:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地方文化活動契約委外的績效觀感:客家節慶利害關係人的角度
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:孫煒 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Way
出版日期:2018
卷期:66
頁次:頁1-38
主題關鍵詞:文化活動契約委外績效觀感績效衡量客家節慶Cultural campaignContracting outPerceived performancePerformance measurementHakka festival
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:319
  • 點閱點閱:6
臺灣地方民選行政首長熱衷舉辦各種文化活動,而且大多數採用契約委外由民間廠商承辦,往往耗費巨資卻鮮少進行較嚴謹的績效衡量。本文採用績效觀感的研究途徑,並依據文化活動的複雜性質,發展出創新、負責、品質與效能等四項衡量文化活動契約委外階段的核心績效指標,進一步運用地方客家節慶包括傳統典慶(義民祭)與現代慶典(桐花祭)為經驗研究對象,透過委託人-代理人架構,針對契約委外的客家行政機關、承辦廠商以及地方公民團體和參與民眾等利害關係人進行訪談,分析它們對於客家文化活動的績效觀感,並深入探討績效觀感之間的差距及其原因,並根據文化活動契約委外的研究發現,提出提升績效的建議。
Taiwan's elected local administrative leaders have been keen to organize cultural campaigns, most of which are contracting out to private vendors. However, given the large amount of money spent, rigorous performance measurements are often lacking. Based on the complex nature of cultural campaigns, this article employed perceived performance approach and developed four core performance indicators to measure innovation, accountability, quality and effectiveness in outsourced cultural campaign stages. The article targeted local Hakka festivals, including traditional festivals (Yi-Ming Festival) and contemporary festivals (Tong Blossom Festival). Using a principal-agent framework, this article interviewed stakeholders including the Hakka administrative agencies contracting out the campaigns, the contractors, local nonprofit organizations and participating public to determine their perceptions of campaign performances. Furthermore, the reasons for differences in performance perceptions are also explored. Finally, according to the research findings on the outsourced cultural campaigns, this article recommended policy suggestions and institutional revision to improve performances.
期刊論文
1.Hodsoll, Frank(1998)。Measuring for Success and Failure in Government and the Arts。Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society,28(3),230-240。  new window
2.So, Bennis Wai Yip(2012)。Learning as a key to citizen-centred performance improvement: a comparison between the health service centre and the household registration office in Taipei City。The Australian Journal of Public Administration,71(2),201-210。  new window
3.胡龍騰(20070600)。公民引領之政府績效管理:初探性模式建構。行政暨政策學報,44,79-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Eshuis, Jasper、Braun, Erik、Klijn, Erik-Hans(2013)。Place marketing as governance strategy: An assessment of obstacles in place marketing and their effects on attracting target groups。Public Administration Review,73(3),507-516。  new window
5.蘇偉業(20090300)。公共部門事前定向績效管理:反思與回應。公共行政學報,30,105-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Behn, Robert D.(2003)。Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures。Public Administration Review,63(5),586-606。  new window
7.Van Slyke, David M.、Roch, Christine H.(2004)。What do they know, and whom do they hold accountable? Citizens in the government-nonprofit contracting relationship。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,14(2),191-209。  new window
8.朱金池、王俊元、郭銘峰(20141000)。從利害關係人途徑析探公部門績效管理:我國地方政府之經驗。文官制度季刊,6(4),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.莊文忠(20131200)。績效指標建構的二元論證:以地方政府廉政指數為例。法政學報,25,65-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.彭欽清(2017)。客家文化要發揚什麼?客家核心價值在哪裡?。世界客家,1,37-39。  延伸查詢new window
11.Bailey, Jackie、Richardson, Lance(2010)。Meaningful Measurement: A Literature Review and Australian and British Case Studies of Arts Organizations Conducting 'Artistic Self-assessment'。Cultural Trends,19(4),291-306。  new window
12.Brown, Trevor L.、Potoski, Matthew、Van Slyke, David(2009)。Contracting for Complex Products。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,20,i41-i58。  new window
13.Brown, Trevor L.、Potoski, Matthew、Van Slyke, David(2015)。Managing Complex Contracts: A Theoretical Approach。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,31(1),1-24。  new window
14.Döring, Heike、Downe, James、Martin, Steve(2015)。Regulating Public Services: How Public Managers Respond to External Performance Assessment。Public Administration Review,75(6),867-877。  new window
15.Girth, Amanda M.(2014)。A Closer Look at Contract Accountability: Exploring the Determinants of Sanctions for Unsatisfactory Contract Performance。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,24(2),317-348。  new window
16.Hartley, Jean、Sørensen, Eva、Torfing, Jacob(2013)。Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship。Public Administration Review,73(6),821-830。  new window
17.Hvidman, Ulrik、Andersen, Simon Calmar(2015)。Perceptions of Public and Private Performance: Evidence from a Survey Experiment。Public Administration Review,76(1),111-120。  new window
18.Liu, Nicole Ning、Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung、Zhan, Xueyong、Wang, Wei(2015)。Campaign-Style Enforcement and Regulatory Compliance。Public Administration Review,75(1),85-95。  new window
19.Tay, Richard(2005)。The Effectiveness of Enforcement and Publicity Campaigns on Serious Crashes Involving Young Male Drivers: Are Drink Driving and Speeding Similar?。Accident Analysis and Prevention,37,922-929。  new window
20.Verschuere, Bram、De Corte, Joris(2014)。The Impact of Public Resource Dependence on the Autonomy of NPOs in Their Strategic Decision Making。Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,43(2),293-313。  new window
21.Vining, Aiden R.、Weimer, David L.(1988)。Information Asymmetry Favoring Sellers: A Policy Framework。Policy Sciences,28,281-303。  new window
22.莊文忠(20081200)。績效衡量與指標設計:方法論上的討論。公共行政學報,29,61-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Ramia, Gaby、Carney, Terry(2000)。Contractualism, Managerialism and Welfare: the Australian Experiment with a Marketised Employment Services Network。Policy & Politics,29(1),59-83。  new window
會議論文
1.張維安(2006)。生態、文化與產業--竹苗地區臺三線文化產業消費者調查分析。苗栗火旁龍文化與觀光研討會,(會議日期: 2月10-12日)。苗栗:育達商業技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張四明、施能傑、胡龍騰(2012)。我國政府績效管理制度檢討與創新之研究。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖美玲(2010)。用故事打造節慶品牌的客家桐花祭之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Richards, Greg、Palmer, Robert、國立臺灣師範大學歐洲文化與觀光研究所(2012)。文化節慶管理。台北:桂魯有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Talbot, Colin(2010)。Theories of Performance: Organizational and Service Improvement in the Public Domain。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.丘昌泰(2000)。公共政策:基礎篇。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Osborne, David、Gaebler, Ted(1992)。Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
5.王雲東(2012)。社會研究方法。新北市:威仕曼。  延伸查詢new window
6.Smith, Melanie K.、國立臺灣師範大學歐洲文化與觀光研究所(2014)。文化觀光學。桂魯。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝世宗、劉瑞超(2012)。客家地方典慶和文化觀光產業:中心與邊陲的形質建構。臺北:客家委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.Taplin, Dana H.、Clark, Hèlene(2012)。Theory of Change Basics: A Primer on Theory of Change。New York:Act knowledge。  new window
9.羅清俊(2015)。公共政策:現象觀察與實務操作。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.羅烈師(2005)。義民信仰的傳播與形成--以臺灣平鎮褒忠祠為例。義民信仰與客家社會。臺北:南天出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱彥貴(2001)。從祭典儀式看北臺灣義民信仰。義民心、鄉土情:褒忠義民廟文史專輯。新竹:新竹縣文化局。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫煒(2014)。臺灣地方政府社會福利服務的契約治理。地方治理之趨勢與挑戰:臺灣經驗。臺北:臺灣民主基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃玉晴(20160000)。尋找客家文學:以客委會「桐花文學獎」發展為例。跨界思維:臺灣與全球客家的政策對話。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE