:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:立法問政與選區服務:第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:盛杏湲 引用關係
作者(外文):Sheng, Shing-yuan
出版日期:1999
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁89-120
主題關鍵詞:立法行為代表選區服務立法問政政治目的Legislative behaviorRepresentationConstituency serviceLaw-makingLegislators' political purposes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(23) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:19
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:94
本研究試圖瞭解立委在兩種代表行為──立法問政與選區服務──上的表現,以及影響立委不同表現的原因。過去對立法問政與選區服務的研究傾向認為二者是為兩難或互補,前者的論點在於國會議員的資源是有限的,當他花許多的資源在其中之一種活動時,必然無法兼顧另一種活動;而後者的主要論點在於當國會議員努力於一種活動時,必然緩和了來自於另一種活動的壓力。但本研究以第三屆立委為研究焦點,採用問卷訪問與內容分析方法,研究結果發現:跨不同的立委作比較,立法問政與選區服務行為並不是負方向的關係,而是沒有必然的關係,也就是說,在立法問政較用心的立委並不見得一定較疏於選區服務;同樣的,對選區服務較用心的立委也不見得一定較疏於立法問政。 其次,就立委個人而言,立委必然對於他身為一個代表的角色有所期許,此一期許反映了立委的選區、政黨、以及立委本身的政治目的、資源與經歷,而進一步會影響他在代表方式上作選擇,或者是偏重選區服務,或者是偏重立法問政。根據 Logit 模型的檢証結果顯示,選區因素是影響立委代表行為的最重要因素,那些票源愈集中的立委,愈傾向作選區服務,反之,票源愈分散的立委愈傾向作立法問政。除此之外,政黨的歸屬、黨內競爭程度、立委的政治目的、資深度、是否擔任黨職、以及委員會活動等
This paper examines representative behavior of Taiwan's legis-lators and the reasons for their representative behavior. The rep-resentative behavior is divided into two categories: activities in the Legislative Yuan and activities in constituencies. Some researchers argue that these two categories of representative behavior are a trade-off, because legislators' resources are limited. Others argue that making efforts on one of these two categories of activities may reduce pressure from the other one. However, this paper indicates that these two arguments are not true for Taiwan's legislators. Based on a survey on legislators' assistants and a content analysis up-on Legislative gazettes, this paper shows that the relationship of these two categories of behavior is not necessarily negative. That is to say, the legislators who make efforts in the Legislative Yuan may not necessarily ignore the constituencies. On the contrary, the legislators who make efforts in the constituencies may not neces-sarily ignore the activities in the Legislative Yuan. Secondly, the research findings indicate that individual legisla-tors must have some expectations on their representative roles, and hence these expectations affect their choices on legislative career, either pays more attention to law-making or to constituency ser-vices. Meanwhile, these expectations are affected by the factors related to legislators' party, constituency, and their own political purposes and resources. Furthermore, comparing these influential factors, I find that the factors related to the constituency are the most important. The legislators whose votes are concentrated on a certain part of the electoral district tend to make more efforts in constituencies. On the other hand, the legislators whose votes are scattered across the electoral district tend to make more efforts in the Legislative Yuan. Meanwhile, the research findings show that the following factors affect legislators' representative behavior: party affiliation, the degree of intra-party competition, political purposes, seniority, whether holding a party position, and the ac-tivities in committees.
