:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:近代中國「權利」觀念的意義演變--從晚清到「新青年」
書刊名:中央研究院近代史研究所集刊
作者:金觀濤劉青峰
作者(外文):Jin, GuantaoLiu, Qingfeng
出版日期:1999
卷期:32
頁次:頁209-260
主題關鍵詞:中國近現代政治觀念形成權利自由主義Formation of key political concepts in modern ChinaRightsLiberalism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(5) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:149
  • 點閱點閱:54
     「權利」是現代自由主義政治及法學的核心觀念,其意義為個人自主性為正當。本文通過對「權利」一詞在晚清文獻和《新青年》雜誌中使用時的意義分析,以及初步統計研究,試圖揭示中國現代文化形成中是如何接受和使用個人權利思想的。研究表明,由於「權利」在中文中原有意義是權力和利益,晚清中國知識階層是從維護國家權力和利益角度意識到國家和群體的自主性為正當。這是用「權利」翻譯rights的原因。在1900至1915年間,自主性的理念適用範圍從國家(群體)拓展到個人,這一時期「權利」的意義比較接近西方文化中的原有含義。由於中國文化中任何正當性都與道德聯繫在一起,政治文化離不開道德判斷,中國人難以接受某種不等同於道德的正當性理念。新文化運動是塑造中國現代政治文化的關鍵時期,本文選取《新青年》為個案,對其使用「權利」理念進行意義分類及初略統,並與晚清、辛亥時期「權利」觀念的意義比較。我們發現五四時期「權利」觀念日益道德,權利一開始被當作一種新道德,人們甚至用道德的種種屬性來評判權利。這種意義演變是以《新青年》為代表的部份知識份子拋棄自由主義‵認同馬克思主義的一個重要原因。 本文使用的方法是關鍵詞(「權利」)的意義分析和統計,並結合思想史內在理路的疏,來探討中國現代政治文化形成。我們力圖將某些重要觀念在中西不同文化價值系統的原有意義及翻譯傳播與重大歷史大事件對人思想的衝擊結合起來考察觀念演變。
     The concept of "rights" is the kernel and basis of modern liberalism and jurisprudence. It implies the legitimacy of the autonomy of the individual. This essay is aimed at exploring the process of the acceptance and the usage of this concept in the formation of modern Chinese culture. We know that in Chinese the word "quanli" means both power and interest. And it is no coincidence that Late-Qing Chinese intellectuals' awareness of the legitimacy of the autonomy of the nation (the community) actually came from their efforts to strengthen the nation's power and protect its interests. This is why "quanli" was used to translate "rights". From 1900 to 1915, the scope of the concept of autonomy was being so expanded that it now covered both the concept of the nation (the community) and that of the individual. During this period, the meanings of "quanli" was closer to the meanings of "rights" in the West than it had been before. In Chinese culture, the concept of "legitimacy" is closely connected with morals while political culture is inseparable from moral judgment. Therefore, it is hard for the Chinese to accept any notion that legitimacy is not an equivalent of morality. New Culture Movement was the vital period that shaped the landscape of modern Chinese political culture. We choose La Jeunesse as the object of our case study in which the usage of the concept "quanli" was analyzed and categorized to provide necessary statistics. Then, a comparison was made of the usage of "quanli" in La Jeunesse with its usage in literature published in late Qing and the 1911 Revolution. The comparison shows that the concept "quanli" was getting more and more moralized and even became a new standard of morals. It was this evolution of meanings that caused some Chinese intellectuals as represented by the writers with La Jeunesse to accept Marxism and reject liberalism. The research methods we employed take the form of an analysis of both the meanings of the keyword "quanli" and its statistics. And we put the result of this analysis within the context of intellectual history for studying or the formation of modem Chinese political culture. In this study, we need to clarify the meanings of certain important concepts in different cultural value systems and explore their translations across cultures. The influence of significant historical events in modern Chinese history on the evolution of the meanings of these concepts is also a factor to be taken into account in the course of doing this study.
期刊論文
1.劉廣京(19940900)。晚清人權論初探--兼論基督教思想之影響。新史學,5(3),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.新青年。新青年。  延伸查詢new window
3.二十一世紀。二十一世紀。  延伸查詢new window
4.Raz, Joseph(1978)。Professor Dworkin’s Theory of Rights。Political Studies,26。  new window
會議論文
1.(1987)。儒家倫理研討會論文集。新加坡。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.熊月之(1986)。中國近代民主思想史。上海:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.嚴復(1931)。天演論。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.中國史學會(1953)。戊戌變法。  延伸查詢new window
4.張佛泉(1955)。自由與人權。香港:臺北:亞洲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Masini, Federico、黃河清(1997)。現代漢語詞匯的形成:十九世紀漢語外來詞研究。漢語大詞典出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.張枬、王忍之(1960)。辛亥革命前十年間時論選集。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.金觀濤、劉青峰(2000)。中國現代思想的起源--超穩定結構與中國政治文化的演變。中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉保強(1991)。人權的理念與實踐。香港:天地圖書。  延伸查詢new window
9.富蘭克林.包默、李日章(1988)。西方近代思想史。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.MacIntyre, Alasdair(1981)。After Virtue。London:Duckworth Press。  new window
11.Hume, David、關文運、鄭之驤(1980)。人性論。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.康有為、湯志鈞(1981)。康有為政論集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.盧梭、何兆武(1980)。社會契約論。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.石元康(19950000)。當代自由主義理論。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Waldron, Jeremy(1984)。Theories of rights。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Nozick, Robert(1974)。Anarchy, State and Utopia。Blackwell。  new window
17.黃克武(19980000)。自由的所以然:嚴復對約翰彌爾自由思想的認識與批判。臺北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Berlin, Isaiah、陳曉林(1986)。自由四論。台北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.Sandel, Michael J.(1982)。Liberalism and the limits of justice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.(1996)。中國現代學術經典(康有為卷)。中國現代學術經典(康有為卷)。石家莊。  延伸查詢new window
21.(1994)。新政真詮─何啟、胡禮垣集。新政真詮─何啟、胡禮垣集。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
22.Easton, Stewart C.(1989)。西洋近代史。西洋近代史。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.郭少棠(1993)。西方的巨變:1800-1980。西方的巨變:1800-1980。香港。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳弘毅(1998)。法治、啟蒙與現代法的精神。北京:中囯政法大學出版。  延伸查詢new window
25.劉小楓、林立偉(1998)。中國近現代經濟倫理的變遷。中國近現代經濟倫理的變遷。香港。  延伸查詢new window
26.Maurice, Crane(1973)。What Are Human Rights?。What Are Human Rights?。London。  new window
27.Brinton, Cranston(1950)。Ideals and Men: The Story of the Western Thought。Ideals and Men: The Story of the Western Thought。New York。  new window
28.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Right Seriously。Taking Right Seriously。Cambridge, Mass。  new window
29.Greenleaf, W. H.(1988)。The British Political Tradition。The British Political Tradition。London。  new window
其他
1.Wheaton, Henry(1864)。萬國公法,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.新民叢報,橫濱。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1994)。漢達古籍資料庫,香港。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張之洞、苑書義、孫華峰、李秉新(1998)。陳撫台來電(光緒二十四年八月二十六日丑刻到)。張之洞全集。石家莊:河北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE