臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：APEC經濟體之總要素環境能源效率
作者：高志宏
作者(外文)：Chih-Hung Kao
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：胡均立
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2006
主題關鍵詞：資料包絡分析法；環境能源政策；總要素能源效率；總要素節能目標；總要素二氧化碳減量目標；產業結構；Data envelopment analysis (DEA)；Environmental-energy policy；Total-factor energy-saving target (EST)；Total-factor energy-saving target ratio (ESTR)；Total-factor CO2 abatement target (CAT)；Industrial structure
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
能源係人類生活中的重要元素。隨著經濟的持續發展，能源消耗亦大量增加，但能源卻有其供給上限。同時，能源的生產及消費所產生的廢氣對環境產生極大的衝擊。因此，使用能源以促進經濟發展，並兼顧環境保護的議題日漸重要，並為能源政策中重要的一環。在新燃料及替代能源具可行性及經濟性以前，為維持經濟發展需要，在制定環境能源政策上，提昇能源效率及降低二氧化碳(CO2)排放量成為兩大主軸。尤其是發展中及工業化國家，更注重這兩方面的議題。
過去能源學者如Patterson (1996)及Wilson et al. (1994)曾建議能源效率應以總要素概念進行衡量，但過去文獻仍均採用部分要素指標進行環境能源效率之衡量及比較。本文嘗試使用資料包絡分析法，建構總要素資源投入減量指標，再發展出總要素環境能源指標，以探討環境能源政策中，有關節能效率及CO2減量議題，並以APEC經濟體為例進行探討。透過建構出的總要素環境能源指標與實際投入量的比較，分別就能源及CO2，以分析各經濟體的節能目標及CO2減量目標。本文亦就環境能源效率與經濟發展及產業結構之關聯進行分析，同時審視APEC中主要經濟體的能源效率政策，以提供各經濟體於制定提昇能源效率及降低CO2排放量的環境能源政策上的政策建議及方案構想。
本研究分析1991年至2000年間亞太經濟合作(APEC)中17個經濟體的環境能源效率。名目變數均已轉換為以1995年為基準年的購買力(PPP)實質變數。本研究主要發現如下：(1)中國的環境能源效率最低，並在能源消耗及CO2減量上，具有最大可減少量及比率（約50%）。(2)香港、菲律賓及美國是APEC中最具有環境能源效率的三個經濟體，可為其他經濟體在環境能源政策上仿傚及學習的標竿。(3)APEC經濟體的總體及個別環境經濟效率都在逐年提昇中。(4)人均節能目標與人均GDP間有倒U型的關係存在。(5)人均 CO2減量目標與人均GDP間存有環境顧志耐曲線的關係。(6)環境能源效率與服務業對GDP的貢獻比重呈正相關。工業對GDP的貢獻比重愈高，能源使用效率愈差。
發展中及新興工業國家不僅可持續投入資源以維持經濟發展，更可透過節能及CO2減量以兼顧永續發展。經由本文的研究分析，無效率的APEC經濟體在制定政策計畫時，可向有效率的經濟體已施行的政策經驗借鏡，且不會妨礙國家的經濟發展。透過APEC的跨國際合作，可減少成本並增加新政策成功的機會。
Energy is one of the most important basic elements for human’s living from time immemorial. Perto-fossil fuels are limited while energy consumption and economic development are unconstrained. Meanwhile, energy production and consumption have undesirable environmental repercussions. The effects of economic growth using energy on natural and environmental resources have become a central question with the rising concern over environmental protection. Before new and alternative fuels become available, improving energy efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions are two necessities for an economy to design national environmental-energy policy while remaining its economic development possibilities.
Although some energy scholars, such as Patterson (1996) and Wilson et al. (1994), suggested using total factor indicator to evaluate energy efficiency, the existing literature all uses partial-factor indicators to analyze environmental-energy efficiency. This study tries to use the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach for constructing a total-factor framework which is then applied to study APEC economies. Input-reducing targets are extracted from the total-factor framework. Environmental-energy efficiency indicators are also derived from the same total-factor framework. The potential energy savings and CO2 abatement also result from the environmental-energy efficiency indicators. This study also overview the energy efficiency polices in selected APEC economies for providing policy and program ideas for reducing consumption and emission growth.
Seventeen APEC economies during 1991 to 2000 are analyzed. All nominal variables are transformed into real variables by the purchasing power parity (PPP) at the 1995 price level. The DEA approach is used to construct environmental-energy efficiency indicators for APEC economies without reducing their maximum potential gross domestic productions (GDPs) in each year. The production function with inputs including labor and capital as well as energy and CO2, respectively, is analyzed, while GDP is the single output. The major findings are as follows: (1) China has the worst environmental-energy efficiency and has the largest potential energy savings and CO2 abatement almost half of its current amount. (2) Hong Kong, the Philippines, and the United States have the highest environmental-energy efficiency. (3) The environmental-energy efficiency generally increases for APEC economies. (4) An inverted U-shape relation exists between per capita potential energy savings and per capita GDP. (5) An Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) relation exists between per capita CO2 abatement target and per capita GDP. (6) The higher value-added percentage of GDP by the service sector has more efficient environmental-energy efficiency. The higher value-added percentage of GDP by the industry sector has more inefficient energy consumption.
1. Agence de l'environnement et de la maîtrise de l'énergie (ADEME) and Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC), Survey on Energy Efficiency Policy Measures for the World Energy Council, ADEME and APERC, 2000.
2. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), APEC Energy Statistics 2000, APEC Secretariat, Singapore, 2002.
3. APEC, http://www.apecsec.org.sg/apec.htm, 2006.
4. APEC Secretariat, APEC at a glance, APEC Secretariat, Singapore, 2005.
5. Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC), APEC Energy Pricing Practices, APERC, Tokyo, 2000.
6. Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC), Energy Efficiency Indicators, APERC, Tokyo, 2001.
7. Asia Pacific Energy Research Center (APERC), Energy Efficiency Indicators and Potential Energy Savings in APEC Economies, APERC, Tokyo, 2002.
8. Balce, G. R., Sharma, D., Karki, S. K., “Energy policy issues in the ASEAN region”, the International Conference on Asian Energy in the New Century Issues and Policies, Hong Kong, August 16-17, 2001.
9. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, 30, pp. 1078-1092, 1984.
10. Beckerman, W., Two Cheers for the Affluent Society: A Spirited Defense of Economic Growth, Saint Martin’s Press, New York, 1975.
11. Bengochea-Morancho A., Higόn-Tamarit, F., Martínez-zarzoso, I., “Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in the European Union”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, pp.165-172, 2001
12. Boyd, G. A., Pang, J. X., “Estimating the linkage between energy efficiency and productivity”, Energy Policy, 28, pp. 289-296, 2000.
13. Berndt, E. R., “Aggregate energy, efficiency and productivity measurement”, Annual Review of Energy, 3, pp. 225-249, 1978.
14. Chang, C. C., Luh, Y. H., “Efficiency change and growth in productivity: the Asian growth experience”, Journal of Asian Economics, 10, pp. 551-570, 2000.
15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C., Rousseau, J., “Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA”, Annals of Operations Research, 2, pp. 139-156, 1985.
16. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E., “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429-444, 1978.
17. Chen, E. K. Y., “The total factor productivity debate: determinants of economic growth in East Asia”, Asian Pacific Economic Literature, 11, pp. 18-38, 1997.
18. Collins, C., Transport Energy Management Policies: Potential in New Zealand Ministry of Commerce, Wellington, 1992.
19. Coelli, T., “A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program”, CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Armidale, 1996.
20. Crompton, P., Wu, Y., “Energy consumption in China: past trends and future directions”, Energy Economics, 27, pp. 195-208, 2005.
21. de Bruyn, S. M., Economic Growth and the Environment: An Empirical Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000.
22. de Nooij, M., van der Kruk, R., van Soest, D. P., “International comparisons of domestic energy consumption”, Energy Economics, 25, pp. 359-373, 2003.
23. Drysdale, P., Huang, Y., “Technological catch-up and economic growth in East Asia and the Pacific”, Economic Record, 73, pp. 201-211, 1997.
24. Edvardsen, D. F., Førsund, F. R., “International benchmarking of electricity distribution utilities”, Resource and Energy Economics, 25, pp. 353-371, 2003.
25. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Hernandez-Sancho, F., “Environmental performance: an index number approach”, Resource and Energy Economics, 26, pp. 343–352, 2004.
26. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
27. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., Pasurka, C., “Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, pp. 90-98, 1989.
28. Farrell, M. J., “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120 (Part 3), pp. 253-290, 1957.
29. Ghali, K. H., El-Sakka, M. I. T., “Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis”, Energy Economics, 26, pp. 225-238, 2004.
30. Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B., “Economic growth and the environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp. 353-377, 1995.
31. Hausman, J. A., Taylor, W. E., “A generalized specification test”, Economics Letters, 8, pp. 239-245, 1982.
32. Haynes, K. E., Ratick, S., Cummings-Saxton, J. “Toward a pollution abatement monitoring policy: measures, model mechanics and data requirements”, Environmental Professional, 16, pp.292-303, 1994.
33. Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B., Penn World Table Version 6.1, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 2002.
34. Hirschhorn, T., Jackson, T., Baas, L., “Towards prevent: the emerging environmental management paradigm” In: Jackson, T. (Ed.), Clean Production Strategies. Developing Preventive Environmental Management in the Industrial Economy, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 1993.
35. Hu, J. L., “Efficient air pollution abatements of regions in China”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, forthcoming.
36. Hu, J. L., Wang, S. C., “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China”, Energy Policy, forthcoming.
37. Hu, J. L., Sheu, H. J., Lo, S. F., “Under the shadow of Asian brown clouds: the unbalanced regional productivities in China with environmental concerns”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12, pp. 429-442, 2005.
38. International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Balances of OECD Economies, IEA, Paris, 2002.
39. International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Balances of Non-OECD Economies, IEA, Paris, 2002.
40. International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Efficiency Profiles for Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and USA, IEA, Paris, 2001.
41. Iwami, T., “Economic development and/or environmental quality: emissions of CO2 and SO2 in East Asia”, Seoul Journal of Economics, 17, pp.55-83, 2004.
42. Jamasb, T., Pollitt, M., “International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities”, Energy Policy, 31, pp. 1609-1622, 2003.
43. Jean-Baptiste, P., Ducroux, R., “Energy policy and climate change”, Energy Policy, 31, pp.155-166, 2003.
44. Joint Economic Committee of the Congress of the United States, A National Index for Energy Productivity, US Government, Washington, DC, 1981.
45. Kaivo-oja, J., Luukkanen, J., “The European Union balancing between CO2 reduction commitments and growth policies: decomposition analyses”, Energy Policy, 32, pp. 1511-1530, 2004.
46. Keong, C. Y., “Energy demand, economic growth, and energy efficiency － the Bakun dam-induced sustainable energy policy revised”, Energy Policy, 33, pp. 679-689, 2005.
47. Kim, J. I., Lau, L. J., “The sources of growth of the East Asian newly industrialized economies”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8, pp. 235-271, 1994.
48. Kim, J. I., Lau, L. J., “The role of human capital in the economic growth of the East Asian newly industrialized economies”, Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 1, pp. 3-22, 1995.
49. Krüger, J. J., Cantner, U., Hanusch, H., “Total factor productivity, the East Asian miracle and the world production frontier”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136, pp. 111-136, 2000.
50. Krugman, P., “The myth of Asia’s miracle”, Foreign Affairs, 73, pp. 62-78, 1994.
51. Lansink, A. O., Silva, E., “CO2 and energy efficiency of different heating technologies in the Dutch glasshouse industry”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, pp. 395-407, 2003.
52. Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C., Cook, T. J., “Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts”, Omega, 10, pp. 401-11, 1982.
53. Linkmark, M., “Patterns of historical CO2 intensity transitions among high and low-income economies”, Explorations in Economic History, 41, pp. 426-447, 2004.
54. Lopes, L., Hokoi, S., Miura, H., Shuhei, K., “Energy efficiency and energy saving in Japanese residential building-research methodology and surveyed results”, Energy and Buildings, 37, pp. 698-706, 2005.
55. Lόpez, R., “The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, pp. 163-184, 1994.
56. Lovell, C. A. K., Pastor, J. T., Turner, J. A., “Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: a comparison of European and non-European countries”, European Journal of Operational Research, 87, pp. 507-518, 1995.
57. Marland, G., Rotty, R.M., “Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels: a procedure for estimation and results for 1950-82”, Tellus 36(B), pp. 232-61, 1984.
58. Marland, G., Boden, T. A., Andres, R. J., “Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions” In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 2005.
59. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future, Chelsea Green, New York, 1992.
60. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Behrens, W. L., The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York, 1972.
61. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., Ehitmore, G. A., Applied Statistics, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts, 1988.
62. New Scientist, http://www.newscientist.com, 2005.
63. Oates, W. E., Schwab, R. M., “Economic competition among jurisdictions: efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?”, Journal of Public Economics, 35, pp. 333-354, 1988.
64. Patterson, M. G., “What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues”, Energy Policy, 24, pp. 377-390, 1996.
65. Pearson, P. J. G., Fouquet, R., “Energy efficiency, economic efficiency and future CO2 emissions from the developing world”, Energy Journal, 17, pp. 135-160, 1996.
66. Ramanathan, R., Introductory Econometrics with Applications, 5th edition, South-western, Ohio, 2002.
67. Reister, D. B., “The link between energy and GDP in developing economies”, Energy, 12, pp. 427-499, 1987.
68. Renshaw, E. F., “Energy efficiency and the slump in labour productivity in the USA”, Energy Economics, 3, pp. 36-42, 1981.
69. SAS Institute Inc. (SAS), SAS/ETS User’s Guide, SAS, Cary, 1999.
70. Schurr, S. H., “Energy use, technological change and productive efficiency: and economic-historical interpretation”, Annual Review of Energy, 9, pp. 409-451, 1984.
71. Seiford, L. M., Thrall, R. M., “Recent development in DEA-the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis”, Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp.7-38, 1990.
72. Shephard, R., Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Pricenton (NJ), 1970.
73. Sioshansi, F., “Energy electricity and the US economy: emerging trends”, Energy Journal, 7, pp. 81-89, 1986.
74. Smulders, S., “Endogenous growth theory and the environment”, In: van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1999.
75. Turvey, R., Norbay, A. R., “On measuring energy consumption”, Economic Journal, 75, pp. 787-793, 1965.
76. Tyteca, D., “On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms-a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective”, Journal of Environmental Management, 46, pp.281-308, 1996.
77. Tyteca, D., “Linear programming models for the measurement of the environmental performance of firms-concepts and empirical results”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8, pp.183-197, 1997.
78. Young, A., “Lessons from the East Asian NICs: a contrarian view”, European Economic Review, 38, pp. 964-973, 1994.
79. Young, A., “The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp. 641-680, 1995.
80. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Climate Change Information Kit, UNEP, Geneva, 1999.
81. Vedantam, S., “Kyoto treaty takes effect today – impact on global warming may be largely”, Washington Post, February 16, pp. A04, 2005
82. Wilson, B., Trieu, L. H., Bowen, B., “Energy efficiency trends in Australia”, Energy Policy, 22, pp. 287-295, 1994.
83. World Bank, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy, World Bank, Washington, DC, 1993.
84. World Bank, World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005.
85. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
86. World Energy Council (WEC), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), World Energy Assessment 2000, 2000.
87. Wu, Y., “Openness, productivity and growth in the APEC economies”, Empirical Economics, 29, pp. 593-604, 2004.
88. Zofío, J. L., Prieto, A. M., “Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries”, Resource and Energy Economics, 23, pp. 63-83, 2001.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：433（臺灣：430，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2459241 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68254244
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上