期刊論文
1.Weissberg, Robert(1978)。Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress。American Political Science Review,72(2),535-547。  new window
2.Hsieh, John fuh-Sheng、Niemi, Richard G.(1999)。Can Duverger's Law Be Extended to SNTV? The Case of Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Elections。Electoral Studies,18(1),101-116。  new window
3.Jewell, Malcolm E.(1983)。Legislative-Constituency Relations and the Representative Process。Legislative Studies Quarterly,8,303-337。  new window
4.Miller, Warren、Stokes, Donald(1963)。Constituency Influence in Congress。American Political Science Review,56(1),43-56。  new window
5.Reed, Steven R.(1994)。Democracy and the Personal Vote: A Cautionary Tale from Japan。Electoral Studies,13(1),17-28。  new window
6.黃秀端(19960900)。選區服務與專業問政的兩難。理論與政策,10(4)=40,21-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Achen, Christopher H.(1978)。Measuring Representation。American Journal of Political Science,22(3),475-510。  new window
8.Hall, Richard L.(1987)。Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making。American Political Science Review,81(1),105-127。  new window
9.Jones, Bryan D.(1973)。Competitiveness, Role Orientations and Legislative Responsiveness。The Journal of Politics,35(4),924-947。  new window
10.Kuklinski, James H.(1978)。Representativeness and Elections: A Policy Analysis。American Political Science Review,72(1),165-177。  new window
11.盛杏湲(19981100)。政黨配票與侯選人票源的集散度:一九八三年至一九九五年臺灣地區立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,5(2),73-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.盛杏湲(19970900)。國會議員的代表行為:研究方法的探討。問題與研究,36(9),37-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.盛杏湲(19970300)。立法委員的立法參與:概念、本質與測量。問題與研究,36(3),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.韋洪武(1994)。立法院審查預算角色的分析。國立政治大學政治學研究所四十週年學術研討會,127-160。  延伸查詢new window
2.盛杏湲(1998)。立法院委員會分配的影響因素與政治後果。「政治制度:理論與現實」學術研討會。中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃秀端(1992)。立法委員對選區的認知和對選區的服務。  延伸查詢new window
2.財團法人國會觀察文教基金會(1998)。第三屆立法委員問政表現總評研究報告。財團法人國會觀察文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃秀端(1998)。金權政治和立法院的財政、經濟與交通委員會 (計畫編號:NSC 85-2417-H-031-001)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張嘉仁(1995)。當前立法委員預算審議行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃麗香(1999)。國會政黨的組織誘因與立法團結:以第二屆立法院為例的探討(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡佳泓(1996)。立法委員的選民服務之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林淑慎(1994)。解嚴後立法院之功能研究(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.許禎元(1993)。增額立委質詢與臺灣地區之政治發展--從甄補背景角度探討(1972-1991)(博士論文)。文化大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Sheng, Shing-Yuan(1996)。Electoral Competition and Legislative Participation: The Case of Taiwan(博士論文)。University of Michigan。  new window
7.李自揚(1993)。立法院議決國家總預算案過程之研究--以七十七年度至八十二年度中央政府總預算案為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.林妙津(1990)。立法院第七十九至八十四會期施政總質詢之內容分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.許志鴻(1986)。選區選民影響力對議員角色行為的作用之探討:第四屆臺北市議員之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ho, Szu-Yin Benjamin(1986)。Legislative Politics of the Republic of China: 1970-1984(博士論文)。University of California,Santa Barbara。  new window
11.吳宗敏(1977)。我國立法院委員會之功能分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kingdon, John W.(1989)。Congressmen's Voting Decisions。Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.楊日青(1992)。立法院常設委員會之結構與功能分析。臺北:民主基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fenno, Richard F. Jr.(1973)。Congressmen in Committees。Boston, MA:Little, Brown & Co.。  new window
4.黃秀端(1994)。選區服務。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Jacobson, Gary C.(1992)。The Politics of Congressional Elections。Boston, MA:Little, Brown, and Company。  new window
6.Bauer, Raymond、Pool, Ithiel、Dexter, Lewis(1963)。American Business and Public Policy。New York:Atherton Press。  new window
7.Boynton, G. R.、Kim, Chong Lim(1975)。Legislative Systems in Developing Countries。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。  new window
8.Fiorina, Morris(1974)。Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies。Toronto, Canada:Lexinton, Books。  new window
9.Cain, Bruce E.、Ferejohn, John A.、Fiorina, Morris P.(1987)。The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Fenno, Richard F. Jr.(1978)。Home Style: House Members in Their Districts。Glenview, Illinois:Scott, Foresman and Company。  new window
11.Fiorina, Morris P.(1989)。Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment。Yale University Press。  new window
12.Hall, Richard L.(1996)。Participation in Congress。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
13.Ramseyer, J. Mark、Rosenbluth, Frances McCall(1993)。Japan's Political Marketplace。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
14.陳明通(1995)。派系政治與臺灣政治變遷。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Eulau, Heinz、Karps, Paul D.(1978)。The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness。The Politics of Representation: Continuities in Theory and Research。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Mezey, Michael(1985)。The Function of Legislatures in the Third World。Handbook of Legislative Research。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Jewell, Malcolm E.(1970)。Attitudinal Determinants of Legislative Behavior: The Utility of Role-Analysis。Legislatures in Developing Perspective。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。  new window
4.Dodd, Richard(1977)。Congress and the Quest of Power。Congress Considered。New York:Praeger Publishers。  new window
5.Hall, Richard L.(1993)。Participation, Abdication, and Representation in Congressional Committees。Oppenheimer, Congress Reconsidered。Washington, DC:A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
6.Kim, Chong Lim、Woo, Byung-Kyu(1975)。Political Representation in the Korean National Assembly。Legislative Systems in Developing Countries。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE