:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國家創新系統對台灣高科技產業發展影響之研究
作者:邱奕嘉 引用關係
作者(外文):Yi-Chia Chiu
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:科技管理所
指導教授:徐作聖
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2003
主題關鍵詞:高科技產業國家創新系統產業創新系統high-tech industriesnational innovation systemsindustiral innovation systems
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
創新富國是知識經濟時代的重要策略,而國家創新系統(National Innovation Systems)的建立更是各國科技政策發展的重要議題。從創新富國的角度來看,民間企業應是一個國家創新能量的主體,政府適時介入民間企業的技術創新活動有其階段性的任務。本研究主要是提供一套分析性的國家創新系統模型,包含了國家面、產業面、企業面的分析,該模型探討開發中國家的國家產業組合、產業組合、產業創新系統、產業競爭策略群組,我們利用其互動,以分析瞭企業競爭力的來源與經濟成長之動力。
為驗證模型的有效性與實用性,本研究以台灣IC/SOC與生物晶片產業為例,並利用相關的定性與定量方法,分析國家創新系統對產業發展的影響。研究結果除顯示該模型確可提供一套完整的分析邏輯外,更可以了解不同產業特性與國家創新系統的關聯。
研究結果顯示台灣IC/SOC產業由於具有良好的半導體基礎,目前處在變遷期階段,逐漸朝向成熟期發展。現在有共識認為發展所需的產業創新系統為需求條件與相關性支援產業,而在未來五年則是技術接收能力。就生物晶片產業而言由於仍在萌芽階段,現在有共識認為發展所需的產業創新系統為需求條件、技術接收能力、多元化創新機制、知識本質與擴散機制,而未來五年則是生產要素、相關性支援產業、網路連結性、多元化創新機制。
在探討技術與產業互動關係最著名的兩個理論,分別為新貿易理論(New Trade Theory)與技術生命週期(Technology Life Cycle)。本研究以上述兩個理論佐證國家創新系統的研究,並將研究結果與上述兩個理論作比較,其推衍結論的一致性証實了本研究結論的實用性。
The national innovation systems (NIS) are the key to promoting nation’s capability for innovation. It has especially been the main focus on the development of science-technoloogy based economic growth for developing nations, within which government plays a pivotal role.
This dissertation reports on an analytical approach for the development of the National Innovation Systems (NIS) which entail national, industrial and firm level analysis. Four key elements are included in this approach, namely national portfolio analysis, industrial portfolio analysis, industry innovation systems, and analysis of firm’s strategic positioning. While the NIS and IIS are crafted to identify the critical relationships between the NIS and industry’s key success factors (KSFs) that contribute to firm competitiveness and economic growth, the industrial portfolio model is aimed at characterizing Taiwan’s industrial structure for a given industry.
Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to study impacts of NIS on the developments of Taiwan’s High-tech Industries. IC/SOC and bio-chips industries are chosen to illustrate the utility of the model.
Cross-comparisons of the results, as derived from NIS and portfolio analysis, show that Taiwan’s IC/SOC industry is in the transitional phase and moves toward the specific phase. For the IC/SOC industry, the present common factors which are required to facilitate the industrial development are “demand conditions”, “related industries”, whereas “the receiver competence” for the future perspective derived from the two analyses.
The bio-chips industry is in the fluid phase which presently requires the common factors such as “demand conditions”, “receiver competence”, “variety of creation”, “nature of knowledge and diffusion”. In the future, the factor conditions, related industries, network connectivity, variety of creation are needed for expeditious development.
Two economic theories, “The New Trade Theory” and “Theory of Technology Life Cycle”, are used to explain the interactions of technological and industrial dynamics in the changing locus of comparative advantage. It seems that the New Trade Theory can betther explain the results derived from the NIS analysis for the IC/SOC industry. However, both theories seem to fail to explain the results for the bio-chips industry, suggesting the high uncertainties and burgeoning nature of the industry.
Freeman, C., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, 1982.
Lundvall, B., National Systems of Innovations: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, Pinter Publishers, 1992.
Mowery, D.C. and Nelson R, Sources of industrial Leadership: Studeies of Seven Industries, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
同註1
同註2
Schumpeter J., The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1934.
Nelson, R., National Innovation Systems - A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, 1993.
同註1
同註2
同註5
. 同註2
. 同註5
. 同註4
. Archibugi, D. and Michie, J., “National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis”, Research Policy,25, August 1996
. Archibugi, D. and Michie, J., “Technological Globalization or National Systems of Innovation ?”, Future, 29, pp.121-137, 1997.
Mowery, D.C. and Rosenberg, N., Technology and the pursuit of Economic Growth, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Mytelka, L. K., “Local System of Innovation in Globalized World Economy”, Industry and Innovation, 7(1):15-32, 2000.
OECD, National Innovation System: Background Report,1997
Arocena, R.. and Sutz, J., “Looking at systems of Innovation from the South”, Industry and Innovation, 7(1):55-75, 2000.
. Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R., The Nature and Importance of Economic Competence in Technological Systems and Economic Performance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
. Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R., On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological System in Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation, Kluwer Acadmic Publishers, 1995.
. 同註19
. 同註20
. 同註19
Porter, M. E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, New York, 1990.
同註24
Kolter, P., The Marketing of Nations , The Free Press, New York, 1997.
Kim, L., Imitation to Innovation , Harvard Business School Press, pp.24 ,1997
徐作聖, 全球科技政策與企業經營,華泰書局, pp.25,1995
同註24
同註26
鈴村興大郎著,產業政策與產業結構,台灣經濟研究院編譯,台灣經濟研究院發行,1997.
同註26
同註29”
同註24
同註26
同註27
同註27
Treacy, M. and Wiersema, F., The Discipline of Market Leaders-Choose your Customers, Narrow Your Focus, Dominate Your Market, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 4th printing, March 1995
Hope, J. and Hope, T., Competing in the Third Wave: The Ten Key Management Issues of the Information Age, Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
Shank, J. K. and Govindarajan, V., Strategic Cost Management, The Free Press, New York, 1993, pp231
Barnard, C. S., Farm planning and control , 2th ed., Cambridge Press New York, 1976
Tillett, B. B., Authority control in the online environment , Haworth Press , New York , 1989
Ferguson, C. R. and Dickinson, R., “Critical Success Factor for Director in the Eighties”, Business Horizons, 1982.
Boyton, B. and Zmud, R. W., “An Assessment of Critical Success Factor”, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 1984, pp17-27
Krugman, P., Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1987.
Posner, M.V. “International Trade and Technical Change”, Oxford Economic Papers, Oct. 1961.
Vernon, R. “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966.
Utterback, J., Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard University Press, 1994.
Rothwell, R., Zegveld., Industrial Innovation and Public Policy, Greenwood Publishing Group 1981,
同註24
同註29
同註27
同註40
李元亨,「台灣SOC產業發展政策與產業組合研究」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
陳佳伶,「台灣蛋白質晶片和實驗室晶片之產業組合分析與創新政策」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
黃煜程,「台灣生技產業之產業組合分析與創新政策 - 以基因晶片為例」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
同註56
同註57
同註58
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE