臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：重審臺灣憲法法院的政治角色--以大法官釋字第261號為例
書刊名：交大法學評論
作者：王金壽／宋昱嫺
作者(外文)：Wang, Chin-shou／Sung, Yu-hsien
出版日期：2021
卷期：9
頁次：頁1-55
主題關鍵詞：大法官；憲法法庭；261號解釋；民主化；司法政治；Justice；Constitutional Court；J. Y. Interpretation No. 261；Democratization；Judicial politics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:267
  • 點閱點閱:0
期刊論文
1.Whittington, Keith E.(2005)。Interpose your friendly hand: Political supports for the exercise of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court。American Political Science Review，99(4)，583-597。  new window
2.楊與齡(19980100)。大法官第二六一號解釋與我國憲政發展--「萬年國會」的形成與終結。憲政時代，23(3)，3-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chang, Wen-Chen(2005)。The role of judicial review in consolidating democracy: The case of Taiwan。Asia Law Review，2(2)，73-88。  new window
4.王金壽(20120600)。臺灣司法政治的興起。臺灣政治學刊，16(1)，61-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Graber, Mark A.(2011)。Hollow Hopes and Exaggerated Fears: The Canon/AntiCanon in Context。Harvard Law Review Forum，125，33-39。  new window
6.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(2009)。Romancing the Court。Boston University Law Review，89，563-579。  new window
7.Toharia, José J.(1975)。Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian -Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain。Law and Society Review，9(3)，475-496。  new window
8.吳乃德(20001200)。人的精神理念在歷史變革中的作用--美麗島事件和臺灣民主化。臺灣政治學刊，4，57-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Chu, Yun-han、Lin, Jih-wen(2001)。Political Development in the 20th Century Taiwan: State-Building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity。The China Quarterly，165，102-109。  new window
10.吳乃德(19890300)。搜尋民主化的動力：兼談民主轉型的研究取向。臺灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，145-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Bell, Derrick A. Jr.(1976)。Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation。The Yale Law Journal，85(4)，470-516。  new window
12.葉俊榮(19990100)。從國家發展與憲法變遷論大法官的釋憲機能：一九四九至一九九八。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，28(2)，1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Kuo, Ming-Sung(2016)。Moving Towards a Nominal Constitutional Court? Critical Reflections on the Shift from Judicial Activism to Constitutional Irrelevance in Taiwan's Constitutional Politics。Washington International Law Journal，25(3)，597-641。  new window
14.王金壽(20140600)。臺灣環境運動的法律動員：從三件環境相關判決談起。臺灣政治學刊，18(1)，1-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Kuo, Ming-sung、Chen, Hui-wen(2017)。The Brown Moment in Taiwan: Making Sense of the Law and Politics of the Taiwanese Same-Sex Marriage Case in a Comparative Light。Columbia Journal of Asian Law，31(1)，72-149。  new window
16.林建志(20140300)。Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Case of Taiwan。National Taiwan University Law Review，9(1)，103-160。new window  new window
17.官曉薇(20190300)。婚姻平權與法律動員--釋字第748號解釋前之立法與訴訟行動。臺灣民主季刊，16(1)，1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳美華(20190300)。性交易的罪與罰--釋字第666號解釋對性交易案件的法律效果。臺灣民主季刊，16(1)，45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Dahl, Robert A.(1957)。Decision-making in a democracy: The supreme court as a nation policy maker。Journal of Public Law，6，279-295。  new window
20.Klarman, Michael J.(1996)。Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions。Virginia Law Review，82(1)，1-67。  new window
21.林瑩秋(1992)。憲法法庭裡有一座傾斜很久的天平，現任大法官黨籍隸屬比例對憲法法庭的負面影響。新新聞周刊，292，74-75。  延伸查詢new window
22.翁文靜(1990)。法統已近黃昏，法制怎堪凋零。新新聞周刊，162，72-73。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳東豪(1990)。大法官臨門一腳，法學界判他越位。新新聞周刊，172，94-95。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳東豪(1994)。準大法官彎腰斟酒，眾國代合唱一杯一票。新新聞周刊，389，48-49。  延伸查詢new window
25.陳柔縉(1990)。林洋港點名「入學」，大法官裝啞「上課」。新新聞周刊，188，41。  延伸查詢new window
26.Balkin, Jack M.、Levinson, Sanford(2001)。Understanding the Constitutional Revolution。Virginia Law Review，87(6)，1045-1109。  new window
27.Graber, Mark A.(2017)。Judicial Supremacy Revisited: Independent Constitutional Authority in American Constitutional Law and Practice。William & Mary Law Review，58(5)，1549-1607。  new window
28.Hall, Matthew E. K.、Ura, Joseph Daniel(2015)。Judicial Majoritarianism。The Journal of Politics，77(3)，818-832。  new window
29.Klarman, Michael J.(2001)。How Great Were the 'Great' Marshall Court Decisions?。Virginia Law Review，87(6)，1111-1184。  new window
30.Klarman, Michael J.(2009)。Social Reform Litigation and It's Challenges: An Essay in honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg。Harvard Journal of Law & Gender，32，251-301。  new window
31.Lin, Chien-Chih(20160622)。The Judicialization of Politics in Taiwan。Asian Journal of Law and Society，3(2)，299-326。  new window
32.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(2001)。The Road Taken: Robert A. Dahl's Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker。Emory Law Journal，50，613-630。  new window
33.Schauer, Frederick(2000)。Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior。University of Cincinnati Law Review，68，615-636。  new window
34.Shapiro, Martin(1964)。Political Jurisprudence。Kentucky Law Journal，52(2)，294-345。  new window
35.Waldron, Jeremy(1998)。Review: Dirty Little Secret。Columbia Law Review，98(2)，510-530。  new window
36.Whittington, Keith E.(2002)。Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses。North Carolina Law Review，80(3)，773-851。  new window
37.Whittington, Keith E.、Rinderle, Amanda(2012)。Making a Mountain out of a Molehill? Marbury and the Construction of the Constitutional Canon。Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly，39(4)，823-860。  new window
38.Wood, Gordon S.(1999)。The Origins of Judicial Review Revisited, or How the Marshall Court Made More out of Less。Washington and Lee Law Review，56(3)，787-809。  new window
39.王振寰(19890300)。臺灣的政治轉型與反對運動。臺灣社會研究季刊，2(1)，71-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.吳佳樺(20121200)。難以置信的真相--論釋字第666號解釋與社會變遷。臺北大學法學論叢，84，71-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.翁岳生(20110615)。司法院大法官之解釋與臺灣民主政治及法治主義之發展。臺灣法學雜誌，178，1-22。  延伸查詢new window
42.葉俊榮(20031100)。轉型法院的自我定位：論憲法解釋對修憲機制的影響。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(6)，29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.Cheng, Tun-jen(1989)。Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan。World Politics，41(4)，471-499。  new window
44.Gillman, Howard(2004)。Martin Shapiro and the movement from "old" to "new" institutionalist studies in public law scholarship。Annual Review of Political Science，7，363-382。  new window
45.Weingast, Barry R.(1997)。The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law。The American Political Science Review，91(2)，245-263。  new window
46.葉俊榮(20020300)。從「轉型法院」到「常態法院」：論大法官釋字第二六一號與第四九九號解釋的解釋風格與轉型脈絡。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，31(2)，59-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Graber, Mark A.(1993)。The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary。Studies in American Political Development，7(1)，35-73。  new window
48.Helmke, Gretxhen、Rosenbluth, Frances(2009)。Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective。Annual Review of Political Science，12，345-366。  new window
49.Solomon, Peter H. Junior(2007)。Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes。World Politics，60(1)，122-145。  new window
50.Hirschl, Ran(2008)。The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Politic Court。Annual Review of Political Science，11，93-118。  new window
會議論文
1.陳慧雯(2020)。在民主改革浪潮下，終結萬年國會：釋字第261號解釋檔案。「大法官與轉型正義：從9份解釋談起」研討會，促進轉型正義委員會 。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.立法院(1990)。立法院公報。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張世賢(2010)。從萬年國會到全面改選--台灣民主化過程的一個面向(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡育倫(2002)。台灣民主化歷程中政治菁英、選舉機制及媒體的角色探討--以第一屆立法委員的退職歷程為個案(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.國是會議實錄編輯小組、國是會議秘書處(1990)。國是會議實錄。國是會議秘書處。  延伸查詢new window
2.McCloskey, Robert G.、Levinson, Sanford(2000)。The American Supreme Court。the University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.陶涵、林添貴(2000)。蔣經國傳--臺灣現代化的推手。台北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Shapiro, Martin(1964)。Law and Politics in the Supreme Court: New Approaches to Political Jurisprudence。New York：Free Press of Glencoe。  new window
5.Unger, Roberto Mangabeira(1996)。What should legal analysis become?。Verso。  new window
6.Gillman, Howard、Clayton, Cornell W.(1999)。The Supreme Court in American politics: New institutionalist interpretations。University Press of Kansas。  new window
7.Friedman, Barry(2009)。The Will Of The People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning Of the Constitution。New York, NY：Farrar, Straus and Giroux。  new window
8.Bickel, Alexander M.(1962)。The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics。  new window
9.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。  new window
10.吳乃德(2020)。臺灣最好的時刻，1977-1987：民族記憶美麗島。春山。  延伸查詢new window
11.李登輝、鄒景雯(2001)。李登輝執政告白實錄。印刻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.司法院司法行政廳(2004)。臺灣法界耆宿口述歷史。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
13.何智霖(2004)。立法院院長梁肅戎傳記。立法院議政博物館。  延伸查詢new window
14.宋楚瑜、方鵬程(2019)。從威權邁向開放民主：臺灣民主化關鍵歷程（1988-1993）。商周。  延伸查詢new window
15.邱萬興(2019)。台灣民主印象：邱萬興攝影集1986-2016。典藏文創。  延伸查詢new window
16.張特生(1997)。談人生說司法：一個司法工作者的人生體驗。植根。  延伸查詢new window
17.翁岳生、李建良(2021)。憶往述懷：我的司法人生。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳俊榮(1999)。大法官。揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
19.楊與齡(2018)。楊與齡大法官回憶錄：六十年司法改革真相。三民。  延伸查詢new window
20.Shapiro, Martin(1966)。Freedom of Speech: The Supreme Court and Judicial Review。  new window
21.Silverstein, Gordon(2009)。Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics。  new window
22.Sweet, Martin J.(2010)。Merely Judgment: Ignoring, Evading, and Trumping the Supreme Court。  new window
23.Kahn, Ronald、Kersch, Ken I.(2006)。The Supreme Court and American Political Development。  new window
24.若林正丈、洪金珠、許佩賢、吳密察(1994)。臺灣：分裂國家與民主化。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.梁肅戎(1995)。大是大非：梁肅戎回憶錄。臺北：天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.蔡玲、馬若孟、羅珞珈(1998)。中國第一個民主體系。臺北：三民。  延伸查詢new window
27.Ginsburg, Tom(2003)。Judicial review in new democracies: constitutional courts in Asian cases。Cambridge University Press。  new window
28.Lovell, George I.(2003)。Legislative Deferrals : Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
29.McCann, Michael W.(1994)。Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization。University of Chicago Press。  new window
30.Rosen, Jeffery(2006)。The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America。Oxford University press。  new window
31.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(1991)。The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?。University of Chicago Press。  new window
32.Ginsburg, Tom、Moustafa, Tamir(2008)。Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
33.Whittington, Keith E.(2007)。Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University。  new window
34.Moustafa, Tamil(2007)。The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Reform in Egypt。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
35.Powe, Lucas A.(2002)。The Warren Court and American Politics。Cambridge, MA。  new window
36.Powe, Lucas A.(2009)。The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789-2008。Cambridge, MA。  new window
37.Trochev, Alexei(2008)。Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990-2006。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.夏珍(19910305)。梁肅戎保證絕不讓立院議事再陷入混亂，中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Graber, Mark A.(2005)。From Republic to Democracy: The Judiciary and the Political Process。Institution of Democracy: The Judicial Branch。  new window
2.Tate, C. Neal(1995)。Why the Expansion of Judicial Power?。The Global Expansion of Judicial Power。New York, NY：New York University。  new window
3.Chang, Wen-Chen(2017)。The Constitutional Court of Taiwan。Comparative Constitutional Reasoning。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Adamany, David、Meinhold, Stephen(2003)。Robert Dahl: Democracy, Judicial Review, and the Study of Law and Courts。The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior。  new window
5.Kritzer, Herbert M.(2003)。Martin Shapiro: Anticipating the New Institutionalism。The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior。  new window
6.吳乃德(2004)。回憶蔣經國、懷念蔣經國。二十世紀臺灣民主發展：第七屆中華民國史專題論文集。臺北市：國史館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：699（臺灣：640，外國：59） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1293556 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67097056
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上