臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以資訊處理觀點探討研究發展專案的協調活動對績效之影響
作者：鄭毅萍
作者(外文)：Cheng Yih-Ping
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：張保隆
學位類別：博士
出版日期：1999
主題關鍵詞：專案管理；協調活動；正式化；人際互動；資訊處理觀點；工作不確定性；研究發展；專案績效；project management；coordination activities；formalization；interpersonal communication；information processing perspective；task uncertainty；R&；D；project performance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
為了因應複雜多變的環境及競爭壓力，企業組織必須不斷在產品、製程或勞務提供上進行創新及變革，以提高品質、吸引顧客、開拓市場。專案團隊此種以任務導向而非功能性編制、並能有效的整合組織內不同專業人員的工作單位，因此應運而生，且被企業組織普遍引用。本研究著眼於專案團隊為了要加強不同功能單位間的橫向整合，所需從事的協調活動為核心，來探討其對專案績效的影響。本研究並將協調活動分為正式化與人際互動兩類，做深入的分析討論。
依據資訊處理觀點，本研究推導出正式化協調活動和專案人員在不同溝通對象上的人際互動協調活動，須與專案的工作不確定性相配合，方可提昇專案績效。此外，本研究還提出，專案的協調活動對績效的正向影響，會隨著專案人員與使用者連結活動的增加而增強。
本研究以研究發展專案為實證對象。樣本包括國內某一財團法人研發機構及半導體高科技公司。本研究採問卷調查，共取得135個專案的資料，以Schoonhoven所發展的方法來進行分析，並驗證所提出的假說。
本研究實證結果顯示：1）專案的「正式化」協調活動，對專案的效率之提昇較有幫助，而專案的「人際互動」協調活動，對專案的技術創新及使用者的效益較有幫助。2）專案的工作不確定性與正式化對績效的影響效果，會受正式化的不同衡量方式及專案人員的認知而改變。3）在「專案內其他人員」、「高階主管」、「供應商」等溝通對象上，工作不確定性與溝通量對專案績效的影響效果，與原假說所推導者不同，本研究提出「資訊內涵」及「資訊有用性」兩因素，來說明實證結果與原假說不同的原因。4）專案的協調活動要能真正發揮其對專案績效的助益，必須要有取得市場或顧客需求資訊的活動。本研究除了討論造成上述結果的原因外，並根據這些結果，提出理論與實務意涵的說明。
In response to the fast-changing business environment and the pressures of competition, modern organizations need to continually innovate and improve their products and production processes in order to upgrade service quality, attract customers, and expand their market shares. Therefore, the resulting task-oriented project teams rather than the functional ones have been originated and widely used at enterprise. The design of the project teams is to efficiently integrate various professionals within different functional units in an organization. In order to enhance the lateral integration of various functional units in organization, this research has been focused specifically on the coordination activities of the project teams and investigated their effects on project performance. This coordination work can be further classified into formalization and interpersonal communication and discussed in depth respectively.
Based on the information processing perspective, the research deduced that the coordination work, of both formalization and interpersonal communication, has to be fitted with the task uncertainty of the project work in order to enhance the project performance. We also theoretically hypothesized that the more the linkage between the project people and users, the more positive effects of the coordination activities on project performance.
The subjects of the study are the various R&D projects. The sample was drawn from a large government-sponsored research institute and the high-tech companies in semiconductor industry. Questionnaires were used to collect data. In addition, the analytical method developed by Schoonhoven was used to test the research hypotheses.
Findings of this study reveal that 1). The formalization can be beneficial for the efficiency in project execution. On the other hand, the interpersonal communication will be helpful for the technical innovation and the effectiveness to users. 2). The different measures in formalization and the perceptions of R&D personnel have influence on the effects of formalization and task uncertainty on project performance. 3). For various communication members such as other members within project, top management, and suppliers, the effects of the interpersonal communication and task uncertainty on project performance are not the same as predicted ones in hypotheses. Contents and usefulness of the information have been proposed in this study to elucidate the possible causes. 4). Without the information about market and customer requirements, project coordination work alone may not be effective in improving performance. Hence, the linkage to customers is a must for coordination activities to fully exert their effects on project performance. In addition to the discussions about the causes of these findings, their theoretical and managerial implications are also provided.
王耀德，高志宏，朱博湧（民86），「管理行為與專案特徵對專案績效的影響」，人文與管理學報，第一卷第一期，199-221頁
王耀德，蔡昌武（民88），「科技專案的特質與研究人員工作活動組型之配適對專案績效的影響」，交大管理學報，第十九卷第一期
張保隆，鄭毅萍（民84），「專案管理環境特性因素對專案執行的影響」，科技管理學刊，第一卷第一期，161-177頁
Adams, J. & Barndt, S. 1988. Behavioral Implications of the Project Life Cycle. In Project Management Handbook, edited by D. Cleland and W. King. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Adams, M. E., Day, G. S., & Dougherty, D. 1998. Enhancing New Product Performance: An Organizaitonal Learning Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15: 403-422.
Alexander, J. W., Randolph, W. A. 1985. The Fit between Technology and Structure as A Predictor of Performance in Nursing Subunits. Academy of Management Journal, 28(4): 844-859.
Allen, T. J., Lee, D. M. S., Tushman, M. L. 1980. R&D Performance as a Function of Internal Communication, Project Management, and the Nature of the Work. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-27 (1): 2-12.
Allen, T. J. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technology Information within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ancona, D. G. 1990. Outward Bound: Strategies for Team Survival in an Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 334-365.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.
Astley, W. G., Van de Ven, A. H. 1983. Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 245-273.
Argote, L. 1982. Input Uncertainty and Organizational Coordination in Hospital Emergency Unit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 420-434.
Atuahene-Gima, K. 1995. An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product performance: A Contingency Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12:275-293.
Baker, B. N., Murphy, D. C., & Fisher, D. 1988. Factors Affecting Project Success. In Project Management Handbook, edited by D. Cleland and W. King. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Bailetti, A. J., & Litva, P. F. 1995. Integrating Customer Requirements Into Product Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12: 3-15.
Barczak, G., & Wilemon, D. 1991. Communications Patterns of New Product Development Team Leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(2): 101-109.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 343-375.
Chakrabarti, A. K., & Hauschild, J. 1989. The Division of Labour In Innovation Management. R&D Management, 19: 161-171.
Cheng, J. L. C. 1984. Organizational Coordination, Uncertainty, and Performance: An Integrative Study. Human Relations, 37(10): 829-851.
Clark, K. B. 1989. Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effect of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement On Product Development. Management Science, 35(10): 1247-1263.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
Cleland, D. I. & King W. R. 1983. Systems Analysis and Project Management. McGraw-Hill,New York, 3rd ed.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management, 23(3): 239-290.
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H. 1984. Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design. Research in Organizational Behavior,6 :191-233.
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H. 1986. Organizational Information Requirement, Media Richness, and Structural Design. Management Science, 32: 554-571.
David, F. R., Pearce, J. A., Randolph, W. A. 1989. Linking Technology and Structure to Enhance Group Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2): 233-241.
DeCotiis, T. A., & Dyer, L. 1979. Defining and Measuring Project Performance. Research Management, 16: 17-22.
Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms. Organization Science, 3(2): 179-202.
Drazin, R., Van de Ven, A. H. 1985. Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 514-539.
Drucker, P. F. 1988. The Coming of the New Organization. Harvard Business Review, 88(1): 45-53.
Drucker, P. F. 1974. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, and Practice. Harper & Row: New York.
Ettlie, J. E., Reza, E. M. 1992. Organizational Integration and Process Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 795-827.
Ford, R. C., Randolph, W. A. 1992. Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management. Journal of Management, 18(2): 267-294.
Ford, R. C., & McLanghlin, F. S. 1992. The Questions and Answers in managing Projects. Project Management Journal, 23(3): 21-28.
Freeman, M., & Beale, P. 1992. Measuring Project Success. Project Management Journal, 23(1): 8-17.
Fry, L. W. 1982. Technology-Structure Research: Three Critical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3): 532-552.
Fry, L. W., Slocum, J. W. 1984. Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2): 221-246.
Fulk, J., Boyd, B. 1991. Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations. Journal of Management, 17(2): 407-446.
Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing Complex Organization. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Gales, L., & Mansour-Cole, D. 1995. User Involvement in Innovation Project: Toward an Information Processing Model. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 12:77-109.
Gilbreath, R. D., 1988. Forward Thinking: The pragmentist's Guide to Today's Business Trend. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Gupta, A. K., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. 1987. Managing the R&D-Marketing Interface. Research Management, 30(2): 38-43.
Gupta, P. P., Dirsmith, M. W. & Fogarty, T. J. 1994. Coordination and Control in a Government Agency: Contingency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on GAO Audits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 264-284.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? Journal of Marketing, 62(October): 30-45.
Hartley, J. L., Meredith, J. R., McCutcheon, D., & Kamath, R. R. 1997. Suppliers’ Contributions to Product Development: An Exploratory Study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3): 258-267.
Huelwy, R. F., & Hult, T. M. 1998. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62: 42-54.
Ito, J. K., Peterson, R. B. 1986. Effects of Task Difficulty and Interunit Interdependence on Information Processing Systems. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1): 139-149.
Katz, R. 1982. The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 81-104.
Katz, R. & Allen, T. J. 1985. Project Performance and the Locus of Influence in the R&D Matrix. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1): 67-87.
Keller, R. T. 1994. Technology-Information Processing fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1): 167-179.
Keller, R. T., Holland W. E. 1983. Communicators and Innovators in Research and Development Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4): 742-749.
Kerzner, H. 1998. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 7th ed.: Van Nostram and Reinhold.
Kessler, E. H., Chakrabarti, A. K. 1996. Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1143-1191.
Knight, K. 1976. Matrix Organization : A Review. Journal of Management Studies , 17(2): 111-130
Kohli, A. K., & Maworski, B. 1990. Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1-18
Kumar, K., Subramanian, R. Yauger, C. 1998. Examining the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship: A Context-Specific Study. Journal of Management, 24(2): 201-233.
Larson, E. W., Gobeli, D. H. 1989. Significance of Project Management Structure on Development Success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2): 119-125.
Larson E.W. & Gobeli D.H. 1987. Relative Effectiveness of Different Project Structures. Project Management Jorunal, 18(2),
Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. 1967. Organization and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mansfield, E. 1988. The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. Internal Technology. Management Science, 34(10): 1157-1168.
March, J. G., Simon, H. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
McCollum, J. K., Sherman, J. D. 1991. The Effects of Matrix Organization Size and Number of Project Assignments on Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1): 75-78.
Might, R. J., Fischer, W. A. 1985. The Role of Structural Factors in Determining Project Management Success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 32: 71-77.
Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., Wang, Y. D., Huber, G. P. 1991. Understanding technology-Structure Relationships: Theory Development and Meta-analytic Theory Testing. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 370-399.
Moenaert, R. K., Souder, W. E., De Meyer, A., & Deschoolmeester, D. 1994. R&D-Marketing Integrationg Mechanisms, Communication Flows, and Innovation Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11:31-45.
Moorman, C. 1995. Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 318-335.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. 1990. The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54: 20-35.
Ottom, B. D., & Moore, W. L. 1997. The Role of Market Information in New Product Success/Failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14: 258-273.
Perrow, C. W. 1967. A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations. American Sociological Review, 16: 194-208.
Pinto, J. K., Covin, J. G. 1989. Critical Factors in Project Implementation: A Comparison of Construction and R&D Project. Technovation, 9: 49-62.
Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. 1990. The Causes of Project Failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4): 269-276.
Pinto, J. K. & Slevin, D. P. 1988. Project Success: Definitions and Measurement Techniques. Project Management Journal, 19(1): 67-72.
Quinn, J. B. 1985. Managing Innovations: Controlled Chaos. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 73-84.
Rubin, I. M., & Seelig, W. 1967. Experience as a Factor in the Selection and Performance of Project Managers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-14(3): 131-135.
Schoonhoven, C. B. 1981. Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden within the Language of Contingency ”Theory“. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 349-377.
Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D. 1996. Toward a Typological Theory of Project Management. Research Policy, 25: 607-632.
Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. 1997. Mapping the Dimensions of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 28(2): 5-13.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. 1995. Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing, 59: 63-74.
Souder, W. E. 1987. Managing New Product Innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Tushman, M. L., Nadler, D. A. 1978. Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organization Design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624.
Tushman, M. L. 1977. Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 587-605.
Tushman, M. L. 1978. Technical Communication in R&D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4): 624-645.
Tushman, M. L. 1979. Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 82-97.
Van de Ven, A. H., 1976. A Framework for Organization Assessment. Academy of Management Review, 1: 64-78.
Venkatraman, N. 1989. The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3): 423-444.
Victor, B., & Blackburn, R. S. 1987. Determinants and Consequences of Task Uncertainty: A Laboratory and Field Investigation. Journal of Management Studies, 24(4): 387-404.
Withey, M., Daft, R. L. & Cooper, W. H. 1983. Measures of Perrow‘s Work Unit Technology: An Empirical Assessment and A New Scale. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 45-63.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：643（臺灣：634，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68365690
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上