:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同空間關係中人對不同擬人程度之機器人的感知
書刊名:設計學報
作者:程東奕陳圳卿 引用關係鄭孟淙 引用關係
作者(外文):Cheng, Tung-yiChen, Chun-chingZheng, Meng-cong
出版日期:2019
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁25-47
主題關鍵詞:空間關係擬人化設計恐怖谷ProxemicsAnthropomorphic designUncanny valley
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:6
本研究主要探討在不同空間關係中人對於不同擬人程度之機器人的感知。研究藉由問卷調查法,讓受測者在模擬感受與機器人互動的情境後,針對不同擬人程度之機器人頭部圖片進行評估,以了解其與機器人在不同空間中角色關係的主觀感知程度。研究結果顯示在不同空間關係中人對不同擬人程度之機器人的感知有所差異。在「親密空間關係」、「個人空間關係」與「社交空間關係」中,人們對於機器人擬人程度的適切度感受偏向於擬人程度高的機器人,同時亦具有較低的警戒感、較高的掌控感與較高的愉悅感。而在「公共空間關係」中,則對於擬人程度低的機器人的適切度感受較佳,並且具有較低的警戒感、較高的掌控感與較高的愉悅感。在「親密空間關係」、「個人空間關係」與「社交空間關係」中進行機器人外形設計時,應以擬人程度與真人相似的機器人為設計方向;而在「公共空間關係」中進行機器人外形設計時,低擬人程度的外形設計或許是更適合的選擇。
This study ascertains people's perception of robots with different degrees of anthropomorphic design in different spatial relationships. A questionnaire survey is conducted on subjects that simulate interactions with robots, and evaluate images of the head of robots with different degrees of anthropomorphic design, learning about their perception of the relationship with robots in different spaces. Research results show differences in the perception of robots with different degrees of anthropomorphic design in different spatial relationships. Subjects felt that higher degree of anthropomorphic design was more appropriate for robots in intimate space, personal space, and social space, and it resulted in higher pleasure, lower alertness, and higher dominance. In public space, subjects felt that lower degree of anthropomorphic design was more appropriate for robots, and it resulted in higher pleasure, lower alertness, and higher dominance. Results show that the appearance of robots should have a similar design to humans in intimate space, personal space and social space. And a design less similar to humans maybe a more suitable option in public space.
期刊論文
1.Bar, M.、Neta, M.(2006)。Humans prefer curved visual objects。Psychological Science,17(8),645-648。  new window
2.Duffy, B. R.(2003)。Anthropomorphism and the social robot。Robotics and Autonomous Systems,42(3/4),177-190。  new window
3.Green, R. D.、MacDorman, K. F.、Ho, C. C.、Vasudevan, S. K.(2008)。Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness。Computers in Human Behavior,24(5),2456-2474。  new window
4.MacDorman, K.、Coram J.、Ho C.、Patel, H.(2010)。Gender differences in the impact of presentational factors in human character animation on decisions in ethical dilemmas。Presence,19(3),213-229。  new window
5.Mori, Masahiro(1970)。The uncanny valley。Energy,7(4),33-35。  new window
6.Nass, C.、Steuer, J.(1993)。Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: Computers as social actors。Human Communication Research,19(4),504-527。  new window
7.Woods, S.(2006)。Exploring the design space of robots: Children's perspectives。Interacting with Computers,18(6),1390-1418。  new window
8.Turati, C.(2004)。Why faces are not special to newborns: An alternative account of the face preference。Current Directions in Psychological Science,13(1),5-8。  new window
9.Russell, James A.、Barrett, Lisa Feldman(1999)。Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76(5),805-819。  new window
10.Willis, J.、Todorov, A.(2006)。First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face。Psychological Science,17(7),592-598。  new window
11.董芳武(20130900)。兒童對人形機器人之感知與評價研究。設計學報,18(3),23-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Gray, K.、Wegner, D. M.(2012)。Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley。Cognition,125,125-130。  new window
13.MacDorman, K. F.、Ishiguro, H.(2006)。Opening Pandora's uncanny box: Reply to commentaries on The uncanny advantage of using androids in social and cognitive science research。Interaction Studies,7(3),361-368。  new window
14.Kim, Y.、Mutlu, B.(2014)。How social distance shapes human-robot interaction。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,72,783-795。  new window
15.Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M.、Krämer, N. C.(2014)。How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses。Computers in Human Behavior,36,422-439。  new window
16.Seyama, J.、Nagayama, R. S.(2007)。The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces。Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,16(4),337-351。  new window
17.Ekman, P.(1993)。Facial expression and emotion。American Psychologist,48(4),384-392。  new window
18.Donovan, Robert J.、Rossiter, John R.(1982)。Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach。Journal of Retailing,58(1),34-57。  new window
會議論文
1.Hanson, D.(2006)。Exploring the aesthetic range of humanoid robots。Vancouver:Cognitive Science Society。16-20。  new window
2.Bartneck, C.、Kanda, T.、Ishiguro, H.、Hagita, N.(2007)。Is the uncanny valley and uncanny cliff?。Jeju:IEEE。368-373。  new window
3.DiSalvo, C.、Gemperle, F.、Forlizzi, J.、Kiesler, S.(2002)。All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads。London:ACM。321-326。  new window
圖書
1.Littlejohn, S. W.、Foss, K. A.(2008)。Theories of human communication。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
2.Linden, David J.、張美惠(2011)。愉悅的祕密:解開人類成癮之謎。臺北:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Guthrie, S. E.(1997)。Anthropomorphism: A definition and a theory。Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals。New York, NY:State University of New York。  new window
4.Robert, F.、Robert, J.(2000)。Faces。San Francisco, CA:Chronicle Books。  new window
5.Tung, F. W.(2011)。The influence of gender and age on the attitudes of children towards humanoid robots。Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Applications。Heidelberg:Springer。  new window
6.Hall, E. T.(1969)。The hidden dimension。Doubleday。  new window
7.Mehrabian, Albert(1972)。Nonverbal Communication。Chicago, IL:Aldine Atherton。  new window
8.傅小蘭(2016)。情緒心理學。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Verderbe, Kathleen S.、Verderber, Rudolph F.、陸洛、周君倚、梁錦泉、陳楓媚、樊學良(2015)。人際關係與溝通。新北:前程。  延伸查詢new window
10.畢恆達(2016)。空間就是權力。心靈工坊文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Samovar, L. A.、Porter, R. L.、McDaniel, E. R.(2007)。Communication between cultures。Dubuque, IA:Brown & Benchmark。  new window
12.Yonck, Richard、范堯寬、林奕伶(2017)。情感運算革命。台北市:商周。  延伸查詢new window
13.Beattie, M.、蘇子堯、許妍飛(2015)。愛我就不要控制我--共依存症自我療癒手冊。台北市:心靈工坊。  延伸查詢new window
14.葉重新(2015)。心理學。新北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hay, L. L.、黃春華(2006)。創造生命的奇蹟。台北:天鏡文化。  延伸查詢new window
16.Maslow, Abraham Harold(1970)。Motivation and personality。Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
17.Turkle, Sherry(2011)。Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other。New York:Basic Books。  new window
18.王鴻祥、翁鶴嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑、Norman, Donald A.(2011)。情感@設計。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hekkert, P.、Leder, H.(2008)。Product aesthetics。Product Experience。Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE