|
壹、中文
方崇雄、林坤誼、張聖麟（2004）。生活科技學域能力指標詮釋之研究。教育研究資訊，12（2），35－58。
王素芸（2001）。「基本能力指標」之發展與概念分析。教育研究資訊，9（1），1－14。
王鼎銘（1999）。科技發展與科技教育學習經驗。生活科技教育，32（11），2－9。
余鑑（2003）。工藝教育思想的流變。生活科技教育月刊，36（8），3－11。
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯（2001）。Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin著。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法。嘉義：濤石文化。
李大偉（2005）。新綱要、新紀元－高中生活科技暫行綱要之規劃與實施。高中生活科技課程規劃理念與實施研討會暨中華民國工業科技教育學會年會，頁28－54。台北：國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育系。
李坤崇（2002）。綜合活動學習領域能力指標概念分析。教育研究月刊，98，頁111－122。
李隆盛（1996）。科技與職業教育的課題。台北：師大書苑。
李隆盛（1999a）。檢核國教九年一貫課程的要點。國民教育，40（1），16－21。
李隆盛（1999b）。國教階段一貫科技與生涯發展課程綱要的研訂。教育研究資訊，7（4），19－27。
李隆盛（2000）。國中學校本位課程發展的5W1H。載於李隆盛和賴春金（主編），科技與人力教育的進展（頁97－106）。台北：師大書苑。
李隆盛（2001）。有命才有運。生活科技教育月刊，34（3），1。
李隆盛（2002）。標準本位的生活科技教學單元。生活科技教育月刊，35（12），13－16。
李隆盛、王詩婷、王保堤、柯景耀、王景祥、何啟君、吳曉亮、呂慶元、沈月清、林人龍、林湧順、張銘傑、陳得人、馮雪容、黃炯（2004）。中小學科技教育簡介。國立臺灣師範大學科技學院。
李隆盛、林坤誼（2003）。中美中小學生活科技標準之比較。中等教育，54（3），20－29。
沈珊珊（2005）。從比較教育觀點思考我國中小學一貫課程之規劃：美、法課程標準之對照。教育研究月刊，140，頁145－158。
林人龍、游光昭（2005）。水平整合的思考：以MST為導向的九年一貫生活科技課程設計。生活科技教育月刊，38（8），24－41。
封四維（2005）。教師發展標準取向課程之行動探究—以國民中學課程為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。
徐宗國譯（1997），Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin著。質性研究概論。台北：巨流。
康自立（1987）。美國工業技術教育思想之演進。師大學報，36，63－114。
教育部中等教育司（2004）。後期中等教育共同核心課程研訂。2004年1月15日，取自http://www.cer.ntnu.edu.tw/ccc/index.htm。
教育部中等教育司（2005）。高級中學課程標準修訂資訊。2005年5月21日，取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/HIGH-SCHOOL/EDU7362001/i1301/course/update/index.htm?open。
教育部國民教育司（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。2005年5月21日，取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/Web/EJE/index.htm。
陳明印（2004）。美國中小學教科書採用制度研究－以加州、德州、佛州為例。國立編譯館館刊，32（1），2－31。
陳玫良（2005）。台北市國民教育輔導團自然與生活科技輔導小組現況與展望。生活科技教育月刊，38（3），3－7。
黃光雄、楊龍立（2000）。課程設計：理念與實作。台北：師大書苑。
黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。台北：東華。
黃政傑（1997）。課程改革的理念與實踐。台北：漢文。
黃政傑、李隆盛（1996）。中小學基本學力指標之綜合規劃研究。台北：教育部。
黃瑞琴（1994）。質的教育研究方法。台北：心理。
楊振昇、洪淑萍（2002）。基本能力指標與轉化－以語文學習領域為例。教育研究月刊，96，頁23－33。
甄曉蘭（2003）。課程行動研究：實例與方法解析。台北：師大書苑。
鄭慧如、林世華（2002）。九年一貫課程數學領域第三、四學習階段分段能力指標序階之適切性初探研究。測驗年刊，49（1），51－74。
盧雪梅（2001）。「九年一貫課程能力指標」知多少。教育研究月刊，85，頁66－75。
盧雪梅（2004）。從技術面談九年一貫課程能力指標建構：美國學習標準建構的啟示。教育研究資訊，12（2），3－34。
貳、英文
Achieve (2001). Raising the bar, closing the gap. Achieve 2001 annual report. Washington, DC: Author.
Achieve (2002). Staying on course: Standard-based reform in America’s schools: Progress and prospects. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Federation of Teachers (AFT). (2001). Making standards matter 2001: A fifty-state report to implement a standard-based system. Standards, curriculum, assessment, and accountability. Washington, DC: Author.
Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (1997). Policy perils of international comparisons: The TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 22-28.
Barnette, E. (2003). The role of technology teachers in ensuring standard-based programs. The Technology Teacher, 62(7), 32-35.
Bennett, C. A. (1926). History of manual and industrial education up to 1870. Peoria, IL: Chas. A. Bennett Co., Inc. Publishers.
Bennett, C. A. (1937). History of manual and industrial education 1870 to 1917. Peoria, IL: Chas. A. Bennett Co., Inc. Publishers.
Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt, Rineehart and Winston.
Cajas, F. (2000). Technology education research: potential directions. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 75-85.
California Department of Education. (2004). California career technical education model curriculum standards and framework timeline. Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://www.sonoma.edu/cihs/cte/ketDates.html/
California Department of Education. (2005a). Industrial & Technology Education. Retrieved August, 9, 2005, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/ct/ie/index.asp/
California Department of Education. (2005b). All curriculum frameworks. Retrieved August, 9, 2005, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf/allfwks.asp/
California Industrial Technology Education Association. (2003). Bylaws of the California industrial and technology education association foundation. Retrieved May, 8, 2005, from http://www.citea.org/exec/images_exec/other_docs/CITEAF_bylaws_100403.pdf/
California Industrial Technology Education Association. (n.d.). California Industrial Technology Education Association. Retrieved May, 8, 2005, from http://www.citea.org/index.htm/
California Institute on Human Services. (2005). California career technical education model curriculum standards executive summary. Retrieved June, 21, 2005, from http://www.sonoma.edu/cihs/cte/newStandards/executiveSummary.pdf/
Cicchinelli, L., Gaddy, B., Lefkowits, L., & Miller, K. (2003). No Child Left Behind: Realizing the vision [policy brief]. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Clark, S. C. (1989). The industrial arts paradigm: adjustment, replacement, or extinction? Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), 1-9.
Council for Basic Education. (1998). Great expectations: Defining and assessing the rigor in state standards for Mathematics and English language arts. Washing, DC: Author.
Dean, C. B., & Bailey, J. A. (2003). A report documenting the process for developing an integrated standard-based instructional unit. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Diegmuller, K. (1995). Running out of steam. Struggling for standards: an education week special report. Washington, DC: Education Week.
Dugger, W. E. (2000). Standard-based reform for technology education. In G. Eugene Martin (Eds.), Technology education for the 21st century (pp. 133-139). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.
Dugger, W. E., Jr. (2000). Standard-based reform for technology education. In G. Eugene Martin (Eds.), Technology education for the 21st century (pp. 133-139). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (Eds.). (1974). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Exploring Technology Education Association. (n.d.). Exploring technology education association. Retrieved October 13, 2004, from http://www.eteaca.org/
Falk, C. J. (1968). The development and organization of education in California. San Francisco, CA: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Foster, P. (1994). Must we MST? Journal of Technology Education, 6(1), 76-84.
Gaddy, B. B., Dean, C. B., & Kendall, J. S. (2002). Noteworthy perspectives: Keeping the focus on learning. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Gandal, M. (1995). Making standards matter, 1995: A fifty-state progress report on efforts to raise academic standards. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
Gay, G. (1985). Curriculum development. In Torsten Husen, T. Neville Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (1170-1179). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Glidden, H. (1999). Making standards matter, 1999: A fifty-state progress report on efforts to raise academic standards. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
Hacker, M., & Burghardt, M. D. (2004). Technology education: learning by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
High School Teaching and Learning Office. (1996). Industrial and technology education: Career path guide and model curriculum standards. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Hopkins, L. T. (1941). Interaction: The democratic process. Boston: D. C. Health.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (1996). Technology for All Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (1999). A guide to develop standard-based curriculum for K-12 technology education. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2004). Engineering design: A standard-based high school model course guide. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2005a). Planning learning: Developing technology curricula. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2005b). Invention and innovation: A standard-based middle school model course guide. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
Kendall, J. S. (2001). A technique guide for revising and developing standards and benchmarks. Aurora, CO: The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (2000). Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for k-12 education (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (2004). Content knowledge: A compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education (4th ed.). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Kendall, J. S., DeFrees, K. L., Pierce, J., Richardson, A., & Williams, J. (2003). Connecting ideas: A strategy for extending the curriculum (Rev. ed.). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Law, N., Lee, Y., & Chow, A. (2002). Practice characteristics that lead to 21st century learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, pp. 415-426.
Lewis, T. (1999). Content of process as approaches to technology curriculum: Does it matter come Monday morning? Journal of Technology Education, 11(1), 45-59.
Loveland, T. (2004). Technology education standards implementation in Florida. Journal of Technology Education, 16(1), 40-54.
Mallinson, V. (1975). An introduction to the study of comparative education. London: Heinemann.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (1996). A comprehensive guide to designing standard-based districts, school, and classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (1997). The fall and rise of standard-based education: A National Association of School Boards of Education (NASBE) issues in brief. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Massell, D., Kirst, M., & Hoppe, M. (1997). Persistence and change: standarda-based reform in nine states. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 718)
Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond “the design process”: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 117-128.
McCracken, J. R. (2000). Design- The creative soul of technology. In G. Eugene Martin (Eds.), Technology education for the 21st century (pp. 85-90). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
McGonagle, L. (2003). Resources for developing standard-based curriculum. Retrieved October, 9, 2004, from http://www.dedham.k12.ma.us/dhs/curriculum/index.htm
Meade, S. D. & Dugger, W. E. (2004). Reporting on the status of technology education in the U.S. The Technology Teacher, 64(2), 29-35.
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (2000). Noteworthy perspectives on implementing standard-based education. Aurora, CO: Author.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved October, 13, 2004, from http://www.goalline.org/Goal%20Line/NatAtRisk.html/
National Council on Education Standards and Testing (NCEST) (1992). Raising standards for American education: A report to congress, the secretary of education, the national education goals panel, and the American people. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ndahi, H. B. & Ritz, J. M. (2003). Technology education teacher demand: 2002-2005. The Technology Teacher, 62(7), 27-31.
Newberry, P. B. (2001). Technology education in the U.S.: A status report. The Technology Teacher, 61(1), 1-16.
Oakes, J., & Saunders, M. (2004). Education’s most basic tools: Access to textbooks and instructional materials in California’s public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1967-1988.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2003). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Pattison, C., & Berkas, N. (2000). Critical issues: Integrating standards into the curriculum. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/currclum/cu300.htm/
Peter Harris Research Group. (2002). Survey of California teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
Popham, W. J. (1999). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Pratzner. F. (1985). The vocational education paradigm: Adjustment, replacement or extinction? Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 22(2), 6.
Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen’s guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Ravitch, D. (1996). 50 states, 50 standards: The continuing need for national voluntary standards in education. The Brookings Review, 14, pp. 1-9.
Reeve, E. M., Nielson, C., & Meade, S. D. (2003). Utah junior high teachers respond to standards for technological literacy. The Technology Teacher, 62(8), 26-29.
Regional Educational Laboratory Network. (2000). Implementing education reform: Strategies used by states, districts, and schools. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Sanders, N. M. (2001). Standards in classroom practice: Research synthesis. Aurora, CO: The Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Shepard, L. (1993). Setting performance standards for student achievement. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education, Stanford University.
Shumway, S., & Berrett, J. (2004). Standard-based curriculum development for pre-service and in-service: A “partnering” approach using modified backwards design. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 26-29.
Sonoma State University. (2005). Career Technical Education: Standards and framework. Retrieved August, 13, 2005, from http://www.sonoma.edu/cihs/cte/background.html/
Stone, J. C., & Hempstead, R. R. (1968). California education today. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Weiss, I. R., Knapp, M. S., Hollweg, K. S., & Burrill G. (2001). Investigating the influence of standards: A framework for research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Wicklein, R. C. (1993). Identifying critical issues and problems in technology education using a modified-delphi technique. Journal of Technology Education, 5(1), 54-71.
Wicklein, R. C. (2005). Critical issues and problems in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(4), 6-9.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Zuga, K. F. (1989). Relating technology education goals to curriculum planning. Journal of Technology Education, 1(1), Retrieved July, 7, 2005, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v1n1/pdf/zugascii.pdf
Zuga, K. F. (2000). Technology education as an integrator of science and mathematics. In G. Eugene Martin (Eds.), Technology education for the 21st century (pp. 223-227). Peoria, IL: Glencoe/McGraw Hill.
|