本文作者延續其流動空間概念，指出流動空間除了是由互動網絡、節點與中繼站所組成，更是會操作網絡的社會行動者之住所，它也包含電子空間。本文進一步指出這種流動空間的邏輯建構，本身就是一種支配性。流動空間應引入兩個條件，即：它不應僅僅是個電子空間，更應包含地方，而電子空問與流動空間，是不具排它性地為社會/經濟/文化支配所組織起來，雖然有著頗大比例的網絡菁英，且在網路裡仍存有社會等差別與偏見，也讓全球菁英得以繞過片斷的地域，來確保自己的支配性。但社會本身就是個充滿衝突的開放過程，那裡有支配，那裡就有抵抗，流動空間也可以為抵抗及意義的多樣性所穿透，網絡內價值與意圖的多樣與多元性激增，以及地方與資訊流動問的連結，都將流動空間的邏輯轉化，讓它成為一個競爭的空間，成為一種均一性與自主性、支配與抵抗、工具性與經驗相互穿透的動能，那些跳過民主而嚐試逃入抽象空間的資本、媒體與權力，或者是將自我經驗侷限於地方的方式，都正受到許多來自流動空間草根化的挑戰。

　　　　　The author continues his concept of the space of flows, points out that it includes networks of interaction, nodes and hubs, and also made of habitats made for the social actors that operate the networks, and electric spaces. He added that the constitution of the logic of the space offlows was in itself a form of domination. Two major qualifications may be introduced: The space of flows includes places. It isn't simply an electronic space. Both Electronic spaces and the space of flows are not exclusively organized around and by social/economic/cultural domination. In the net, there is a big size elite and a social bias, and so on. Global elites ensure their domination in the spatial process, bypassing segmented locales. But Societies are always open processes, characterized by conflict. Wherever there is domination, there is resistance. The space of flows can be penetrated by resistance, and diversified in its meaning. The irruption of diversity, plurality of values and intents, in the net, the linkage between places and information flows, transforms the logic of the space of flows, and makes it a contested space. It's a new dynamics of interpenetration of uniformity and autonomy, of domination and resistance, of instrumentality and experience. The attempt by capital, media, and power to escape into the abstraction of the space of flows, bypassing democracy and experience by confining them in the space of places, is being challenges, from many sources, by the grassrooting of the space offlows.