李材。觀我堂稿。臺北:中研院傅斯年圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.李材。觀我堂摘槁。臺北:漢學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
10.林月惠(2005)。良知學的轉折--最雙江與羅念菴思想之研究。臺北:臺大出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.容肇祖(1993)。中國歷代思想史:明代卷。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.張廷玉(1974)。明史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.李紀祥(1988)。兩宋以來大學改本之研究。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.張學智(2000)。明代哲學史。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.清黃宗羲(2005)。明儒學案。黃宗羲全集。浙江:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE