:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:民初俠影--以《小說大觀》收錄小說為例
書刊名:東吳中文線上學術論文
作者:賴万正
作者(外文):Lai, Wan-cheng
出版日期:2018
卷期:44
頁次:頁37-50
主題關鍵詞:小說大觀武俠編目The Grand MagazineMartial artsCataloging
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1
過往學者的論述將文學脈絡中的俠分剖明白,對於其所指的範圍與意義也已經有了清楚的辨析。然而有任俠、豪俠、遊俠、劍俠、義俠之籌的探討,卻獨獨忽略了「武俠」,好似此詞的使用,理所當然。林紓〈傅眉史〉於包天笑《小說大觀》刊登,是為史上第一篇分類題為「武俠小說」的作品。所待解決的是,「武俠小說」雖然由這篇發端,但整套《小說大觀》再無題為相同分類的作品,究竟早期「武俠」冠於小說之上是如何逐漸形成,而為大家所接受?本文由《小說大觀》季刊出版切入,由編輯凡例、前言、對應社會背景與包氏自己的回憶錄,肯定其小說一方面搭載在梁啟超興小說言論的潮流之中,一方面又同時隱含讀者導向的選材。而在武俠脈絡之下,這樣的編目創新有積極的意義,開創武俠分類,提供區隔古典「俠義」的稱呼,更顯示跨類的創作。而細究三篇與俠有關的文本發現,俠在當時代表一己之力,同時也是世道艱險之中的一種希望。目前學界對於民國初年「俠」之概念其實甚為模糊,本文只算釐清一二的開端,在這樣的開端之下,繼而可以再從其他更廣博的資料之中,多管齊下,進而窺見全豹,展現民初武俠的豐富全貌
The discourses of past scholars have divided the Xia in the literary context, and have clearly identified the scope and meaning of its reference. However, there are discussions about the "trustworthy man", "chivalrous man", "travelling man", "celestial man", and "chivalrous man". However, they alone ignore the " martial heroes ". Lin Biao's "Fu Mei Shi" published in Bao Tianxiao's "The Grand Magazine " was a work titled " Wuxia Novel" for the first classification in history. What remains to be solved is that although "martial arts novels" are originated by this story, the entire "novel grand view" is no longer titled the same classification works. How did the "martial arts" in the early stages of the novel come into being and was accepted by everyone? This article was published by the quarterly publication of "The Grand Magazine". From editorial examples, prefaces, corresponding social backgrounds, and Pao's own memoirs, he affirmed that his novels were carried on the one hand in the trend of Liang Qichaoxing's novels. On the other hand, they also chose for the readers. In the context of martial arts, such cataloging innovations have positive significance. On the one hand, it helps to popularize the word "martial arts". On the other hand, it provides the title of "chivalry" in classical novels. On the other hand, it also shows cross-class creation. . After careful study of the three texts related to Xia (俠), Xia represented his own power at the time and was also a hope in the difficulties of the world. At present, the academic community is actually very vague about the concept of "chivalry" in the early years of the Republic of China. This article only clarifies the beginning of January and February. Under this kind of starting point, we can then proceed from other more extensive sources and proceed to a multi-pronged approach. A glimpse of the whole leopard reveals the rich panorama of the early years of the martial arts
期刊論文
1.聶淳(2008)。包天笑與中國近、現代報刊業。新世紀圖書館,2008(1),95-98。  延伸查詢new window
2.王利濤(2009)。從場域理論看民初通俗文學期刊--以《小說大觀》為例。重慶師範大學學報.哲學社會科學版,2009(4),28-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.王利濤(2011)。場域視角下的民初第一小說季刊《小說大觀》。海南大學學報人文社會科學版,29(1),96-101。  延伸查詢new window
4.明鳳英(20100600)。小說家的辯言--包天笑的小說和困境。現代中文文學學報,10(1),122-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.范伯群(2011)。論民國武俠小說奠基作《近代俠義英雄傳》。西南大學學報.社會科學版,37(1),37-40。  延伸查詢new window
6.李仁淵(20050900)。新式出版業與知識份子:以包天笑的早期生涯為例。思與言,43(3),53-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王利濤(2004)。中國第一小說季刊《小說大觀》研究(碩士論文)。重慶師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郝奇(2010)。《小說大觀》研究(碩士論文)。復旦大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.何楓琪(2008)。包天笑及其小說研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.包天笑(1971)。釧影樓回憶錄。大華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Benjamin, Walter、張旭東、魏文生(1992)。發達資本主義時代的抒情詩人。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇天爵(1983)。滋溪文稿。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉洪生(1994)。武俠小說談藝錄:葉洪生論劍。臺北:聯經出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.曹正文(1997)。中國俠文化史。雲龍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.龔鵬程(2007)。大俠--俠的精神文化史論。臺北:風雲時代出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.包天笑(1990)。小說大觀。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
8.段懷清(2013)。清末民初報人:小說家:海上漱石生研究。臺北:獨立作家。  延伸查詢new window
9.汪應蛟。汪子中詮。北京大學圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.包天笑(1990)。小說大觀。江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社。  延伸查詢new window
11.龔鵬程、林保淳(1995)。廿四史俠客資料彙編。臺北:學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林保淳(2016)。〈傅眉史〉與武俠小說。縱橫今古說武俠。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.林保淳(2016)。從遊俠、少俠、劍俠到義俠--中國古代俠義觀念的演變。縱橫今古說武俠。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top