:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:道德實驗課程中愛國德目「回到從前」單元課程決定的省思--多元文化教育觀點
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:王前龍 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chien-lung
出版日期:1998
卷期:1:4
頁次:頁29-41+135-136
主題關鍵詞:多元文化教育課程決定課程發展課程社會學道德教育Multicultural educationCurriculum decision-makingCurriculum developmentSociology of curriculumMoral education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:460
  • 點閱點閱:42
     臺灣省國民學校教師研習會的道德課程實驗研究小組,於84學年度發展國小五年 級愛國德目「回到從前」單元。由於課程標準修訂於威權時代,因此本單元內容項目:熱愛 我國優良文化和傳統、體念先人的努力,隱含著大中國意識與漢族中心的意識型態。但隨著 臺灣社會的民主化,課程小組基於多元化教育的觀點,對其重新加以詮釋,但也面臨若干限 制。首先,單元中不再選取代表仇日、漢族中心等意識型態的歷史人物,轉而希望兒童從祖 先、長輩生活中認同傳統文化並體念先人努力;其次,基於兩性平權的考量,課文的編寫也 以女性為主角,但真正表現單元內涵的人物卻仍是男性。最後在族群平等方面,教學活動設 計雖然透過不同背景的兒童分享彼此文化來學習相互遵重,但課文編寫仍無可避免的選擇以 最多數、最具權力的閩南文化為代表。
     In 1995, the Moral Curriculum Group of Taiwan Provincial Institute for Elementary School Teachers' Inservice Education (IEST) developed the teaching unit regarding "patriotism" "Back to the past" for fifth grade students of elementary schools. There are some suthoritarian ideologies in the curriculum content regarding "patriotism," because the moral curriculum standard was revised in the authoritarian age in Taiwan. Therefore, in the teaching unit, the content outlines, "loving our country's excellent culture and tradition fervently" and "appreciating the efforts of ancestors, "basically represent the ideology of "Chinese ethnocentrism." However, under the democratized social context nowadays in Taiwan, the curriculum group re-interpreted the meanings of the content outlines based on the idea of multicultural education. Firstly, when editing the content, the curriculum group no longer chose the political figures to represent the ideologies of the past authoritarian age like "anti-Japan," "anti-Communist" and "Chinese ethnocentrism." Contrarily, the curriculum group intended to make children identify traditional culture through understanding their ancestors' lives. Secondly, based on the consideration of gender equality, the author chose a girl as the main character to avoid gender stereotypes while writing the reading article. However, the figure representing the content of the unit was a man, actually her grandfather. Thirdly, based on the emphasis of equality between ethnic groups, the curriculum group intended to make the children of each ethnic group in Taiwan share each other's traditional culture and respect it mutually. However, the culture of the new major and dominant ethnic group was still chosen in the reading article.
期刊論文
1.王前龍(19980200)。國家認同與國小道德科「愛國」德目的課程發展。教師之友,39(1),40-45。  延伸查詢new window
2.但昭偉(1995)。國小道德與健康科德目之--愛國。康橋教研學會雜誌,9,62-63。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊明貞(19950600)。「多元文化教育」在國小道德科的教學實施。國民教育,35(9/10),13-19。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王前龍(1997)。愛國德目教材內容與臺灣社會政治權力結構的辯證。八十六學年度教育學術研討會論文,花蓮師範學院主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grant, C. A.(1998)。History and current state of multicultural education in the United States。多元文化教育理論與實際國際學術硏討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wang, C.(1997)。A analysis of curriculum decision-making in moral curriculum development in Taiwan。the 1997 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: 1997)。  new window
4.Wang, C.(1998)。National identity and the moral curriculum development regarding Patriotism in Taiwan。The 1998 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,(會議日期: 1998)。San Diego, California。  new window
5.陳麗華(1995)。從兒童的族群社會化談班級的族群關係經營。班級經營理論與實務研討會,台北市立師範學院主辦 15-40。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳迺臣(1993)。國民小學道德教育的內涵、教學活動及教學評量之研究。花蓮:國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃建一(1989)。我國國民小學價値教學之研究。高雄:復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.國立編譯館(1991)。國民小學生活與倫理。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
3.國立編譯館(1991)。高級中學公民。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省國民學校教師研習會(1996)。國民小學道德實驗教材。臺北:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺灣省國民學校教師研習會(1996)。國民小學道德實驗教材教學指引。臺北:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Beyer, L. E.、Apple, M. W.(1988)。The Curriculum problems, polotics, and possibilites。Albany:State University of New York Press。  new window
7.Goodlad, J. I.(1979)。Curriculum inquiry。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.教育部國民小學課程標準編輯審查小組(1993)。國民小學課程標準。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃政傑(1992)。課程設計。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡文輝(1989)。社會學。臺北市:三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃宣範(19940000)。語言、社會與族群意識:臺灣語言社會學的研究。臺北:文鶴出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Walker, Decker F.(1990)。Fundamentals of curriculum。Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.莊明貞(1997)。教育與性別。現代教育社會學。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.譚光鼎、湯仁燕(1993)。臺灣原住民青少年文化認同與學校教育關係之探討。多元文化教育。臺北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.譚光鼎(1997)。教育與族群。現代教育社會學。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Banks, J. A.(1989)。Multicultural education: Caracteristics and goals。Multicultural education: Issues and practice。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
5.Grant, C. A.、Sleeter, C. E.(1989)。Race, class, gender, and disability in the classroom。Multicultural education: Issues and practice。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Sadker, M.、Sadker, D.、Long, L.(1989)。Gender and educational equality。Multicultural education: issues and perspectives。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.黃政傑(1993)。多元文化教育的課程設計途徑。多元文化教育。臺北:臺灣書店。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE