:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣新政商關係的形成與政治轉型
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:王振寰 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Jenn-hwan
出版日期:1993
卷期:14
頁次:頁123-163
主題關鍵詞:政商關係政治轉型國家機器資本The stateCapitalPolitical transition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(16) 專書(10) 專書論文(7)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:626
  • 點閱點閱:310
     本文在討論臺灣政商關係的改變與政治轉型之間的關係。本文的主要問題是:是 甚麼原因造成臺灣政商關係的轉型,而這個轉型又意味著甚麼樣的社會政治轉變?本文從國 家機器,資產階級,以及下層人民的動員三個因素來解釋臺灣政治的自由化與新政商關係的 出現。本文指出,臺灣的政治轉型,與大?的動員和對威權體制的抗拒有密切的關係,由於 大?的動員使得國家機器與資產階級之間產生更密切的聯盟關係。最後,本文指出雖然資產 階級對國家機器的影響力逐漸的增加,但是國家機器並沒有失去主導的力量,資本家與國家 機器之間的關係是從“父子關係”轉變到“大小伙伴”的聯盟關係。
     The main question of this paper is: what factors have caused the transformation of state-capital relationship in Taiwan's recent political transition? This paper uses three factors in accounting for this transformation: the state, the capitalist, and the popular movement. The main argument is: while the popular movement has caused Taiwan's recent political transition, it has also been responsible for the rise of a neo-authoritarian regime that transforms the state-capital relationship from a patrimonial to a senior-junior type of alliance. However, though this transformation has allowed the capitalists to have more influence on the state, the KMT state still has kept its autonomy in major decision-making processes.
期刊論文
1.Zeitlin, Maurice(1976)。Class Segments: Agrarian Property and Political Leadership in the Capitalist Class of Chile。American Sociological Review,41,1006-1029。  new window
2.吳乃德(19890300)。搜尋民主化的動力:兼談民主轉型的研究取向。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),145-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.徐瑞希(1991)。臺灣企業政商關係史。商業周刊,1991(9/10月號)。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃德福(19900300)。選舉、地方派系與政治轉型:七十八年底三項公職人員選舉之省思。中山社會科學季刊,5(1),84-96。  延伸查詢new window
5.Amsden, Alice(1979)。Taiwan's Economic History。Modern China,5(3),341-80。  new window
6.Block, Fred(1977)。The Ruling Class Does Not Rule。Socialist Revolution,33,6-27。  new window
7.Dupul, Arthur、Thuchil, Barry(1979)。Problems in the Theory of State Capitalism。Theory and Society,8(1)。  new window
8.Schmitter, Philippe(1974)。Still the Century of Corporatism。Review of Politics,36,85-131。  new window
9.王振寰(19880200)。國家角色、依賴發展與階級關係:從四本有關臺灣發展的研究談起。臺灣社會研究,1(1),117-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王振寰(19910600)。出現中的市民社會及其限制。二十一世紀,5,57-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張家銘(19910300)。戰後臺灣地區企業與政府的關係:一種家父長的政治經濟權威結構。中山社會科學季刊,6(1),13-34。  延伸查詢new window
12.Perez Sainz, Juan P.(1980)。Toward A Conceptualization of State Capitalism in the Periphery。The Insurgent Sociologists,9(4),59-65。  new window
13.Offe, C.、Ronge, V.(1975)。Thesis on the Theory of the State。New German Critique,6,137-147。  new window
14.Therborn, Goran(1977)。The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy。New Left Review,105。  new window
15.林佳龍(19890300)。威權侍從政體下的臺灣反對運動:民進黨社會基礎的政治解釋。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),117-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王振寰(19890300)。臺灣的政治轉型與反對運動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),71-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Winckler, Edwin(1989)。Taiwan Politics in the 1990s: From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism。Conference on Democratization in the ROC,he Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University (會議日期: Jan. 9-11. 1989.)。  new window
研究報告
1.陳明通(1989)。區域性聯合獨佔經濟,地方派系與省議員選舉。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Gold, Thomas B.(1981)。Dependent Development in Taiwan(博士論文)。Harvard University。  new window
2.吳介民(1990)。政體轉型期的社會抗議--台灣1980年代(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rueschemyer, Dietrich(1992)。Capitalist Development and Democracy。London:Polity。  new window
2.Lipset, S. M.(1965)。Political Man。NY:Doubledays。  new window
3.Gold, Thomas B.(1985)。State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
4.(1989)。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1990)。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
6.中華徵信所。臺灣前五百大企業集團。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1990)。財訊雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
8.(19890200)。新新聞。  延伸查詢new window
9.(19890800)。新新聞。  延伸查詢new window
10.(19901200)。新新聞。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1990)。戰略生產力雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
12.Domhoff, G. W.(1990)。The Power Elite and the State。Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
13.Gramsci, Anthonio(1971)。Selections from the Prison Notebooks。London:Lawrence and Wishart。  new window
14.Jessop, Bob(1990)。State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place。London:Polity。  new window
15.Moore, Barrington Jr.(1966)。Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
16.O'Donnell, G.、Schmitter, Philippe C.(1986)。Transitions From Authoritarian Rule。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
17.Lenin, V. I.(1971)。States and Revolution。NY:Internationals。  new window
18.Marshall, T. H.(1966)。Class, Citizenship and Social Development。Westport, Con:Greenwood Press。  new window
19.Poulantzas, Nicos(1978)。State, Power, Socialism。London:NLB。  new window
20.Zeitlin, Maurice(1984)。The Civil Wars in Chile。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
21.Evans, Peter B.(1979)。Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil。Princeton University Press。  new window
22.張茂桂(1990)。社會運動與政治轉化。臺北:國家政策研究資料中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳師孟、林忠正、朱敬一、施俊吉、劉錦添、張清溪(19920000)。解構黨國資本主義 : 論臺灣官營事業之民營化。臺北:自立晚報。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Deyo, Frederic C.(1987)。The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism。Cornell University Press。  new window
25.Przeworski, Adam(1991)。Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.(19900410)。中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐正光(19900509)。如何面對一個全新的政治生態。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19890104)。經濟日報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Evans, Peter(1982)。Reinventing the Bourgeoisie: State Entrepreneurship and Class Formation in Dependent Development。The Marxist Inquiry。AJS Supplementary。  new window
2.周添城(1989)。權力邊陲的中小企業。壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭新煌(1989)。臺灣新興社會運動的剖析。壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺灣研究基金會。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Tilly, Charles(1986)。Warmaking and Statemaking as Organized Crime。Bringing the State Back In。NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.朱雲漢(1989)。寡佔經濟與威權政治體制。壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺北:臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
6.林忠正(1989)。威權主義下弱勢團體的相互剝削的循環。壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cardoso, F. H.(1979)。On the Characterization of the Bureauractic--Authoritarian Regime。The Modern Authoritarianism in Latin America。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.Cardoso, F. H.(1986)。Entrepreneurs and the Transition Process: the Brazilian Case。Transitions From Authoritarian Rule。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Evans, Peter(1987)。Class, State, and Dependence in East Asia: Lessons for Latin America。The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
10.Gold, Thomas(1988)。Entrepreneurs, Multinationals, and the State。The Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan。NY:Sharpe。  new window
11.O'Donnell, Guillermo(1979)。Tensions in the B-A State and the Question of Democracy。The Modern Authoritarianism in Latin America。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
12.Amsden, Alice H.(1985)。The State and Taiwan's Economic Development。Bringing the State Back In。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Przeworski, Adam(1986)。Some Problems in the Study of Transition to Democracy。Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy。The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE