:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用TRA與TAM闡釋行動學習之使用者行為意向
作者:林育如
作者(外文):Lin Yu-Ru
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理科學系所
指導教授:黃仁宏
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:行動學習使用者接受度TRA模式TAM模式LISRELM-learninguser acceptanceTRATAMLISREL
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
以 Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) 和Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 模式驗證使用者對於行動學習(Mobile learning)的接受度,在TRA模式中,主要探討社會影響力(如:朋友)的影響;而在TAM模式,則探討個別差異(如:知覺有用)帶來的影響。由台灣的大學院校中收集大學部學生的資料。問卷採取網路填答方式,在網路問卷裡設計了避免遺漏值的程式。收集的有效樣本共313份。本研究以SEM(Structural equation modeling)方法探討變數之間的影響,採用的軟體為LISREL 8.51。結果發現,使用者的確對行動學習抱持著很高的期許,也將它視為一個有效的工具。TRA和TAM模式在消費者對行動學習的接受度有相當好的解釋力。本研究從使用者的角度,剖析消費者在使用行動學習這新科技的考慮因素與接受程度。藉由社會影響力端看對TRA模式的影響,以及個別差異在TAM模式中造成的影響。
To explain the emerging M-learning benefits customers in many ways and to empirically examine consumer acceptance of M-learning by using the theory of reasoned action and the technology acceptance model, the former model is focused on the factors of social influences (i.e. friends), the latter model is focused on individual indifferences (i.e. perceived usefulness). An online survey was conducted to collect data. A total of 313 undergraduate and graduate students in Taiwan universities answered the questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was employed to examine the fit of the data with the model by using the LISREL software. Consumers do hold great expectation for M-learning, and view M-learning as an efficient tool. Both the TRA and TAM demonstrate the fairly good fits. This study presents an understanding of social influences and individual indifferences, and proves both TRA and TAM have ability to predict user acceptance of the new technology, M-learning.
�c Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-247.
�c Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. (2000), “Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 665-694.
�c Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 361-391.
�c Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211.
�c Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
�c Alexander, B. (2004), “Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education”, EDUCAUSE Review, Vol. 39 (Sept/Oct) No. 5, pp. 29-35.
�c Anckar, B. and D’Incau, D. (2002), “Value creation in mobile commerce: Findings from a consumer survey”, JITTA: Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 43-64.
�c Bagozzi, R.P., Baumgartner, H. and Yi, Y. (1992), “State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: an application to coupon usage”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18 No. 4, pp. 505-518.
�c Balasubramanian, S., Peterson, R.A. and Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2002), “Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 348-361.
�c Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
�c Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
�c Bentler, P. M. (1990), “Comparative fit indexes in structural models”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107 No. 2, pp. 238-246.
�c Bentler, P. M. (1992), “On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 112 No. 3, pp. 400-404.
�c Bentler, P. M. (1995), EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
�c Bentler, P.M. and Bonnet, D.G. (1980), “Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 88 No. 3, pp. 588-606.
�c Blazevic, V., Lievens, A. and Klein, E. (2003), “Antecedents of project learning and time-to-market during new mobile service development”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 120-148.
�c Bobbitt, L.M. and Dabholkar, P.A. (2001), “Integrating attitudinal theories to understand and predict use of technology-based self-learning: the internet as an illustration”, International Journal of Learning Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 423-450.
�c Brown, I. and Licker, P. (2003), “Exploring differences in Internet adoption and usage between historically advantaged and disadvantaged groups in South Africa”, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 6 No. 4; pp. 6-26.
�c Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1989), “Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 24, pp. 445-455.
�c Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993), Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
�c Bruner II, G.C. and Kumar, A. (2005), “Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 553-558.
�c Byrne, B. M. (1998), Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
�c Chan, S.C. and Lu, M.T. (2004), “Understanding Internet banking adoption and use behavior: a Hong Kong perspective”, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 21-43.
�c Chang, C.Y., Sheu, J.P. and Chan, T.W. (2003), “Concept and design of ad hoc and mobile classrooms”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 336-346.
�c Chang, M.K. (1998), “Predicting unethical behavior: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17 No. 16, pp. 1825-1834.
�c Chen, Y.S., Kao, T.C. and Sheu, J.P. (2003), “A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 347-359.
�c Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. and Carson S. (2001), “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 511-535.
�c Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A. (1995), “On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 237-246.
�c Choo, H.J., Chung, J.E. and Psysarchik, D.T. (2004), “Antecedents to new food product purchasing behavior among innovator groups in India”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 5/6, pp. 608-625.
�c Chou, H.W. and Wang, T.B. (2000), “The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 455-472.
�c Clarke, I. (2001), “Emerging value propositions for m-commerce”, Journal of Business Strategies, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 133-148.
�c Clyde, L.A. (2004), “m-learning”, Teacher Librarian, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 45-46.
�c Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995), “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 189-211.new window
�c Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, S. (1999), “Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 145-158.
�c Coursaris, C. and Hassanein, K. (2002a). “Understanding m-commerce a consumer centric model”, Quarterly journal of electronic commerce, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 247-271.
�c Coursaris, C. and Hassanein, K. (2002b), A framework for m-commerce: a consumer's perspective, 3rd World Congress on the Management of Electronic Commerce, Hamilton, ON.
�c Coursaris, C., Hassanein, K. and Head, M. (2003), “M-commerce in Canada: an interaction framework for wireless privacy”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 54-73.
�c Dabholkar, P.A. (1994), “Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: analyzing models of mental comparison processes”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 100-118.
�c Dabholkar, P.A. and Bagozzi, R.P. (2002), “An attitudinal model of technology-based self-learning: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 184-201.
�c Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-340.
�c Davis, F.D. (1993), “User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 475-487.
�c Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
�c Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1992), “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 14, pp. 1111-1132.
�c de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M.G.M. and Kleijnen, M.H.P. (2001), “Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 184-207.
�c Devaraj, S., Fan, M. and Kohli, R. (2002), “Antecedents of b2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics”, Information Systems Research, Vol.13 No. 3, pp. 316-333.
�c Doll, W.J., Hendrickson, A. and Deng, X. (1998), “Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making a confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 839-69.
�c Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Beliefs, Attitudes, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction of Theory and Research, Addison Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
�c Gay, G., Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M. and Hembrooke, H. (2001), “The effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning”, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 257-276.
�c Gefen, D. (2003), “TAM or just plain habit: a look at experienced online shoppers”, Journal of End User Computing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 1-13.
�c Gentry, L. and Calantone, R. (2002), “A comparison of three models to explain shop-bot use on the web”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 11, pp. 945-956.
�c Gillmore, M.R., Archibald, M.E., Morrison, D.M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E.A., Hoppe, M.J., Nahom, D. and Murowchick, E. (2002), “Teen sexual behavior: applicability of the theory of reasoned action”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 885-897.
�c Goh, T. and Kinshuk (2004), Getting Ready for Mobile Learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland, June 21-26, pp. 56-63.
�c Gong, M., Xu, Y. and Yu, Y. C. (2004), “An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning”, Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 365-374.
�c Hansen, T., Jensen, J.M. and Solgaard, H.S. (2004), “Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 539-550.
�c Henderson, R. and Divett, M.J. (2003), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 59, pp. 383-395.
�c Hill, T., Smith, N.D. and Mann, M.F. (1987), “Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case of computers”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 307-313.
�c Hill, T.R. and Roldan, M. (2005), “Toward third generation threaded discussions for mobile learning: opportunities and challenges for ubiquitous collaborative environments”, Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 55-70.
�c Hoelter, J. W. (1983), “The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices”, Sociological Methods and Research, Vol. 11, pp. 325-344.
�c Hsu, T.Y., Ke, H.R. and Yang, W.P. (2006), “Knowledge-based mobile learning framework for museums”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 24 No. 5, (forthcoming).
�c Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-55.
�c Hu, J., Chau, Y.K., Sheng, R.L. and Tam, K.Y. (1999), “Examining technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 91-112.
�c Huffman, C. and Houston, M.J. (1993), “Goal-oriented experiences and the development of knowledge”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 190-207.
�c Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J. (1995), “The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage”, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 587-605.
�c Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995), “Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study”, Information & Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 227-238.
�c Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. and Baroudi, J.J. (1996), “A motivational model of microcomputer usage”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 127-143.
�c Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International, Inc.
�c Kamel, S. and Hassan, A. (2003), “Assessing the introduction of electronic banking in Egypt using the technology acceptance model”, Annals of Cases on Information Technology, Vol. 5, pp. 1-25.
�c Kelloway, E. K. (1998), Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide, SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, California.
�c Klopping, I.M. and McKinney, E. (2004), “Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer E-commerce”, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 35-48.
�c Langford, M. and Reeves, T.E. (1998), “The relationships between computer self-efficacy and personal characteristics of the beginning information systems student”, The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 41-45.
�c Liu, T.C., Wang, H.Y., Liang, J.K., Chan, T.W., Ko, H.W. and Yang, J.C. (2003), “Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 371-382.
�c Lu, J., Yu, C.S., Liu, C. and Yao, J.E. (2003), “Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet”, Internet Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 206-222.
�c Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S. and Ajzen, I. (1992), “A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 3-9.
�c Mathieson, K. (1991), “Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 173-191.
�c McDonald, R.P. and Ho, M.R. (2002), “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis”, Psychological Method, Vol. 7, pp. 64-82.
�c Miniard, P.W. and Cohen, J.B. (1983), “Modeling personal and normative influences on behavior” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 169-180.
�c Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a world wide web context”, Information & Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 217 - 230.
�c Nohria, N. and Leestma, M. (2001), “A moving target: the mobile-commerce customer”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42 No. 3, p. 104.
�c O’Cass, A. and Fenech, T. (2003), “Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users web retailing behaviour”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Learnings, Vol. 10, pp. 81-94.
�c Oliver, R.L. and Bearden, W.O. (1985), “Crossover effects in the theory of reasoned action: a moderating influence attempt”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12 No.3, pp. 324-340.
�c Perea y Monsuwe, T., Dellaert, B.G.C. and de Ruyter, K. (2004), “What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review”, International Journal of Learning Industry Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 102-121.
�c Roschelle, J. (2003), “Keynote paper: unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 260-272.
�c Randall, D.M. (1989), “Taking stock: can the theory of reasoned action explain unethical conduct?”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 8 No. 11, pp. 873-882.
�c Ryan, M.J. (1982), “Behavioral intention formation: the interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 263-278.
�c Ryan, M.J. and Bonfield, E.H. (1975), “The Fishbein extended model and consumer behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 118-136.
�c Ryan, M.J. and Bonfield, E.H. (1980), “Fishbein’s intentions model: a test of external and pragmatic validity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44, pp. 82-95.new window
�c Segars, A.H. and Grover, V. (1993), “Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 517-25.
�c Seppälä, P., Alamäki, H. and Ab, O.R. (2002), “Mobile learning and Mobility in Teacher Training”, Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2002), August 29-30, Växjö, Sweden.
�c Seppälä, P. and Alamäki, H. (2003), “Mobile learning in teacher training”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 330-335.
�c Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P.R., (1988), “The theory of reasoned action: a meta analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 325-343.
�c Shih, Y.Y. and Fang, K. (2004), “The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan”, Internet Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 213-223.
�c Shimp, T.A. and Kavas, A. (1984), “The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 795-809.
�c Siau, K., Lim, E.P. and Shen, Z. (2001), “Mobile commerce: Promises, challenges, and research agenda”, Journal of Database Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 4-13.
�c Steiger, J. H. (1990), “Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 173-180.
�c Stoel, L. and Lee, K.H. (2003), “Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware”, Internet Research, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 364-374.
�c Sutton, S., McVey, D. and Glanz, A. (1999), “A comparative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in a national sample of English young people”, Health Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 72-81.new window
�c Tan, T.H., and Liu, T.Y. (2004), The MObile-Based Interactive Learning Environment (MOBILE) and A Case Study for Assisting Elementary School English Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2004).
�c Taylor, J. (2003), A Task-Centered Approach to Evaluating a Mobile Learning Environment for Pedagogical Soundness. Paper presented at the MLearn, Birmingham.
�c Teo, T.S.H. and Lim, V.K.G. (1997), “Usage patterns and perceptions of the Internet: The gender gap”, Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 16 No. 6/7, pp. 1-8.
�c Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. and Lai, R.Y.C. (1999), “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage”, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 25-37.
�c Ting, R.Y.L. (2005), Mobile Learning: Current Trend and Future Challenges. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2005).
�c Trifonova, A. and Ronchetti, M. (2003), A General Architecture for M-learning. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multimedia and ICTs in Education (m-ICTE 2003), Badajoz, Spain.
�c van der Heijden, H. (2003), “Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands”, Information & Management, Vol. 40, pp. 541-549.
�c van Dolen, W.M. and de Ruyter, K. (2002), “Moderated group chat: an empirical assessment of a new e-learning encounter”, International Journal of Learning Industry Management, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 496-511.
�c Varshney, U. and Vetter, R. (2002), “Mobile commerce: framework, applications and networking support”, Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 185-198.
�c Venkatesh, V. (2000), “Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-365.
�c Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996), “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 451-481.new window
�c Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.
�c Venkatesh, V., Speier, C. and Morris, M.G. (2002), “User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 297-316.
�c Wang, Y.S., Wang, Y.M., Lin, H.H. and Tang, T.I. (2003), “Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study”, International Journal of Learning Industry Management, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 501-519.
�c Wanta, W. and Gao, D. (1994), “Young readers and the newspapers: Information recall and perceived enjoyment, readability, and attractiveness”, Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 926-936.
�c Wexler, J. (2001), “Why computer users accept new systems”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42 No. 3, p. 17.
�c Wu, I.L. (2003), “Understanding senior management’s behavior in promoting the strategic role of IT in process reengineering: use of the theory of reasoned action”, Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 1-11.
�c Yang, K.C.C. (2005), “Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 257-277.
�c Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y. (2003), “Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 59, pp. 431-449.
�c Yu, J., Ha, I., Choi, M. and Rho, J. (2005), “Extending the TAM for a t-commerce”, Information & Management, Vol. 42 No. 7, pp. 965-976.
�c Zurita, G. and Nussbaumw, M. (2004), “A Constructivist Mobile Learning Environment Supported by a Wireless Handheld Network”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp.235-243.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE