:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:消音的傳奇--電視古裝劇價值認同的啟示
書刊名:新聞學研究
作者:蔡琰 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Yean
出版日期:1998
卷期:56
頁次:頁85-103
主題關鍵詞:電視戲劇價值認同TelevisionDramaValueIdentity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:51
     這篇論文藉古裝歷史人物電視劇,報告現代觀眾從電視播出的古人故事中,經驗哪些生活規範以及社會價值。研究追問什麼是電視劇重要的道德?什麼是觀眾認同的善良? 本研究從電視歷年來重複最多的題材「包青天」以及「劉伯溫」,檢視古裝電視劇究竟向觀眾展現什麼特定的價值信念。研究結果顯示,古裝劇不是社會的鏡子。古裝劇訴說著一些特定道德信念,同時也是一部消失聲音的現代傳奇,無關科技、民主、自由、平權平等、以及獨立自主。 依據包曼(Emest Bormann)之符號聚合理論(symbolic convergency theory),人們共享象徵符號所架構的真實,最後被共享的訊息所影響。古裝劇可能增強某些既存之道德與價值信念,不在改變。電視用戲劇節目延緩社會變化,是一個值得繼續觀察討論的現象。
     The purpose of this research is to find out what social values and some common morals are in the historic television drama. The study examines two most frequently presented television series, “Pao Chin-tien” and “Liu Po-wen”. Both series have involved Chinese historic figures, but the plots are fictional. The study revealed that the two drama series held a common moral of respecting leaders in political offices and followed an optimistic social attitude. It seemed that historic television series aimed at reinforcing social values rather than encouraging any revolutionary thoughts. Emest Bormann uses symbolic convergence theory to explain how symbolic reality influences beliefs in social reality. Current historic television series neglect contemporary social aspects such as science, democracy, equal rights, and independence. Such a phenomenon, which might decay social change due to the media's used of symbolic reality, is an issue worthy of further observation and discussion.
研究報告
1.蔡琰(1994)。電視戲劇類型與公式分析。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cragan, J. F.、Shields, D. C.(1995)。Symbolic theories in applied communication research: Bormann, Burke, and Fisher。Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press。  new window
2.亞里斯多德、姚一葦(1973)。詩學箋註。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gadamer, H. G.、洪漢鼎(1993)。真理與方法--哲學詮釋學的基本特徵。上海:臺北市:上海譯文出版社:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡琰(1996)。電視歷史劇價值系統與社會意識分析。臺北:文化總會電研會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Real, M. R.(1989)。Super media: A cultural studies approach。Sage。  new window
6.Carey, James(1988)。Media, Myths, and Narratives: Television and the Press。Beverly Hills:Sage。  new window
7.朱生豪(1993)。仲夏夜之夢。仲夏夜之夢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.朱生豪(1993)。皆大歡喜。皆大歡喜。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.徐士瑚(1985)。西歐戲劇理論。北京:中國戲劇出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.孫乃修(1993)。莎士比亞傳。莎士比亞傳。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1981)。Understanding Television - Essays on Television as a Social and Cultural Force。Understanding Television - Essays on Television as a Social and Cultural Force。N. Y.。  new window
12.Berger, A. A.(1991)。Media USA - Process and Effect。Media USA - Process and Effect。N. Y.。  new window
13.(1987)。Television in Society。Television in Society。New Brunswick, NJ。  new window
14.(1994)。Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research。Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research。Hillsdale, NJ。  new window
15.Dukore, B. F.(1974)。Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski。N.Y.:Holt Rinehart and Winston。  new window
16.Himmelstein, H.(1984)。Television Myth and the American Mind。N. Y.:Praeger。  new window
17.Kervin, D.(1991)。Gender ideology in television commercials。Television Criticism: approaches and applications。N. Y.。  new window
18.McGuire, W. J.(1991)。Who's afraid of the big bad media。Media USA - Process and Effect。N. Y.。  new window
圖書論文
1.楊國樞(19940000)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存?。中國人的價值觀 : 社會科學觀點。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE