:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響情感與財務支持連繫的因素
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:熊瑞梅 引用關係
出版日期:1994
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁303-333
主題關鍵詞:情感財務支持
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:92
     這篇研究論文是用臺灣全國性的調查資料,探索出影響1228個情感的或財務支持 連繫的因素。研究發現提供支持者的特質及關係維繫之機制比需要支持者的特質更明顯地影 響了情感或財務支持連繫形成的機率。性別和教育代表不同的位置資源。男性傾向於提供更 多的財務支持,而女性傾向於提供更多的情感支持。高教育者較傾向於提供情感支持,而低 教育者較傾向於提供財務支持。關係內容,連繫強度,及支持需要者及提供者特質的相似性 是關係維繫機制的成份。在臺灣,影響不同支持連繫最重要的變項是關係內容。一般親屬較 傾向於提供財務支持, 而非親屬較傾向於提供情感支持。 親屬對財務支持連繫的影響較 Wellman and Wortley (1989, 1990) 為大。 在臺灣父子軸,兄弟姐妹軸,及其他親屬軸全 顯著地提供財務支持的機率較提供情感支持的機率為高。
     This paper examines the factors affecting 1228 intimate ties of emotional and financial support studied in a nationwide Taiwanese survey. It found that the characteristics of support providers and the maintenance mechanism of relationships are more important than the characteristics of those demanding the support in explaining the probability of forming emotional or financial support ties. Sex and education represent differential positional resources. Men tend to provide more financial support, and women tend to provide more emotional support. Highly educated people tend to provide more emotional support, and less educated people tend to provide more financial support. The content of relationships, the strength of ties, and the similarity of characteristics are components of maintenance mechanism of relationships. The most important in Taiwan is the content of relationships: kin tend to provide more financial support and nonkin tend to provide more emotional support. The financial support ties of kin are much stronger than Wellamn and Wortley found (1989, 1990) . Parents-children, brothers-sisters, and other kin all significantly provide more financial support ties than emotional support ties.
期刊論文
1.Aneshensel, C. S.、Frerichs, R. R.(1982)。Stress, Support, and Depression: A Longitudinal Causal Model。Journal of Community Psychology,10(4),363-376。  new window
2.Marsden, Peter V.(1987)。Core Discussion Networks of Americans。American Sociological Review,52(1),122-131。  new window
3.Hunter, Albert(1975)。The loss of community: an empirical test through replication。American Sociological Review,40(5),537-552。  new window
4.孫清山(19791100)。都市社區的閭鄰社會關係。科學發展月刊,7(11),1147-1155。  延伸查詢new window
5.伊慶春、章英華(19891200)。都市意象:以臺北市居民為例的探討。中國社會學刊,13,43-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝國雄(19890600)。黑手變頭家--臺灣製造業中的階級流動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(2),11-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.伊慶春(19880500)。臺北市的社區類別與鄰里關係。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,19,77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Feld, Scott(1982)。Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates。American Sociological Review,47(6),797-801。  new window
9.Marsden, Peter(1988)。Homogeneity in Confiding Relations。Social Networks,10,57-76。  new window
10.Van der Poel, Mart G. M.(1993)。Delineating Personal Support Networks。Social Networks,15,49-70。  new window
11.Verbrugge, Lois(1977)。The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices。Social Forces,56,576-597。  new window
12.Wellman, Barry、Wortley, Scot(1990)。Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support。American Journal of Sociology,96(3),558-588。  new window
13.Wellman, Barry、Wortley, Scot(1989)。Situating Kinship Relations in Broader Networks of Social Support。Sociological Perspectives,32(3),273-306。  new window
14.Wellman, Barry、Leighton, Barry(1979)。Networks, Neighborhoods and Communities: Approaches to the Study of the Community Question。Urban Affairs Quarterly,15,363-390。  new window
15.Kasarda, John D.、Janowitz, Morris(1974)。Community Attachment in Mass Society。American Sociological Review,39(3),328-339。  new window
16.黃清高(19850900)。都市居民社會網絡之研究。思與言,23(3),35-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳介玄、高承恕(19910600)。臺灣企業運作的社會秩序--人情關係與法律。東海社會科學學報,10,219-231。  延伸查詢new window
18.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
19.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
會議論文
1.Van der Poel, Mart G. M.(1992)。Building Personal Networks: Structural Constraints or Personal Preferences。The XII International Sunbelt Network Conference。San Diego, CA.。  new window
研究報告
1.孫清山、熊瑞梅(1988)。社會資源與社會流動。  延伸查詢new window
2.熊瑞梅(1991)。社會資源、社會流動與居住流動。  延伸查詢new window
3.熊瑞梅、東海大學社會學系[計畫執行](1992)。快速成長的郊區之菁英影響力結構及居民社會資源 (計畫編號:NSC 81-0301-H029-01)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳寶秀(1990)。臺灣製造業員工個人社會網絡分析(碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王仕圖(1993)。快速成長社區的居民支持網絡與社區情感之研究--以「曉蘭社區」為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃清高(1985)。都市社會網絡與地緣關係之研究--台北都會區社區發展方向探討與社區組織系統設計(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.伊慶春(1985)。都市社會網絡與地緣關係之研究--以臺北為例,探討都會區社區發展方向與社區組織系統。台北:中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.費孝通(1949)。鄉土中國與鄉土重建。上海:觀察社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fischer, Claude S.(1977)。Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting。New York:The Free Press。  new window
4.Gans, Herbert(1982)。The Urban Villagers。The Free Press。  new window
5.House, James S.(1981)。Work Stress and Social Support。Addison-Wesley。  new window
6.Fischer, Claude S.(1982)。To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.章英華(1988)。都會化與機會結構及人際關係態度。變遷中的臺灣社會。中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Blau, Peter(1982)。Structural Sociology and Network Analysis: An Overview。Social Structure and Network Analysis。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Granovetter, Mark(1982)。The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited。Social Structure and Network Analysis。Beverly Hills, Calif.:Sage。  new window
4.Lin, Nan(1986)。Conceptualizing Social Support。Social Support Life Events, and Depression。Academic Press, Inc.。  new window
5.Kadushin, Charles(1981)。Notes on expectations of Reward in N-person Networks。Continuities in Structural Inquiry。Berverly Hills, Calif.:Sage。  new window
6.Perlin, L. I.(1984)。Social Structure and Social Support。Social Support and Health。New York:Academic Press。  new window
7.Wellman, Barry(1981)。Applying Network Analysis to the Study of Support。Social Networks and Social Support。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
8.Wellman, Barry(1982)。Studying Personal Communities。Social Structure and Network Analysis。Beverly Hills, Calif.:Sage。  new window
9.Wellman, Barry(1988)。The Community Question Re-evaluated。Power, Community and the City。New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction。  new window
10.Wellman, Barry(1992)。Men in Networks: Private Communities, Domestic Friendships。Men's Friendships。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
11.Wellman, Barry、Carrington, Peter J.、Hall, Alan(1991)。Networks as Personal Communities。Social Structures: A Network Approach。Cambridge Press。  new window
12.Lin, Nan(1982)。Social Resources and Instrumental Action。Social Structure and Network Analysis。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE