臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：高中生學業成就自我效能與學業成就表現之探討：影響自我效能因素與成就表現相關研究
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：徐新逸 引用關係／黃麗鈴
作者(外文)：Shyu, Hsin-yih／Huang, Li-ling
出版日期：1999
卷期：22(下)
頁次：頁267-294
主題關鍵詞：高中生；自我效能；學業成就；社會學習理論；Self-efficacy；Academic performance；Senior high school students；Social learning theory
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:198
　　　　　本研究主要目的在探討高中生學業成就自我效能之因素，計有:性別、先前成績、同儕性別、競爭環境、教師期望及動機等六種變項，並進而探討學業成就自我效能與學業成就實際表現的相關性。在抽樣方面，以台北地區公立高中學校日間部的志願排行做為分層隨機抽樣，共297人。資料處理以t考驗、單因子變異數分析、涂凱法多重檢定（Tukey）、多元迴歸分析法、Pearson積差相關等來進行分析。研究結果如下：一、高中生之學業成就自我效能不受性別的影響；二、高中生的學業成就自我效能不受同儕性別之影響；三、高中生學業成就自我效能會受到競爭環境的影響；四、教師期望會因其高低程度之不同對高中生的學業成就自我效能有所影響；五、高中生動機會因其高低程度之不同對其學業成就自我效能有所影響；六、高中生過去成績與學業成就自我效能雖有正相關，但並不顯著；七、高中生六種不同屬性中，僅動機、教師期望及競爭環境此三者對學業成就自我效能極具顯著影響力；八、高中生學業成就自我效能與學業成就實際表現雖有正相關，但未達到顯著性。
　　　　　Bandura's (1986) social learning theory advocates that personal, behavioral, and environmental factors continuously interact to determine the individual's subsequent behavior. Bandura also suggests that self-efficacy helps understand the relationship between peoples' cognitive processes and behavior change. When considering mental stresses from difficulties in entering college among senior high school students, the concept of self-efficacy may provide a better understanding of students' behavior patterns and perceptions from different personal traits and aptitudes, and environments. This study examined the factors on self-efficacy for senior high schools students and investigated its relationship with students' academic achievement. Those factors caused by personal and school aspects included students' gender, prior experience, motivation, teacher's expectation, the gender of peers, and competition level of school. Two hundred and ninety-seven senior high school students took part. Data were analyzed through Pearson's t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple egression. The results suggested hat: there was no significant difference between girls and boys on academic self-efficacy, there was no significant difference between the gender of the peers on academic self-efficacy, there was significant difference among the competitiveness of school environment on academic self-efficacy, there was significant difference among the levels of teacher's expectations on academic self-efficacy. There was significant difference among the levels of students' motivation on academic self-efficacy, there was a positive relationship between students' past performance and academic self-efficacy, but the relationship was not statistically significant. Among six possible factors, only students' motivation, expectation from teachers and competitiveness of the environment indicated significant prediction: there was a positive relationship between students' performance and academic self-efficacy, but the relationship was not statistically significant.
期刊論文
1.Eccles, J. S.、Adler, T.、Meece, J.(1984)。Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternative theories。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，46(1)，26-43。  new window
2.Schunk, D. H.、Hanson, A. R.(1985)。Peer models: Influence on children self-efficacy and achievement。Journal of Educational Psychology，77，313-322。  new window
3.Brophy, J. E.(1983)。Conceptualizing student motivation。Educational Psychologist，18(3)，200-215。  new window
4.Parsons, J. E.、Ruble, D. N.、Hodges, K. L.、Small, A. W.(1976)。Cognitive-developmental factors in emerging sex differences in achievement-related expectancies。Journal of Social Issues，32，47-62。  new window
5.Hartley, J.、Holt, J.(1971)。Academic motivation and programmed learning。British Journal of Educational Psychology，41，171-183。  new window
6.Bandura, A.、Schunk, D.(1981)。Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation through proximal self-motivation。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，41，586-598。  new window
7.Bullock, D.、Merrill, L.(1980)。The impact of personal preference on consistency through time: the case of childhood aggression。Child Development，51，808-814。  new window
8.Dweck, C. S.、Davidson, W.、Nelson, S.、Enna, B.(1978)。Sex differences in learning helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom; III. An experimental analysis。Developmental Psychology，14，268-276。  new window
9.Ellis, R. A.、Lane, W. C.(1963)。Structural supports for upward mobility。American Sociological Review，28，743-756。  new window
10.Entwistle, N. J.(1968)。Academic motivation and school attainment。The British Journal of Educational Psychology，38，181-188。  new window
11.Krauss, I.(1964)。Sources of educational aspirations among working-class youth。American Sociological Review，29，867-879。  new window
12.Morris, W. N.、Nemcek, D. Jr.(1982)。The development of social comparison motivation among preschoolers: Evidence of a stepwise progression。Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development，28，413-425。  new window
13.Vollmer, F.(1986)。Why do men have higher expectancy than women?。Sex Roles，14，351-362。  new window
14.Meece, J. L.、Wigfield, A.、Eccles, J. S.(1990)。Predictors of Math Anxiety and Its Influence on Young Adolescents。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(1)，60-70。  new window
15.Russell, I. L.(1969)。Motivation for school achievement: Measurement and validation。The Journal of Educational Research，62，263-266。  new window
16.Multon, Karen D.、Brown, Steven D.、Lent, Robert W.(1991)。Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation。Journal of Counseling Psychology，38(1)，30-38。  new window
17.孫志麟(19911200)。自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究，22，47-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Zimmerman, Barry J.、Martinez-Pons, Manuel(1990)。Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(1)，51-59。  new window
19.黃郁文(19941000)。自我效能概念及其與學業成就表現之關係。諮商與輔導，106，39-41。  延伸查詢new window
20.Bandura, Albert(1982)。Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency。American Psychologist，37(2)，122-147。  new window
會議論文
1.Crandall, V. C.(1978)。Expecting sex differences and Sex differences in expectancies: A developmental analysis。The meeting in the American Psychological Association。Toronto。  new window
2.Frank, P.(1996)。Current Directions in Self-Research: Self-efficacy。The annual meeting of the American Education Research Association。New York。  new window
3.Everson, H. T.、Tobias, S.、Hartman, H.、Gourgey, A.(1991)。Test anxiety in different curricular areas: An exploratory analysis of the role of subject matter。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Chicago。  new window
學位論文
1.陳玉玲(1995)。目標設定、目標投入與自我效能對國小學生數學作業表現的影響(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林宜貞(1994)。國中生的教師期望、歸因型態、失敗容忍力與失敗反應關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周玉真(1992)。青少年的身體意象滿意度與其自我概念、班級同儕關係之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
4.關復勇(1987)。山地泰雅族國中學生自我概念、成就動機、學業成敗歸因與其學業成就之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭生玉(1973)。國中低成就學生心理特質之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉威德(1994)。國中教師教學成敗歸因、社會支持與教學自我效能相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bandura, A.、Walters, Richard H.(1959)。Adolescent Aggression: A Study of the Influence of Child-Training Practices and Family Interrelationships。New York：Ronald Press。  new window
2.Lefcourt, H. M.(1976)。Locus of control trends in theory and research。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Eribaum Associates。  new window
3.Sules, J. M.、Miller, R. L.(1977)。Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspective。Washington, DC：Hemisphere。  new window
4.張春興(1994)。教育心理學。臺北市：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
單篇論文
1.Schunk, D. H.(1988)。Perceived self-efficacy and related social cognitive performance(ED293886)。  new window
2.Owen, S.(1990)。Academic, social and physical self-efficacy scale for students in high schools。  new window
3.Tippins, D. J.(1991)。The Relationship of Science Self-Efficacy and Gender to Ninth Grade Student's Intentions to Enroll in Elective Science Courses(ED350 144)。  new window
其他
1.徐新逸(1991)。高中生自我效能量表。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Roesnthal, T. L.、Bandura, A.(1978)。Psychological modeling: Theory and practice。Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis。New York：Wiley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 南投縣高中生家庭氣氛、自我效能對人際關係與團隊合作之影響
2. 高齡學習者社會資本、自我效能與幸福感關係之研究—以南部地區樂齡學習中心學員為例
3. 高級中等學校教師情緒勞務、組織承諾、自我效能與知識分享之關係研究
4. 科技大學時尚造型相關科系學生人格特質、創業自我效能與創業意向之研究
5. 影響社會比較效應的相關因素探析暨其與自我效能及主觀幸福感關聯模式之建構與驗證
6. 國小教師正向心理資本與教學效能、工作滿意度及主觀幸福感關聯模式之建構與驗證
7. 發展小學專題學習課程方案之行動研究－以四年級為例
8. 技職校院學生選修創意課程之學習策略、創意自我效能、創新行為及創意學習成效關係之研究
9. 高中數理資優生與普通生數學學習歷程與成就結構模式驗證及比較研究
10. 志工的組織信任、心理契約、服務學習與自我效能關係之研究
11. 醫學系學生畢業後一般醫學訓練精神醫學教育介入成效研究
12. 大學校院行政人員工作價值觀、自我效能、經驗學習與工作競爭力關係之研究
13. 不同世代國民小學教師工作價值觀,角色知覺與教學自我效能和專業表現之研究
14. 高中生英語自我效能、英語學習焦慮、英語學習策略與英語學習成就關係之研究
15. 高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展之關聯及角色楷模課程實驗之影響研究
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：439（臺灣：422，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67257297
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上