臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：升降單位調降對台灣股票市場微結構的影響
作者：謝宗祐
作者(外文)：Tzung-Yuan Hsieh
校院名稱：國立成功大學
系所名稱：企業管理學系碩博士班
指導教授：莊雙喜
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2008
主題關鍵詞：升降單位調降；價差；訂單處理成本；訂單持續性；訂單導向市場；日內型態；資訊不對稱成本；深度；價格受限程度；Order processing cost；Spread；Order persistence；Order-driven market；Intraday pattern；Tick-size reduction；Binding-constraint probability；Depth；Information asymmetry cost
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
本文主要討論升降單位調降對於市場流動性、價差成份、及其日內型態的影響。本論文由下列三篇文章所組成：第一篇為探討升降單位調降對於市場流動性及價格受限程度的影響；第二篇為探討升降單位調降對於價差成份的影響；第三篇為探討升降單位調降對於市場流動性及價差成份等日內型態的影響。主要結果如下:
第一篇:升降單位調降對於市場流動性的影響
升降單位調降後，價差、深度、市場流動性及價格受限程度皆降低。此種情況對低價股票特別明顯，主要原因可能為價格受限程度減少所致。此外，升降單位調降後，交易較活絡的股票、市值較大的股票及價格受限程度較嚴重的股票，其價差、深度及市場流動性下降的幅度較大。交易活動在解釋價差、深度及市場流動性上扮演重要的角色。因此，升降單位調降降低了交易成本。
第二篇:升降單位調降對於價差成份的影響
資訊不對稱成本、訂單處理成本及訂單持續性於升降單位調降後減少。升降單位調降前，價格受限程度較嚴重的股票，其資訊不對稱的下降幅度較大。此外，交易較活絡的股票可能因為升降單位調降後，其交易資訊較容易散播，故其資訊不對稱成本下降的幅度較大。相同的，由於規模經濟的原因，交易較活絡的股票其訂單處理成本下降的幅度亦較大。
第三篇：升降單位調降對於市場流動性及價差成份日內型態的影響
價差、市場流動性、交易活動及資訊不對稱成本呈現U型日內型態。但是深度及價格受限程度呈現ㄇ型的日內型態，此結果支持市場關門假說。此外，除了價格受限程度外，開盤時(盤中)，其值的下降幅度最大(較小)；其餘的值為開盤時(盤中)，其值的下降幅度最小(較大)。此外，藉由比較價格受限程度與資訊不對稱程度的關係，發現價差、交易活動及深度下降的主要原因來自於資訊不對稱程度的下降，而非價格受限程度減少所導致。
This paper provides evidence about the impact of tick-size reductions on market liquidity, spread components, and intraday patterns of the above measures. The results are built into the following three parts. The first part is the effect of tick-size reduction on market liquidity and binding-constraint probability. The second part concerns the effect of tick-size reduction on the spread components. Finally, the third part highlights the effect of tick-size reduction on the intraday patterns of market liquidity and spread components. The results are summarized below.
ESSAY I: Impact of Tick-Size Reduction on the Changes of Market Liquidity
The empirical results show that the spread, depth, market liquidity, and binding-constraint probability all decrease following a tick-size reduction, especially for low-price stocks. These results can be attributed to the relaxation of binding constraints. Additionally, stocks that are frequently traded, have larger market capitalization, or have restrictive binding constraints, experience considerable declines in spread, depth, and market liquidity following a tick-size reduction. Trading activity plays an important role in explaining changes in spread, depth, market liquidity, and binding constraints. Thus, a tick-size reduction in the Taiwanese Stock Market can reduce investors’ trading costs.
ESSAY II: Impact of Tick-Size Reduction on the Changes of Spread Components
The empirical results show that information asymmetry costs, order processing costs, and order persistence do decrease after a tick-size reduction. This work also shows that stocks with greater binding constraints experience larger declines in information asymmetry. Besides this, stocks that are traded frequently experience a lower degree of information asymmetry because trading information can be disseminated more efficiently after the tick-size reduction. Similarly, stocks traded frequently also experience larger declines in order processing costs due to economies of scale.
ESSAY III: Impact of Tick-Size Reduction on the Intraday Patterns of Market Liquidity and Spread Components
Regardless of whether pre- or post-reduction periods are used, the intraday patterns in terms of spread, market liquidity, trading activity, volatility, and information asymmetry all exhibit a U-shaped pattern, with both the depth and binding-constraint probability being an inverted U-shaped pattern. Such results can be explained by the market closure theory. Further, with the exception of the binding constraints, where the largest (smallest) declines occur during the first thirty-minute interval (midday), the magnitudes of the declines for the other measures are the largest (smallest) during midday (during the first thirty-minute interval). Finally, this paper uses changes in information asymmetry and binding constraints to explain these phenomena. The results show that most of the declines in each measure may be due to the declines in information asymmetry, but not binding constraints.
Admati, A.R., Pfleiderer, P., 1988. A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price volatility, Review of Financial Studies 1, 3-40.
Ahn, H.J., Cai, J., Hamao Y., Ho, R.Y.K., 2002. The components of the bid-ask spread in a limit-order market: evidence form the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Journal of Empirical Fiance 9, 399-430.
Ahn, H.J., Cao, C.Q., Choe, H., 1996. Tick size, spread and volume, Journal of Financial Intermediation 5, 2-22.
Ahn, H.J., Cheung, Y.L., 1999. The intraday patterns of the spread and depth in a market without market makers: the stock exchange of Hong Kong, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7(5), 539-556.
Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., 1987. Trading mechanism and stock returns: an empirical investigation, Journal of Finance 42, 533-553.
ap Gwilym, O., McManus I., Thomas, S., 2005. Fractional versus decimal pricing: evidence from the UK gilt futures market, Journal of Futures Markets 25(5), 419-442.
Ataise, R.K., 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements, Journal of Financial Accounting Research 23(1), 21-36.
Bacidore, J.M., 1997. The impact of decimalization on market quality: an empirical investigation of the Toronto Stock Exchange, Journal of Financial Intermediation 6, 92-120.
Bacidore, J.M., 2001. Decimalization, adverse selection, and market maker rents, Journal of Banking and Finance 25, 829-855.
Bessembinder, H., 2003. Trade execution costs and market quality after decimalization, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38, 747-777.
Bessembinder, H., Kaufman, H.M., 1997. A cross-exchange comparison of execution costs and information flow for NYSE-listed stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 46, 293-319.
Bhushan, R., 1989. Collection of information about publicly traded firms: theory and evidence, Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 183-206.
Biais, B., Hillion, P., Spatt, C., 1995. An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse, Journal of Finance 50, 1655-1689.
Biais, B., Hillion, P., Spatt, C., 1999. Price discovery and learning during the preopening period in the Paris Bourse, Journal of Political Economy 107(6), 1218-1248.
Bollen, N.P.B., Whaley, R.E., 1998. Are “teenies” better? Journal of Portfolio Management 25, 10-24.
Bourghelle, D., Declerck, F., 2004. Why markets should not necessarily reduce the tick size, Journal of Banking and Finance 28(2), 373-398.
Brock, W.A., Kleidon, A.W., 1992. Periodic market closure and trading volume: A model of intraday bids and asks, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16(3), 451-489.
Brockman, P., Chung, D.Y., 1999a. Bid-ask spread components in an order-driven environment. Journal of Financial Research 2, 227-246.
Brockman, P., Chung, D.Y., 1999b. An analysis of depth behavior in an electronic, order-driven environment, Journal of Banking and Finance 23(12), 1861-1886.
Chakravarty, S., Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., 2005. The effect of decimalization on trade size and adverse selection costs, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32(5), 1063-1081.
Chakravarty, S., Wood, R.A., Van Ness, R.A., 2004. Decimals and liquidity: A study of the NYSE, Journal of Financial Research 27(1), 75-94.
Chan, K.C., Christie, W.G., Schultz, P.H., 1995. Market structure and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spread for Nasdaq securities, Journal of Business 68, 35-60.
Chan, K.C., Hwang, C.Y., 2001. The impact of tick size on the quality of a pure order-driven market: evidence from the stock exchange of Hong Kong, Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Chang, E.C., Cheng, J.W., Khorana, A., 2000. An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: an international perspective, Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 1651-1679.
Chang, R.P., Hsu, S.T., Huang, N.K., Rhee, S.G., 1999. The effects of trading methods on volatility and liquidity: evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 137-170.
Chordia, T., Roll, R., Subrahmanyam, A., 2001. Market liquidity and trading activity, Journal of Finance 56, 501-530.
Chung, K.H., Charoenwong, C., Ding, D.K., 2004. Penny pricing and the components of spread and depth changes, Journal of Banking and Finance 28(12), 2981-3007.
Chung, K.H., Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., 1999. Limit orders and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 53, 255-287.
Chung, K.H., Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., 2001. Can the treatment of limit orders reconcile the differences in trading costs between NYSE and Nasdaq issues? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36(2), 267-287.
Chung, K.H., Van Ness, R.A., 2001. Order handling rules, tick size, and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spreads for Nasdaq stocks, Journal of Financial Markets 4, 143-161.
Copeland, T.E., Stoll, H.R., 1990. Trading markets, In: (2nd ed.).
de Jong, F., Nijman, T., Roell, A., 1996. Price effects of trading and components of the bid-ask spread on the Paris Bourse, Journal of Empirical Finance 3, 193-213.
Foster, F.D., Viswanathan, S., 1993. Variations in trading volume, return volatility, and trading costs: evidence on recent price formation models, Journal of Finance 48, 187-211.
George, T.J., Kaul, G., Nimalendran, M., 1991. Estimation of the bid-ask spread and its components: a new approach, Review of Financial Studies 4, 623–656.
Gerety, M.S., Mulherin, J.H., 1992. Trading halts and market activity: an analysis of volume at the open and the close, Journal of Finance 47(5), 1765–1784.
Gibson, S., Singh, R., Yerramilli, V., 2003. The effect of decimalization on the components of the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Intermediation 12(2), 121-148.
Glosten, L.R., Harris, L.E., 1988. Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread, Journal of Financial Economics 21(1), 123-142.
Glosten, L.R., Milgrom, P.R., 1985. Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders, Journal of Financial Economics 14(1), 71-100.
Goldstein, M.A., Kavajecz, K.A., 2000. Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE, Journal of Financial Economics 56(1), 125-149.
Hameed, A., Terry, E., 1998. The effect of tick size on price clustering and trading volume, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25, 849-867.
Harris, L.E., 1991. Stock price clustering and discreteness, Review of Financial Studies 4(3), 389-415.
Harris, L.E., 1994. Minimum price variations, discrete bid-ask spreads, and quotations sizes, Review of Financial Studies 7, 149-178.
Hasbrouck, J., 1988. Trades, quotes, inventories and information, Journal of Financial Economics 22(2), 229-252.
Ho, T.S.Y., Stoll, H.R., 1983. The dynamics of dealer markets under competition, Journal of Finance 38(4), 1053-1074.
Huang, R.D., Stoll, H.R., 1996. Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE, Journal of Financial Economics 41(3), 313-357.
Huang, R.D., Stoll, H.R., 1997. The components of the bid-ask spread: A general approach, Review of Financial Studies 10, 995-1034.
Huang, R.D., Stoll, H.R., 2001. Tick size, bid-ask spreads, and market structure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36(4), 503-522.
Huang, Y.C., 2002. Trading activity in stock index futures markets: the evidence on emerging markets, Journal of Futures Markets 22(10), 983-1003.
Huang, Y.C., 2004. The components of bid-ask spread and their determinants: TAIFEX versus SGX-DT, Journal of Futures Markets 24(9), 835-860.
Jain, P.C., Joh, G.H., 1988. The dependence between hourly prices and trading volume, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23(3), 269-283.
Jones, C.M., Lipson, M.L., 1999. Execution costs of institutional equity orders, Journal of Financial Intermediation 8(3), 123–140.
Kandel, E., Marx, L.M., 1997. Nasdaq market structure and spread patterns? Journal of Financial Economics 45(1), 61-89.
Kang, J.K., Stulz, R.M., 1996. How different is Japanese corporate finance? An investigation of the information content of new security issues, Review of Financial Studies 9, 109-139.
Ke, M.C., Jiang, C.H., Huang, Y.S., 2004. The impact of tick size on intraday stock price behavior: evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 12(1), 19-39.
Kyle, A.S., 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading, Econometrica 53, 1315-1335.
Lau, S.T., McInish, T.H., 1995. Reducing tick size on the Stock Exchange of Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 3(4), 485-496.
Lee, C.M.C., Mucklow, B., Ready, M.J., 1993. Spreads, depths, and the impact of earnings information: an intraday analysis, Review of Financial Studies 6(2), 345-374.
Lee, C.M.C., Ready, M.J., 1991. Inferring trade direction from intraday data, Journal of Finance 46, 733-746.
Lee, Y.T., Lin, J.C., Liu, Y.J., 1999. Trading patterns of big versus small players in an emerging market: An empirical analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance 23(5), 701-725.
Lin, J.C., Sanger, G.C., Booth, G.G., 1995. Trade size and components of the bid-ask spread, Review of Financial Studies 8, 1153-1183.
Madhavan, A., Richardson, M., Roomans, M., 1997. Why do security prices change? a transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks, Review of Financial Studies 10, 1035-1064.
McInish, T.H., Van Ness, B.F., 2002. An intraday examination of the components of the bid-ask spread, The Financial Review 37(4), 507-524.
Merton, R.C., 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information, Journal of Finance 42(3), 483-510.
Morck, R., Yeung, B., Yu, W., 2000. The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements, Journal of Financial Economics 58(1), 215-260.
Porter, D.C., Weaver, D.G., 1997. Decimalization and market quality, Financial Management 26, 5-26.
Rhee, S.G., Wang, C.J., 1997.The bid-ask bounce effect and the spread size effect: Evidence from the Taiwan stock market, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 5(2), 231-258.
Ronen, T., Weaver, D.G., 2001. Teenies anyone? Journal of Financial Markets 4(3), 231-260.
Smith, B.F., Turnbull, D.A.S., White, R.W., 2006. The impact of pennies on the market quality of the Toronto stock exchange, The Financial Review 41(2), 273-288.
Stoll, H.R., 1989. Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: theory and empirical tests, Journal of Finance 44(1), 115-134.
Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A., Warr, R.S., 2001. How well do adverse selection components measure adverse selection? Financial Management 30(3), 77-98.
Vo, M.T., 2007. Limit orders and the intraday behavior of market liquidity: Evidence form the Toronto stock exchange, Global Financial Journal 17(3), 379-396.
Wang, J., 1999. Asymmetric information and the bid-ask spread: An empirical comparison between automated order execution and open outcry auction, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 9(2), 115-128.
Wei, P.H., 1992. Intraday variations in trading activity, price variability and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Research 15, 265-276.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1090（臺灣：1087，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2432875 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68231056
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上