:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣電子產業技術發展階段模式之研究---採技術能力與技術策略互動觀點
作者:蔡千姿
作者(外文):Chien-Tzu Tsai
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
指導教授:張保隆
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2001
主題關鍵詞:產業技術階段模式技術能力技術策略電子業Industrial TechnologyStage ModelTechnology CapabilityTechnology StrategyElectronics Industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
科技已成為影響產業發展的關鍵要素,而產業發展問題難免涉及區域性的背景因素,本研究從關心科技發展如何促進產業成長的角度,以產業技術的發展為研究主題,經由對台灣電子業的探討,建構一呈現本土性觀點、掌握後進者產業問題特質的「電子產業技術發展模式」。
本研究電子產業技術發展模式的概念架構,來自文獻探討四個理論的彙整,包括:科技政策三維架構論、產業蛙跳理論、資源槓桿論、以及產業生態論,歸納出產業技術發展問題的共通本質為:發展時程階段、技術能力、與技術策略三向度。在各發展階段的學習歷程中,技術能力支持與促成適當的技術策略,策略影響實際的發展經驗,而發展經驗又形成新的技術能力。反映此一問題特性,技術能力以「技術內容要素」的四成分作為分析概念,包括技術體、人員體、資訊體、組織體。在此一能力與策略動態調適的概念下,本研究針對台灣電子業中的電腦產業、IC封裝業、IC製造業、IC設計業進行個案研究,經由產業報導資料收集與廠商、專家訪談,以及深入的解析,獲致以下結果:
1.台灣電子業的背景特徵包括:資源有限、市場狹小、人力優良、出口導向。
2.台灣電子業的發展呈現後進國家階段性技術追趕的軌跡。
3.在技術追趕的歷程中,能力與策略的階段性特徵為:
發展初期技術遠遠落後,技術能力提昇以技術體為重,發展策略在於技術獲取,策略行動採行引進國外技術。
發展中期技術稍微落後,技術能力提昇以人員體為重,發展策略在於技術流通,策略行動採行衍生公司。
發展後期技術緊密跟隨,技術能力提昇以資訊體為重,發展策略在於技術加值,策略行動採行策略聯盟。
4.台灣電子業的發展特色可歸納為:階段性追趕、利基性切入、產官學研合作之體系、下游往上游發展之生態。
模式呈現由技術模仿快速將產業發展起來的方式,也導致根本的自有研發能量遲未建立,對下一階段發展的推演,台灣電子業未來應以組織體的提昇為標的,以技術創造策略為指引方向,發展關鍵在於創新體制的建立,資源的投入則須著重支持前瞻性自有研發。
至於模式在競爭要素、策略行動等方面的深度探討,以及延伸應用在其他產業方面,則為未來繼續努力的研究方向。
Entering the 21st century, technology has become the key issue of industrial development. Industrial development problems usually involve local characteristics. This research is concerning the industry problems of backward economics. From the viewpoint of how the technology development can progress industry growth, we construct a technology development model by exploring Taiwan electronics industry.
The conceptual framework of this electronics industry technology development model comes from four referencing literatures, including: the integrative framework of technology policy by Kim , the industrial leapfrogging by Hong, resource leverage by Mathews and industrial ecology by Yang & Cheng. This framework constructing the common essences of industry technology development into three dimensions of development stages, technology capability and technology strategy. In the learning progress of each development stage, the technology capability supports the strategy and affects the actual development experience. Then, this experience will cause a new technology capability in the next stage. To reflect the properties of technology capability in such problem, four components of technology, including technoware, humanware, inforware and organware, are used as the analytical basis. The case studies of our research are aimed at the PC industry, IC packaging industry, IC manufacturing industry and IC design industry of Taiwan. By visiting companies, interviewing experts and collecting industry reports, we acquire plentiful data. We make detail analysis under the concept of dynamic adaptation of strategy to technology capability, and obtain following results:
1.The background characteristics of Taiwan electronics industry including: limited resources, small local market, superior human resource, and export-led industry.
2.The development of Taiwan electronics industry appears staged technology chasing trajectory of backward economics. At each stage, the characteristics of capability and strategy are:
At the initial development stage, technology capability is far behind the advanced countries, and the upgrading of technology capability is focused on the technoware. Development strategy is then emphasized at obtaining technologies overseas, and the critical action is buying foreign technology.
At the middle development stage, technology capability is slightly behind the advanced countries, and the upgrading of technology capability is focused on the humanware. Development strategy is then emphasized at technology diffusing, and the critical action is spin-off new companies.
At the third development stage, technology capability is nearly catching up the advanced countries, and the upgrading of technology capability is focused on the infoware. Development strategy is then emphasized at adding values to technologies, and the critical action is strategic alliance.
Deriving from the model, we can see that organware is the development core of next stage, the technology creating is the strategic guideline, the critical issue is the construction of innovation mechanism, and the resources should allocate on supporting the self R&D of advanced technologies.
As to the industry technology development, there are some research topics worth to be kept on, such as competitive advantage factors and strategic actions discussed in our model, and the application of this model to other industries.
[1]Arensman, R., Brown, G. C. and Wilson, D., 1991. “Asia Turns on to R&D”, Electronic Business, Vol. 17, No. 24, pp.14-16.
[2]Autio, E. and Laamanen, T., 1995, “Measurement and Evaluation of Technology Transfer: Review of Technology Transfer Mechanisms and Indicators”, Int. J. Technology management, Vol. 10, Nos 7/8, pp.643-664.
[3]Benbasat, I., 1984, “A Critique of the Stage Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Evidence”, CACM, May
[4]Betz, F., 1993, Strategic Technology Management, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[5]Betz, F., 1998, Managing Technological Innovation─Competitive Advantage from Change, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[6]Brown, M. A. & Berry L. G. (1991), Guidelines for successfully transferring government-sponsored innovations, Research Policy, Vol. 20, pp.121-143.
[7]Burglman, R. A., Maidique, M. A., and Wheelwright, S. C., 1996, Strategic management of Technology and Innovation
[8]Burglman, R. A., Rosenbloom, R. S., 1989, “Technology Strategy: An Evolutionary Process Perspective”, Research on Tchnological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 4, pp.1-23
[9]Chang, P. L., Shih, C. and Hsu, C. W., 1993, “Taiwan’s Approach to Technological Change: The Case of Integrated Circuit Design’, Technology Analysis & Strategic management, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.173-177
[10]Chang, P. L., Shih, C. and Hsu, C. W., 1994, “The Formation Process of Taiwan’s IC Industry--Method of Technology Transfer’, Technovation, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.161-171
[11]Chang, P. L. & Hsu, C. W., 1998, “The Development strategies for Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 45, No.4, Nov., pp.349-356
[12]Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W. and Lung, S. S. C., 1999, “The Forecast Model for the Technology Needs of Taiwan High-tech Industries”, Internal Journal of Technology management, Vol. 18, No. 1/2, pp.133-145
[13]Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W. and Tsai, C. T., 1999, “A Stage Approach for Industrial Technology Development and Implementation — the Case of Taiwan’s Computer Industry”, Technovation, Vol. 19, pp.233-241.
[14]Chen, C. F. and Sewell, G., 1996, “Strategies for Technological Development in South Korea and Taiwan: the Case of Semiconductors”, Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp.759-783.
[15]Chiang, J. T., 1990, “Management of national Technology Programs in a Newly Industrialized Country-Taiwan”, Technovation, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp.531-554
[16]Chiesa, V. and Manzini, R., 1998, “Towards a Framework for Dynamic Technology Strategy”, Technology Analysis & Strategic management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 111-129
[17]CIC(Chip Implementation Center), 2000, Hand Book of Industrial Service of National Chip Implementation Center, NSC, Taiwan.
[18]Choi, H. S., 1988, “Science and Technology policies for industrialization of developing countries”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 36, pp.209-215.
[19]Clark, K., Ford, D., Saren, M., 1989, “Company TechnologyStategies”, R&T Manaement, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.215-229
[20]Danila, N., 1989, “Strategic Evolution and Selection of R&D Projects”, D&D Management, Vol. 19, Jan., pp.47-62
[21]Devlin, G. And Bleackley, M., 1988, “Strategic Alliance-Guidelines for Success”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp.18-23.
[22]Dodgson, Mark, 1993, Technological Collaboration in Industry, London, Routledge
[23]Drucker, P., 1968, The Age of Discontinuity, Harper and Row Publishers
[24]Foster, T. M., 1996, “Making R&D More Effective at Westinghouse”, Research & Technology Management, pp.31-37, Jan.-Feb.
[25]Fusfeld, Herbert I. and Haklisch, Carmela S., 1986, “Collective Industrial Research: Initial Concepts ”, in Denis O. Gray, Trudy Solomon and William Hetzner (ed.), Technological Innovation Strategies for a new Partnership, North-Holland, pp.113-133.
[26]Gerschenkron, Alexander, 1962, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
[27]Gibson, C. F. & Nolan, R. L., 1974, “Managing the Four Stages of EDP growth”, HBR, Jan-Feb.
[28]Grenier, L. E., 1972, “Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow’, HBR, Jul.-Aug.
[29]Harvey, M. G., 1984, “Application of Technology life cycles to technology transfer”, The Jorunal of Business Strategy, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.51-58
[30]Hobday, M.,1994, “Export-led Technology Development in the Four dragons: The Case of Electronics”, Development and Change, Vol. 25, pp.333-361
[31]Hong, S. G., 1992, The Politics of Industrial Leapfrogging; The semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea, Dissertation of PhD, Northwestern University
[32]International Institute for Management Development (IMD), 1998, World Competitiveness Yearbook.
[33]ITRI, 1991~2000, Year Books of Semiconductor Industry, MOEA, Taiwan.
[34]Kim, L. and Dahiman, C. J., 1992, “Technology policy for industrialization: An Integrative Framework and Korea’s Experience”, Research Policy, Vol. 21, pp.437-452.
[35]King J. L. & Kraemer, K. L., 1984, “Evolution and Organizational Information System: An Assessment of Nolan’s Stage Model”, CACM, May
[36]Klein, J. A., etc., 1996, “Measuring the Economic Benifit from R&D:Results from the Mass, Length and Flow Programmes of the UK National Measurement System”, R&D Management, Jan., pp.5-15
[37]Lee, C. O., 1991, “Stages of Economic Development and Technology Policy: the Experience of Korea, Science and Public Policy, 18(4), pp.219-224.
[38]Lee, C. S. and Pecht, M., 1997, The Taiwan Electronics Industry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York
[39]Lei, D. T., 1997, “Competence-Building, Technology Fusion and Competitive Advantage: The Key roles of Organizational Learning and Strategic Alliances”, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 14, Nos 2/3/4
[40]Levy, Brian, 1988, “Korean and Taiwanese Firms as International Competitors: The Challenges Ahead”, Columbia Journal of World Business, Spring, pp.43-51
[41]Liu, C. Y., 1993, “Government’s Role in Developing High Technology Industry: the case of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry”, Technovation, (13/5), pp.299-309.
[42]Luchsinger, V. P., 1990, “Managing Technological Transfer and Innovation: The Small Business Innovation Research Program”, in Khalil T. and Bayarktar B.(ed), Management of Technology II, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, U.S.A., pp.15-22
[43]Mathews, J. A., 1997, “A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry”, California Management Review, Vol. 39, No.4, pp.26-53
[44]Mathews, J. A., 1995, High-Technology Industrialisation in East Asia: The Case of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and Korea, Taiwan, CIER
[45]McKiernan, P., 1997, “Strategy Pasr; Strategy Futures”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp.790-790
[46]Mody, Ashoka, 1990, “Institution and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: The Electronics Industry in South Korea and Taiwan”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 14, pp.291-314
[47]Mogavero, L. N. and Shane, R. S., 1982, Technology Transfer and Innovation, Marcel Dekker, New York.
[48]Narin F., Albert M. B. and Smith V. M., 1992, “Technology Indicators and Coporate Strategy”, Vol. 19, No.6, pp.369-381
[49]NII協進會(National Information Infrastructure Enterprise Promotion Association), 1999, 3C整合科技與產業白皮書, Taiwan.
[50]Nolan, R. L., 1973, “Managing the Computer Resource: A Stage Hypothesis”, CACM, Jul.
[51]Nolan, R. L., 1984, “Managing the Advance Stages of Computer Technology; Key Research Issues”, in McFarlan, F. W. (eds) The Information Systems Research Challenge, Harvard Business School Press
[52]Novak, Larry, 1992, “A Consortium-Based Model of Technology Transfer”, in V. Gibson and Raymond W. Smilor ed., Technology Transfer in Consortia and Strategic Alliances, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp.103-110.
[53]Perlmutter, H. V., David, A. H. ,1986, “Cooperate to Compete Globally”, Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr., pp.136-152
[54]Pisano, G. P. and Wheelwrigh S. C., 1995, “High-Tech R&D”, Harvard Business Review, Sep.-Oct., pp.93-105
[55]Porter, M. E., 1985, “Technology and competitive strategy”, in Competitive Advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance, Chapter 5, Free Press, New York.
[56]Poter, M. E., 1979, On Competition, Harvard Business Review Book Series
[57]Roessner, J. D., Porter, A. L. and Xu, H., 1992, ‘National Capacities to Absorb and Institutionalize External Science and Technology”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 4(2), pp.99-113.
[58]Rothwell, R. and Zqgveld, W., 1982, “The General Problem of Government Intervention and the Main Forms of Government Influence on Technical Innovation”, in Rothwell R. and Zqgveld W.,Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, Frances Printer, London, pp.46-54.
[59]Saghafi, M. M. and Davidson C. S., 1989, “The New Age of Global Competition in the Semiconductor Industry: Enter the Dragon”, Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.60-70.
[60]Sharif, M. N., 1986, “Measurement of Technology for National Development”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 29, pp.138-171
[61]Sharif, M. N., 1997, “Technology Strategy in Developing Counties: Evolving from Comparative to Competitive Advantage’, Int. J. Technology management, Vol. 14, Nos 2/3/4, pp.309-343.
[62]Soete, L. 1985, “International Diffusion of Technology, Industrial Development and Technological Leapfrogging”, World Development, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.409-422
[63]Sounder, W. E. And Nassor, S., 1990, “Managing R&D Consortia for Success”, Research Technology Management, Sep.-Oct., pp.44-50.
[64]TAT(a)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, “A framework for Technology Based National Planning”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 32, pp.5-18
[65]TAT(b)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, "Components of Technology for Resources Transformation”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 32, pp.19-35
[66]TAT(c)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, “Measurement of Technology Content Added”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 32, pp.37-47
[67]TAT(d)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, “Measurement of Level and Gap of Technology Development”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.32, pp.49-68
[68]TAT(e)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, “Evaluation of National Technology Capabilities”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 32, pp.69-83
[69]TAT(f)(Technology Atlas Team), 1987, “Assessment of Technology Climate in Two Countries”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 32, pp.85-109
[70]Toffler, A., 1980, The third wave, Bantam Books, New York
[71]Toffler, A., 1990, Power Shift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence At The Edge of The 21st Century, Bantam Books, New York
[72]Trak, A. and Mackenzie, M., 1980, “Appropriate Technology Assessment: a Note on Policy Considerations”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 17, pp.329-338
[73]Vogel, Ezra F., 李孝悌譯,1987,日本第一,長河書局
[74]Willyard, C. H. & McCless, C. W., 1987, “Motorolas technology Roadmap Process”, Research & Technology Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.13-19
[75]Woo, Jung-en, 1990, “The Political Economy of Industrial Leapfrogging: The semiconductor Industry in Korea”, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco
[76]Yin, J. E., 1992, ‘Technological Capabilities as Determinants of the Success of Technology Transfer Project”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 42, pp.17-29.
[77]Yuan, B. and Wan, M. Y., 1995, “The Influential factors for the Effectiveness of International Strategic Alliances of High-Tech Industry in Taiwan”, Int. J. Technology management, Vol. 10, Nos 7/8.
[78]Zahra, S. A., 1996, “Technology Strategy and New Venture Performance: a Study of Corporate-Sponsored and Independent Biotechnology Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11, Jul., pp.289-321
[79]曾雪良,1996,產業技術發展指標,經濟部科技研究發展專案產業技術政策規劃研究計劃執行報告,編號 85-EC-2-A-17-1816,經濟部
[80]主計處第三局網址:http: //140.129.146.192,2001,行業分類表,行政院
[81]吳思華、王政堂,1997,台灣積體電路相產業共生型態與演化動力之研究,中華民國科技管理研討會論文集
[82]呂雪彗,2000,“知識經濟方案”,工商時報8月29日第二版
[83]李仁芳,1998,“合作研發與國家創新系統”,科技發展政策報導,pp.541-550
[84]李仁芳、賴建男、賴威龍,1997,“台灣IC設計業中技術知識特質與組織動態能耐之研究”,中華民國科技管理研討會論文集
[85]杜富燕、林漢昌,1997,“高科技企業國際競爭力評估指標建立之研究-以台灣資訊電子業為例”,中華民國科技管理研討會論文集,pp.11-20
[86]林明杰,1996,技術能力與技術引進績效相關之研究,政大企研所博士論文
[87]林建山,1991,產業政策與產業管理-針對我國經濟發展的理論與現實,環球經濟社
[88]林瑞池,1997,技術合作策略影響因素之研究,中正企管碩士論文
[89]林文成,1995,台灣育成中心模式之研究─科技研發成果商品化的培育措施,交大科技管理研究所碩士論文
[90]洪德芳,1993,高科技企業技術策略與行銷策略配合對新產品發展績效關係影響之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
[91]科技顧問組,1992,科技管理之基本概念與實踐經驗,科技管理經驗交流與推廣計劃專案計劃報告,編號: STAG-81P-003,行政院
[92]徐作聖、羅達賢、許博炫、游朝成,1999,“工業技術研究院創業育成中心對我國產業發展之影響及未來展望”,第一屆工研院科技管理研討會論文集
[93]徐作聖、蘇俊榮,1998,“產業組合與創新政策之分析-以台灣積體電路產業為例”,中華民國科技管理年會暨論文研討會論文集
[94]徐炯生,1995,“台灣發光二極體產業技術與專利發展策略之研究”,交通大學科管所碩士論文
[95]馬維揚,2000,台灣高科技產業管理與經濟專題-以科學園區為例,滄海書局
[96]國科會,1989,中華民國科技統計名詞定義手冊,行政院
[97]張保隆,1997,產業技術擴散與融合成效之研究,國科會專題研究計劃成果報告
[98]張春興,1975,心理學,東華書局
[99]陳怡之,1994,“跨國資訊技術競爭力之比較研究”,ROC科技研討會論文集,pp. 365-375
[100]陳幸雄、張如心、劉政欣,1999,半導體第三次產業變革─SIP席捲全球,工業技術研究院電子研究所
[101]黃欽勇,1995,電腦王國R.O.C.-Republic of Computer的傳奇,天下文化出版
[102]楊丁元、陳慧玲,1998,業競天擇-高科技產業生態,工商時報出版
[103]楊國樞等,1988,社會及行為科學研究法,東華書局
[104]資策會,1997~1999,資訊工業年鑑
[105]劉常勇,1998,“後進地區科技產業發展策略探討-以台灣半導體產業與光碟機產業為研究對象”,中華民國科技管理年會暨論文研討會論文集,pp.41-50
[106]劉俊儀,1995,衡量國家技術能力之研究,交通大學科管所碩士論文
[107]劉錦龍,1994,“科技研發績效評估之探討”,研考雙月刊第18卷第5期, 10月, pp.22-31
[108]蔣碩傑等,1988,利用外資引進技術以促進我國產業技術升級,中華經濟研究院
[109]蔡正楊,1991,國際策略聯盟與技術移轉,技術移轉實務性講座
[110]鄭瑞雨,1993,“我國電腦、通訊及民生電子產業技術發展歷程”,工研院20週年慶我國科技產業發展之歷程研討會紀念論文集
[111]盧志遠,1997,“台灣半導體產業技術奇蹟之見證”,科技月刊,11月, pp.898-907
[112]蕭豐雄,1994,我國產業政策與產業發展,遠東經濟研究顧問社有限公司
[113]謝良武,1997,我國半導體製造業技術策略之研究,中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
[114]羅達賢、何錦堂,1998,“我國研發機構與高科技產業發展之研究-以資訊科技產業為例”,中華民國科技管理年會暨論文研討會論文集
[115]譚大純、陳正男,1997,“台灣─南韓半導體產業之相對國際競爭力,以Porter鑽石模式為基礎之實證研究”,中華民國科技管理研討會論文集
[116]柯王孫鵬,1996,台灣小型CNC控制器產業研發能力成長的觀察,交大管研所博士論文
[117]潘金平,1999,“基板形半導體構裝市場及技術趨勢”,工業材料151期,pp.78-85
[118]溫啟宏,1998,IC封裝業發展前景分析,工業技術研究院電子研究所
[119]溫偉利,1996,技術環境、技術策略與技術發展績效關係之研究:以台灣汽車電子零組件產業為例,政大企管所碩士論文
[120]許根雄,1999,“先進的封裝技術-晶圓級的封裝技術”,工業材料151期,pp.86-91
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE