:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The Transcultural Situation of Contemporary Chinese-speaking Thought and Its Relation to the Chinese Script
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:宋灝
作者(外文):Obert, Mathias
出版日期:2018
卷期:53
頁次:頁47-71
主題關鍵詞:跨文化思維華語思維華語文字體系視像性身體Transcultural thoughtChinese-speaking philosophyChinese scriptIconicityBody
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:2
本文主要目標在於以當代華語思維為出發點,釐清當今跨文化思維所身處的情況。在「文化間性」、「跨文化性」等名義下被進行的反思通常大程度上忽略諸種語境之間的差異性及其所連帶的詮釋學問題,而且也完全忽視文字書寫這個課題。鑒此,在對現有的幾種跨文化思維的支流進行分析和批判之後,本文企圖解晰中文字獨有的「視像性」,進而從此觀察思考目前以華語被進行的跨文化思維的特殊處境。為了凸顯華語文字體系就其豐富且複雜的視像性特質而言固有的哲學潛力,本文聚焦在文字型態是如何藉由諸種聯想直接激發觀者對語意的掌握這個問題。於是,隱藏於文字視像中的身體、運動、觸發等因素獲得專注,以便讓我們將閱讀中文的過程理解為一種貫穿、牽連讀者一整個身體自我的「回應」。基於這些現象學分析,便可推出這樣的結論:應用華語及中文字的當代思維的大特點在於,哲學論述和哲學書寫這兩個層面之間有一種錯綜複雜的糾纏關係在發揮作用,使得當代華語思維在跨文化的領域上擁有其他當代思維所全無的思考資源,亦即思維深入滲透書寫,書寫又復深入貫穿思考這種獨一無二的特質
The main purpose of this paper is to clarify the present situation of transcultural thinking, such as it presents itself from the stance of contemporary Chinese-speaking philosophizing. Common approaches to "interculturality" or "transculturality" tend to largely underestimate the primary role which has to be attributed to the diversity of languages and hermeneutic problems, and they all the more totally neglect the problem of writing. For this reason, this paper first analyzes the main streams, such cross-cultural philosophical endeavors have been pursuing so far, in a critical perspective. Then it tries to elucidate the particular iconicity of the Chinese script, the latter representing one major peculiarity of contemporary transcultural thinking in the Chinese language. In order to emphasize the philosophical potential inherent in the rich and complex iconic features of the Chinese writing system, this paper focuses on how linguistic sense is constituted by the bias of associative impulses directly set forth by the shapes of the written characters, during visual intuition. Furthermore, it analyzes how the very iconic shape of a written character encompasses certain impressive, suggestive and motivating values, making its deciphering result in sort of a living response, on the part of the reader, which is deeply rooted in bodily conditions and body movement. All these observations finally lead to the conclusion that contemporary Chinese-speaking thinking in all its transcultural hybridity and transcultural dynamics has got one very important philosophical resource to be taken advantage of: by use of the iconic Chinese script, this thinking actually relies on an intimate embodiment of thought by its written form, and this complex relation between philosophical discourse and philosophical writing is unequalled by any other transcultural philosophical disposition in the present
期刊論文
1.Kwan, Tze-wan(2011)。Abstract Concept Formation in Archaic Chinese Script Forms: Some Humboldtian Perspectives。Philosophy East and West,61(3),409-452。  new window
2.Boodberg, Peter A.(1937)。Some Proleptical Remarks on the Evolution of Archaic Chinese。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,2(3/4),329-372。  new window
3.宋灝(20150300)。當代思維部署與書畫理論上的動勢。中國文哲研究通訊,25(1)=97,91-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.宋灝(20150600)。華語思維與文字動勢。漢學研究,33(2)=81,103-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Elberfeld, Rolf(2008)。Durchbruch zum Plural der Begriff der Kulturen bei Nietzsche。Nietzsche-Studien,37,115-142。  new window
6.Boodberg, Peter A.(1940)。Ideography' or Iconolatry?。T'oung Pao,35(4),266-288。  new window
7.Obert, Mathias(2002)。Buchnotiz: François Jullien: Umweg und Zugang. Strategien des Sinns in China und Griechenland. Wien 2000。Philosophische Rundschau,49(1),65-72。  new window
圖書
1.Karlgren, Bernhard(1923)。Sound and Symbol in Chinese。London:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Jullien, François(2007)。Chemin faisant, connaître la Chine, relancer la philosophie。Paris:Seuil。  new window
3.Husserl, Edmund(1952)。Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie。The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
4.Waldenfels, Bernhard(2010)。Sinne und Künste im Wechselspiel: Modi ästhetischer Erfahrung。Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp。  new window
5.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1969)。La prose du monde。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
6.Boltz, William(1994)。The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System。New Haven:Eisenbrauns。  new window
7.Adorno, Theodor W.(1973)。Ästhetische Theorie。Suhrkamp。  new window
8.Husserl, Edmund、Biemel, Marly(1952)。Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie: Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution。Den Haag:Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
9.Heidegger, Martin(1983)。Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit。Frankfurt am Main:Vittorio Klostermann。  new window
10.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1945)。Phénoménologie de la perception。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
11.Derrida, Jacques(1972)。Marges de la philosophie。Paris:Minuit。  new window
12.Karlgren, Bernhard(1957)。Grammata Serica Recensa。Stockholm:Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities。  new window
13.Mail, Ram Adhar(1989)。Die drei Geburtsorte der Philosophie. China, Indien, Europa。Bonn:Bouvier。  new window
14.Wimmer, Franz Martin(2002)。Essays on Intercultural Philosophy。Chennai:Satya Nilayam Publications。  new window
15.Wimmer, Franz Martin(1990)。Interkulturelle Philosophie: Geschichte und Theorie。Wien:Passagen。  new window
16.Billeter, Jean François(1989)。L'art chinois de l'écriture. Essai sur la calligraphie。Genève:Skira。  new window
17.Horkheimer, Max、Adorno, Theodor W.(2000)。Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente。Frankfurt a. M.:Fischer。  new window
18.Jullien, François(1998)。Un sage est sans idée ou l'autre de la philosophie。Paris:Seuil。  new window
19.Jullien, François、Marchaisse, Thierry(2000)。Penser d'un dehors (la Chine). Entretiens d'Extrême-Occident。Paris:du Seuil。  new window
20.Jullien, François(2001)。Du «temps». Eléments d'une philosophie du vivre。Paris:Grasset。  new window
21.Jullien, François(2012)。L'écart et l'entre, Leçon inaugurale de la Chaire sur l'altérité。Paris:Galilée。  new window
22.Kimmerle, Heinz(1994)。Die Dimension des Interkulturellen。Amsterdam:Rodopi。  new window
23.Unger, Ulrich、Stumpfeldt, Hans、Hanke, Martin(2009)。Kleine Schriften。Gossenberg:Ostasien Verlag。  new window
24.Husserl, Edmund、Fleischer, Margot(1966)。Analysen zur Passiven Synthesis: Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918-1926。Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
25.Merleau-Ponty, Maurice(1964)。Le visible et l'invisible。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE