臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：動態平台策略
作者：江宏祥
作者(外文)：Hong-Shiang Jiang
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：楊千
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2003
主題關鍵詞：平台策略；產品平台；策略管理；科技管理；能力；取得；Platform Strategy；Product Platform；Strategic Management；Technology Management；Competency；Acquisition
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
在擁有多項產品且該多項產品有著共同相關技術的高科技公司中，平台架構已被採用成新產品開發設計及面對不斷成長、改變之新市場應用的基礎。在本篇論文中，首先我們在平台策略動態過程的情境架構中提出兩個管理架構來整合定位(positioning)、能力(competencies)及能力取得(acquisitions)這三個策略構面。在此所建議的整合方法即是平台-市場矩陣(Platform-Market Matrix)以及市場應用-平台-能力矩陣(APC Matrix)。藉此，公司能快速地在適當的情境設定中選擇所需的活動模式或平台策略及其平台支援策略。
其次，我們採用動態的觀點來分析平台策略的活動及這些活動間的關係，最後並提出平台策略的成功方程式。在此所提出的成功方程式是一個正向回饋迴圈(positive feedback loop)，該迴圈能呈現如何槓桿利用(leverage)平台特定能力(platform-specific competencies)並經由平台為主的活動(platform-based activities)來傳送競爭優勢。接著這些競爭優勢又能產生利潤並因此能再投資於培養未來的平台特定能力。當公司維持這樣的迴圈於正向的方向時，該成功方程式將會使得公司持續地降低產品創造和實現的成本、更快速地在市場上推出新產品、並創造更多樣化的產品。最後我們針對平台策略發展了一個代數陳述式(algebraic expression)來描述平台為主的活動間的配適(fit)會影響平台的成功與否。
Platform architectures are being adopted as the basis for new product designs in a growing number of market applications, especially in high-technology companies that have multiple products related by common technology. In this dissertation, we present two management frameworks to integrate positioning, competencies, and acquisitions in the context of a dynamic process of platform strategy. The integration methods suggested are the platform-market matrix and applications-platforms-competencies (APC) matrix. With these proposed frameworks a company can quickly choose the action modes or platform strategies in an appropriate setting as well as its supporting strategies.
Besides, we adopt a dynamic view to analyze activities of a platform strategy and relations among these activities and finally present a successful formula for platform strategy. The successful formula suggested here is a positive feedback loop that shows how platform-specific competencies are leveraged via platform-based activities to deliver competitive advantages. These competitive advantages can be leveraged to result in profitability and reinvested to nurture platform-specific competencies in the future. When keep the loop working in the upward direction, this successful formula will enable firms to lower costs of product creation and realization, introduce technologically improved products more rapidly, bring new products to market more quickly, and create greater product variety. Finally, we develop an algebraic expression for platform strategy to describe ways in which the strategic fit among platform-based activities can affect the platform success.
[1] Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., Otto, K. N. and Baker, J. D., “A Method for Architecting Product Platforms,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 12, pp. 61-72, 2000.
[2] Meyer, M. H., “Revitalize Your Product Lines through Continuous Platform,” Research Technology Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 17-28, 1997.
[3] Sanderson, S. and Uzumeri, M., “Managing Product Families: The Case of the Sony Walkman,” Research Policy, vol. 24, pp. 761-782, 1995.
[4] Meyer, M. H., “The Strategic Integration of Markets and Competencies,” Int. J. Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 677-695, 1999.
[5] McGrath, M. E., Product Strategy for High Technology Companies. The McGraw-Hill Companies, second edition, 2001.
[6] Sanderson, S. “Cost Models for Evaluating Virtual Design Strategies in Multicycle Product Family.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 8, pp. 339-358, 1991.
[7] Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. “Creating Project Plans to Focus Product Development.” Harvard Business Review, vol.70, no.2, pp. 70-82, 1992.
[8] Meyer, M. H. and Utterback, J. M. “The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 34, no.3, pp. 29-47, 1993.
[9] Meyer, M. H. and Lopez, L. “Technology Strategy in a Software Products Company.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 12, pp. 294-306, 1995.
[10] Muffatto, M. and Roveda, M. “Developing Product Platforms: Analysis of the Development Process.” Technovation, vol. 20, pp. 617-630, 2000.
[11] Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K. “Planning for Product Platform.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 19-31, 1998.
[12] Ericsson, A. and Erixon, G., Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms. ASME Press, 1999.
[13] Cooper, R. G., Product Leadership: Creating and Launching Superior New Products. Perseus Books, 2001.
[14] Meyer, M. H. and DeTore, A. “PERSPECTIVE: Creating a Platform-based Approach for Developing New Services.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.18, pp. 188-204, 2001.
[15] Muffatto, M., “Introducing a Platform Strategy in Product Development.” Int. J. Production Economics, vol. 60-61, pp. 145-153, 1999.
[16] Meyer, M. H., “The Strategic Integration of Markets and Competencies.” Int. J. Technology Management, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 677-695, 1999.
[17] Wells, P., “Platforms: Engineering Panacea, Marketing Disaster?” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 115, pp. 166-170, 2001.
[18] Tatikonda, M. V., “An Empirical Study of Platform and Derivative Product Development Projects.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 16, pp. 3-26, 1999.
[19] Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R. A. and Mistree, F., “Product Platform Design: Method and Application.” Res Eng Design, vol. 13, pp. 2-22, 2001.
[20] Meyer, M. H. and Lehnerd, A., The Power of Product Platforms. New York: The Free Press, 1997.
[21] Meyer, M. H. and Zack, M. H., “The Design and Development of Information Products.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 43-59, 1996.
[22] Meyer, M. H. and Selinger, R., “Product Platforms in Software Development.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 61-74, 1998.
[23] Meyer, M. H. and DeTore, A., “Product Development for Services.” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 64-76, 1999.
[24] Wheelwright, S. C. and Sasser, W. E., “The New Product Development Map.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 112-123, 1989.
[25] Kekre. S and Srinivasan, K., “Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?” Management Science, vol. 36, no.10, pp. 1216-1231, 1990.
[26] Meyer, M. H. and Mugge, P. C., “Make Platform Innovation Drive Enterprise Growth.” Research Technology Management, vol. 44, no.1, pp. 25-39, 2001.
[27] Krishnan, V. and Gupta, S., “Appropriateness and Impact of Platform-based Product Development.” Management Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 52-68, 2001.
[28] Sundgren, N., “Introducing Interface Management in New Product Family Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 16, pp. 40-51, 1999.
[29] Gupta, S. and Krishnan, V., “Integrated Component and Supplier Selection for a Product Family.” Production and Operations Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163-182, 1999.
[30] Desai, P., Kekre, S., Radhakrishnan, S. and Srinivasan, K., “Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers.” Management Science, vol. 47, no.1, pp. 37-51, 2001.
[31] Fisher, M., Ramdas, K. and Ulrich, K., “Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: A Study of Automotive Braking Systems.” Management Science, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 297-315, 1999.
[32] Gupta, S. and Krishnan, V., “Product Family-based Assembly Sequence Design Methodology.” IIE Transactions, vol. 30, pp. 933-945, 1998.
[33] Moore, W. L., Louviere, J. J. and Verma, R., “Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms.” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 16, pp. 27-39, 1999.
[34] Zack, M. H., “Electronic Publishing: A Product Architecture Perspective.” Information & Management, vol. 31, pp. 75-86, 1996.
[35] Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P. and Otto, K. N., “Modular Product Architecture.” Design Study, vol. 22, pp. 409-424, 2001.
[36] Kotler, P. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey 07632, 1994.
[37] Porter, M. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York, 1980.
[38] Krishnan, V. and Ulrich, K. T. “Product Development Decisions: A Review of Literature.” Management Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2001.
[39] West, A. Innovation Strategy, Prentice Hall, 1992.
[40] Markides, C. C., “A Dynamic View of Strategy.” Sloan Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 55-63, 1999.
[41] Shaw, J. K., Strategic Management in Telecommunications. Boston-London: Artech House, 2000.
[42] Reinertsen, D. G., Managing the Design Factory. New York: The Free Press, 1997.
[43] Fowler, S. W., King, A. W., Marsh, S. J. and Victor, B., “Beyond Products: New Strategic Imperatives for Developing Competencies in Dynamic Environments,” J. Eng. Technol. Manage., vol. 17, pp. 357-377, 2000.
[44] Packard, D., The HP Way. New York: HaperBusiness, 1995.
[45] Clark, J. and Guy, K., “Innovation and Competitiveness: A Review,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 363-395, 1998.
[46] Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997.
[47] Chiesa, V. and Manzini, R., “Towards a Framework for Dynamic Technology Strategy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 111-129, 1998.
[48] Chakravarthy, B. S., “Flexible Commitment: A Key to Strategic Success.” Strategy & Leadership, May/June, pp. 14-20, 1996.
[49] Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-120, 1991.
[50] John, G., Weiss, A. M. and Dutta, S., “Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: toward a Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, pp. 78-91, 1999.
[51] Porter, M. E., “Toward a Dynamic Theory of Strategy.” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 12, pp. 95-117, 1991.
[52] Mario, K., “Developing Consensus on Firm Competencies and Capabilities.” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 10, pp. 40-51, 1996.
[53] Foss, N. J., “The Emerging Competence Perspective.” in Toward a Competence Theory of the Firm, Foss, N. J. and Knudsen, C., Ed. London: Routledge, 1996.
[54] Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin J. A., “Dynamic Capabilities: What are They?” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 1105-1121, 2000.
[55] Porter, M. E., “What is Strategy?” Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no.6, pp. 61-78, 1996.
[56] Louviere, J. J., Analyzing Decision Making. London: Sage Publications, Inc., 1988.
[57] Barney J. B., Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Pearson Education, Inc., 2002.
[58] Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K., Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994, p.357.
[59] Lengnick-Hall, C. A. and Wolef, J. A., “Similarities and Contradictions in the Core Logic of Three Strategy Research Streams.” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, pp. 1109-1132, 1999.
[60] Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management, vol. 17, pp. 99-120, 1991.
[61] Barney, J. B., “Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage.” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 49-61, 1995.
[62] Conner, K. R., “A Historical Comparison of Resource-based Theory and Five Schools of Thought within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?” Journal of Management, vol. 17, pp. 121-154, 1991.
[63] Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G., “The Core Competencies of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 17-30, 1990.
[64] Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K., “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 75-84, 1993.
[65] Wernerfelt, B., “A Resource-based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171-180, 1984.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：582（臺灣：574，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68366602
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上