:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣製造業企業功能對生產力績效之影響
作者:廖世義 引用關係
作者(外文):Shu-Yi Liaw
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:工業管理學系
指導教授:陳梁軒
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2001
主題關鍵詞:企業功能生產力製造業經營績效模糊集群分析Business FunstionsProductivityManufacturing IndustryBusiness PerformanceFuzzy Clustering Analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 歷年統計:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
製造業產值的貢獻在我國經濟發展中一直佔有關鍵性的地位。然而國內近年產業結構的轉型、環保意識高漲,以及勞工成本上升等問題,加上自然資源的缺乏,使得國內製造業之經營日趨困難。因此對製造業而言,如何強化企業管理的功能與改善產業的體質,來提昇生產力績效與產品的競爭力,以因應外在環境的變化,已是一迫切性的問題。本研究從四個企業管理功能面,即生產管理制度、財務管理因素、行銷管理制度、與人力資源管理策略等,分別探討其對生產力績效的影響,來了解其與總要素生產力、勞動生產力與資本生產力的關係,進而從各企業管理功能面,瞭解其影響產業生產力績效的主要關鍵因素,並以模糊集群分析將廠商予以分群並討論之,探討不同集群廠商的特性與生產力績效的關係,以提出經營改善的建議。最後整合四個企業管理功能執行程度之評量指標,建立與總要素生產力之關係模式,並以廠商企業功能之集群型態,討論各集群特性與生產力績效之關係,有助於廠商了解本身相對於同業的競爭定位,以調整組織加強本身企業管理功能的方向,來提升廠商的生產力績效與製造業整體的競爭優勢。
The output values of manufacturing industry always play an important role in Taiwan economic development. In recent years, the shortage of natural resource and the rise of labor cost make the operation of manufacturing firms become more difficult in Taiwan. Therefore, how to enhance business functions and to improve productivity and then promoting the manufacturing firms’ competitiveness has been an important issue. Based on the measurement of total factor productivity (TFP), from the views of four business functions, i.e. production management, financial management, human resource management and marketing management, this study aims to find out the relationship between business functions and associated productivities. Furthermore, factor analysis is used to extract the key success factors of each business function. Using these factors, fuzzy clustering approaches are then employed to categorize the firms into several patterns with distinct characteristics of productivity. Pattern approach is applied to discuss the characteristics of productivity and critical factors of business functions for each pattern, and some suggestions to improve the firms’ productivity are proposed.
Finally, integrating the associated indices of achievement levels of four business functions, a relation model between business functions and TFP is set up. Pattern approach based on distinct characteristics of business functions and productivity is also applied to explore the firms’ orientations and relative competitive strength. The conclusion would help the firms reinforce their business functions and adjust their directions of organizational development. This could make performance of the firms’ productivities and competitive advantage of manufacturing industry in Taiwan can be further improved.
方世榮,「從策略觀點探討製造與行銷策略之互動對績效的影響」,中山管理評論,民國85年3月,頁63-88。
李茂興 譯 Subhash C. Jain 著,「行銷策略」 Marketing Planning & Strategy, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing, 台北:揚智文化,民國89年,頁72-76。
林慶忠,「國內五百大製造業之策略規劃活動研究」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月,頁121-123。
余朝權,「企業生產力衡量與分析」,中國生產力中心,1984。
高孔廉,張緯良,「台灣地區銀行業企劃功能作業之研究」,管理評論,民國77年7月,頁27-44。
彭瑞振,「規劃型態、策略行為與經營績效關係之研究」,國立淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國78年6月。
陳豐盛,生產管理指標體系建立之研究,清大工業工程研究所碩士論文,1995
陳勇信,企業生產力與財務因素之相關性研究─以國內大型製造業為例,成大工業管理研究所碩士論文,1997。
劉慶祥,「企業環境、策略規劃系統與策略行為關係之研究」,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月。
鍾育民,「製造業策略、行銷策略之配合與績效關係研究」,中興企研所碩士論文,民國84年6月。
穰穎堅,製造業生產力診斷系統之發展─以國內大型機械製造業為例,成大工業管理研究所碩士論文,1994。
Becker, B. and Gerhart, B. (1996) “The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp.796-797.
Chakravarthy, B. S., “Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.7, 1982, pp.35-44.
Chandler, A. D., Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, 1962.
Chen, L-H, Kao, C., Kuo, S., Wang, T-Y and Jang, Y-C (1996) “Productivity diagnosis via fuzzy clustering and classification: an application to machinery industry,” Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.309-319.
Chirillo, L. D. (1989) Statement by Louis D. Chirillo to the Commission on Merchant Marine and Defense, 18 July 1988, Journal of Ship Production, 5(1), pp.61-65.
Craig, C. E. and Harris R. C. (1973) “Total productivity measurement at the firm level, ” Sloan Management Review, 14, pp. 13-29.
Delaney, J.T. and Huselid, M. A. (1996) “The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp. 949-969.
Dessler, G., Human Resource Management, 8th ed, Prentice Hall Press, New Jersey, 2000.
Donaldson, G., Managing Corporate Wealth, New York: Praeger Inc, 1984.
Emory, C. W. and Cooper, D. R. Business Research Methods, 4th Ed., Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1991.
Gath, I. and Geva, A. B. (1989) “Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 11, pp. 773-781.
Glueck, W.F., Business Policy-Strategy Formation and Management Action, 2nd ed., 1984.
Gu, T. and Dubuisson, B. (1990) “Similarity of class and fuzzy clustering,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 34, pp. 213-221.
Hall, D. J. and Saias, M. A. (1980) “Strategy follows structure,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 1, pp.149-163.
Hayes, R. H. and Wheelwright S. C. (1984) Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing, pp. 395-397.
Kao, C., Wang, T-Y, Kuo, S., Chen, L-H and Horng, S-D (1995) “Production Pattern of Machinery firms: view points of technology and management,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 3207-3215.
Kendrick, J. W. and Creamer D. (1965) Measuring Company Productivity: Handbook with Case Studies, Studies in Business Economics, 89, National Industrial Conference Board, New York.
Kinnear, T. and Bernhardt K. (1998) Principles of Marketing, 5th ed., Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman and Company.
Kotler, P. Marketing Management, 8th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994.
Malhotra, M. K., Grover, V. and Steel, D. C. (1994) “Important strategic and tactical manufacturing issues in the 1990s,” Decision Sciences, 25(2), pp. 189-214.
Miller, D. (1988) “Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 280-308.
Mintzbery, H. (1994) “Rethinking strategic planning part I: Pitfalls and Fallacies,” Long Range Planning, 27(3), pp. 12-21.
Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Rhyne, L. C. (1985) “The relationship of information usage characteristics of planning system sophistication: an empirical examination,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 319-337.
Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage, Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press, 1985.
Roubens, M. (1982) “Fuzzy clustering algorithm and their clustering validity,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 10, pp. 294-301.
Schendel, D. and Patton, R. (1978) “A simultaneous equation model of corporate strategy,” Management Science, Vol. 24, pp. 1611-1621.
Snell, S. A., Youndt, M. and Casio, W. F. Managing Human Resources; Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits (2nd ed.), Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1989, pp. 86-56.
Stroh, L. and Caligiurl, P. (1998) “Strategic human resource: a new source for competitive advantage in the global arena,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-17.
Sumanth, D. J. Productivity Engineering and Management, McGraw Hill, NY, 1984.
Taylor, B. W. and Davis K. D. (1977) “Corporate productivity - getting it all together,” Industrial Engineering, Vol. 9, pp. 32-36.
Thorelli, H. B. Organizational theory: An Ecological View, In: B.T. Hans (Ed.), Strategy Plus Structure Equals Performance, Bloomington Inc., Indiana University Press, 1977.
Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986) “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No.4, pp. 801-814.
Pride, W. M. and Ferrell, O. C. Marketing: Concepts and Strategies, 6th ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 20-22, 1989.
Xie, X. L. and Beni, G. (1991) “A validity measure for fuzzy clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 13, pp. 841-847.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top