:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐代的債務保人
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:羅彤華 引用關係
作者(外文):Lo, Tung-hwa
出版日期:1998
卷期:16:1=31
頁次:頁59-90
主題關鍵詞:唐代保人債務保人留住保證支付保證T'ang dynastyGuarantorLiability guarantorCircumstantial guaranteeDispensation guarantee
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:372
  • 點閱點閱:16
     唐代保證人的種類繁多,本文只就債務擔保中的保證人立論。債務保人的概念在 唐代始具體成形,它是傳統時代法制發展過程中,人們維謢債權,保障個人自身利益的一個 重要里程碑。 債務保人是指在債務人逃亡或身故,而不能履行債務時,為之代價債務的第三者,亦即 其主要負擔的是留住保證。該項制度的優點,在穩定債權債務關係。 促進社會經濟發展,同時,保人也不直接承擔債務壓力。債務保人在債務關係中可有可 無,視當事人之需要而定,但最多不超過五人。擔任保人者多是與被保人關係密切的親屬, 或與之相熟的鄰人、朋友。各保人的責任分擔方式,是以平均分攤為原則,於必要時才負連 帶責任。保人的償付次序,通常後於債務人及其共產親。保人的法律責任,以民事之留住與 代償為主,受刑事處分的不多。
     While many different types of guarantors existed during the T'ang dynasty, this article focuses in particular on liability guarantors. The liability guarantor concept developed during the T'ang dynasty was an important milestone in the process of the traditional judicial system in terms of the protection of entitlements and personal interests. A liability guarantor was defined as a third party who was bound to repay a debt in the event that the original debtor either absconded or passed away. The main advantage of this system was that it established a stable relationship between entitlements and liabilities, thus promoting social and economic development. Moreover, guarantors were not subjected directly to debt pressure. Liability guarantors were optional in liability relationships; the decision of whether or not to use them was based on the needs of the involved parties, and the maximum number of guarantors was set at five. Those who assumed the responsibility of serving as guarantor tended to be the warrantee's close relatives, neighbors or friends. Each guarantor shared an equal amount of responsibility, and only took on a fringe responsibility when necessary. Guarantors were not required to repay immediately when the debtor absconded or passed away, but rather to assume responsibility only if the debtor's assets fell short after liquidation. While liability guarantors were saddled with civil and criminal responsibilities, as long as the lender did not file a suit, guarantors had only to repay the debt, and were free from criminal prosecution.
期刊論文
1.羅彤華(199709)。唐代的伍保制。新史學,8(3),1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.池田溫(1973)。中國古代の租佃契。東洋文化研究所紀要,60。  延伸查詢new window
3.秋月觀暎(1954)。唐代宗教刑法に關する管見。東方宗教,4/5。  延伸查詢new window
4.石田勇作(1990)。吐魯番出土「舉錢契」雜考。駿臺史學,78,120-121。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.池田温(1979)。中国古代籍帳研究。東京:東京大学東洋文化研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.仁井田陞(19830210)。唐宋法律文書の研究。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yamamoto, Tatsuro、Ikeda, On(1987)。Tun-huang and Turfan Documents concerning Social and Economic History(III)。Tun-huang and Turfan Documents concerning Social and Economic History(III)。Tokyo。  new window
3.仁井田陞(1981)。唐代の鄰保制度。東京。  延伸查詢new window
4.王文誥(1971)。唐代叢書。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.王梵志、張錫厚(1983)。王梵志詩校輯。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.喬偉(1985)。唐律研究。濟南:山東人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.李昉(1965)。文苑英華。台北:華聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.杜佑(1987)。通典。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.清聖祖(1960)。全唐詩。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.杜牧、陳允吉、裴延翰(1979)。樊川文集。臺北:九思出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.錢大群、錢元凱(1989)。唐律論析。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉俊文(1989)。敦煌吐魯番唐代法制文書考釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.仁井田陞(1983)。唐令拾遺。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
14.戴炎輝(1977)。唐律通論。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
15.長孫無忌、劉俊文(1986)。唐律疏議。臺北:弘文館出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.滋賀秀三(1981)。中國家族法の原理。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
17.戴炎輝(1988)。唐律各論。臺北:成文出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李昉、汪紹楹(1981)。太平廣記。文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.仁井田陞(1983)。中國身分法史。東京:東京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.王溥(1974)。唐會要。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.王梵志、項楚(19911000)。王梵志詩校注。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.歐陽修、宋祁(1976)。新唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.戴炎輝(1979)。中國法制史。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.蔣禮鴻(1997)。敦煌變文字義通釋。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.董誥(1990)。全唐文。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.劉昫(1976)。舊唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
27.李林甫、陳仲夫(1992)。唐六典。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.唐耕耦、陸宏基(1990)。敦煌社會經濟文獻真蹟釋錄。北京:全國圖書館文獻縮微複製中心。  延伸查詢new window
29.仁井田陞。元明清代および黎氏安南の保証制。中國法制史研究(第2冊)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
30.池田溫(1987)。敦煌の便榖歷。日野開三郎博士頌壽紀念論集──中國社會‧制度‧文化史の諸問題。福岡。  延伸查詢new window
31.中田薰(1943)。唐宋時代の家族共產制。法制史論集。東京。  延伸查詢new window
32.中田薰(1943)。我古法に於ける保証及び連帶債務。法制史論集。東京。  延伸查詢new window
33.仁井田陞。唐宋時代の保証と質制度。中國法制史研究(第2冊)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
34.張文見(1981)。魏晉隋唐史論集。魏晉隋唐史論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
35.唐耕耦(1980)。敦煌寫本便物曆初探。敦煌吐魯番文獻研究論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
36.鄭玉波(1974)。民法債編各論。民法債編各論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
37.(1996)。唐律疏議譯註篇四。唐律疏議譯註篇四。東京。  延伸查詢new window
38.曹漫之(1989)。唐律疏議釋注。唐律疏議釋注。長春。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)竇儀(1974)。宋刑統,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1981)。周禮,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(宋)王欽若(1972)。冊府元龜,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1989)。令義解,東京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(西漢)司馬遷(1993)。史記。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1974)。通鑑,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.吐魯番出土文書﹙第四冊﹚,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.令集解。  延伸查詢new window
9.唐大紹令集。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.坂本太郎(1984)。日唐令の篇目の異同について。律令制の諸問題。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE