:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:購買力平價及其迷思之非線性實證分析
作者:陳佩芬
作者(外文):Pei-Fen Chen
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:國際經濟所
指導教授:吳致寧
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:購買力平價門檻向量誤差修正模型實質匯率門檻自我迴歸非線性均數迴歸半衰期Half-lifeNonlinear mean reversionThreshold autoregressionReal exchange ratePurchasing power parityThreshold vector error correction model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
本文共分五章。第一章說明本文的研究動機,包含了各章節的概述。第二章整理了購買力平價(purchasing power parity)在理論與實證上的重要文獻。第三章是本文所包含之三篇實證研究的第一篇。在市場存在著交易成本的考量下,本研究以對稱的區間門檻迴歸模型(Band-TAR)來檢驗長期購買力平價假說是否成立。實證結果發現當以TPI做為物價指數時,長期購買力平價假說才成立,以CPI或PPI做為物價指數皆不支持購買力平價假說。此外,本研究還以三個體制的門檻向量誤差修正模型(threshold VECM)去分析實質匯率偏離均衡值時之主要調整變數。而以一般化的衝擊反應函數去估計實質匯率遇到外生衝擊時的半衰期(half-life),發現在非線性架構下所估計的半衰期大約在一年以內。
第四章是第二篇實證研究。本研究以對稱的區間門檻迴歸模型去檢驗1885年到2003年英鎊對美元實質匯率之非線性調整特性。由於資料期間橫跨了不同體制之匯率制度,因此其均衡值可能不是常數。在以Balassa-Samuelson效果去除了具有時間趨勢的均衡值後,區間門檻迴歸模型的實證結果仍支持長期購買力平價假說。而以一般化的衝擊反應函數去估計的半衰期較短,與理論上所認為的相符,可以說解決了有名的購買力平價之迷思(PPP puzzle)。
第五章以門檻向量誤差修正模型將實質匯率偏離均衡值時之主要調整變數分解為名目匯率與兩國相對物價兩者,實證對象分別是以馬克與美元計價之六個國家的實質匯率。實證結果發現主要的調整變數是名目匯率而非傳統上認為的相對物價。這個結果與Cheung, et al. (2004)的結論相符,不同的是在非線性架構下所估計的半衰期較短,約在2.5年以內,此點與理論所主張的較為接近。
Chapter 1 introduces the motivations for this dissertation and provides a brief review of each chapter. Chapter 2 presents a brief review of the PPP-related literature. Chapter 3 consists of the first essay on PPP. It considers the existence of market frictions or transactions costs which may impede the goods’ arbitrage. A symmetric band-TAR model is applied in examining the validity of PPP. The empirical evidence finds that nonlinear adjustments of long-run PPP are supported by TPI-based, but not PPI-based or CPI-based, real exchange rates. In addition, with a three-regime threshold VECM, the sources of real exchange rate adjustment toward PPP are revealed. By engaging in generalized impulse response analysis, the estimated half-lives implied by the band–TAR model are found to be within one year for various sizes of shock.
Chapter 4 provides the second essay on PPP. This paper applies a symmetric band-TAR model to investigate the nonlinear adjustment of the real pound-dollar rate over the period 1885-2003. The data covering more than one century may possess a non-constant equilibrium since they contain pre-float observations. The empirical evidence supports the nonlinear mean reversion of pound rates that are conditional upon the existence of a non-constant equilibrium in order to reflect the Balassa-Samuelson effect. The estimated half-life is less than two years with large shocks, which partly resolves the PPP puzzle.
The essay in Chapter 5 focuses on dissecting the sources of PPP convergence using a bivariate threshold VECM with Deutschmark- and US-based exchange rates respectively. The empirical results show that PPP convergence is mainly attributed to nominal exchange rate adjustment, which is consistent with the findings of Cheung et al. (2004, Journal of International Economics 64, 135-150). The estimated half-lives in the nonlinear framework are at most 2.5 years. In addition, the estimated half-life of nominal exchange rates is longer than that of prices facing a specific shock.
References
Abuaf, N. and P. Jorion (1990), “Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run,” Journal of Finance 45, 157-174.
Adler, M. and B. Lehmann (1983), “Deviations from Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run,” The Journal of Finance 38, 1471-1483.
Andrews, D. W. K. and W. Ploberger (1994), “Optimal Tests When A Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Econometrica 62, 1383-1414.
Balassa, B. (1964), “The Purchasing-Power-Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Political Economy 72, 584-596.
Bec, F., M. B. Salem, and M. Carrasco (2004), “Tests for Unit-root versus Threshold Specification with An Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Relationship,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, forthcoming.
Balke, N. S. and T. B. Fomby (1997), “Threshold Cointegration,” International Economic Review 38, 627-645.
Canzoneri, M. B., R. E. Cumby, and B. Diba (1999), “Relative Labor Productivity and the Real Exchange Rate in the Long Run: Evidence for a Panel of OECD Countries,” Journal of International Economics 47, 245-266.
Cheung, Y.-W. and K. S. Lai (1993) “Long-Run Purchasing Power Parity During the Recent Float,” Journal of International Economics 34, 181-192.
Cheung, Y-W and K. S. Lai (2000), “On the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle,” Journal of International Economics 52, 321-330.
Cheung, Y.-W., K. S. Lai and M. Bergman (2004) “Dissecting the PPP Puzzles: the Unconventional Roles of Nominal Exchange Rates and Price Adjustments,” Journal of International Economics 64, 135-150.
Coleman, A.M.G. (1995), “Arbitrage, Storage and the Law of One Price: New Theory for the Time Series Analysis of an Old Problem,” Discussion Paper, Department of Economics, Princeton University.
Cuddington, J. T. and H. Liang (2000), “Purchasing Power Parity Over Two Centuries?” Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 751-755.
Davies, R. B. (1987), “Hypothesis Testing When A Nuisance Parameter is Present Only under the Alternative,” Biometrika 74, 33-43.
Dixit, A.K. (1989), “Hysteresis, Import Penetration and Exchange Rate Pass Through,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 205-228.
Dornbusch, R. (1976) “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Political Economy 84, 1161-76.
Dumas, B., (1992) “Dynamic Equilibrium and Real Exchange Rates in Spatially Separated World,” Review of Financial Studies 5, 153-180.
Elliott, G., T. J. Rothenberg, and J. H. Stock (1996) “Efficient Tests for An Autoregressive Unit Root,” Econometrica 64, 813-836.
Enders, W. and C. W. J. Granger (1998), “Unit-root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with An Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 16, 304-311.
Engel, C. (1999) “Accounting for U.S. Real Exchange Rate Changes,” Journal of Political Economy 107, 507-538.
Engel, C. and C. J. Kim (1999), “The Long-run U.S./U.K. Real Exchange Rate,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 31, 335-356.
Engel, C. and J. C. Morley (2001), “The Adjustment of Prices and the Adjustment of the Exchange Rate,” NBER Working Paper no.8550.
Froot, K. and P. Klemperer (1989), “Exchange Rate Pass-Through When Market Share Matters,” American Economic Review 79, 637-654.
Granger, C. W. J. and T. Terasvirta (1993), Modeling Nonlinear Economic Relationships, Oxford; New York; Toronto and Melbourne: Oxford University Press
Hansen, B. E. (1997), “Inference in TAR Models,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 2, 1-14.
Hansen, B. E. (1999), “Testing for Linearity,” Journal of Economic Surveys 13, 551-76.
Hansen, B. E. and B. Seo (2002), “Testing for Two-Regime Threshold Cointegration in Vector Error-Correction Models,” Journal of Econometrics 110, 293-318.
Heckscher, E. F. (1916), “Vaxelkursens Grundval vid Pappersmyntfot,” Ekonomisk Tidskrift 18, 309-312.
Imbs, J., H. Mumtaz, M. O. Ravn and H. Rey (2005) “PPP Strikes Back: Aggregation and The Real Exchange Rate,” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXX, 1-43.
Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models,” Econometrica 59, 1551-1580.
Kapetanios, G., Y. Shin and A. Snell (2003) “Testing for A Unit Root in the Nonlinear STAR Framework,” Journal of Econometrics 112, 359-379.
Koop, G., M. H. Pesaran and S. Potter (1996), “Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models,” Journal of Econometrics 74, 119-147.
Krugman, P. (1987), “Pricing to Market When the Exchange Rate Changes,” In: Arndt, S., Richardson, J. D. (Eds.), Real Financial Linkages Among Open Economies. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levin, A. and C.-F. Lin (1992), “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties,” Discussion Paper 92-23, University of California, San Diego.
Lothian, J.R. and M.P. Taylor (1996), “Real Exchange Rate Behavior: the Recent Float from the Perspective of the Past Two Centuries,” Journal of Political Economy 104, 488-509.
Lothian, J. R. and M. P. Taylor (2000), “Purchasing Power Parity Over Two Centuries: Strengthening the Case for Real Exchange Rate Stability: A Reply to Cuddington and Liang,” Journal of International Money and Finance 19, 759-764.
Mark, N. C. (1990), “Real and Nominal Exchange Rates in the Long Run: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of International Economics 28, 115-136.
Meese, R. A. and K. Rogoff (1983), “Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies. Do They Fit out of Sample?” Journal of International Economics 14, 3-24.
Michael, P., A. R. Nobay and D. A. Peel (1997), “Transaction Costs and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Political Economy 105, 862-879.
Ng, S. and P. Perron (2001) “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit-Root Tests with Good Size and Power,” Econometrica 69, 1519-1554.
Obstfeld, M. and A. M. Taylor (1997), “Nonlinear Aspects of Goods-Market Arbitrage and Adjustment: Heckscher’s Commodity Points Revisited,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 11, 441-479.
O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998a), “The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity,” Journal of International Economics 44, 1-19.
O’Connell, P. G. J. (1998b), “Market Frictions and Real Exchange Rates,” Journal of International Money and Finance 17, 71-95.
Papell, D. (1997), “Searching for Stationarity: Purchasing Power Parity under the Current Float,” Journal of International Economics 43, 313-332.
Papell, D. and H. Theodoridis (2001), “The Choice of Numeraire Currency in Panel Tests of Purchasing Power Parity”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 33, 790-803.
Paulsen, J. (1984), “Order Determination of Multivariate Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Roots,” Journal of Time Series Analysis 5, 115-127.
Paya, I., I.A. Venetis, and D.A. Peel (2003), “Further Evidence on PPP Adjustment Speeds: the Case of Effective Real Exchange Rates and the EMS,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65, 421-437.
Peel, D.A. and M.P. Taylor (2002), “Covered Interest Rate Arbitrage in the Interwar Period and the Keynes-Einzig Conjecture,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 34, 51-75.
Peel, D.A. and I.A. Venetis (2003), “Purchasing Power Parity over Two Centuries: Trends and Nonlinearity,” Applied Economics 35, 609-617.
Rogoff, K. (1996), “The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 647-668.
Samuelson, P. A. (1964), “Theoretical notes on trade problems,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 46, 145-154.
Sarno, L., M. P. Taylor and I. Chowdhury (2004), “Nonlinear Dynamics in Deviations from the Law of One Price: A Broad-Based Empirical Study,” Journal of International Money and Finance 23, 1-25.
Seo, B. (2003), “Nonlinear Mean Reversion in the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 2243-2265.
Sercu, P., R. Uppal and C. Van Hulle (1995), “The Exchange Rate in the Presence of Transactions Costs: Implications for Tests of Purchasing Power Parity,” Journal of Finance 50, 1309-1319.
Taylor, A. (2001), “Potential Pitfalls for the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle? Sampling and Specification Biases in Mean-Reversion Tests of the Law of One Price,” Econometrica 69, 473-498.
Taylor, M. P., D. A. Peel and L. Sarno (2001), “Nonlinear Mean-Reversion in Real Exchange Rates: Toward a Solution to the Purchasing Power Parity Puzzles,” International Economic Review 42, 1015-1042.
Uppal, R. (1993), “A General Equilibrium Model of International Portfolio Choice,” Journal of Finance 48, 529-553.
Wu, Y. (1996), “Are Real Exchange Rates Nonstationary? Evidence from a Panel-Data Test,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, 54-63.
Xu, Z. (2003), “Purchasing Power Parity, Price Indices, and Exchange Rate Forecasts,” Journal of International Money and Finance 22, 105-130.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE