|
1.Abelson, R.P. and A. Levi (1985), “Decision Making and Decision Theory,” in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, NY: Random House. 2.Agarwal, R. and V. Venkatesh (2002), “Assessing a Firm’s Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 168-186. 3.Alba, J., J. Lynch, B. Weitz, C. Janiszewski, R. Lutz, A. Sawyer, and S. Wood (1997), “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, July, pp. 38-53. 4.Anderson, N. H. (1968), A Simple Model for Information Integration, in R.P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W.J. McGuire, T.M. Newcomb, M.J. Rosenberg and P.H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally. 5.Ba, S. (2002), “Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 245-268. 6.Bar-Hillel, M. (1973), “On the Subjective Probability of Compound Events,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 9, pp.396-406. 7.Beam, C. and A. Segev (1996), “Electronic Catalogs and Negotiation,” CITM 96-WP-1016, Fisher Center for Information Technology Management, University of California at Berkeley, August. http://haas.berkeley.edu/~citm/wp-1016-summary.html 8.Berkeley, D. and P. Humphreys (1982), Structuring Decision Problems and the Bias Heuristic, Acta Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 201-252. 9.Bhatnagar, A. and P. Papatla (2001), “Identifying Locations for Targeted Advertising on the Internet,’ International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.23-44. 10.Brewer, M.B. and R.M. Kramer (1986), “Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size, and Decision Framing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.50, pp. 543-549. 11.Brewer, T. and G. B. Chapman (2002), “The Fragile Basic Anchoring Effect,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 15, pp.65-77. 12.Burgoon, M. (1989). The Effects of Message Variables on Opinion and Attitude Change, in J. Bradac (ed.), Messages in Communication Sciences: Contemporary Approaches to the Study of Effects, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 129-164. 13.Busemeyer, J. R. and W.M. Goldstein (1992), “Linking Together Different Measures of Preference: a Dynamic Model of Matching Derived from Decision Field Theory,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 52, pp. 370-396. 14.Cervone, D. and P. K. Peake (1986), “Anchoring, Efficacy, and Action: the Influence of Judgmental Heuristics and Self-Efficacy Judgments and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 492 – 501. 15.Chaiken, S. (1980), “Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 39, pp.752-766. 16.Chaiken, S. (1987), “The Heuristic Model of Persuasion,” Social Influence: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 5, pp. 3-39, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 17.Chapman G.B. and E.J. Johnson (2000), “Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value,” in Gilovich, T., Griffin, D.W. and Kahneman D. (Eds), The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment: Heuristics and Biases, NY: Cambridge University Press. 18.Chapman, G. B. and B. H. Bornstein (1996), “The More You Ask For, The More You Get: Anchoring in Personal Injury Verdicts,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 519-540. 19.Chapman, G. B. and E. J. Johnson (1994), “The Limits of Anchoring,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 7, pp. 223-242. 20.Chapman, G. B. and E. J. Johnson (1999), “Anchoring, Cctivation and the Construction of Values,” Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp.115-153. 21.Danaher, P.J. and G.W. Mullarkey (2003), “Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students,” Journal of Advertising Research, September, pp.252-267. 22.Davis, H. L., S. J. Hoch, and E. E. Ragsdale (1986), “An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13, pp. 25-37. 23.Dunegan, K.J. (1993), “Framing, Cognitive Modes, and Image Theory: Toward an Understanding of a Glass Half Full,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, pp. 79-86. 24.Dunegan, K.J. (1996), “Fines, Frames and Images: Examining Formulation Effects on Punishment Decisions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 68, pp. 58-67. 25.Dunegan, K.J., D. Duchon, and D. Ashmos (1995) “Image Compatibility and the Use of Problem Space Information in Resource Allocation Decisions: Testing a Moderating Effects Model,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 64, pp. 31-37. 26.Dworman, G.O., S.O. Kimbrough, and J.D. Laing (1995), “On Automated Discovery of Models Using Genetic Programming: Bargaining in a Three Agent Coalition Game,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 97-125. 27.Edwards, W. (1954), “The Theory of Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 51, pp. 380-417. 28.Engel, J.F. and R.D. Blackwell (1982), Consumer Behavior, 4th Edition, NY: The Dryden Press. 29.Fagley, N.S. and P.M. Miller (1990), “The Effect of Framing on Choice: Interactions with Risk-Taking Propensity, Cognitive Style, and Sex,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 16, pp. 496-510. 30.Festinger, L. (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparision Processes,” Human Relations, Vol. 7, pp.117-140. 31.Fischhoff, B. (1975), “Hindsight ≠ Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 1, pp. 288 – 299. 32.Fleischman, J.A. (1988), “The Effects of Decision Framing and Others’ Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 32, pp. 162-180. 33.Friedlander, M. L. and S. J. Stockman (1983), “Anchoring and Publicity Effects in Clinical Judgment,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 39, pp. 637–643. 34.Ganzach, Y. and N. Karsahi (1995), “Message Framing and Buying Behavior: A Field Experiment,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 32, pp. 11–17. 35.Gilbert, D. T. (1991), “How Mental Systems Believe,” The American Psychologist, Vol. 46, pp. 107-119. 36.Gilovich, T. (1991), How We Know What Isn’t So, NY: Free Press. 37.Glazer, R. (1991), “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55, October, pp. 1-19. 38.Grewal, D., J. Gotlieb, and H. Marmorstein (1994), “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, pp. 145-153. 39.Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham and W. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, NJ: Prentice Hall. 40.Helson, H. (1964), Adaptation Level Theory: An Experimental and Systemantic Approach to Behavior, NY: Harper. 41.Herr, P. M. (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16, June, pp.67-75. 42.Highhouse, S. and P. Yuce (1996), “Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 65, pp. 159-167. 43.Highhouse, S. and P.W. Pease (1996), “Problem Domain and Prospect Frame: Choice under Opportunity versus Threat,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22, pp.124-132. 44.Hinsz, V. B., L. R. Kalnbach, and N. R. Lorentz (1997), “Using Judgmental Anchors to Establish Challenging Self-set Goals without Jeopardizing Commitment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 71, pp. 287 – 308. 45.Hoffman, D. and T. Novak (2000), “Advertising Pricing Models for the World Wide Web,” in Hurley, D. Kahn, B. and Varian, H. Eds., Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 46.Hoffman, D.L. and T.P. Novak (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, July, pp.50-68. 47.Hogarth, R. M. (1987), Judgment and Choice: The Psychology of Decision, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience Publication. 48.Homer, P. M. and S.G. Yoon (1992), “Message Framing and the Interrelationships among Ad-Based Feelings, Affect, and Cognition,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. XXI, pp. 19-32. 49.Huang, M. H. (2000), “Information Load: its Relationship to Online Exploratory and Shopping Behavior,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20, pp. 337-347. 50.Irwin, F. W. (1953), "Stated Expectations as Functions of Probability and Desirability of Outcomes," Journal of Personality, Vol. 21, pp. 329-335. 51.Jacowitz, K.E. and D. Kahneman (1995), “Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 21, pp. 1161-1166. 52.Johnson, B. T. and A. H. Eagly (1989), “Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 2, pp. 290-314. 53.Johnson, R. D. (1987), “Making Judgments when Information is Missing: Inferences, Biases, and Framing Effects,” Acta Psychologica, Vol. 66, pp. 69-82. 54.Joyce, E. and G. Biddle (1981), “Anchoring and Adjustment in Probabilistic Inference in Auditing,” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 19, pp. 120-145. 55.Jupiter Media Metrix (2002), http://www.newsbytes.com/cgi-bin/udt/im.display.printable?client.id=newsbtytes&story.id=175015/. 56.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1973), “On the Psychology of Prediction,” Psychological Review, Vol. 80, pp. 237. 57.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 263–291. 58.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1990), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, in Moser, P.K. Eds., Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.140-170. 59.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, (1972), "Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness," Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 430-454. 60.Kahneman, D. and D. T. Miller (1986), “Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives,” Psychological Review, Vol. 93, pp.136-153. 61.Kahneman, D. and J. Knetsch (1993), Strong Influences and Schallow Inferences: An Analysis of Some Anchoring Effects, Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley. 62.Kahnemen, D. and A. Tversky (2000), Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 63.Kang, J.Y. and E. S. Lee (1998), “A Negotiation Model in Electronic Commerce to Reflect Multiple Transaction Factors and Learning”, IEEE, pp.275-278. 64.Kanouse, D. E. (1984), “Explaining Negativity Biases in Evaluation and Choice Behavior: Theory and Research,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp. 703-708. 65.Kramer, R. M. (1989), “Windows of Vulnerability or Cognitive Illusions? Cognitive Processes and the Nuclear Arms Race,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 79-100. 66.Krishnamurthy, P., P. Carter, and E. Blair (2001), “Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 85, No.2, pp. 382–399. 67.Kristensen, H. and T. G
|