:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國都市更新之演進與後設治理
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:柯于璋
作者(外文):Ke, Yu-chang
出版日期:2021
卷期:48:3
頁次:頁265-281
主題關鍵詞:都市更新後設治理治理失靈治理移轉混合治理Urban renewalMetagovernanceGovernance failureShifts of governanceMixed governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:144
  • 點閱點閱:11
期刊論文
1.Osborne, Stephen P.(2006)。The New Public Governance?。Public Management Review,8(3),377-387。  new window
2.邊泰明、黃泳涵(20130300)。信任與都市更新參與意願之研究。都市與計劃,40(1),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.章毅、林元興(20120900)。美國的都市更新。土地問題研究季刊,11(3)=43,74-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.江尚書、周素卿、吳幸玲(20100600)。都市再發展與新自由主義治理的經驗模式:以臺北車站特定專區之開發為例。都市與計劃,37(2),167-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張維修(20121200)。都市更新不曾發生:臺北市的上流化政策分析。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,20,63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇瑛敏(20110400)。淺談民眾自力更新公私協力之議題與策略。中華技術,90,72-74+76-79。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jessop, Bob(1997)。Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance。Review of International Political Economy,4(3),561-581。  new window
8.Sørensen, Eva、Torfing, Jacob(2009)。Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance。Public Administration,87(2),234-258。  new window
9.Marsh, D.(2011)。The New Orthodoxy: The Differentiated Polity Model。Public Administration,89(1),32-48。  new window
10.Kooiman, J.、Bavinck, M.、Chuenpagdee, R.、Mahon, R.、Pullin, R.(2008)。Interactive Governance and Governability: an Introduction。The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies,7(1),1-11。  new window
11.王宏文(20101200)。如何使增額稅收融資(TIF)在都市更新中發揮應有效益--從芝加哥市的經驗來看。土地問題研究季刊,9(4)=36,2-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳敦源(20050600)。為公共選擇辯護:論公共選擇理論與「公共性」議題在行政學中的相容性。行政暨政策學報,40,1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.藍逸之、李承嘉、林宜璇(20150600)。從擴大租隙解析都市更新條例之新自由主義邏輯:地產博奕或優質再生?。都市與計劃,42(2),109-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Stoker, Gerry(1998)。Governance as Theory: Five Propositions。International Social Science Journal,50(155),17-28。  new window
15.柯于璋(20150900)。我國都市更新條例政策變遷之研究--結合倡導聯盟架構與多層次學習的觀點。臺灣民主季刊,12(3),1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.柯于璋(20190900)。我國都市更新利益與分配正義之研究。都市與計劃,46(3),221-247。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.胡海豐(20150900)。都市更新、建築容積移轉與獎勵的經濟效率性。建築學報,93,105-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.胡海豐(20160300)。從「都市治理」到「公司治理」:都市更新的可行性探討。都市與計劃,43(1),31-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.楊重信(2010)。政治考量下之都市更新。新社會政策,11,8-12。  延伸查詢new window
20.Brinkerhoff, D. W.、Brinkerhoff, J. M.(2011)。Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on publicness, and good governance。Public Administration and Development,31(1),2-14。  new window
21.周素卿(19990500)。再造老臺北:臺北市都市更新政策的分析。國立臺灣大學理學院地理學系地理學報,25,15-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Bell, S.、Hindmoor, A.(2009)。Commentary: The governance of public affairs。Journal of Public Affairs,9(2),149-159。  new window
23.Rhodes, R. A. W.(1996)。The new governance: Governance without governments。Political Studies,44(4),652-667。  new window
24.陳敦源、張世杰(20100700)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Denhardt, Robert B.、Denhardt, Janet Vinzant(2000)。The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering。Public Administration Review,60(6),549-559。  new window
學位論文
1.林佑璘(2003)。臺北市實施都市更新歷程及影響之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bevir, Mark、Rhodes, R. A. W.(2010)。The State As Cultural Practice。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Meuleman, L.(2008)。Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks, and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations。Heidelberg:Physica-Verlag。  new window
3.張潤書(2006)。行政學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hughes, Owen E.(2003)。Public Management and Administration。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
5.Rhodes, Robert A. W.(1997)。Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability。Open University Press。  new window
6.Kooiman, Jan(2003)。Governing as Governance。Sage Publications。  new window
7.江岷欽、林鍾沂(1999)。公共組織理論。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.Peters, B. G.(2008)。The Two Futures of Governing: Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing。Institut für Höhere Studien。  new window
9.Thaler, R.、Sunstein, C.(2008)。Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness。Penguin。  new window
10.Niskanen, William A. Jr.(1971)。Bureaucracy and Representative Government。Chicago, IL:Aldine-Atherton。  new window
其他
1.李永展(2014)。容積獎勵了公益還是私利?,http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/255/article/1373。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭揚凱(20180511)。20年修法9次,台灣的都市更新為什麼還是一團亂?,https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/411/article/6878。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部(2017)。行政院院會通過都市更新條例修正草案務實改善都更問題,建構全面都更能量,https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/A3152D16ACC37F8B?A=C。  延伸查詢new window
4.花敬群(2014)。「自力更新」才是都更最核心的價值,http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/260/article/1367。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Jessop, B.(2011)。Metagovernance。The Sage Handbook of Governance。London:Sage。  new window
2.Marks, Gary、Hooghe, Liesbet(2004)。Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance。Multi-level Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Jessop, Bob(2000)。Governance Failure。The New Politics of British Local Governance。Macmillan。  new window
4.Jessop, B.(2003)。Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony。Governance as Social and Political Communication。Manchester University Press。  new window
5.Jessop, B.(2009)。From governance via governance failure and from multilevel governance to multi-scalar meta-governance。The Disoriented State: Shifts in Governmentality, Territoriality and Governance。Springer Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE