臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：在股東權益極大化考量下銀行進行合併與轉投資決策之解析架構
作者：尹賢瑜
作者(外文)：Hsien-yu Yin
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：吳壽山
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2001
主題關鍵詞：銀行合併；轉投資決策；選擇權模式；股東權益極大化；bank consolidation；reinvestment decision；option model；maximization of equity value
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本文以選擇權模式衡量銀行權益價值，將金融機構合併後視為一個新的投資組合，分析銀行合併後的風險及權益價值狀態，並以極大化期初股東權益淨額為銀行目標，加上資本管制限制式，以探討銀行在此目標下將如何進行資產投資組合選擇行為，並進而討論影響選擇行為的因素及產生銀行合併綜效所需的相關條件。
本文主要結果如下：
1. 政府希望以合併改善目前銀行業營運風險過高的狀況，必須提高激勵的經濟誘因，如此將使銀行選擇互補行較高的銀行進行合併，並在合併後積極從事新種業務以分散資產風險，如此不但可以產生較大的合併綜效，同時也可以有效的降低銀行倒閉機率，達成政府的管制目標。當資本管制的風險權數較低時，激勵的效果較為顯著，激勵效果會隨著風險權數的增加而降低。
2.政府放寬銀行承作轉投資業務的限制，使得銀行間可以透過轉投資活動先行瞭解彼此的營運狀況，並且釋放可能合併的訊息試探市場的反應，以減少立即進行合併對營運所產生的衝擊，並決定是否將進一步進行銀行合併的策略。假設銀行在合併前先進行轉投資，與直接進行合併的策略相較而言將產生以下差異。
(1).當兩家銀行在合併前先進行轉投資，與直接進行合併相較而言，銀行將從事較多分散資產風險的業務。
(2).銀行只需從事較少分散資產風險的業務，即能產生合併綜效。因此將使銀行產生較大合併綜效，使銀行合併案較容易成功。
This article evaluates equity value by option pricing model taking a consolidated financial institute as a new portfolio to analyze the change of risk and equity value. Besides finding how the banks selecting portfolio to maximizing net equity value subject to capital regulation constraint, we also discuss the factors affecting selecting behaviors and the necessary conditions leading to consolidated synergy.
We obtain the main results as following:
1. If government hopes to improve the over-risky situation bank industry facing by means of mergers, the more economic incentives must be proposed. This policy will make banks selecting ones with more substitute business to merge and aggressively operating new business to diversify post-merger asset risks happened. The regulatory goal can be achieved because of larger synergy and lower insolvent risk. The inspiring effect is more significant if the lower risk weight is adopted by capital regulation, but will decrease with higher risk weights.
2. Government releasing the scope of reinvestment business will make banks comprehend each other through reinvesting activities and supply information of possible consolidation to test the reaction of market, so the impact from mergers on operation can be decreased, and the decision of consolidation can also be determined. Comparing to direct consolidation, banks merging after reinvesting have the following differences:
(1). Banks will operate more risk-diversifying business.
(2). Banks operating only fewer risk-diversifying businesses can produce synergy. It means the larger synergy will succeed the merger case more easily.
參考文獻
1.丁碧慧，吳壽山，尹賢瑜，吳欽衫，「存款保險與風險性資產導向資本管制」，存款保險資訊季刊，第十三卷，第四期，中華民國八十九年六月。
2.尹賢瑜，吳壽山，「銀行風險性資本管制後營運投資風險與存款保險機制之整合與解析」，淡江人文社會學刊，第八期，中華民國九十年，即將刊出。
3.尹賢瑜，吳壽山，「銀行合併之決策模式」，臺灣銀行季刊，第五十二卷，第三期，中華民國九十年九月，即將刊出。
4.李孟茂，「金融機構併購之探討」，臺灣經濟金融月刊，第二十七卷，第九期，1-9頁，中華民國八十年九月。
5.李桐豪，「檢視問題金融機構發生原因與處理政策」，基層金融，第37期， 1-13頁，中華民國八十七年九月。
6.李紹盛、李儀坤，「綜合銀行制度與防火牆」，台北銀行月刊，第二十二卷第六期，中華民國八十一年六月。
7.李儀坤，「金融制度改革與證券業」，證券市場發展季刊，第十二期，中華民國八十年十月。
8.沈中華，「銀行合併轉投資之現在與未來」，金融財務，第五期，中華民國八十九年。
9.沈中華，「邁向綜合銀行之路」，台北銀行月刊，第二十八卷，第四期，中華民國八十七年四月。
10.邱杏茹，「影響本國銀行購併因素之探討」，文化大學國際企業管理研究所，碩士論文，中華民國八十九年。
11.林　音，「臺灣地區金融機構合併及改制問題之研究」，臺灣銀行季刊，第四十二卷，第二期，1-39頁，中華民國八十年六月。
12.吳昭欣，「台灣企業合併收購的績效評估：以股票上市公司為例」，東海大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文，中華民國八十一年。
13.孫梅瑞，「國內上市公司從事公司購併活動對經營績效影響之研究」，國立政治大學，博士論文，中華民國八十九年。
14.許李瑋，「我國銀行業購併之績效與綜效之實證研究」，文化大學國際企業管理研究所，碩士論文，，中華民國八十八年。
15.郭照榮，「金融機構合併之考量因素及其對象之選擇」，金融財務，第五期，1-11頁，中華民國八十九年。
16．葉怒彰，「從金融機構跨業經營模式探討中國商銀、上海商銀與世華商銀合併之可行性研究」，國立台灣大學財務金融學系，碩士論文，中華民國八十九年。
17.郭錦貴，「不同規模銀行之合併是綜效或補貼－以第一、大安及泛亞銀行為例」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所，碩士論文，中華民國九十年。
18．魏美玉，「從銀行業跨業合併探討臺灣銀行與華南銀行合併之可行性研究」，國立台灣大學財務金融學系，碩士論文，中華民國八十九年。
19．魏啟林，「台灣廠商跨國經營之購併策略分析」，台灣企業國際化研討會論文，中華民國八十二年十月。
20.Allen, L. and A.S. Ceboyan, “Bank acquisitions and ownership structure: theory and evidence,” Journal of Banking and Finance,15, pp.425-428, 1991.
21.Amihud, Y. and B. Lev. "Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers," Bell Journal of Economics, 12, pp.605-617,1981.
22.Berger, A.N. and T.H. Hannan, “The price-concentration relationship in banking,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, pp.291-299, 1989.
23. “Using measures of firm efficiency to distinguish among alternative explanations of structure-performance relationship,” Managerial Finance, 23, pp.6-31, 1997.
24.Berger, A.N. and D.B. Humphrey, “Interstate banking and the payment system,” Journal of Financial Service Research , 1, pp.131-145,1988.
25. “Megamergers in banking and the use of cost efficiency as an antitrust defense,” Antitrust Bulletin, 37, pp.541-600, 1992.
26.Berger, A.N., A.K. Kashyap and J.M. Scalise, “The transformation of US banking industry: What a long, strange trip it’s been,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 2 , pp.55-218, 1995.
27.Berger, A N., S.D. Rebecca and E.S. Philip, “The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, pp.135-194, 1999.
28.Black, F. and M. Scholes, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp.617-659, 1973.
29.Brealey, Richard A. and Stewart C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
30.Cornett, M.M. and H. Tehranian, “Changes in corporate performance associated with bank acquisitions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 31, pp.211-234, 1992.
31.Cox, John C. and Mark Rubinstein, Options markets, Prentice-Hall,Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1985.
32.Cummins, J.D., S.L. Tennyson, and M.A.Weiss, “Consolidation and efficiency in the Us life insurance industry,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, pp.325-357, 1999.
33.Delong, G.L., R.C. Smith and I. Walter, Global merger and acquisition tables 1997, Solomon Center, New York University, New York, 1998.
34.Duan, Jin-Chuan, Arthur F. Moreau and C.W. Sealey, “Incentive-compatible deposit insurance pricing and bank regulatory policies,” Research in Finance, 11, pp.207-227, 1993.
35.Elyasiani, E. and S. Mehdian, “The comparative efficiency performance of small and large us commercial banks in the pre-and post-deregulation eras,” Economics, 27(11), pp.1069-1079, 1995.
36.Gorton, G. and A.M. Santomero, “Market discipline and bank subordinated debt,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 22, pp.119-128 , 1988.
37.Hancock, D. and D.B. Humphrey, “Payment transactions, and system: A survey,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, pp.1573-1624, 1998.
38.Handlock, C.J., J.F. Houston and M. Ryngaert, “The role of managerial incentives in bank acquisitions,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, pp.221-249, 1999.
39.Hannan, T.H. “Bank commercial loan markets and the role of market structure: Evidence from surveys of commercial lending,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 15, pp.133-149, 1991.
40. “Bank fees and their variation across banks and locations,” Working paper, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC., 1998
41.Hannan, T.H. and J.D. Wolken, “Returns to bidders and targets in the acquistion process: Evidence from the banking industry,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 3, pp.5-16. , 1989.
42.Heggested, A “Riskness of investments in n bank activities by bank holding companies,” Journal of Economics and Business, pp.219-223, 1975.
43.Jackson, W.E. III. “Market structure and the speed of price adjustments: Evidence of nonmonotonicity,” Review of Industrial Organation, 12, pp.37-57, 1997.
44.Linder,J.C. and D.B. Crane, “Bank mergers: Integration and profitability,” Journal of Financial Services Research , 7, pp.35-55, 1992.
45.Merton, R.C. “On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, pp.449-470, 1974.
46.Meyer, L.H. Statement before the committee on banking and financial services , US House of Representatives, April 29 , 1998.
47.Milbourn, T.T., A.W.A. Boot and A.V. Thakor, “Megamergers and expanded scope: Theories of bank size and activity diversity,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, pp.195-214, 1999.
48.Pilloff, S.J. “Performance changes and shareholder wealth creation associated with mergers of publicly traded banking institutions,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 28, pp.294-310, 1996.
49.Pilloff, S.J. and A.M. Santomero, “The value effects of bank mergers and aquistions,” In: Amihud, Y. Miller, G. (Eds.) Bank Mergers and aquistions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp.59-78, 1998.
50.Radecki, L.J., J. Wenninger and D.K Orlow, “Industry structure: Electronic delivery’s potential effects on retail banking,” Journal of Retail Banking Services, 19 (4), pp.57-63, 1997.
51. Rhoades, S.A. “The efficiency effects of bank mergers: An overview of case studies of nine mergers,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp.273-291, 1998.
52.Ronn, E. and A. Verma, “Pricing risk-adjusted deposit insurance: an option-based model,” Journal of Finance, 41, pp.87-95, 1986.
53.Scherer, F. M., Industrial market structure and economic performance, Houghton Mifflins, pp.21-33, 1980.
54.Spindt, P.A. and V. Tarhan, “Are there synergies in bank mergers,” Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA. , 1992.
55. Vander, Vennet R. “Determinants of EU bank takeovers: A logit analysis,” Mimeo, March, 1997.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：685（臺灣：682，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68362817
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上