:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒童與電腦間之社會互動-探討互動性、語音、與表情符號的影響
作者:董芳武 引用關係
作者(外文):Fang-Wu Tung
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用藝術研究所
指導教授:鄧怡莘
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:互動設計互動性語音表情符號兒童社會臨場感Interaction designInteractivitySpeechEmoticonChildrenSocial presence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
許多研究證實將社會線索置入使用者介面可賦予電腦本身之社會臨場感,有助於提升人們對電腦的認同而產生滿意的互動經驗。電腦即社會成員典範指出人們會對電腦衍生社會性的回應,這在於增進人們對電腦的參與動機提出了具有潛力的應用性。然而這類研究大多以成人為研究對象,因此,本研究擬以兒童為研究對象,探討社會線索在數位學習環境的應用,檢視互動性、語音與臉部表情做為社會線索的應用,就兒童對電腦的態度與參與學習動機的影響。
本研究旨在探索如何善用人際溝通中互動性、語音、表情符號的社會特質作為社會線索應用在數位學習環境中,在兒童參與學習活動時對電腦的態度與學習動機之影響。主要的研究議題如下:1. 首先,在人機互動中,互動性、語音、和表情符號作為社會線索的應用是否足以提升兒童之社會臨場感受;2. 再者,透過這些社會線索的提供,是否能影響兒童對電腦衍生社會吸引;3. 最後,社會線索置入於數位學習環境中是否能提升兒童的學習動機。
本研究執行三個研究以檢視上述所提出之議題。首先進行研究(一)探討人際溝通中互動性和語音轉換於使用者介面之互動設計,是否能讓兒童體驗較強的社會臨場感與社會吸引感受,並提升他們參與學習的動機,研究結果顯示社會線索確實能提升兒童與電腦的互動經驗與參與數位學習之動機。基於研究(一)的成果,著手執行研究(二)比較語音和表情符號作為社會線索的應用,並預測兩者具有相當的影響力,但研究結果指出表情符號未能達到語音所產生的影響程度,此研究結果促使研究者進一步討論臉部表情在人際溝通中的本質。根據研究(二)的結果與討論,研究(三)的執行目的在於檢視語音和動態表情符號作為社會線索應用於數位學習環境中,就兒童對電腦的態度與學習動機之影響。研究結果證實語音和動態表情符號的影響程度並沒有顯著的差異,此外,結果分析中發現性別差異影響兒童對語音和動態表情符號的接受與偏好。
經由本研究執行,可具體達成以下目的:1.獲知如何將人際溝通中的互動、語音、和臉部表情轉換為社會線索應用於介面設計;2.理解電腦即社會成員典範在以兒童為對象的應用性;3.了解互動性、語音、和表情符號之社會線索對兒童與電腦互動中社會臨場感與社會吸引的影響; 4.了解互動性、語音、和表情符號應用於數位學習環境中,對兒童參與學習動機的影響; 5. 以研究為基石,提出發展社會化與激勵性之介面設計策略。本研究模式不僅可應用於相關產業,同時提出一個以兒童為使用者的研究方法探討社會臨場感之互動設計對使用者的參與感受與學習動機之影響。
Researchers have shown that incorporating social cues into a user-interface enables a computer to create a social presence, which helps people better identify with the computer and results in more sociable experiences. The CASA (Computers Are Social Actors) paradigm asserts that human to computer interactions are fundamentally social responses. It shows potential for improving engagement and motivation. Much of this research has been focused on adult subjects. This research discussed the effects of the management of social cues in children's e-learning environment development. Specifically, it examined the roles that interactivity, speech and the emoticon play in an e-learning environment in the development of children attitudes toward computers and their intrinsic motivation.
The research aimed at exploring how to utilize the social attributes of interactivity, speech, and the emoticon as social cues, as well as obtaining an insight in what effects these social cues have on children's attitudes toward computers and learning as employed in e-learning environments. It intended to focus on the following issues raised in the research. 1) The first issue of concern was whether the manipulation of such social cues as interactivity, speech, and the emoticon can be effective enough to generate strong feelings of social presence in child-computer interaction; 2) The second issue of concern was whether social cues provided by computers have an impact on children's perception of social attraction; 3) the third issue concerned whether computers with social interfaces could foster children’s intrinsic motivation for learning.
Three studies were conducted to investigate the impact of interactivity, speech, and the emoticon on the issues addressed above. The first study tested whether modeling the computer to user interaction after the two factors in interpersonal communication could allow children to experience stronger feelings of social presence and social attraction, as well as sustain their intrinsic motivation with learning. The preliminary results gave us an idea that children’s attitudes toward computers can be influenced significantly and positively by the social cues rendered by a computer interface. Based on the results obtained from study I, the research then conducted the second study to compare the effects of using speech and the emoticon as social cues in e-learning environments on children. The results of study II showed that the effects of emoticon do not reach the same level as the effects of speech, and as such were not consistent with the predictions. As a result, the nature of facial expressions in interpersonal communication was reviewed further. According to the results and discussion of study II, the study III was conducted to test the effects of the use of speech and dynamic emoticons as social cues on children's attitudes toward computers, as well as their motivation within learning. Similar effects of the two social cues on children’s attitudes and motivation were observed. It was found that gender differences influence children's perception and preference of speech and dynamic emoticon.
The following goals were attained through the research: 1) to acquire the knowledge of how to employ interactivity, speech, and facial expressions of interpersonal communication as social cues in application to interface design; 2) to comprehend the implementation of the CASA paradigm to target children; 3) to understand effects of social cues of interactivity, speech and the emoticon on children’s feelings of social presence and social attraction; 4) to comprehend the impacts of interactivity, speech and the emoticon in e-learning environments on children’s motivation for learning; 5) to propose a set of principles for the design of more sociable and motivating interfaces. The results of the research are useful not only to relevant industries, but also to those interested in exploring how children react to the feelings of social presence and motivation created by an interactive system.
Allison T, McCarthy G, Nobre A, Puce A, Belger A (1994) Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. Cerebral Cortex ,5, 544-554
Ambadar Z, Schooler JW, Cohn JF. (2005). Deciphering the enigmatic face: the importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions, Psychological Science 16:403–410
Aragon, S.R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments, In S.R. Aragon (Ed.), Facilitating learning in online environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 57-68
Bartneck, C. (2001), How convincing is Mr. Data's smile: Affective Expressions of Machines, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(4), 279-295
Bartneck, C., & Reichenbach, J.(2005). Subtle emotional expressions of synthetic characters. The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 179-192
Biele, C., & Grabowska, A (2006) Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions, Exp Brain Res., 171(1), 1-6.
Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved February 15, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html
Bolter J. D.,(1984), Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Boyatzis CJ, Chazan E, Ting CZ. (1993) Preschool children’s decoding of facial emotions. J Gen Psych 154:375–382
Bracken, CC & Lombard, M. (2004). Social Presence and Children: Praise, Intrinsic Motivation, and Learning with Computers. Journal of Communication. 54, 22-37
Brave, S., Nass, C. (2003). Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction, The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp 81-96
Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. (2005). Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied conversational agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 2, 161-178.
Brown, J. (1986). Some motivational issues in computer- based instruction. Educational Technology, 26(4), 7–29
Bruckman, A & Bandlow, A. (2003). HCI for Kids, in. Human–Computer Interaction Handbook (pp. 428–440), J. Jacko and. A. Sears, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion, New York: Guilford
Bullock, M. (1985). Causal reasoning and developmental changes over the preschool years. Human Development, 28, 169-191.
Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Woodall, W.G. (1996). Nonverbal-Communication: the Unspoken Dialogue, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Burgoon, JK., Bonito, JA., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, NE., Kam, K., & Fisher, J. (2002) Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction, Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657-676
Burns, K., & Beier, E. (1973). Significance of vocal and visual channels in the decoding of emotional meaning. Journal of Communication, 23, 118-130.
Cahn, JE, (1990). The generation of affect in synthesized speech. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 8(1), 1-19.
Caporael, L.R., Heyes, C.M., (1997). Why Anthropomorphize? Folk Psychology and Other Stories, in Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals (Mitchell, R.W, Thompson, N.S, Miles, H.L eds.). New York: State University of New York Press , 59-73.
Chalfonte, B. L., Fish, R.S., & Kraut, R.E. (1991). Expressive Richness: A Comparison of Speech and Text as Media for Revision. In: Robertson, Scott P., Olson, Gary M., Olson, Judith S. (ed.): Proceedings of the ACM CHI 91 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, 21-26
Chiasson, S., Gutwin, C. (2005) Testing the Media Equation with Children, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 829-838
De Saussure, F. (1959), Course in General Linguistics, New York: McGraw-Hill
Dolgin, K. G., & Behrend, D.A. (1984). Children's knowledge about animates and inanimates. Child Development, 55, 1646-1650
Druin, A., Inkpen, K. (2001). When are Personal Technologies for Children? Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3), 191-194.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Ekman, P. (1993) Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384-392.
Ekman, P. (1994). The nature of emotion: fundamental questions. Oxford University Press, New York
Ekman, P., Levenson, RW, & Friesen, WV,1983, Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1210.
Etcoff, N.L., & Magee, J.J., 1992, Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44, 227-240
Extejt, M., 1998, Teaching students to correspond effectively electronically. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(2): 57-67
Ferdig, R., & Mishra, P. (2004). Emotional Responses to Computers: Experiences in Unfairness, Anger, and Spite. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13 (2), 143-161
Fogg, B. J. & Nass, C. (1997). Silicon sycophants: Effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(5), 551-561.
Fogg, B.J. (2002). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers To Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann
Gunawardena, C.N. ( 1995 ). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1 (2/3), 147-166
Guthrie, S.E. (1997). Anthropomorphism: A Definition and a Theory, in Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals (Mitchell, R.W, Thompson, N.S, Miles, H.L eds.). State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 50-58
Hanssen, L., Jankowski, N. W. & Etienne, R. (1996). Interactivity from the Perspective of Communication Studies. In N. Jankowski & L. Hanssen (eds.), The contours of multimedia; Recent technological, theoretical and empirical developments, (pp. 61-73). Luton: University of Luton Press, John Libbey Media
Harmon, A. (1995). Putting personality in your PC, LA Times, Jan. 13
Harwood, N.K., Hall, L.J., & Shinkfield, A.J. (1999). Recognition of facial emotional expressions from moving and static displays by individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 104, 270–278.
Heeter, C. (1995). Communication research on consumer VR. In Frank Biocca & Mark R. Levy (eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality, Hillsdale, (pp. 191-218). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hess, U., & Kleck, R.E. (1994). The cues decoders use in attempting to differentiate emotion-elicited and posed facial expressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 367–381.
Innis, H. A. (1964). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Jensen, C., Farnham, S. D., Drucker, S. M., & Kollock, P. (2000). The Effect of Communication Modality on Cooperation in Online Environments. Proceeding of CHI 2000, Netherlands, 470-477
Katsikitis, M. (1997). Classification of facial expressions of emotions: a multidimensional scaling approach. Perception 26, 613–626
Keil, M., & Johnson, RD. (2002). Feedback Channels: Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Voice Mail to Email. Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol.13, No.4, pp.295-302
Keller, J.M. (1997). Motivational design and multimedia: Beyond the novelty effect. Strategic Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), 188-302
Kirouac, G. & Dore, F. (1985). Accuracy of judgment of facial expression of emotions as a. function of sex and level of education. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 3-7
Klein, J., Moon, Y. and Picard. R.W. (2002). This computer responds to user frustration:. theory, design and results. Interacting with Computers, 14 (2), 119-140
Krohn, F. (2004). A generational approach using emoticons as nonverbal communication. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication , 34(4): 321-329.
Kroll, B.M. (1978) Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269-281
Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Langer, E. J. (1992), Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 289-305.
Laurel B. (1990). Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. In: B. Laurel (eds), The Art of Human- Computer Interface Design (pp. 355-365).MA: Addison-Wesley
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Yan, C., & Jin, S. (2006). Can Robots Manifest Personality?: An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754-772.
Lombard, M. and Ditton, T.B. (1997) At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (2). Retrieved July 20 2006 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
Malone, T. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivation instruction, Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.
Malouf, D.B. (1988). The effect of instructional computer games on continuing student motivation. The Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 27-38.
Marakas, G., Johnson, R. and Palmer, J.W. (2000). A Theoretical Model of Differential Social Attributions Toward Computing Technology: When the Metaphor Becomes the Model, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 719-750.
McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974) The measurement of interpersonal attraction, Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McNeil, B. J., & Nelson, K. R. (1991). Meta-analysis of interactive video instruction: A 10 years review of achievement effects. Journal of Computer-based Instruction. 18(1), 1-6.
Minsky, M. (1980). "Telepresence," OMNI Magazine,45-52.
Mishra, P. (2006). Affective Feedback from Computers and its Effect on Perceived Ability and Affect: A Test of the Computers as Social Actor Hypothesis, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 15 (1), 107-131
Moon, Y. & Nass, C. (1998). Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(1), 79-94.
Moon, Y. (1996). Similarity effects in human-computer interaction: Effects of user personality, computer personality, and user control on attraction and attributions of responsibility, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Moon, Y., Morkes, J., Kim, E-Y., & Fogg, B.J. (1997). Computers are social actors: A review of current research. In B. Friedman (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 137-162). Stanford, CA: CSLI Press,
Morkes, J., Kernal, H. & Nass, C. (1998). Effects of humor in computer-mediated communication and human-computer interaction. Summary of the Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) Conference.
Morris, M. & Christine, O. (1996). The Internet as a Mass Medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 39-50
Muller, M. (2004). Multiple paradigms in affective computing. Interacting with Computers 16(4): 759-768
Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L. (1993). Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(2), 1097-1108.
Napolitano, A. C., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2004). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? The Flexible Nature of Modality Dominance in Young Children. Child Development, 75, 1850-1870.
Nass, C , Steuer, J., Tauber, E. (1994). Computers are social actors, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, Boston, Massachusetts
Nass, C. & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Nass, C., & Gong, L. (2000). Social aspects of speech interfaces from an evolutionary perspective: Experimental research and design implications. Communications of the ACM, 43, 36–43
Nass, C., Foehr, U., Brave, S., & Somoza, M. (2001). The effects of emotion of voice in synthesized and recorded speech. Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Emotional and Intelligent II: The Tangled Knot of Social Cognition. North Falmouth, MA
Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 669-678
Nass, C., Jonsson, I-M., Reaves, B., Endo, J., & Harris, H. (2005). Increasing safety in cars by matching driver emotion and car voice emotion. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI).
Nass, C., Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103
Newberry, B. (2001). Raising student social presence in online classes. In W. Fowler & J. Hasebrook (Eds.), Proceedings of WebNet 2001 World Conference on the WWW and the Interne (pp.905-910), Orlando, FL. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Norman, D. (2004), Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things, NY: Basic Books
Nowak, K. L. (2004). The Influence of Anthropomorphism and Agency on Social Judgment in Virtual Environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(2), Retrieved July 20 2006 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol9/issue2/nowak.html
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw Hill
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pearson, B. L. (1977). Introduction to Linguistic Concepts, New York : Knopf.
Piaget, J. (1929). The Child's Conception of the World. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Picard, R , Wexelblat, A , Nass, C. (2002). Future interfaces: social and emotional, CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computer systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Posner, MI, Nissen, MJ, & Klein, RM. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171
Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp.110-134), Newbury Park, CA: Sage,
Rafaeli, S. (1990). Interaction with media: Parasocial interaction and real interaction, In B. D. Ruben and L. A. Lievrouw (eds.), Mediation, information, and communication: Information and behavior, (Vol. 3, pp. 125-181). New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books
Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B. (1994). Development and validation of brief measure of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation: The AFS scales, Educational Psychological measurement, 54, 506-515
Reeves, B., Nass, C. (1996). Media equation: how people treat computer, television, and new media like real people and places, New York: Cambridge University Press
Relan, A. (1992). Motivational strategies in computer based instruction: Some lessons from theories and models of motivation. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 612–624
Rezabek, L.L. & Cochenour, J.J. (1998). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18, 201-215.
Rifkind, L. J. (1992). Immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in the instructional television. Journal of Interactive Television, 1(1), 31-38
Rivera, K., Cooke, N., & Bauhs, J. (1996). The effects of emotional icons on remote communication, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems: common ground, 99-100
Robinson, C.W. & Sloutsky, V.M. (2004). Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development. Child Development, 75, 1387-1401.
Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York: Free Press
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3) 51-70.
Scaife, M. & Van Duuren, M. A. (1995). Do computers have brains? What children believe about intelligent artefacts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 321-432
Scherer, K. R. (1979). Nonlinguistic vocal indicators of Emotion and psychopathology, In: C. E. Izard (eds.) Emotions in personality and psychopathology, NY: Plenum, 493-529
Scherer, KR, Banse R., & Wallbott, HG (2001). Emotional interferences from vocal. expression correlate across languages and cultures. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,. 32, 76-92
Schnackenberg; H.J. & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(2), 19-28
Shackman, JE, & Pollak, SD. (2005). Experiential influences on multimodal perception of emotion. Child Development, 76(5), 1116-1126
Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 120-126
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface, 3rd Edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. p.380
Short, J., Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Willey & Sons Ltd.
Singh, R. & Ho S.Y. (2000). Attitudes and attraction: A new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 197-211
Sloutsky, V. M, & Napolitano, A.C. (2003). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Preference for auditory modality in young children. Child Development, 74 (3), 822-833.
Sproull, L, Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J. H. & Waters, K. (1996) When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 97-124
Strommen, E., & Alexander, K. (1999). Emotional interfaces for interactive aardvarks: designing affect into social interfaces for children, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit,528-535, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Takeuchi, A. & Nagao, K. (1993). Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 187-193
Thayer JF, Johnsen BH. (2000) Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: A multivariate analysis of recognition errors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41:243-246
Thompson, P.A., Foulger, D.A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior ,12 (2), 225-243
Tu, C. H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in an online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38 (1), 45-60
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. S. (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 131-150.
Tung, F. W. (2006). Social Presence in Digital Art, Journal of Arts Education, 153, 86-94 (in Chinese)
Tung, F. W., & Deng, Y. S. (2004). Interaction Design as A Motivator, Proceedings of the Design and Emotion 2004 Conference, Ankara, Turkey
Tung, F. W., & Deng, Y. S. (2006 a). A study on the Social Presence of Social Actors in Computer-Mediated Learning Environment- Testing the Effect of Speech feedback on Children, Instructional Technology & Media, 76, 32-45 (in Chinese)
Tung, F. W., & Deng, Y. S. (2006 b). Designing social presence in e-learning environments: Testing the effect of interactivity on children, Interactive learning environments,14(3),251-264
Turkle, S. (1980). Computer as Rorschach. Society,17(2), 15-24
Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, New York: Simon and Schuster
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster
Turkle, S. (2003). Sociable Technologies: Enhancing Human Performance when the computer is not a tool but a companion. In Mihail C. Roco, and William Sims Bainbridge (Eds.), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 151-158
Tylor, R. P. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Tzeng, J. (2004). Toward a More Civilized Design: Studying the. Effect of Computers that Apologize. International Journal. of Human Computer Studies, 61(3), 319-345.
Van Duuren, M. & Scaife, M. (1996). "A robot’s brain controls itself, because a brain hasn’t got a brain, so it just controls itself"- Young children’s attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artefacts. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 11, 365-376.
Walker, J.H., Sproull, L., Subramani, R., 1994. Using a human face in an interface. Proceedings of the ACM CHI’94, NewYork, pp. 85–91.
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
Yeh, S. W. and Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of Learner Control and Learning Strategies on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learning from Interactive Hypermedia Lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 141-159
Zaidel, S.F., & Mehrabian, A. (1969). The ability to communicate and infer positive and negative attitudes facially and vocally. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 233-241
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE