臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：馬克思文論中的政治、社會、與歷史：對《霍華德莊園》的詹明信式閱讀
作者：陳鄭玉秀
作者(外文)：Chen Cheng Yu-shiow
校院名稱：淡江大學
系所名稱：西洋語文研究所
指導教授：狄殷豪
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2001
主題關鍵詞：詹明信；福斯特；馬克思；盧卡契；民族；文化；霍華德莊園；此情可問天；後殖民理論；文化研究；後設評論；政治潛意識；Jameson；Marxist literary criticism (theory)；metacommentary；Forster；nation；culture；post-colonialism；Marx；Engles；Macherey；Goldmann；Lukacs；the political unconscious；history；society；politics；Kafka；Beethoven；New Criticism；Structuralism；post-structuralism；cultural studies
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:93
馬克思文論中的政治、社會、歷史:
對《霍華德莊園》的詹明信式閱讀
　　本論文的立場基於一個假設：文學乃歷史的呈現與指導。
　　多數二十世紀的文論，都不能完全將文學與歷史緊密的結合；然而，發展近一百年的馬派文論卻在這方面發揮了極大優越性。從馬克思、恩格斯、盧卡契、高德曼、馬舍雷，我們可以看到馬派歷史詮釋的基本視角：政治與社會。馬派歷史詮釋在這個視角下，不斷參入西方各家文論概念，試圖對文學的價值意義做出評判。然而，我們必須指出，歷史詮釋的廣域並不能為馬克思文論所概括；「政治」與「社會」也並非文學內涵的全部。因此我們須在當代找到一條不同於馬派概念的歷史詮釋，即文化與民族歷史詮釋（這也是當代重視後殖民議題的西方歷史詮釋的轉向）來重新考量並批判馬派歷史詮釋的缺失，最後再嘗試提出一新的歷史詮釋概念來呈現文學的本質。這便是本論文的歷程與目標，而作者探討馬派文論良劣的焦點便是透過當代馬派代表詹明信之「政治、社會、歷史」同心圓理論來對現代主義文本《霍華德莊園》作分析，佐以詹明信本人在晚期對此文本的討論，再進而指陳理論的優越與缺點。
　　詹明信在《政治潛意識》一書中，建立起其同心圓理論。我們可看出其作為馬派文論家對馬克思主義的執著，也可看出其作為當代西方知識份子對其他文論的批評與嚮往；這兩種傾向構成其理論的高度聚合力，也造成其理論的雜亂與矛盾。另一方面，選擇福斯特，一位極早觸種族、性別，及殖民文化衝突的二十世紀初現代主義者和其作品，便是為了對詹明信理論作一總體考驗。
　　經過了第三章的應用實踐批評《霍華德莊園》之後，我們將明確地指出詹明信的缺失、他晚期的歷史詮釋轉向、以及這種轉向的不完全性所呈現的馬派文論侷限。之後，整篇論文將集中地從「文化與民族」視角對詹明信文論理論與馬克思的歷史詮釋架構做出樍進的批判，然後提出一個重要問題：馬派文論以及馬思克主義能否解決當代面臨的歷史和文學問題？它在將來是否具有存在的適當性？
　　在結論的部分，作者將提供有興趣的讀者一個可能的答案，以及一套新的同心圓歷史詮釋概念。
Abstract
This dissertation is based on one idea: literature is the direct presentation and guidance of history.
Most literary theories in the twentieth century cannot intensively connect literature and history; however; Marxist literary theory, which has developed for nearly one hundred years, shows its superiority in this aspect. From Marx and Engels, through Lukács and Goldmann, to Macherey, we see the basic points in Marxist historical interpretation: the political and the social. From these two angles, Marxist literary theory has been continuously subsuming other Western literary theories for attempting to evaluate the significance in literature and literary texts.
Nevertheless, we have to point out that the realm of historical interpretation cannot be contained in Marxist literary theory. In addition, the political and the social are not the whole content of literature. Therefore, it is necessary to find a different historical interpretation for reconsidering and criticizing the shortcomings of Marxist historical view and finally tries to bring forward a new historical interpretation to present the essence of literature. This is the historical interpretation from the national and cultural points of view (This also shows the turn of Western historical interpretation, emphasizing post-colonial topics nowadays). This is the process and goal of this dissertation. The author’s focus of discussing the advantage and disadvantage in Marxist theory is on the contemporary Marxist, Jameson’s, theory of “the political, the social, and the historical,” the three concentric framework, and its applied analysis of Howards End, a typical modernist text. There is also Jameson’s later discussion on this text, and the evaluation on his discussion.
In Jameson’s “The Political Unconscious,” he establishes the theory of concentric framework. We can see here his persistence in Marxism and his aspiration for other Western literary theories. These two inclinations form both richness and contradictions in his theory. On the other hand, the practical criticism by this theory on Forster, a modernist very early writing about national, gender, and cultural conflicts, and his work is for the general test of Jameson’s Marxist framework.
After the criticism on Howards End in Chapter 3, we will clearly point out Jameson’s flaws, his later turn of historical interpretation, and the significance presenting the limits of Marxist theory by this “turn.” Then, this dissertation will focus on the radical commentary, from cultural and national vision, on Marxist and Jameson’s structure of historical interpretation. The author of this dissertation therefore raises an important question: Can Marxist theory solve the contemporary problem of history and literature? Will it keep the propriety for its own existence?
In Conclusion, the author will finally provide the readers interested in this question with a proper answer and a brand new concentric framework for the concept of historical interpretation.
Works Consulted
Abicht, Ludo. “Marx, Freud, and the Writers: A New Attempt at Integration.” Style 18.3 (1984): 377-386.
Adorno, Theodor W. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Ed. J. M. Bernstein. London: Routledge, 1991.
Ahmad, Aijaz. “Jameson’s Rhetoric of Otherness and the ‘National Allegory’.” The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. Ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Holen Tiffin. London: Routledge, 1995.
Althusser, Louis. Essays on Ideology. London: Columbia UP, 1991.
Bennett, Tony. Formalism and Marxism. London: Methuen. 1979.
Bennington, Geoff. “Not Yet.” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 12.3 (1982): 23-32.
Berlin, Isaiah. Karl Marx: His Life and Environment. New York: Oxford UP, 1978.
Berthoud, J. A. “Narrative and Ideology: A Critique of Fredric Jameson’s The Political Unconscious.” Narrative: From Malory to Motion Pictures. Ed. Hawthorn Jeremy. London: Arnold, 1985.
Behar, Jack. “Radical Unworldliness.” Essay in Literature 12.1 (1985): 125-137.
Born, Daniel. “Private Gardens, Public Swamps: Howards End and the Revaluation of Liberal Guilt.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 35.3 (1993 Fall): 347-62.
Bradbury, Malcolm (ed). Forster: A Collection of Critical Essays. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
Brander, Laurence. E. M. Forster: A Critical Study. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1968.
Buck, R. A. “Dialogue and Power in E. M. Forster’s Howards End.” Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context. Ed. Peter Verdonk and Jean Jacques Weber. London: Routledge, 1995.
---. “Forster’s Howards End.” Explicator 53.4 (1995 Summer): 221-24.
Buhariwala, Shernavaz. Arcades to a Dome: Humanism in the Novels of E. M. Forster. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1983.
Burnharm, Clint. The Jamesonian Unconscious: The Aesthetics of Marxist Theory. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.
Cabral, Amilcar. “National Liberation and Culture.” Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. Ed. Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Calinescu, Matei. “Marxism, ‘Theory,’ and History.” Stanford Literature Review 3.2 (1986 Fall ): 173-182.
Clark, Michael. “Imagining The Real: Jameson’s Use of Lacan.” New Orleans Review II(1984): 67-72.
Collits, Terry. “Imperialism, Marxism, Conrad: A Political Reading of Victory.” Textual Practice 3.3 (1989 Winter): 303-322.
Dasenbrock, Reed Way. “Fredric Jameson and the Dilemmas of Late Marxism.” Raritan: A Quarterly Review 11.3 (1992): 117-130.
Delany, Paul. “’Islands of Money’: Rentier Culture in Howard End.” E. M. Forster. Ed. Tambling Jeremy. New York: St. Martin’s, 1995.
Dowling, William C. Jameson, Althusser, Marx: An Introduction to The Political Unconscious. New York: Cornell UP, 1984.
Doyle, T Douglas. “Forster’s Howards End.” Explicator 52.4 (1994 Summer): 226-28.
Eagleton, Tedrry. “Fredric Jameson: The Politics of Style.” Against the Grain: Essays 1975-1985. London: Verso, 1986.
---. Marxism and Literary Criticism. London: Methuen, 1976.
---. Walter Benjamin or Toward a Revolutionary Criticism. London: Verso, 1981.
Fanon, Frantz. “On National Culture.” Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. Ed. Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Fisher, Ernst and Franz Marek. Marx in His Own Words. Trans. Anna Bostock. New York: Penguin, 1970.
Flieger, Jerry Aline. “The Prison-House of Ideology: Critic as Inmate.” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 12.3 (1982): 47-56.
Forster, E. M. Howards End. New York: Signet, 1992.
---. Maurice. New York: Penguin Books, 1971.
---. A Room with a View. New York: Vintage Books, 1989.
---. Where Angels Fear to Tread. New York: Bantam Book, 1996.
Fromm, Erich. Marx’s Concept of Man. New York: A Frederick Ungar Book, 1988.
Frow, John “Marxism After Structuralism.” Southern Review: Literary and Interdisciplinary Essays 17.1 (1984): 33-50.
Furbank, P. N. E. M. Forster: A Life. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978.
Gardner, Philip. “E. M. Forster and ‘the Possession of England’.” Modern Language Quarterly: A Journal of Literary History 42.2 (1981 June): 166-183.
Giles, Steve. “Against Interpretation? Recent Trends in Marxist Criticism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 28.1 (1998):68-77.
Gilroy, Paul. “Urban Social Movements, ‘Race’ and Community.” Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. Ed. Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
Golden, Denneth L. “Jung, Modern Dissociation, and Forster’s Howards End.” College Language Association Journal 29.2 (1985 Dec):221-231.
Goldmann, Lucien. Towards a Sociology of the Novel. Trans. Alan Sheidan. London: Tavistock, 1975.
Goldstein, Philip. “The Politics of Fredric Jameson’s Literary Theory: A Critique.” Postmodernism, Jameson, Critique. Ed. Douglas Kellner. Washinton DC: Mainsonneeuve, 1989.
Green, Leonard. “Interview.” Diacritics: A Review 11.1 (1984): 36-45.
Heims, Neil. “Forster’s Howards End.” Explicator 42.1 (1983 Fall): 39-41.
Howard, Catherine E. “‘Only connect’: Logical Aesthetic of Fragmentation in A World Child.” Twentieth Century Literature: A Scholarly and Critical Journal 38.1 (1992 Spring): 54-65.
Iffland, James. “The Political Unconscious.” New Orleans Review 11.1 (1984):36-45.
Jackson, Leonard. The Dematerialisation of Karl Marx: Literature and Marxist Theory. New York: Longman, 1994.
Jameson, Fredric. The Ideologies of Theory, Essays 1971-1986,Volume 1: Situations of Theory. Minneapolis: Minnesota Up, 1989.
---. The Ideologies of Theory, Essays 1971-1986, Volume 2: The Syntax of History. Minneapolis: Minnesota Up, 1989.
*---. Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1971.
---. “Modernism and Imperialism.” Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.
---. Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. New York: Cornell UP, 1981.
---. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1991.
---. The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1972.
---. “Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism.” Social Text 15 (fall), 1986.
Jay, Martin. Marxism and Totality: The Adventure of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley: California UP, 1984.
Jelmling, Steven. “Marxist Pleasure: Jameson and Eagleton.” Ed. Amiran Eyal and Unworth John. Essays in Postmodern Culture. New York: Oxford UP, 1993.
Kazin, Alfred. “Howards End Revisited.” Partisan Review 59.1 (1992 Winter): 29-43.
Kellner, Gouglas. “Jameson, Marxism, and Postmodernism.” Postmodernism, Jameson, Critique. Washington DC: Maisonneuve, 1989.
Kolakowski, Leszek. Main Currents of Marxism: Its Origins and Dissolution. Trans. P. S. Falla. 3 Vols. New York: Oxford UP, 1978.
Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978.
Laing, Dave. The Marxist Theory of Art. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1978.
Lang, Berel and Forrest Williams (ed.). Marxism and Art: Writings in Aesthetics and Criticism. New York: David McKay, 1972.
Layoun, Mary. “The Strategy of Narrative Form.” Crit. Exchange 22 (1987 Spring): 37-42.
Leitch, Vincenct B. “Postmodern Culture: The Ambivalent of Frdric Jameson.” College Literature 19.2 (1992): 111-122.
---. The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. Trans. John and Necke Mander. London: Merlin Press, 1963.
---. Writer and Critic. Trans. Arthur Kahn. London: Merlin Press, 1978.
Levenson, Michael. “Liberalism and Symbolism in Howards End.” Papers on Language and Literature: A Journal for Scholars and Critics of Language and Literature 21.3 (1985 Summer): 295-316.
Lyotard, Jean-François. “The Unconscious, History, And Phrases: Notes on The Political Unconscious.” Trans. Michael Clark. New Orleans Review II(1984): 73-79.
Lukács, Georg. The Historical Novel. Trans. Hannah and Stanley Mitchell. London: University of Nebraska P1983.ress,
---. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin Press, 1983.
---. “Realism in the Balance.” Aesthetics and Politics. Ed. Ronald Taylor. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Verso, 1977.
---. The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. Trans. John and Necke Mander. London: Merlin Press, 1963.
---. Theory of the Novel. Trans. Anna Bostock. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1971.
---. Record of a Life: An Autobiographical Sketch. Trans. Rodney Livington. Ed. István Eörsi. London: Verso, 1971.
---. Writer and Critic. Trans. Arthur Kahn. London: Merlin Press, 1978.
Lunn, Eugene. Marxism and Modernism: An Historical Study of Lukács, Brecht, Benjamin, and Adorno. London: California UP, 1982.
Macaulay, Rose. The Writings of E. M. Forster. London: The Hogarth Press, 1970.
Mackoski, Nacy. “A Postmodern Critique of the Modern Projects of Fredric Jameson and Patricia Bizzell.” Journal of Advanced Composition 13.2 (1993 Fall): 329-344.
Marcuse, Herbert. The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston: Beacon Press, 1978.
---. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.
Martin, Robert K. and Herz Judith Scherer (ed.). E. M. Forster: Century Revaluations. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1982.
Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto. Ed. Frederic L. Bender. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988.
---. The Economic & Philosophic Manuscript of 1844. Ed. Dirk J. Struik. New York: International Publishers, 1986.
Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. The German Ideology. Ed. C. J. Arthur. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1970.
---. Marx and Engels on Literature & Art. Ed. Lee Baxadall and Stefan Morawski. St. Louis: Telo Press, 1973.
---. Selected Correspondence. Ed. S. W. Ryazanskaya. Trans. I. Lasker. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1982.
May, Brian. “Neoliberalism in Rorty and Forster.” Literature and Psychology 41.1-2 (1995): 19-36.
MaLellan, David. The Thoughts of Karl Marx: An Introduction. London: Macmillan, 1980.
---. Marxism after Marx: An Introduction. London: Macmillan, 1980.
Merquior, J. G. Western Marxism. Ed. Justin Wintle. London: Granada, 1986.
Mohanty, S. P. “History at the Edge of Discourse: Marxism, Culture, Interpretation.” Diacritic: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 12.3 (1982): 33-45.
Muhlestein, Daniel Kay. Rethinking The Political Unconscious. Diss. Rice U, 1992. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1997. 9234405.
Mulhern, Francis (ed.). Contemporary Marxist Literary Criticism. London: Longman, 1992.
Norris, Christopher. Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. London: Methuen, 1982.
O’Hara, Daniel T. “The Poverty of Theory: On Society and the Sublime.” Contemporary Literature 26.3 (1985): 335-350.
Palmer, Richard E. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Shleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1969.
Parkinson, G.H.R. George Lukács. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
Pinkeron, Mary. “Ambiguous Connections: Leonard Bast’s Role in Howards End .” Twentieth Century Literature: A Scholarly and Critical Journal 31.2-3 (1985 Summer- Fall): 221-235.
Pradhan, S. V. “Libations in New Haven! What Did Jameson Imbibe? On Synthesizing Marx and Freud.” Littcrit 13. 1-2(1987):1-21.
Ryan, Michael. “Political Criticism.” Contemporary Literary Theory. Ed. G. Douglas Athkins & Laura Morrow. Amherst: Massachusetts UP, 1989.
Scholes, Bobert. “Interpretation and Narrative: Kermode and Jameson.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 17.3 (1984): 266-278.
Scott, P. J. M. E. M. Forster: Our Permanent Contemporary. London: Vision, 1984.
Seaton, James. “Marxism Without Difficulty: Fredric Jameson’s The Political Unconscious.” The Centennial Review 28-29.4-1 (1984-1985): 122-142.
Shahane, Vasant A. Approaches to E. M. Forster: A Centenary Volume. Stlantic Highlands: Arnold Heinemann, 1981.
---. E. M. Forster: A Study of Double Vision. New Dehli: Arnod-Heinemann, 1975.
Shankar Lavina Dhingra. The Great Turn of the Century Debated on the ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’. Diss. Tufts U, 1996. Ann Arbor: MI (DAI), 1996. DA9626778.
Shimomoto, Teruaki. “About the Condition of England Question During the Edwardian Period with Special Reference to Tono Bungay, Howards End, and The Condition of England.” Language and Culture 23 (1992): 115-40.
Shumway, David, R. “Jameson/ Hermeneutics/ Postmodernism.” Postmodernism, Jameson, Critique. Ed. Gouglas Kellner. Washington DC: Maisonneuve, 1989.
Singer, Alan. “Desire’s Desire: Toward a Historical Formalism.” Enclitic 8.1-2 (1984): 56-67.
Sontag, Susan. Against Interpretation, and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Groux, 1969.
Sprinker, Michael. Imaginary Relations: Aesthetics and Ideology in the Theory of Historical Materialism. New York: Verso 1987.
---. “the Part and the Whole.” Diacritic: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 12.3 (1982): 57-71.
---. “Reinventing Historicism: An Introduction to the Work of Fredric Jameson.” American Critics at Work: Examinations of Contemporary Literary Theory. Ed. Kramer Victor A. New York: Whitson, 1984.
Stape, J. H. “Leonard’s ‘Fatal Forgotten Umbrella’: Sex and the Manuscript Revision to Howards End.” Journal of Modern Literature 9.1 (1981-1982): 123-132.
Stephanson, Anders. “Regarding Postmodernism─A Conversation with Fredric Jameson.” Postmodernism, Jameson, Critique. Ed. Gouglas Kellner. Washington DC: Maisonneuve, 1989.
Stoll, Rae Harris. “The Unthinkable Poor in Edwardian Writing.” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature 15.4 (1982 Dec.): 23-45.
Stone, Wilfred. The Cave and the Mountain: A Study of E. M. Forster. London: Oxford UP, 1966.
Tambling, Jeremy (ed.), E. M. Forster. New York: St. Martin’s, 1995.
Taylor, Ronald. Aesthetics and Politics. London: Verso, 1980.
Thompson, Ewa M. “Dialectical Methodologies in the American Academy.” Modern Age: A Quarterly Review 28(1984): 9-22.
Thomson, Douglass H. “From Words to Things: Margaret’s Progress in Howards End.” Studies in the Novel 15.2 (1983 Summer): 122-134.
Trilling, Lionel. E. M. Forster: The Makers of Modern Literature. Norfolk: New Directions Books, 1943.
Veeser, H. Aram (ed). The New Historicism. New York: Routledge, 1989.
Weatherhead, Andrea K. “Howards End: Beethoven’s Fifth.” Twentieth Century Literature: A Scholarly and Critical Journal 31.2-3 9 (Summer- Fall): 247-264.
Weber, Samuel. “Capitalizing History: Notes on The Political Unconscious.” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 13.2 (1983): 14-28.
Wilde, Alan. The Search for Order: A Study of E. M. Forster. New York: New York UP, 1964.
West, Cornell. “Fredric Jameson’s Marxist Hermeneutics.” Boundary-2: A Journal of Postmodern Literature and Culture 11.1-2 (1982-1983): 177-200.
Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford UP, 1978.
Wise, Christopher jAnthony. The Marxian Hermeneutics of Fredric Jameson. Diss. California U, 1992. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1997. 9231950.
Wood, Allen. Karl Marx. London: Routledge, 1986.
Wood, Philip. “Sartre, Anglo-American Marxism, and the People of the Subject in History.” Yale French Studies 68 (1985):15-54.
Wright, Anne. Literature of Crisis, 1910-22: Howards End, Heartbreak House, Women in Love and The Waste Land. New York: St. Martin’s, 1984.
Xie, Shaobo. Beyond the Linguistic Moment: Allegories of the Political Unconscious. Diss. Calgary U, 1994.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：662（臺灣：637，外國：25） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68004190
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上