臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：定價異常與投資者情緒之研究
作者：李文聖
作者(外文)：Wen-Shen Li
校院名稱：國立中央大學
系所名稱：財務金融研究所
指導教授：周賓凰
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2006
主題關鍵詞：公司特徵；總體經濟因子；投資者情緒；套利定價理論；特徵模型；因子模型；極端值；定價異常；characteristics；macroeconomic factor；extreme observations；factor model；characteristic model；APT；investor sentiment；pricing anomalies
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
本研究是由二篇關於資產定價異常及投資者情緒之文章所構成。
第一篇文章是關於共變數風險及資產定價異常的堅實性檢定。在剔除極端的樣本之後，我們重新檢定因子模型及特徵模型的定價關係。我們的結果顯示即使使用了與Daniel及Titman (1997)類似的樣本（1963年7月至2002年6月，共39年的期間），在去除極端的樣本之後，三因子模型比特徵模型更能解釋價值貼水。對於規模貼水而言，如同Davis、Fama及French (2000)及Daniel、Titman及Wei (2001)的發現，我們沒有足夠的證據能夠拒絕三因子模型及特徵模型。但是當我們排除了極端的月份後，實證結果轉為支持特徵模型。隨後我們檢驗了一月效應，發現在一月以外的其他月份，特徵模型比三因子模型更能解釋規模效果。
在第二篇文章裡，我們根據Ross (1976)所提出的套利定價理論之精神來探討當投資者情緒作為定價的共同因子時所扮演的角色。在文章中我們探討了市場情緒、總體經濟因子及股票特徵對股票橫斷面報酬變異的解釋能力。我們的結果發現情緒因子非常顯著，亦即情緒因子有非常強的解釋能力，並且與Chen、Roll及Ross (1986)所提出之總體經濟因子是獨立的。這表示投資者情緒能夠捕捉到市場參與者對未來市場的預期中總體經濟因子所沒有捕捉到的部分。然而，情緒因子的解釋能力卻會被公司規模及帳面對市值比所吸收。因此，我們的結果支持規模效果及帳面市值比效果是與投資者行為相關的。
This study contains two essays about pricing anomalies and investor sentiment.
Essay 1 examines the robustness of covariance risk and pricing anomalies. By trimming extreme observations, we reexamine the competition between the factor model and the characteristic model. Although we use almost the same sample period (July 1963 to June 2002, 39 years) as Daniel and Titman (1997), our results indicate that after trimming extreme observations the three-factor risk model explains the value premium better than the characteristic model. For size premium, like Davis, Fama, and French (2000) and Daniel, Titman, and Wei (2001), neither the three-factor nor the characteristic model can be rejected. But when we exclude influential months, our evidence turns to support the characteristic model. Then we investigate whether the results are related to the January seasonality. Our results indicate that in non-January months the characteristic model explains the size premium better than the three-factor risk model.
In essay 2, we explore the role of investor sentiment as a common factor in the spirit of Ross’s (1976) APT. We study the explanatory power of market sentiments, macroeconomic factors, and stock characteristics in capturing the variations in the cross-sectional stock returns. Our result shows that the sentiment premium is highly significant, and is independent of both the market factor and macroeconomic factors identified by Chen, Roll, and Ross (1986). It appears that investor sentiment captures market participants’ expectation of the future market prospects not fully capture by the common macroeconomic variables. However, the sentiment premium is absorbed by both firm size and book-to-market value. The result provides an evidence supporting the behavioral argument of size effect and value premia.
Essay 1: On the robustness of covariance risk and pricing Anomaliesnew window

Banz, Rolf W., 1981, The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3-18.
Banz, Rolf W., and William J. Breen, 1986, Sample-dependent results using accounting and market data: Some evidence, Journal of Finance 41, 779-793.
Basu, Sanjoy, 1983, The relationship between earnings yield, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 12, 129-156.
Bhandari, Laxmi Chand, 1988, Debt/Equity ratio and expected common stock returns: Empirical evidence, Journal of Finance 43, 507-528.
Black, Fischer, 1972, Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing, Journal of Business 45, 444-455.
Black, Fischer, 1993, Beta and return, Journal of Portfolio Management 20, 8-18.
Chan, Louis K., Yasushi Hamao, and Josef Lakonishok, 1991, Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan, Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1789.
Chou, Pin-Huang, Robin K. Chou, and Jane-Sue Wang, 2004, On the cross-section of expected stock returns: Fama-French ten years later, Finance Letters 2, 18-22.
Daniel, Kent, and Sheridan Titman, 1997, Evidence on the Characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns, Journal of Finance 52, 1-33.
Daniel, Kent, Sheridan Titman, and K. C. John Wei, 2001, Explaining the cross-section of stock returns in Japan: Factors or characteristics?, Journal of Finance 56, 743-766.
Davis, James L., Eugene F. Fama, and Kenneth R. French, 2000, Characteristics, covariances, and average returns: 1929 to 1997, Journal of Finance 55, 389-406.
DeBondt, Werner F. M., and Richard H. Thaler, 1985, Does the stock market overreact, Journal of Finance 40, 793-805.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1992, The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1996, Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies, Journal of Finance 51, 55-84.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1998, Value versus growth: The international evidence, Journal of Finance 53, 1975-1999.
Fama, Eugene F., and James D. MacBeth, 1973, Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests, Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636.
Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, and Sheridan Titman, 1993, Return to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for sock market efficiency, Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.
Keim, Donald B., 1983, Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality, Journal of Financial Economics 12, 13-32.
Knez, Peter J., and Mark J. Ready, 1997, On the robustness of size and book-to-market in cross-sectional regressions, Journal of Finance 52, 1355-1382.
Lintner, J., 1965, The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 13-37.
MacKinlay, A. Craig, 1995, Multifactor models do not explain deviations from the CAPM, Journal of Financial Economics 38, 3-28.
Markowitz, H., 1952, Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance 7, 77-91.
Newey, Whitney K., and Kenneth D. West, 1987, A simple, heteroskedastic and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica 55, 703-708.
Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth Reid, and Ronald Lanstein, 1985, Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency, Journal of Portfolio Management 11, 9-17.
Ross, Stephen A., 1976, The arbitrage theory of capita asset pricing, Journal of Economic Theory 13, 341-360.
Sharpe, W. F., 1964, Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance 19, 425-442.
Stattman, Dennis, 1980, Book values and stock returns, The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers 4, 25-45.

Essay 2: On rational and behavioral aspects of investor Sentiment

Baker, Malcolm and Jeremy C. Stein, 2004, Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator, Journal of Financial Markets 7, 271-299.
Baker, Malcolm and Jeffrey Wurgler, 2004, Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns, forthcoming in Journal of Finance.
Banz, Rolf W. and William J. Breen, 1986, Sample-dependent results using accounting and market data: Some evidence, Journal of Finance 41, 779-793.
Black, Fisher, 1986, Noise, Journal of Finance 41, 529-543.
Brown, Gregory W. and Michael Cliff, 2004, Investor Sentiment and the Near-Term Stock Market, Journal of Empirical Finance 11, 1-27.
Brown, Gregory W. and Michael T. Cliff, 2005, Investor sentiment and asset valuation, Journal of Business 78, 405-440.
Chan, L. K. C., N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok, 1996, Momentum Strategies, Journal of Finance 51, 1681-1713.
Chan, L. K. C., J. Karceski, and J. Lakonishok, 1998, The Risk and Return from Factors, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33, 159-188.
Chen, Nai-fu, Richard Roll, and Stephen A. Ross, 1986, Economic Forces and the Stock Market, Journal of Business 59, 383-403.
Clarke, Roger G. and Meir Statman, 1998, Bullish or Bearish, Financial Analysts Journal 54, 63-72.
De Bondt, Werner F. M. and Richard Thaler, 1985, Does the Stock Market Overreact?, Journal of Finance 40, 793-805.
DeLong, J. B., Andrei Shleifer, Lawrence H. Summers, and Ribert J. Waldmann, 1990, Noise trader risk in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy 98, 703-738.
Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, and Jeffrey A. Busse, 1998, Do Investors Care about Sentiment?. Journal of Bussiness 71, 477-500.
Fama, Eugence F. and James D. MacBeth, 1973, Risk, return and equilibrium - Empirical tests, Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636.
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1992, The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.
Fama, Eugence F. and Michael R. Gibbons, 1984, A Comparison of Inflation Forecasts, Journal of Monetary Economics 13, 327-348.
Fisher, Kenneth L. and Meir Statman, 2000, Investor sentiment and stock returns, Financial Analysts Journal 56, 16-23.
Lee, Wayne Y., Christine X. Jiang, and Daniel C. Indro, 2002, Stock market volatility, excess returns, and the role of investor sentiment, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 2277-2299.
Lee, Charles M. C., Andrei Shleifer, and Richard H. Thaler, 1991, Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle, Journal of Finance 46, 75-109.
Neal, Robert and Simon M. Wheatley, 1998, Do measures of investor sentiment predict returns?, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33, 523-547.
Newey, Whitney K., and Kenneth D. West, 1987, A simple, heteroskedastic and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica 55, 703-708.
Qiu, Lily and Ivo Welch, 2005, Investment sentiment measures, NBER working paper series.
Ross, Stephen A., 1976, The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing, Journal of Economic Theory 13, 341-360.
Soft, Michael E. and Meir Statman, 1988, How Useful is the Sentiment Index, Financial Analysts Journal 44, 45-55.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：569（臺灣：566，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68306870
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上